Conference Session

Student Experiences with Undergraduate Research

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wookwon Lee P.E., Gannon University; Nicholas B. Conklin, Gannon University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

were 3 female and 5 male students; 3 of them were domestic students and 5 of themwere international students. For a total of 40 questions in 10 categories, average scores andstandard deviations were calculated for individual questions and also for each category. The resultsare summarized in Table 1 where the survey categories are labeled by Roman numerals andindividual questions are sequentially labeled with a prefix Q. The average and standard deviationfor “Overall” are for the category. For a comparison between the results from the twoquestionnaires, the averages and standard deviations were presented in two sets of columns,denoted by “Perception” (questionnaire 1) and “Achievement” (questionnaire 2). For intuitive understanding from these

Conference Session

Approaches to Curriculum and Policy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Afroditi Vennie Filippas, Virginia Commonwealth University; Rebecca Segal, Virginia Commonwealth University ; Alen Docef, Virginia Commonwealth University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

faculty interactions with math facultyOf the faculty who responded to the survey, two had met with mathematics faculty (Q.3). Bothhad attended the special meeting we held in the spring of 2017 and had participated in theclassroom observation opportunity, and one of them had also participated in one-on-onemeetings with math faculty (Q.4). In both cases, these meetings only changed their perceptionson faculty engagement (Q.5). The interaction that was listed as being the most impactful was themeeting/classroom observation, but the one-on-one visits also ranked high on the list (Q.6). Itdoes seem, though, that building in opportunities for faculty socialization and active exchange ofideas is important.Questions 8: Have you provided feedback or input

Conference Session

Experiences of Underrepresented Students in Engineering

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Manuel Jimenez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Sonia M. Bartolomei-Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Oscar Marcelo Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Aidsa I. Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Carla López del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Pedro O. Quintero, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nelson Cardona-Martínez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Estadístico sobre la educación de Puerto Rico 2016-2017 (Databook): Tabla 9. Tasas de graduación (IPEDS Graduation Rate) en las instituciones de educación superior en Puerto Rico (año académico 2016-17)” [Online] Available: CEPR webpage, http://www2.pr.gov/agencias/cepr/inicio/estadisticas_e_investigacion/Pages/default.aspx [Accessed Mar. 21, 2018][17] Q. Jin, S. Purzer, and P.K. Imbrie, “Measuring first year engineering students' knowledge and interest in materials science and engineering”, In Proceedings of 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012[18] P.O. Garriott, L.Y. Flores, and M.P. Martens, “Predicting the math/science career goals of low-income prospective first

Conference Session

Data-informed Approaches to Understanding Student Experiences and Outcomes

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Qin Liu, University of Toronto; Greg Evans, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3406386), 2010.[4] M. Borrego and J. Bernhard, "The emergence of engineering education research as an internationally connected field of inquiry," Journal of Engineering Education vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 14-47, 2011.[5] Q. Liu, "A snapshot methodological review of journal articles in engineering education research," in Proceedings of the annual Canadian Engineering Education Association conference, Ottawa: ON, 2019, June 8-12.[6] Advance CTE, "The state of career technical education: Improving data quality and effectiveness," Silver Spring, Maryland: Advance CTE, 2019, Available: https://careertech.org/resource/state-cte-improving-data-quality-effectiveness.[7] National

Conference Session

Experiences of Underrepresented Students in Engineering

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Oleksandr Kravchenko, Old Dominion University; Konstantin Cigularov, Old Dominion University; Phillip Dillulio, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

academicallymature individuals with work experiences outside of college. This information would be valuablefor identifying the precise needs of SCS undergraduate students and targets for intervention andprogrammatic efforts to facilitate their academic and career goals and support their well-being. Specifically, we examined the following research questions:Q.1 How do SCS undergraduate students differ from traditional undergraduate students andgraduate students in terms of needs based on their levels of school and personal demands andresources?Q.2 How do SCS undergraduate students differ from traditional undergraduate students andgraduate students in their levels of student outcomes?MethodProcedure In April of 2019, a link to a 57-question

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Best Paper Finalists

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrew Forney, Loyola Marymount University; Sunai Kim, Loyola Marymount University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, “Predicting Undergraduate Student Retention in STEM Majors Based on Career Development Factors,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 88–93, 2017.[3] J. G. Cromley, T. Perez, and A. Kaplan, “Undergraduate STEM Achievement and Retention: Cognitive, Motivational, and Institutional Factors and Solutions,” Policy Insights from Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2015.[4] R. W. Lent, A. M. Lopez, F. G. Lopez, and H. Bin Sheu, “Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 2008.[5] A. Carpi, D. M. Ronan, H. M. Falconer, H. H. Boyd, and N. H. Lents, “Development and Implementation of Targeted

Conference Session

Student Perceptions of Self-efficacy, Success, and Identity

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Constanza Miranda, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Julián Iñaki Goñi, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Bruk T. Berhane, Florida International University; Trinidad Sotomayor, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

George Saridakis. (2008). “The Role of Higher Education Skills and Support in Graduate Self-Employment.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (6): 653–72.Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 217-229.Huang-Saad, A., Bodnar, C., & Carberry, A. (2020). Examining Current Practice in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419890828Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal for Global

Conference Session

K-12 and Bridge Experiences in Engineering Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Timothy Ryan Duckett, University of Toledo; Gale A. Mentzer, Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

). “An overview of computational thinking,” International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3 (1) 1-11.[3] V. Shute, C. Sun, & J. Asbell-Clarke (2017). “Demystifying computational thinking’” Educational Research Review, 22, 142-158.[4] M. Berland & U. Wilensky (2015). “Comparing virtual and physical robotics environments for supporting complex systems and computational thinking,” Journal of Science Education and Technology 24(5), 628-647.[5] M. Bers, L. Flannery, E. Kazakoff, & A. Sullivan, (2014). “Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum,” Computers & Education 72, 145–157.[6] B. Zhone, Q. Wang, J. Chen, & Y. Li (2016). “An exploration of

Conference Session

Data-informed Approaches to Understanding Student Experiences and Outcomes

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mariem Boujelbene, University of Louisville; Khalil Damak, University of Louisville; Asuman Cagla Acun Sener, University of Louisville; Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville; Campbell R. Bego, University of Louisville; Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville; Olfa Nasraoui , University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

progression in built environment and engineering programs: Case of Central Queensland University,” ​J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.​, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2017, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000341.[16] D. Ifenthaler and C. Widanapathirana, “Development and validation of a learning analytics framework: Two case studies using support vector machines,” ​Technol. Knowl. Learn.​, vol. 19, pp. 221–240, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10758-014-9226-4.[17] A. M. Bessent and E. W. Bessent, “Determining the Comparative Efficiency of Schools through Data Envelopment Analysis,” ​Educ. Adm. Q.​, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 57–75, 1980, doi: 10.1177/0013161X8001600207.[18] C. Shah and G. Burke, “An undergraduate student flow

Conference Session

Student Motivation, Identity, and Resilience

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wonki Lee, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jeffrey F. Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

; Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. June 15-18, 2014, 2014.[29] P. R. Pintrich, D. A. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. J. McKeachie, “Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ),” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 801–813, 1993.[30] J. DeBoer et al., “Work in progress: Rigorously assessing the anecdotal evidence of increased student persistence in an active, blended, and collaborative mechanical engineering environment,” in ASEE Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[31] D. Gefen, E. E. Rigdon, and D. Straub, “Editor’s comments: an update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research,” Mis Q., pp. iii–xiv, 2011.[32] L. A. Bryan

Conference Session

Cognitive Skills Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Hannah Smith, Queen's University; Brian M. Frank, Queen's University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

,” Intelligence, vol. 57, pp. 66–72, Jul. 2016.[13] A. Grotlüschen, K. Buddeberg, A. Redmer, H. Ansen, and J. Dannath, “Vulnerable subgroups and numeracy practices: How poverty, debt, and unemployment relate to everyday numeracy practices,” Adult Educ. Q., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 251–270, 2019.[14] N. Center for Education Statistics, “Skills of U.S. Unemployed, Young, and Older Adults in Sharper Focus: Results From the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) 2012/2014 First Look,” Washington, DC, 2016.[15] N. Dion and V. Maldonado, “Making the Grade? Troubling Trends in Postsecondary Student Literacy,” Toronto, Ontario, 2013.[16] N. Dion, “Emphasizing numeracy as an essential skill

Conference Session

Degree Pathways and Cocurricular Experiences

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joanna Mirecki Millunchick, University of Michigan; Yixian Zhou, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

and J. Coughlin, “Examining Person–Environment Fit and Academic Major Satisfaction,” J. Coll. Couns., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 250–262, 2017.[29] D. W. Cox, A. L. Bjornsen, T. S. Krieshok, and Y. Liu, “Occupational Engagement and Academic Major Satisfaction: Vocational Identity’s Mediating Role,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 169–180, 2016.[30] R. S. Burt, Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., 1992.[31] M. Scheidt, R. Senkpeil, J. Chen, A. Godwin, and E. Berger, “SAT Does Not Spell Success: How Non-Cognitive Factors Can Explain Variance in the GPA of Undergraduate Engineering and Computer Science Students,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2018- Octob, pp. 1–5, 2019.

Conference Session

Teaching and Learning in Online Environments

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eunsil Lee, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

- 336, 2010.[15] Q. Li, D. McCoach, H. Swaminathan, & J. Tang, “Development of an instrument to measure perspectives of engineering education among college students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 47-56, 2008.[16] H. M. Matusovich, R. A. Streveler, & R. L. Miller, “Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students' motivational values,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 289-303, 2010.[17] L. Goel, P. Zhang, & M. Templeton, “Transactional distance revisited: Bridging face and empirical validity,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1122-1129, 2012.[18] D.U. Bollinger, & T. Martindale, “Key factors for determining

Conference Session

Instruments and Methods for Studying Student Experiences and Outcomes

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sreyoshi Bhaduri, McGraw-Hill ; Michelle Soledad, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024 14Pitterson, N. P., Brown, S., Pascoe, J., & Fisher, K. Q. (2016). Measuring cognitive engagement through interactive, constructive, active and passive learning activities. Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE, 1–6. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7757733/Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Wagner Alibali, M. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Best Paper Finalists

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Justin Charles Major, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; John Chen, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, and S. Cotner, “Exams disadvantage women in introductory biology,” PLoS One, 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186419.[17] M. Mohamadi, Z. Alishahi, and N. Soleimani, “A Study on Test Anxiety and its Relationship to Test Score and Self-actualization of Academic EFL Students in Iran,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.529.[18] J. Zhang, N. Zhao, and Q. P. Kong, “The relationship between math anxiety and math performance: A meta-analytic investigation,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, pp. 1–17, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613.[19] E. A. Maloney, J. R. Sattizahn, and S. L. Beilock, “Anxiety and cognition,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 403–411, 2014

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research Practices and Community

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Javeed Kittur, Arizona State University; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Approaches to Encouraging Student Engagement

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Panagiotis Apostolellis, University of Virginia; Sitong Wang, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

design.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Rex Hartson and Doug Bowman for their influence in theoriginal course design and guidance throughout. We also express our appreciation to thestudents who contributed to the development of this research study. Finally, many thanks toLindsay Wheeler for her guidance and reviewing of this work.References[1] J. Pirker, M. Riffnaller-Schiefer, and C. Gütl, “Motivational active learning - Engaging university students in computer science education,” in ITICSE 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, 2014, pp. 297–302.[2] B. Simon, S. Esper, L. Porter, and Q. Cutts, “Student experience in a student-centered peer instruction

Conference Session

Teaching and Learning in Online Environments

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Javeed Kittur, Arizona State University; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Instruments and Methods for Studying Student Experiences and Outcomes

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David Reeping, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Cherie D. Edwards, Virginia Commonwealth University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., & Seller, R. (2012). Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International journal of nursing studies, 49(1), 47-53.[15] Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual review of public health, 35, 29-45.[16] Pluye, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International journal of

Conference Session

Care and Inclusive Teaching

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kenya Z. Mejia, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28502.[18] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention,” ​J. Eng. Educ.​, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 361–376, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01033.x.[19] C. Paguyo, R. Atadero, K. Rambo-Hernandez, and J. Francis, “Creating Inclusive Environments in First-year Engineering Classes to Support Student Retention and Learning,” in ​2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings​, Seattle, Washington, Jun. 2015, pp. 26.418.1-26.418.16, doi: 10.18260/p.23757.[20] A. Sithole, E. T. Chiyaka, P. McCarthy, D. M. Mupinga, B. K. Bucklein, and J. Kibirige, “Student Attraction, Persistence and