, Gainesville. She did post-doctoral work with the USDA in Peoria, IL as a biochemist in soy- bean oligosaccharides before joining Central State University in 1989. Dr. Lowell maintains a research program in directed energy to kill weeds as an integrated pest management strategy. She mentors un- dergraduate students in funded research projects who have gone on to present at local, state and national conferences.Dr. Xiaofang Wei, Central State University Dr. Xiaofang Wei, Professor of Geography, GIS, and Remote Sensing at the Department of Water Re- sources Management (WRM) at Central State University. Dr. Wei received her bachelor degree from Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping and her doctoral degree from
College of Engineering (CoE) graduation rates for 2015 at our Hispanic ServingInstitution revealed to be 73% for students from households with income above $50,000/year, and54% from households with income below $7,500/year. Similar trends were also noticed in retentionand persistence rates indicating higher attrition among students from lower income families. Thisprogram aims to increase these statistics among LIATS by integrating elements from Lent’s et al.Social Cognitive Career Theory [1] [2] and Tinto’s Departure Model [3][4] in conjunction with ascholarship program. The final objective is to establish an intervention model to be furtherinstitutionalized in the CoE, if proven to be effective [5][6]. In this program we have includedtools to
programs becomeeligible for graduate assistantship funding as soon as their graduate career level is activated.Since research is a major component in R1 institution’s mission, such early career opportunitiesare vital to student’s success as this fosters the exposure to research at an early stage, whichfurther hones and develops students’ professional and technical skills. The 4+1 program couldfoster an effective educational paradigm by integrating undergraduates to collaborate and workwith graduate students to enhance their technical and professional skills [7].Background and MotivationSTEM Education in the U.S. has undergone drastic changes over the past years due to concernsrelating to the quality of education being offered to prepare the next
and adapted by other instructors, and integrated intotheir own courses and/or GCSP, to reach an even broader audience.The on-ground version of this course uses a lot of active learning techniques and is discussion-based, incorporating activities such as mind mapping, debates, role-play-based simulation,design challenges, and case studies, to help students explore and understand the interdisciplinarynature of the complex global challenges. Additional detail on the on-ground version of the coursecan be found in [2]. This high level of in-person, active learning posed the biggest challenge totranslate to the MOOC. Therefore, in addition to reaping the benefit of modularization forportability, there was also a strong focus and intent on making
the rolesthey play within engineering as a discipline, with their peers, and within engineering classrooms[13]. Women must author their individual engineering identities that will relate to the groupidentity of an engineer [13]. Educational experiences within the classroom have the potential tofoster agency through participation in engineering and directly influence a woman’s pursuit ofengineering both at secondary and post-secondary levels [8]. Development of this identity willrequire active participation in engineering curriculum and social integration into engineeringacademic communities [13].Social Cognitive Career Theory Social cognitive career theory (SCCT) was developed originally to connect anindividual’s career development
young children computational thinking by modeling playground environments. She seeks to expand her experience by volunteering and helping to facilitate STEM workshops.Mr. Salah Alfailakawi, Kansas State University Salah Alfailakawi is a PhD student in Educational Technology (ET) Graduate Programs at Kansas State University’s College of Education. His areas of interest include social/cultural issues in ET, the impact of ET on learners and teachers, as well as practice and change management. He earned his master’s degree in practice and theory in interdisciplinary studies from Montana State University Billings. He has been an a teacher of English as a foreign language since 2006 and a head teacher since 2012 (6th-9th
content.Unlike the majority of the engineering curriculum, professional ethics is neither calculation- nordesign-intensive. Covering this content through traditional lecturing and text-based readingassignments often fails to fully motivate this generation of tech-savvy students to learn to theirfull potential. Improvements to course design and content delivery can improve studentengagement [5-9]. These strategies include developing interactive course activities [6],incorporating multimedia resources [7-9], and integrating practical experiences into the deliveryof the course content [9]. Specifically, recent papers have suggested incorporating a multi-modalapproach to teach ethics using popular media [10].Bearing this in mind, a short ethics module was
(Burke & Stets, 2009). Identity theorists advocate that an understanding of PIDprocesses lead to targeted policies and programs that improve students’ persistence into variousprofessions. PID is the process by which students come to think, act, and feel like professionals(Cruess et al., 2015). It is the successful integration of personal attributes and professionaltraining in the context of a professional community. It is an ongoing process of interpretation andre-interpretation of experiences which allow the strengthening and maturing of an individualthrough a series of processes of professional education and experiences (Beijaard, 2004; Kerby,1991; Kogan, 2000). Multiple factors within and outside the educational and
Paper ID #29207Student Dispositions Toward STEM: Exploring an Engineering Summer Campfor Underrepresented Students (Work in Progress)Dr. Jeanna R. Wieselmann, Southern Methodist University Dr. Jeanna R. Wieselmann is a Research Assistant Professor at Southern Methodist University in Dal- las, TX. Her research focuses on gender equity in STEM and maintaining elementary girls’ interest in STEM through both in-school and out-of-school experiences. Dr. Wieselmann’s research has explored student participation patterns in small group STEM activities. She is interested in STEM schools, inte- grated STEM curriculum development
the engineering classroom.However, teaching computation and programming within the engineering classroom does notcome without challenges. Often times, engineering instructors are dealing with overpackedcurriculum, students who lack confidence or ability within their programming, or lack familiaritywith the programming environments available and useful to students today [5]. Furthermore,gaps continue to exist within racial, gender, and socioeconomic differences [6]. However, recentwork has shown that integrating programming into the curriculum through the lens of popularapplications of its use can help broaden participation within computing disciplines [7].Innovations in computing environments have given rise to technology-enhanced learning
. More than serving as a conduit for academic andsocial integration, several authors have failed to consider the complexities and nuances of theprogram's role. Many researchers referred to the college experience as the black box [13], as it isdifficult to determine which factors lead to retention or attrition of the students. In the currentstudy, an integrated conceptual framework that examined aspects of student success, sense ofbelonging, scientific identity, and conceptions of care within a STEM enrichment programenlightened a multifaceted model for identifying and describing the program's inner workingsand resulting student outcomes.Wilson et al. [14] in their paper discuss how the introduction of two NSF-based scholarshipprograms has shown
expecting to graduate in Spring of 2020. He has been working with high school computer science curriculum and is an advocate for Computer Science classes in all West Virginia schools. Recently, he has been working with middle school students in an after-school program focusing on exposure to STEM topics and experiences.Ms. Isabel Barrio Sanchez, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Isabel Barrio S´anchez is a college student at West Virginia University Institute of Technology. She is currently a Junior pursuing a Mathematics major and Computer Science and Economics minors. She has been working as a middle school and high school mentor for three years. Alongside the Computer Science department at WVU Tech and
managed the NSF-funded JTFD Engineer- ing faculty development program, worked as a high school math and science teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 How a STEM Faculty Member’s Gender Affects Career Guidance from Others: Comparing Engineering to Biology and PhysicsBackground and PurposeAn objective of this research was to determine how female STEM faculty members, as comparedto male counterparts, are guided by other faculty members to engage in research, take onleadership roles, and assume teaching and advising roles. A second objective was to comparehow guidance varied among the disciplines of
Lineberry, Mississippi State University Lineberry is currently a Ph.D. student in Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Education at MSU with a research focus in cybersecurity education. She received her MS in CS with a concentration in Information Assurance from North Carolina A & T State University. Her BS in CS was received from Voorhees College. Previously, Lineberry was Area Coordinator and an Instructor in CS at Voorhees.Dr. Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University Sarah Lee joined the faculty at Mississippi State University (MSU) after a 19 year information technology career at FedEx Corporation. As an associate clinical professor and assistant department head in the Computer Science and
. https://snap.berkeley.edu/. Accessed January 2020.[11] K. Kahn, R. Megasari, E. Piantari, and E. Junaeti, "AI programming by children using snap! block programming in a developing country," in ECTEL Practitioner Proceedings 2018: 13th European Conference On Technology Enhanced Learning, Leeds, UK, September 3-6, 2018., 2018.[12] S. Lopez, J. M., Gonzalez, M. R., & Cano, E. V., "Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “scratch” in five schools," in Computers & Education, 2016.[13] S. Mishra, S. Balan, S. Iyer, and S. Murthy, "Effect of a 2-week Scratch Intervention in CS1 on Learners with Varying Prior Knowledge," in
Convocations Volunteer Network (CVN) and is a Tau Beta Pi member.Miss Meher Rusi Taleyarkhan, Purdue University Meher R. Taleyarkhan is a graduate student earning her Master’s in Engineering Technology degree from Purdue University, West Lafayette Indiana. She received her Bachelor of Science degree from Purdue University and majored in Mechanical Engineering Technology. During her undergraduate she was an un- dergraduate research assistant studying renewable energy with an emphasis on solar energy for residential and utility use. Current research as a Master’s student is in curriculum development for engineering tech- nology programs, notably at Purdue University. Her thesis is on conducting an engineering and financial
Paper ID #31196Gendered Professional Role Confidence and Persistence of ArtificialIntelligence and Machine Learning StudentsMiss Kimberly Ren, University of Toronto Kimberly is an enthusiastic Engineering Science student at the University of Toronto specializing in Biomedical Systems Engineering. She is a passionate proponent of women in STEM. She is an award- winner in engineering competitions across Canada and beyond in areas including super-resolution mi- croscopy, machine learning solutions for health care, and space missions for microbiology research.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an
parentheses, are asfollows: Familiarity (583) concerns a basic awareness of a concept; Usage (375) is the ability to apply a concept in a concrete way; Assessment (152) indicates a level of mastery that involves the ability to select an appropriate approach from understood alternatives.FIGURE 2. PORTION OF ‘LEARNINGOUTCOMES’ SHEET IN CS2013 ‘CURRICULUMEXEMPLARTEMPLATE’ EXCEL FILE.Although developed to more readily allow a program to map their curriculum against theCS2013 Body of Knowledge, no computer science program is expected to implement all of theselearning outcomes; in fact, only 253 address what are referred to as “Tier 1” requirements,whereas nearly half (550) address purely elective content. While examining this sheet
all of their peers, S-STEM studentsearn their scholarships based on merit, and so enter the academic institution excellingacademically. The presentation will focus on how the research team developed methods forculling an acceptable comparison group for quantitative analyses, based on available data andour attention to critical theory and intersectionality.Students with financial need and Students Of Color are more likely to attend 2-year colleges thantheir peers, thus including 2-year schools in the S-STEM program is a thoughtful improvementupon the “4-year only” model. Yet quantitative data regarding the success of community collegerecruitment, retention, and transfer of students in the 2-year S-STEM programs through 4-yearBachelors of
Christine Trinter is an assistant professor of mathematics education with the Center for STEM Education at the University of Notre Dame where she teaches mathematics content and assessment courses with the Institute for Educational Initiatives’ M.Ed. program and data visualization courses for the Notre Dame Education, Schooling, and Society minor. Dr. Trinter’s research focuses on factors affecting teacher development, curriculum design, and technology usage in the mathematics classroom and she serves schools both nationally and internationally providing professional development in these areas.Dr. Chaoli Wang, University of Notre Dame Dr. Chaoli Wang is an associate professor of computer science and engineering at the
design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31208Prof. Didem Ozevin P.E., University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Ozevin is an associate professor of the Department of Civil and Materials Engineering. Dr. Ozevin received her Ph.D. from Lehigh University in 2005. She worked as a research scientist at Physical Acous- tics Corporation till 2010. Her research is integrating structural design and damage assessment methods, and real time process and damage detection.Prof. Jeremiah T Abiade, University of Illinois at Chicago Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Laboratory for Oxide
scalesrepresenting academic challenge (higher order learning, reflective and integrative learning,learning strategies, and quantitative reasoning) and two scales representing experiences withfaculty (student-faculty interactions and effective teaching practices). The subscales associatedwith the latter set of indicators (experiences with faculty) are similar to faculty support andstudent-faculty interaction scales used in other research efforts. In contrast, the four subscalesassociated with academic challenge reflect what students actually do in their academic endeavorsby measuring time on task associated with the various skills that students use and develop duringtheir college experience [15].Studies which focus on the emotional aspects of engagement are
Paper ID #30704Feel the force! An inquiry-based approach to teaching free-bodydiagrams for rigid body analysisEric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl holds an MS degree in mechanical engineering and serves as associate professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and auto-graded online homework. Eric has been a member of ASEE since 2001. He currently serves as awards chair for the Pacific Northwest Section and was the recipient of the 2008 Section
federally funded projects. Dr. Sydlik’s interests are in supporting efforts to improve the educational experiences and outcomes of undergraduate and graduate STEM students. She is or has been the lead external evaluator for a number of STEM and NSF-funded projects, including an ERC education project, an NSF TUES III, a WIDER project, an NSF EEC project through WGBH Boston, two NSF RET projects, an S-STEM project, a CPATH project, and a CCLI Phase II project. She also currently serves as the internal evaluator for WMU’s Howard Hughes Medical project, and has contributed to other current and completed evaluations of NSF-funded projects.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is
the interests of the overarching online organization. The success of the profit/lossorganization has an impact on everyone in the profit/loss organizational unit; in this instantiationthe colleges. To this end, the colleges should want to maintain an administrative hardline to theirrespective leads. Failure to do so, places the colleges themselves in a subservient role to thedirection of the online organization lead; which may not be in the college’s best interest for long-term growth or sustainment, or, may run counter to branding integrity of the individual colleges.Being a part of a matrix also requires each function have identified a well-defined process,depicting the many activities of the process as well as the attendant outputs of each
construction professionals deal with adiverse group of professionals in architecture, engineering and construction. In addition, there isan expectation within the construction industry of 18% growth in the use of Design-Builddelivery method over the years of 2018 to 2021 [2]. Design-Build can be considered a morecollaborative delivery method than Design-Bid-Build due to the engagement of contractor anddesigner during the initial development of a project. The rise in use of more collaborativedelivery methods, such as Design-Build, Construction Management at Risk, Integrated ProjectDelivery, as well as previous research [3], [4] indicates the need for improving collaborationfrom an industry perspective. Additionally, construction programs are aware of
senior year, recenttrends emerged to weave PBL in the first year and throughout the curriculum in semester-long projects.Students are being introduced to design methods, team dynamics and ethics in parallel with the analysis-focused courses (Dym et al., 2005). However, the systematic integration of design and analysis in coursesis still lacking (Carberry & McKenna, 2014). Some of the outstanding research questions about PBL asproposed by Dym et al. (2005) include: “What are the best proportions of problems, projects, teamwork,technology, and reality for a given state of student development,” and “how do the proportions changewith regard to the context of different engineering disciplines and institutional missions?” (p. 112).There are some
revolutionize the engineering curriculum, instead, we are usingthis study to introduce an conceptual flowchart design procedure to integrate AI algorithms intodesign class.Research Method – A case study of a bookshelf designThis research was performed through the use of a case study, as it is suitable for understandingoccurrences in real-life situations and focuses on answering the fundamental exploratory questionsof ‘how’ and ‘why’ [29]. Since this research considers design practices, a case study is appropriatehere as it is often used to study design practices in companies or corporate settings [26], [30]–[34].Since this is exploratory research that poses questions on generative design and its role in theconceptual design process, it fits for case
project involving a “traffic study project”. As aresult, we are removing that project from the curriculum and have added replacement projects.We are sharing our findings to the entire college engineering faculty to further reinforce the needto include design thinking in all subsequent engineering courses.References 1. http://news.mit.edu/2012/emeritus-flowers-wallace-robots-0507 2. J. Bordogna, E. Fromm, and E. Ernst, “Engineering education: innovation through integration,” J. Eng. Ed., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 3-8, January 1993. 3. ABET, “Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States for programs evaluated during the 1998-1999 accreditation cycle,” [1 November 1997]. Baltimore, MD: ABET Inc., pp. 47-49
in the job market with ashortage of experienced STEM workers to fill open positions. Al Salami [1] writes that many schoolsare transitioning to a more integrated curriculum to get students involved at a young age with conceptsand ideas within STEM fields. The Code + Chords workshop that this study is focused on uses anintegrated curriculum by combining music with technology and takes it one step further by targetingself-efficacy in participants.Denise Green [2] illustrates the need for understanding and increasing self-efficacy in students:“Researchers in this area provide empirical evidence that self-efficacy is an accurate predictor of astudent’s skill acquisition, rate of performance, expenditure of energy, persistence, goal setting, and