,” in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Zone 2 Spring Conference Proceedings (Vol. 6), San Juan, Puerto Rico, Mar. 2-5, 2017.[7] J. Kent, The Power of the PE License. [Online]. Available: https://www.monster.com/career-advice/article/professional-engineer-license-pe. [Accessed Nov. 18, 2019].[8] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Civil engineers’ income rises faster than national average. [Online]. Available: https://www.asce.org/templates/press-release- detail.aspx?id=32866. [Accessed Sep. 11, 2019].[9] National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE). Why get licensed? [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/licensure/why-get-licensed. [Accessed Jan. 15, 2020].[10] E. Kaplan
information literacy program for first-year engineering students,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference 2012, 2012, p. 12. [8] M. L. Strife, M. G. Armour-Gemmen, and R. A. M. Hensel, “Re-tooling information instruction delivery and assessment for the freshman engineering class: the good, the bad and the ugly,” presented at the 120th Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013. [9] Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL), “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education,” Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL), 09- Feb-2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework. [Accessed:12-Dec-2019].[10] B. Quigley and J
perspective or from a larger social one. Ishare the example of how a fitness tracker, designed to track a wearers blood pressure, failedbecause the company who created it neglected to test it on people of color [14].In my review of research, I found a fair amount of literature in the library profession related tostructural oppression[15], critical information theory[16], cultural capital and culturalcompetency[17][18], as well as articles on integrating diversity, equity and inclusion ideals intoour libraries[19][20]. The profession collectively is working on examining, understanding, andimplementing new approaches to address inequities. In their ASEE 2019 paper, “AcademicLibraries and the Strategic Vision for Diversity in Higher Education,” Napp and
and K. Marcynuk, “The self-reported confidence and proficiency levels of undergraduate Engineering students in an engineering Technical Communication course,” Proc. 2015 Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA15) Conf., McMaster University, May 31-June 3, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/PCEEA/article/view/5805 [Accessed Dec. 3, 2019].[6] L. Feldmann and J. Feldmann. “Developing information literacy in freshmen engineering technology students.” 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Kansas City MO., Oct. 18-21, 2000. [Abstract]. Available IEEE Xplore. [Accessed Oct. 15, 2019].[7] ABET. “General Criterion 3. Student Outcomes,” [Online
assignment involvesinitially summarizing a pre-determined research article on an engineering innovation, thenconducting further research into the topic to expand their knowledge of it and its implications forfuture research. We noticed that most students could summarize the initial reading, but haddifficulty articulating questions for future study. We reasoned that if students could sharpentheir ability to identify and ask questions succinctly, it would likely improve their research.Therefore, in the Spring 2019 semester, the instructors and librarians added a component thatincluded specific instruction on formulating research questions to improve students’ researchskills.Theoretical Foundations and Literature ReviewAssociation of College and
,” Technical Services Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 257–268, jul 2018.[14] T. Boto and D. Herman, “Creating a curriculum-aligned OER discovery tool: A twist on faculty mini-grant incentives,” in Northeast Regional OER Summit, Amherst, MA, may 2019. [Online]. Available: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/neoer/2019/implementing/14[15] Open Textbook Network, “On-Campus Workshops: Engaging Faculty, Answering Questions,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://open.umn.edu/otn/workshops/[16] J. P. Moore and T. L. Reinsfelder, “Work In Progress: A Snapshot of OER Adoption in Engineering Mechanics Courses,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/31266[17] I. E. Allen and J. Seaman
. Research results demonstrated thatthe flipped lesson improved the quality of students’ sources on mid-semester design proposal andless so on their final report. The lesson was fully implemented for fall semester 2017. Based ondata from the team’s first research project, and feedback from course faculty, the team piloted amid-semester reinforcement lesson in fall 2019. This second phase of the research project seeksto specifically reinforce students’ retention of concepts related to both the use of proper citationformatting and incorporation of more scholarly and authoritative sources in their team’s finalproject report. This work in progress paper discusses preliminary results from the fall 2019 pilot,specifically faculty perceptions of the lesson
perspective, he is able to better understand the business side of research, which many future scientists and engineers will encounter in industry [5, Conclusion].BackgroundThe engineering program at James Madison University (JMU) was established in 2008. Thatsame year saw the opening of a campus STEM library, Rose Library, and the creation of anApplied Sciences Librarian position to provide reference, instruction, and collection managementfor engineering and other applied sciences programs on campus. The Applied Sciences Librarianhired in 2008 has served in this role ever since. As of fall 2019, nearly 1,900 students at JMU areenrolled in the College of Integrated Science and Engineering [6].JMU is also home to a nationally recognized
of engineering students: An empirical study,” Indian J. Public Heal. Res. Dev., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 63–68, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.5958/0976- 5506.2019.00014.7.[29] B. Rieken, M. Schar, S. Shapiro, and S. Sheppard, “Exploring the Relationship between Mindfulness and Innovation in Engineering Students,” in ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc. June 25-28, 2017. Columbus, OH, 2017.[30] M. V. Huerta, “Inner Engineering: A convergent mixed methods study evaluating the use of contemplative practices to promote resilience among Freshman engineering students,” in ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., June 24-27, 2018. Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.
for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, 2020 – 2021. ABET,Baltimore, MD, 2019. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-technology-programs-2020-2021/. [AccessedJanuary 22, 2020].[18] ABET ETAC Side By Side Criteria Final 01 01 19. ABET, Baltimore, MD. Available:http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/ETAC-Side-By-Side-Criteria-Final-01-01-19.pdf. [Accessed, January 22, 2020.][19] E. M. Cooney, “Adapting the VALUE Rubrics to ABET ETAC Outcomes A-K.” Paperpresented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.https://peer.asee.org/20027.[20] AACU, Written Communication VALUE Rubric. Association of American Colleges andUniversities
increased visibility for the Libraryresources and services. It also discusses the positive impact on the students’ research skills andon their literature reviews. Consequently, the training sessions contribute to achieving theUniversity learning objectives for graduate students in research programs.IntroductionIntroductionFounded in Montreal in 1873, Polytechnique Montréal is a francophone engineering universityoffering more than 120 academic programs. In Fall 2019, the institution had 9,000 studentsenrolled, with more than 2,200 in a graduate program [1]. Polytechnique Montréal stronglyencourages diversity among its student population, so as of Fall 2019, 28% of its students werewomen and 29% were international students. Moreover, international
Proc. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, Seattle, WA, 2015.[3] H.L. Coates, J. Carlson, R. Clement, M. Henderson, L.R. Johnston, Y. Shorish, “How are we measuring up? Evaluating research data services in academic libraries,” Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication. 6, pp. 1-33, 2018. Available: doi:10.7710/2162-3309.2226.[4] A. Goben, T. Griffin. “In Aggregate: Trends, needs, and opportunities from research data management surveys,” College & Research Libraries. 80(7), pp.903-924, 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.7.903. Accessed January 22, 2020.[5] L. Perrier, L. Barnes, “Developing research data management services and support
and on‐demand,” Collect. Build., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 20–28, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1108/01604950510576092[10] K. A. Kozak, “Standards, standards: Where might you be?” in 2014 ASEE North Midwest Section Conf., pp. 1–8, 2014, doi: 10.17077/aseenmw2014.1039[11] P. Melgoza, “A study of ILI Standards database cost savings at Texas A&M University,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., pp. 9445–9451, 2002. Available: https://peer.asee.org/10431[12] J. Cusker, “Adding individual technical standards to a library collection: A case study and a proposed workflow,” Collect. Manag., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 124-138, 2019, doi: 10.1080/01462679.2019.1650864[13] L. K. Dunn and S. Xie, “Standards collection development and management in an academic
ebookversions of engineering textbooks whenever possible. Although this institution has beenfollowing this principle for the past ten years, it has done so with little direct knowledgeof students’ preferences regarding their options for print versus ebook format for theirtextbooks. Some studies have shown that students expressed a preference for using theirtextbooks in print format. To assess the usefulness of the service of providingeTextbooks, in the Fall 2019 semester the engineering librarians at the University ofMichigan developed and sent a survey to engineering graduate and undergraduatestudents whose textbooks were available as eTextbooks. The survey sought to learn aboutstudents’ use of the ebooks and their opinions about eTextbooks. As a
exercises (e.g. [1], [2], [14], [15], [16], [17]). In oneof the few photo ethnographic studies, Thomas [18] did a photo diary study with undergraduateambassadors to investigate Rice University’s Fondren Library services and spaces. Her successwith the study informed our research project. However, there is still a gap in the literature for theuse of photography in ethnographic studies.Background of College of Architecture In fall 2019, the College Station campus had a total enrollment of 69,465: 54,476undergraduates (ungr) and 14,989 graduate students (grad) [19]. The College of Architecture hasfour departments, Architecture (ARCH), Construction Science (COSC), Landscape Architecture& Urban Studies (LAUP), and Visualization (VIZA
Construction Engineering;Computer Science; Electrical and Computer Engineering; Industrial Engineering and ManagementSystems; Materials Science and Engineering; and Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.A summary comparison of these two Universities and their respective departments, according toinformation included in their America Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 2018 profiles,is provided [14]. See Table 1.Table 1: University Information Univ. of Miami (UM) Univ. of Central Florida (UCF) University Founded 1925 1963 (year) University Funding Type Private
. McPherson, "Using Everyday Objects to Engage Students in Standards Education," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, 2016: IEEE.[8] D. Solomon, Y.-T. Liao, T., and J. T. Chapin, "Maximizing the Effectiveness of One- time Standards Instruction Sessions with Formative Assessment," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019: ASEE.[9] K. A. Kozak, "Standards, Standards, Where might you be?," in 2014 ASEE North Midwest Section Conference, 2014.[10] L. R. Musser and T. W. Conkling, "Characteristics of Engineering Citations," Science & Technology Libraries, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 41, 1996.[11] R. J. Rodrigues, "Industry Expectations of the New Engineer," Science &
StateUniversity, Maritime Academy IRB committee. Over three years, all students taking the coursewere invited to participate. This resulted in 106 of 112 students giving consent: Fall 2017 (32students), Fall 2018 (42 students), and Fall 2019 (32 students). The course consisted of threemajor laboratory experiments. The lab report topics were convection, airfoil, and truck drag. Asthe semester progressed, the latter two topics were not based on knowledge from prerequisitecourses. Students were provided additional information literacy instruction to help with theirsearches. The supplemental instruction was also a part of an effort to improve students’information literacy skills in this program. Each experiment included theory presentationshalfway through