AC 2003-1163: LEAN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES REDUCE LEAD TIMEFOR IMPLANT PRODUCTIONAnthony Metzinger, DePuy OrthopaedicsNiaz Latif, Purdue University - Calumet Page 8.808.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2003 Session 2163 Lean Manufacturing Techniques Reduce Lead Time for Implant Production Anthony Metzinger, Niaz Latif DePuyACE, Purdue UniversityIntroduction The industry project described here was completed as a part of a graduate student’s workin the Master’s Degree program in the School of Technology
administration, and resource development.The focus of this paper is on that portion of TQI related to the delivery of the academic programs.Course objectives and learning outcomes are indexed to departmental, college, and universitycollege missions to insure homogeneity in activities, i.e. marching to the same drummer. Adescription of the process used to develop the system, difficulties in achieving the desired timeline for completion of the project, level of achievement in the first phase of implementation, andanticipated activities required to achieve a complete TQI process for every facet of thedepartmental activities is described. A detailed example of one course is presented to provide adetailed illustration of the system.IntroductionSouthern
, increasing enrollment in material courses, and stimulating interactionwith students and colleagues in mechanics, thermodynamics, structures, electricalengineering, manufacturing and design. The approach, described in a little more detailbelow, makes maximum use of computer-assisted methods, further stimulating studentengagement and enabling project work that can be set by the instructor or self-generated bythe student.2 A brief outline of the approach The starting point is the “world” of materials. Figure 1 shows the material families:polymers, metals, ceramics, glasses, natural materials, and the composites that can besynthesised by combining these. Figure 2 expands this structure, suggesting a hierarchicalorganisation of the population
Session 1526 Clemson University’s EXPerimental Engineering in Real Time (EXPERT) Program: Assessing the benefit of real-time sensors in the curriculum Matthew W. Ohland, Elizabeth A. Stephan, Benjamin L. Sill General Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634AbstractEXPerimental Engineering in Real-Time (EXPERT) is a three-year NSF-sponsored project atClemson University to study the benefit of using experiments with real-time sensors to improvestudent understanding of the graphical representation of various physical concepts and auxiliarybenefit in understanding the concept itself. The project builds on
the existing resident class “Energy & theEnvironment” at The Pennsylvania State University. The goal of the project was to enablestudents at any of the University’s 25 campus locations, including its virtual “World Campus,” toparticipate in the same high-quality, online, learning experience. Expected outcomes includedincreased enrollments (overcoming room availability issues) and, by virtue of the fact thatstudents would be enabled to study at times and places most convenient to them, a more student-centered learning environment than is typically encountered in large classroom settings. Themethodologies and techniques employed to transform an existing lecture-based resident classinto a compelling and engaging web-only learning environment
planned orientation activities, such as coursecatalog tutorials, math reviews for placement tests, campus tours and completion oftechnical group projects, new students can feel better prepared for the demands of scienceand engineering majors. Orientation activities have always included tours of ACES tobring students through the center and have them familiarize themselves with their newsurroundings. Students use the facilities while they are filling out surveys and working ontheir group projects that they present to their orientation group at the end of theirweeklong orientation. By using ACES, new students are encouraged to use the resourcesavailable to them while participating in their group projects. This is a very similarexperience to what
– Physical models & de monstrations Role • Enthusiasm Model • Positive rapport with students • Frequent assessment of student learning – Classroom assessment techniques – Out-of-class home work and projects • Appropriate use of technology 6 Figure 1: The ExCEEd Teaching Model2 Used in the ASCE Excellence in Civil Engineering Teaching WorkshopsIndividual Faculty Member TeachingThe Civil Engineering program at the United States Military Academy has several toolsavailable to assess the
members will becollected to formally evaluate the effectiveness of each module.IntroductionIn order to teach well, every instructor should be ready to answer a student’s (often unasked)question: “Why should I learn this?” In fact, an instructor should have several different andpersuasive answers to this question that help provide students a context where they might use thecourse material as well as motivate them to learn it better.This project resulted from bi-weekly lunch conversation series that the two authors had abouttheir teaching styles and their impact on the learning outcomes of students. Carol expressed theconcern that even though the current statistics textbooks did have engineering problems, often theproblems were simplistic in nature
students, and threediscipline-specific laboratory courses. The discipline-specific required courses – UnitOperations Laboratory for chemical engineering, Automatic Controls for electricalengineering, and Engineering Synthesis Laboratory for mechanical engineering – allowspecialization at the advanced level, but preserve an interdisciplinary perspective by sharingexperiments and projects. Students emerge from the sequence with a firm understanding of thephysical principles underlying engineering processes, and practical experience in the design,fabrication and testing of tangible products that synthesize multidisciplinary features.Within the larger scope of the engineering curricula, separate disciplines steer in to the dynamicsystems sequence with
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationBuckling), 25, 26, 27, 29, and 35 (design: Design codes, Beam design, Column design,Tension members, Bridges) and statements 37, 41, 42, 43, 44, 48, 49, 50, and 51(ancillary: Soil mechanics, Time value of money, Project management, Marketing services,Business development, International marketplace, Sustainability, Cost estimation, Projectfinancing) between graduation and licensure. These responses, especially the heavyexpectation of an increase of knowledge in the ancillary areas, are most heartening. Itseems most appropriate that students would learn a lot about business development(statement
, etc; //Property-declarations Door_open(), Window_close();//Methods; }Introduce here "The minimum unit of a java project is called a Class. A Java project maycontain several classes." A class is an abstract concept and it can be used to "define" or to Page 8.316.5 5"declare" a real "object" for example Apartment101. Tell students that in order to use theclass to construct the building, we can generate another class that is called building. class building{ public static void main(String [] args
Page 8.1096.7Hall. Some of the daemons have been reviewed and included in various public domaineducational web sites such as the MERLOT project [8]. Judging from the comments receivedProceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright2003, American Society for Engineering Educationfrom educators, it is fair to say that TEST has the potential to become a very useful tool forthermodynamics education. Work is currently underway to develop a chemical equilibriummodule.References: [1] American Society of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Database – Thermodynamics, Combustions and Chemical Balance Analysis, October 20, 2000, http://www.mecheng.asme.org/database/THERMO/MASTER.HTML
mathematics and science courses.To address these issues, the Pre-Engineering Instructional and Outreach Program (PrE-IOP), acollaboration of the Newark College of Engineering and New Jersey Institute of Technology’s(NJIT) Center for Pre-College Programs, was created. This program seeks to increase the futurepool of qualified high-tech workers, including women and minorities. PrE-IOP consists of twocomponents:1. An instructional component that implements pre-engineering curriculum in middle and high school classes.2. An outreach component that consists of a comprehensive information campaign about the rewards of engineering and technology professions.One project of the outreach component is a series of teleconferences on the theme of “Building
. Portions of three lectures were devoted to ethical decision-making, withapplication to several control-oriented case studies. In addition, several homework exercises andthe design project included an ethical component. At the end of the course, students weregenerally appreciative of the added ethical dimension and felt that the right amount of time wasdevoted to it in this course. Most importantly, a majority of the students commented that theyhad gained awareness of ethical issues and decision-making by taking this course.MotivationSince 1999, the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University has articulated a set ofProgram Objectives, which define the capabilities that students should have upon completion oftheir undergraduate program
dealing with learning andinteracting with the student instructors, the result is that the experience was about thesame as a traditional professor taught laboratory course. The only item that received aclear negative response was “I liked this approach.” This response strengthened ourdecision to conduct a follow up evaluation early in the following term.Student Laboratory InstructorsThe student instructors’ reactions were, not unexpectedly, mixed. Both positive andnegative aspects of the project were identified. The student instructors were pleased to beable to help students. They experienced the satisfaction that comes from a successfulteaching experience. (Perhaps we’re recruiting future professors?) For many of us, thebest experience that a
questions suchas, What does the program look and feel like to the student participants? What does the programlook and feel like to other stakeholders? What are the experiences of the participants? What dostakeholders know about the project? What thoughts do stakeholders, who are knowledgeableabout the program, have concerning program operations, processes, and outcomes? What areparticipants‚ and stakeholders‚ expectations? What features of the project are most salient to theparticipants? What changes do participants perceive in them as a result of their involvement inthe project4? Page 8.208.4Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for
in draft on the World Wide Web and peer reviewed via e-mail.Our project is apparently the first to use the Web for both submission and review of studentwork.2. Peer Review on the WebThere is much to recommend a Web-based approach to peer review. Unlike software that iswritten for a specific academic field (e.g., English composition), a Web-based application canaccept submissions in practically any format, including diagrams, still pictures, interactivedemonstrations, music, or video clips. Of course, the student has to understand how to producesuch a submission, but for each field, that expertise tends to “come with the territory.”Secondly, the Web is a familiar interface. Most students use the Web in their day-to-day studies,so they can
undergraduateseniors are also permitted in the course. The premise of the course is to combineengineering innovation with business development with the goal of developing a newproduct and giving the student a thorough understanding of what is required to launch anew product. This includes management; finance, including projections and initialworking capital required; market identification; legal issues, including intellectual propertyconcerns; research and development; staffing; funding sources; and sales considerations.Since students are from varied backgrounds, including many disciplines of engineering andsciences, as well as business, teams are made of individuals with different knowledge setsand mind sets.The course requires teams to develop a product and
restructuring permits the user to guide oneself through the materials at their ownlevel and interest.9 Our objective was to develop, deploy, evaluate and disseminate interactivelearning modules and educational technologies that address the above issues and attempt toimprove electrical engineering education.Project Description Our goal was to improve electronics-related Studio education through the development andutilization of 24 interactive learning modules (ILMs - listed in Table 1) coupled with web-basededucational information technologies.10 Table 1 CCLI modules developed under project
Page 8.871.1program specifically targets the education of technicians being educated for the high performance “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”workplace of advanced technologies. The ATE program, a response to the conceptof a “global market place” and the resulting internationally competitive nature of manufacturingand the rapidly advancing pace of technologic change, solicited proposals for projects, specialprojects, and Centers of Excellence from consortia of two-year colleges, four-year colleges anduniversities, secondary schools, industry
, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 4: Assessment Methods for Objective 2 2. To produce Biomedical Engineers able to communicate effectively with diverse audiences and prepared to work in multidisciplinary teams. After completing the B.S. in Biomedical Engineering, students will be able to: a. Deliver effective oral presentations to multiple audiences, including health care and engineering professionals. (3g) i. Oral presentations of capstone projects made by students in BAE 451 and BAE 452 to an audience that includes health care and engineering professionals. A faculty team has defined a rubric, which
Thermo to everyday Life 3 3.4 0.96 4.5 4.3 0.82Group Project (in fall: Design Project) 4 3.9 0.93 4 3.6 0.88Student Instruction on material in chapter 4 3 3.3 0.95 na na naQuality of Exams (overall) (in fall: Quizzes) 3 3.3 0.70 4 4.0 0.82Individual Exam 2.5 2.8 0.98 na na naGroup Exam 4 3.9 0.72 na na naIn-class Concept Tests 3.75 3.3 1.19 4 3.7 0.71Ethics
, assuring thediversity, the relevance and the quality of this rapidly growing library and teaching / Page 8.87.1learning method.Requirements Analysis in the Engineering Management ContextRequirements analysis is considered to be one of the most important features of anyengineering management project because if done professionally, it helps to specify andthen research / develop appropriate features, processes that customers need / want.In this particular paper we focus on our generic methodology, and illustrate someengineering management applications ([1], [2] and [3]).Our generic Component Oriented Requirements Analysis (CORA), represents asystematic
the students are ready to work on their own using program tools that they arecomfortable with and that are easy to review if they need to return for instruction. The use of thevirtual world and the framing of instruction around a design project helps the students put thelearning in context and makes it more interesting. It is interesting to note that instructionalmaterials not directly related to the design project or homework assignments were rarely used.Although the materials did not need to be delivered in a classroom setting, a choice was made torequire the students to attend a scheduled lab time to use the instructional materials. Without thestructure of a regular class meeting time many freshman would lack the discipline to set
-Net+, Server+, e-Biz+, IT-Project+, Linux+,and CTT+)Sun Java CertificationsChauncey Group Certifications (ATS)Prosofttraining.com Certifications (CIW, Master CIW)Red Hat Certifications (RHCE)LPI Certifications (LPIC)Sair Linux and GNU Certifications (LCP, LCA, LCE, MLCE)Security Certifications (ICSA, SANS-GIAC, CISSP, SSCP, and more)It is noted in some of the publications that the total population of individuals in the UnitedStates today with computer certifications numbers about 6.5 million. And, this trend isexpected to grow in a significant manner. By the year 2010, that number is expected tojump to over 20 million. This trend has been largely accelerated by the serious investmentfrom some major IT companies such as Microsoft, Novell
ofEngineering to foster the exchange of experiences and the development of projects betweenengineering education institutions from South America countries and Iberia Peninsula countries.The biannual meetings with all the engineering institutions since 1997 have been presentinggood results so far and in 2001 during the ASIBEI meeting the “Rio Declaration” has generatedsome guidelines for future conversations about collaborative programs, which is very positiveconsidering the very different social and cultural realities of the two continents. The perspectivesfor the future are promising once some activities have already started and the existence alreadyof French-Brazilian and Italian-Brazilian diplomas as one example of international formation
hands-on activities includemore than 250 different 3-D mechanical puzzles, games, mind teasers, LEGO® Mindstormscompetitions, and design projects, each of which illustrates principles and strategies ininventive/innovative problem solving. (Please see some of the puzzles at:http://www.ee.fau.edu/faculty/raviv/teach.htm). These activities allow for self-paced, semi-guided exploration that improves self-esteem and encourages questioning and daring. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education* This work was supported in part by the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance (NCIIA), and in
b/c I enjoy learning or take my deep knowledge in the mission field.)The average workweek lasted 43.1 hrs. The maximum number of hours worked per weekwas 65 and the median workweek was 40 hours. When asked “what do you like leastabout your job,” seven women mentioned the long hours required, and one specificallymentioned the uncertainty of the number of hours that might be required on any given day.One woman stated the following: My company encourages involvement in civic organizations as well as professional ones. Often times there are city/town/county board meetings related to our projects we must attend during the evenings. Engineering is not simply a 9 to 5 job. This, in combination with the stress of the
structure the classroom setting to provide the most productive learningexperience for students. The How People Learn (HPL) framework suggests that the classroomenvironment be 1) learner-centered (LC), 2) knowledge-centered (KC), 3) assessment-centered(AC), and 4) community-centered (CC)5. We have used these four principles to guide how werestructure courses within the VaNTH ERC. Page 8.348.2 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationComponents of Cross-Disciplinary CollaborationFor the project
student workshops that apply engineering and design principles to “fun” topics —such as air pollution, mechanics, robotics, flight, and invention — offer an inquiry-based approachto teaching both older, and younger, potential engineers.The preparation and guidance of elementary, middle and high school students — especially thosewith backgrounds typically under-represented in engineering — towards the universityengineering and technology pipeline is an overarching goal of our outreach initiatives. During thecourse of various summer resident camps focused on design/build projects, students areintroduced to the world of engineering and the iterative design/build process, including use oftechnological tools.Curriculum Development PartnersIntegral to