Displaying all 9 results
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 2: Success In and Out of the Classroom
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Elizabeth Payne Tofte, South Dakota State University; Albena Yuliyanova Yordanova, South Dakota State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
Sus- tainable Design & Construction (2016); University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri; Master of Arts in Architectural Studies (2005); Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Sofia, Bulgaria; Professional Diploma in Architecture (1991). Teaching Experience: Senior Lecturer, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, College of Engineering, Construction Management Program (2010-present) Interests: Sustainable Building Design and Construction Materials; Engineering Education Pedagody American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Writing Good Reflection Questions
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 1: Learning Aids
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
to studentsLarge classes can improve the student experience in at least four ways.1 The ASEE Engineering Technology listserv, ETD-L@listproc.tamu.edu; SIGCSE-members@listserv.acm.org, forComputer Science educators; and discussion@podnetwork.org, from the Professional and OrganizationalDevelopment NetworkThe first is community. A large class can grow into a supportive learning community. Studentshave more opportunity to partner with, and learn from, other students. Questions are answeredmore quickly on Piazza or a message board. Students can learn from their peers. Clicker-stylepolling provides immediate feedback, regardless of class size. It can even work better in a largeclass, since there is bound to be a critical mass of students who have
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 1: Learning Aids
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Wendy Roldan, University of Washington; Schawnery Lin; Yuxin Xu, University of Washington; Andrea Jacqueline Sequeira; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
notetaking as “a personalized, engaging method to spicing up your mundanenotes”, which correlated to her interview note of everyone having a unique “notetaking style.” Indescribing her artifact, Emily also noted the influence of her peers on her learning during theseminar. This artifact highlights Emily’s change of sentiment towards visual notetaking, fromconsidering her notes messy and never going back to review her notes prior to the seminar todescribing visual notetaking as “creative, rewarding, efficient.”Yifan was a second-year pre-science major student. Prior to the seminar, Yifan considered herselfa visual person, who learned information through writing instead of reading. She was interestedin the research process of visual design and saw the
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 3 - Grading: Grate or Great
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut; Troy J. Vogel, University of Notre Dame; Kristina Wagstrom, University of Connecticut
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
offering of the course during the Spring2019 semester. The broad learning objectives of this course included: (1) research skills, (2)technical communication, and (3) environmental health and safety. This course was broken intotwo sections, one focused on mixtures and reactions and the other on bioengineeringapplications. Students worked on teams in both sections to conduct three laboratory experiments.The corresponding major assessments for each experiment were a lab report (individual), videoarticle (team), and poster (team). All team-based assignments had to be completed at asatisfactory level in order to pass the course. Additionally, all students were required to gothrough safety training. Quizzes on statistics, writing, and scientific
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 3 - Grading: Grate or Great
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Ashish D. Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Christina Marie Zambrano-Varghese, Rutgers University-Newark; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Swapnil Moon
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
to achieve academic honesty among all students. She was the 2018-2019 Chancellor’s Scholar-in-Residence, responsible for organizing faculty development workshops and developing protocols to enhance teaching across disciplines, focusing in particular on the teaching of professional writing across disciplines and prevention of academic dishonesty.Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an application-oriented course for engineering students placed in pre-calculus courses. He has also developed and co-teaches the Fundamen- tals of
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 1: Learning Aids
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Zhilin Zhang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Chirantan Mahipal, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; David Mussulman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Christopher D. Schmitz, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Robert Thomas Baird, University of Illinois Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning; Hongye Liu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Ruihua Sui, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Maryalice S. Wu; Rob Kooper, NCSA / University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
improve undergraduate education as an Education Innovation Fellow (EIF) in the Grainger College of Engineering.Dr. Robert Thomas Baird, University of Illinois Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #29904 As Associate Director at the Center for Innovation in Teaching & Learning Robert helps guide the testing, evaluation, and use of campus emerging technologies in the classroom and online. He has extensive experience in technology-enhanced classrooms, online teaching environments, and web-based student writing and multimedia
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 3 - Grading: Grate or Great
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Timothy Aaron Wood, The Citadel; Dan D. Nale; Ryan Kent Giles P.E., The Citadel
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
requirements.• Tools • Work in pencil. • Write on 8.5 in. 11 in., gridded engineering paper. • Use a straight edge, compass, and/or protractor to draw diagrams. • Staple multi-page submissions together.• Presentation • Include no more than one problem per page. • Number pages per problem if more than one page is needed. • Each problem should have a neatly drawn figure(s). • Figures should be large enough to be easily read. • Variables should appear on figures. • Variables should be described using words and symbols. • Write legibly, in clear, easy-to-read print. • Completely erase any extraneous material. • No crossed-out material should appear on the solutions. • Leave blank lines
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 2: Success In and Out of the Classroom
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- David Gau, University of Pittsburgh; Deanna Christine Easley Sinex, University of Pittsburgh; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Steven Abramowitch, University of Pittsburgh; Sylvanus N. Wosu, University of Pittsburgh
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
paper is to share attendee feedback from the first two years of implementation ofour future faculty development program. This includes those sessions attendees’ thought werethe most important, the usefulness of each session, and impact on future career options. Ourintention is that the feedback we report will assist others (including ourselves) in improving ordeveloping their own faculty development programming.MethodsFuture Faculty Development Program - RecruitmentOur program is advertised within our institution and across peer institutions. We also advertisedthrough word of mouth, departmental emails, and interactions through recruitment visits.Interested applicants are asked to apply via an online program application. Participants
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 4: Tips and Tools
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- David Mussulman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Karle Flanagan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Wade Fagen-Ulmschneider, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Natalia Ozymko, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Rittika Adhikari, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jacqueline Osborn, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
students are in the queue andthe questions that they list. While the Queue software was originally developed to help maximizeefficiency at office hours for large enrollment courses, the software has since been adopted forother educational purposes, including drop-in advising, peer learning, and active learning. Sinceits implementation in Fall 2017, the Queue has been adopted by 25 courses, 4 advising offices,and has facilitated over 70,000 questions.In the early use cases of the Queue, we identified several benefits for students and instructors,including but not limited to saved time, improved accessibility, and improved use of space sinceoffice hours do not need to be in a fixed location when the queue is used. To understand theseimpacts and