at $70,000 each;the extra $30,000 would be used to make the experiment Internet accessible and purchase higherquality equipment. The total expenditure would be $1.26 million and students would have accessto 18 new experiments. The cost of renovation is cut by $1 million (~50%) and students haveaccess to 12 more new experiments (~ 3 times more!). Use of the equipment would requireefficient scheduling but with the equipment available 24 hours a day significant flexibility exists.Such savings could be realized across the curriculum at all educational levels.To realize the benefits of Internet delivery, however, the educational experience must beequivalent to or better than that of a hands-on experiment. The project described here seeks
is an ongoing initiative, originally funded by the NSF, to“reinvent” engineering education, with an emphasis on teaching to diverse learning styles. Thisfits nicely with our goal of maintaining a positive learning environment. Page 8.224.8Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationAs Fall 2002 was the first semester of implementation/planning for the activities listed in Table 5,it is not possible to offer an analysis of their success at this time. However initial feedback fromthe mentoring project is
basis • Class lectures are strictly out of the text book with no discussion or feedbackTable 3. Some Cited Weaknesses and Deficiencies in Math/Science Component of a TypicalPrimary School in the Arab Gulf States • Modify offerings to allow for electives • Widen selection of courses to cover additional areas such as: world history and culture, human psychology, sociology, anthropology, etc… • Encourage group projects, library and internet search, and field-related projects • Introduce one or two courses (per year) using simplified English. Thus, helping learners of English to improve their English skillsTable 4. Suggested Modifications and Improvements in the
, are being measured. Evidence that may be used includes, but is notlimited to the following: cadet portfolios, including design projects; nationally-normed subject contentexaminations; alumni surveys that document professional accomplishments and career developmentactivities; employer surveys; and placement data of graduates.DFAN Program – In 1997, DFAN drafted nine statements that defined the educational outcomesfor the aeronautical engineering program. After faculty and EPAC review, the nine statementswere adopted, and in 2000, they were reviewed, modified and reduced the six statements shownabove. These six statements are specific to the aeronautical engineering program, concurrentlysupport the Institutional Educational Outcomes, and are
and then later, in 1984 by Ranky at Nottingham and Siemens-Plessey in the UK,and then in 1992 when together with Mick F. Ranky, supported by CIMware Ltd.,http://www.cimwareukandusa.com and FESTO Ltd. an interactive multimedia CD-ROMwas developed as an electronic support system for servo-pneumatic positioning, as wellas part of another project for bio-medical engineering with Prof. T. Pato in Berne,Switzerland. In 1997 Paul G. Ranky and Mick F. Ranky developed a 3D browserreadable, virtual computer disassembly method, supported by industry, that has led toseveral other R&D grants (including major DOD grants for NJIT) and publications,including the 3D Multimedia Case Based Library (1995 to date).Since then the topic as well as the
, destructive and simulation testing programs areemployed in the industry. The plastics testing lab at Pittsburg State University iscurrently undertaking a project, in collaboration with Able Manufacturing Corp., Joplin,MO, to develop a “J-Integral Method for Fracture Toughness of Composites (24).” Page 8.172.7 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session 16492.3.c. Case Study: Materials Selection for the Directional Radar Unit
include supervisory authority over severallicensed engineers, are sometimes unable to obtain the P.E. license. The EMF might be aneffective way of correcting this aberration. Principals of large consulting firms in the UnitedStates who have projects overseas are sometimes forced to undertake their work through localless experienced firms because of the local regulations concerning licensure. A register such asthe Engineers Mobility Forum would be a reasonable avenue by which such experienced engineerscould register as professional engineers in the foreign countries in which they have professionalactivities.V. ConclusionThe establishment of the Washington Accord is a most welcome process of enhancinginternational cooperation and unfettered
Session 2438 Dynamic Modeling with Constraint-based CAD in Introductory Engineering Graphics Eric N. Wiebe, Ted J. Branoff, and Nathan W. Hartman NC State University, Raleigh, NCABSTRACT: This presentation is part of an ongoing research project by the authors looking athow constraint-based 3D modeling can be used as a vehicle for rethinking instructionalapproaches to engineering design graphics. A particular goal is moving from a mode ofinstruction based on the crafting by students and assessment by instructors of static 2D drawingsand 3D models. Instead, an
satisfied with their grade.The overall result is that student learning is improved, and both the instructor and the student aremore satisfied with the course outcome.Bibliography1. Bowen, J.D. 2003. Using a Hands-On, Project-Based Approach to Introduce Civil Engineering to Freshman. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education2. Clough, D.E., S.C. Chapra, and G.S Huvard. 2001. A Change in Approach to Engineering Computing for Freshman – Similar Directions at Three Dissimilar Institutions. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education3. Devens, P.E. 2000. MATLAB &
accreditation criteria [1] and their implementation plans were presented. Thiswas our first real exposure to TC2K. It did not appear at that time to be a near-term challenge aswe expected to be reviewed using the existing TAC of ABET feature accounting format.Two months later at the beginning of the academic year, our department chair informed us thatwe had been invited to volunteer in the 2001 pilot visit project. Our other EngineeringTechnology programs were in good shape and could shoulder the responsibility. While the EETprogram circumstances were not ideal, we had sufficient positive factors and so we also agreed toaccept the challenge. Our three-member faculty group at that time consisted of a recently trainedTAC of ABET evaluator, a former
to mechanical engineering to which I have not yet been exposed. (1c)2 I am able to analyze and interpret experimental data. (2)3 I am able to design a system, component, or process to meet a desired need. (3)4 I am able to function and participate effectively as one member of a multidisciplinary team of engineers working on project. (4a) I feel I am able to be an effective leader of a multidisciplinary team of engineers. (4b)5 I learned how to think critically and analytically. (5)6 I have a sufficient understanding of professional ethics to guide the decisions I will make in situations I will encounter in engineering practice. (6)7 I am able to communicate
in engineering careers is well established. In addition,there presently are 268,000 unfilled technology positions in the United States.5 By the year 2010these unfilled positions are projected to grow to 1.6 million.5 “Innovative programs for girls andyoung women provide opportunities for them to interact with women in science and technicalfields”.3 In addition, girls benefit from programs that build on their strengths and encouragethem to explore meaningful possibilities for their futures4.Society is denied the services of talented young women in technology fields, who, were it not forgender or cultural biases, have the potential to become excellent engineers. Withoutinterventions similar in spirit to those represented by the “STEPS for
.” Page 8.171.8 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Bibliography1. Reichert, M. and M. Absher, Taking another look at educating African American engineers: The importance of undergraduate retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 1997. 86(3).2. Besterfield-Sacre, M., C.J. Atman, and L.J. Shuman, Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 1997. 86(2): p. 139-149.3. Morning, C. and J. Fleming, Project preserve: A program to retain minorities in engineering. Journal of
Engineering Education23. Sharp, J.E., "Educating Engineers: Bringing the Real World into the Technical Communication Classroom,” The Catalyst, Newsletter of the Vanderbilt Chemical Engin eering Dept., Vol. 2, No. 2, Winter 2002/2003, p. 6.24. Reference 23.25. Reference 23.26. Sharp, J.E., "Evaluating Oral Presentations in Engineering Classes," Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education 1996 27th Annual Conference, pp. 994-997.27. Brickell, J.L., D.B. Porter, M.F. Reynolds, and R.D. Cosgrove, “Assigning Students to Groups for Engineering Design Projects: A Comparison of Five Methods,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 83, No. 3, July 1994, pp. 259-262.28. Sharp, J.E., "Teaching Teamwork Communication with Kolb Learning Style Theory
methods and fostering of creativespirits.The concrete indicators are composed of the following: learning feelings/value feelings,teaching enthusiasm and organization and clarity, the mutual exchange of the groups,harmonious interpersonal relations, the breadth of knowledge, examination scoring andhomework, reading materials, the course quantity, the difficulty and logical structure[14].In 2001, we have undertaken “the Course Teaching Quality Assessment System”, which is theteaching reform project granted by Education Ministry of China. Such a system indicates thatdifferent assessment forms are made with various emphasis according to experts`, leaders
the Minority Engineering Math and Science orMEMS Project. However, scholarships alone are not enough; they need to be combined withother retention activities. For instance, minority students must maintain a specific course loadand grade level to keep the scholarship. This does not go well with non-traditional minoritystudents who have families to support. Further, CS and CE departments can take anunconventional approach to student retention by offering some financial incentives such astuition credit for students who are in their final year.Concluding RemarksMinority students have been taking advantage of opportunities available in IT by pursuingeducation in CS and CE against all odds. A significant number of them, however, end up leavingCS or
industry he returned to academia at the University ofCalifornia at Berkeley where he received a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering and an M.A. in Statistics. He is aregistered Professional Chemical Engineer in the State of California.POLLY R. PIERGIOVANNIPolly Piergiovanni is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Lafayette College. She received a B.S.from Kansas State University and a Ph.D. from the University of Houston, both in Chemical Engineering. Herresearch interests include cell culture and fermentation , and the LEGO project. Page 8.557.10 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
project based learning. Laboratories, are expensive, but are an efficientvehicle to accomplish student learning. They are refreshing for many students, a welcomecounterpoint to lecture as they provide the challenge as they teach their lesson, rather than in adeferred quiz. Laboratories allow students to demonstrate outcomes mandated by ABET’sEngineering Criteria 2000. In well conceived laboratories students demonstrate an ability to: 1.Apply the tools of modern engineering and science to solve relevant problems. 2. Implementappropriate experimental procedures. 3. Handle data, draw and articulate conclusions. 4. Make “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
lab can be completed easily in two 4-hour lab periods. The experiment isalso suitable for use as a demonstration in a typical lecture course or as a hands-on project forhigh school students and teachers.Bibliography1. Thomas, S. and M. Zalbowitz, “Fuel Cells-Green Power”, Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR-99-3231 (1999).2. Larminie, J. and A. Dicks, Fuel Cell Systems Explained, John Wiley & Sons, (2000).3. Hoogers, G., Fuel Cell Technology Handbook, 1st ed, CRC Press, (2002).4. Hirschenhofer, J. H., D. B. Stauffer, R. R. Engleman, and M. G. Klett, “Fuel Cell Handbook,” Fifth Edition, National Technical Information Service, U. S. Department of Commerce, VA (2000).5. Koppel, T. and J. Reynolds, A Fuel Cell Primer: The Promise and
cram interstates and highways full ofmore trucks, the effects will be devastating. The entire world is experiencing increasing healthcare costs and loss of life as a result of air pollution. It has not only hit hard in the U.S., but alsowith the rest of the world. India, one of the more densely populated countries in the world isexperiencing a jump in the amount of freight shipped by trucks as a result of rapidly increasingdemand. 18 One study showed that Asian cities are being hit the hardest with air pollution beingfive times greater than other industrial countries. Urban population in these nations is projected totriple from 360 million to over a billion in 2020. 5 Other nations are facing similar situations andmany are turning to railroads
+: (½, ½, ½)Cl-: (0, 0, 0) (1, 0, 0) (0, 1, 0) (0, 0, 1)Coordination numbers are then for both ions equal to eight with the following ionic radii:rCs+ = 0.170 nm and rCl- = 0.181 nm. From the relation between the lattice parameter and theionic radii: aCsCl = 2·r Cs+ + 2·r Cl- = 0.405 nm.2.3 Other Crystal StructuresAfterwards, two more ceramic cubic structures, zinc blende (ZnS) and perovskite, are presentedand discussed. In particular, the CaTiO3 is of interest since a perovskite-related structure will beassigned as part of a team project, as indicated in the following section. In the case of CaTiO3the positions of the center of the ions in the unit cell are as follows:Ca2+: (0, 0, 0) (1, 0, 0) (1, 1, 0) (0, 1, 0
Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationMATLAB®, as well as the size of the data sets. Work is currently underway to transition thesimulation to a Web-accessible application using a conventional client/server model. The serverstores the data sets and performs the majority of the computations, while the client performs userinterface functions.We intend to make the Web-accessible version of the module available to the general public viathe Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN).32 BIRN is a consortium of universityand hospital research organizations concerned with neuroimaging data acquisition and analysis.The consortium’s initial projects are all focused on structural and functional neuroimaging data.They include a Web site
many of the things theyreally want to do anyway, which is to have fun developing exciting new courses. In this case,the class is the research project. If the professor is successful, he can then turn this work into apublication. Before a professor jumps into the world of educational research, he needs to makesure his university will accept research of this type. Some universities do not recognizeeducational research as real research. Other universities may accept educational research, butstill want you to do some traditional research. This is the case at our university. The collegeleadership still wants us to do traditional research, but we are allowed to use educationalresearch as part of our overall plan.It is also possible to sometimes
theirperformance on exam problems of increasing levels of difficulty. The results of this part of theNortheastern University project were presented at the 2002 Frontiers in Education Conferencebut not published in the proceedings. The results of the study may be obtaining by contactingyokomoto@iupui.edu.3.0 The Current StudyFor the current study, the authors used a subset of the items from Northeastern University study,selecting only those items that showed a marked difference between student responses andinstructor recommendation for best practice. The investigation was expanded to assessingstudents’ self-reported behaviors and heuristic beliefs at the start of the semester and at a point inthe semester after three exams had been given. In addition, the
Higher Education, “Top 100 Degree Producers,” Black Issues inHigher Education. 6/20/02, pp. 45-122.AuthorsSUNDIATA K. JANGHAMr. Sundiata Jangha is a doctoral student in Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Instituteof Technology. His research interests include prototyping, product development,engineering design education, computer-aided design, the design of complex systems andproducts, and engineering entrepreneurship. He is a member of ASME, ASEE, andNSBE. Sundiata is an ONR HBEC–FFP Fellow and a FOCUS 1996 Alumnus.ROBERT G. HALEYMr. Robert Haley is Director of Special Projects for the College of Engineering andSpecial Assistant to the President at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Mr. Haley is thefounder of the FOCUS program and continues to
. degree from Cornell University in 1980, and a B.S. from theUniversity of Kentucky in 1979, all in Civil Engineering. Dr. Philpot teaches Statics and Mechanics of Materialsand is the project director of the U.S. Department of Education grant that supported this work. Dr. Philpot is theauthor of MDSolids – Educational Software for Mechanics of Materials.RICHARD H. HALLRichard H. Hall is an Associate Professor of Information Science and Technology at the University of Missouri-Rolla. He received his BS degree in Psychology from the University of North Texas, and PhD degree inExperimental Psychology from Texas Christian University. He is the director of UMR’s Media ResearchLaboratory, and his research focuses on Web Design and Usability
InformationTIMOTHY A. PHILPOTTimothy A. Philpot is an Assistant Professor in the Basic Engineering Department and a Research Associate for theInstructional Software Development Center at the University of Missouri–Rolla. Dr. Philpot received a Ph.D.degree from Purdue University in 1992, an M.Engr. degree from Cornell University in 1980, and a B.S. from theUniversity of Kentucky in 1979, all in Civil Engineering. Dr. Philpot teaches Statics and Mechanics of Materialsand is the project director of the U.S. Department of Education grant that supported this work. Dr. Philpot is theauthor of MDSolids – Educational Software for Mechanics of Materials.NANCY HUBINGDr. Hubing is an Associate Professor in the Basic Engineering Department at the University of Missouri
more dominant roles. A new course innanoscale mechanics for engineering students was recently taught at the University of Wisconsin- Madison. This course provided an introduction to nanoscale engineering with a direct focuson the critical role that mechanics needs to play in this developing area. The limits of continuummechanics were presented as well as newly developed mechanics theories and experimentstailored to study and describe micro- and nano-scale phenomena. Numerous demonstrations andexperiments were used throughout the course, including synthesis and fabrication techniques forcreating nanostructured materials, bubble raft models to demonstrate size scale effects in thinfilm structures, and a laboratory project to construct a
styles have to do with Mario? The Clearing House, 59, 9 – 12.[25] Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Freeley, M. E. 1984. Practical applications of the research: Responding to students’ learning styles – step one. Illinois School Research and Development, 21(1), 1 – 12.[26] Hein, T. L. 1994. Learning style analysis in a calculus-based introductory physics course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, CA.[27] Lemmon, P. 1985. A school where learning style makes a difference. Principal, 64(4), 26 – 28.[28] Perrin, J. 1990. The learning styles project for potential dropouts. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 23 – 24.[29] De Bello, T. C. 1990. Comparison of eleven major learning