educator is in thestructured approach in incorporating lifelong learning, whatever the definition or location, whichis still part of ABET ETAC and ABET EAC accreditation criteria and therefore an importantelement in these programs.In this paper, the incorporation of lifelong learning in a hands-on, technology focused, standardsdriven, engine systems laboratory course is explored. The current ABET ETAC Criterion 3student outcome on self-directed lifelong learning is translated to specific course activities,assignments, and assessments. An assessment instrument was developed for an engine systemscourse to evaluate the student’s methods of additional learning of existing technical knowledge.Additionally, the instrument asks students to project their
her knowledge in the field of change man- agement and hopes to study social network analyses of higher education organizations undergoing change to track buy-in, barriers, and adoption.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of
Paper ID #29251Photovoltaic Solar GrillMrs. Brittany Weber, Renewable Energy Society Brittany Weber is an Illinois State University undergraduate student in the Sustainable and Renewable Energy major with a Food Studies minor. She was the president of the Renewable Energy Society and head of the solar grill project from 2019-2020.Miss Katelyn Renee Dunnagan , Renewable Energy Society Katelyn Dunnagan is an undergraduate student at Illinois State University, where she is majoring in Sus- tainable and Renewable Energy. She is currently an executive board member for the Renewable Energy Society and holds a position as a
differences between groups.This paper reports the outcomes of using the Sustainable Design Rubric as a formativeassessment in a civil engineering capstone design course at a regional, teaching-focusedinstitution in the Southeast. The assignment was given to 35 students across 7 teams. First,students individually scored their projects for a subset of the criteria - teams divided up criteriaamongst their members so that at least two people would score each criterion. Next, studentsdiscussed their individual responses with team members to arrive at a set of consensus scores,with written justifications, for all 14 criteria. We reviewed students’ responses forappropriateness of scores and quality written justifications as part of the structural and
point when students developed the feeling of autonomy. The most valuableaspects of the program were ranked to be international field trips, peers, and team projects. Forthe latter two aspects, defined in this work as the group dynamic, the most important factors forbuilding a sense of community are group pro-activity, cohesiveness, and attitude.IntroductionThe emerging call for future engineers with global-citizen mindsets asks for a re-evaluation ofcurrent educational experiences provided in higher education. In the U.S., participation in study-abroad programs for students majoring in engineering has increased more than 50% over the pastdecade [1]. Study-abroad programs represent the general interest of exposing students to othercultures or
on undergraduate education, makerspaces, citizen science, air quality, and photobioreactor design. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Design and Impact of a Combined Makerspace, Wet Lab, and Instructional Design Studio for Chemical Engineering CurriculumAbstract:The designs of the physical spaces in which we teach have been shown to impact classroomdynamics and student outcomes. This interface between space and pedagogy becomesparticularly important in interactive, hands-on, and project-based learning environments. Severalmodels to enhance such environments have been implemented throughout STEM
underrepresented students develop the skills and writing habits to complete doctorate degrees in engineering. Across all of her research avenues, Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 12 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award with her share of funding be ingnearly $2.3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 21 journal publications and more than 70 conference papers. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty, an Outstanding Teacher Award and a Faculty Fellow Award. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University, an M.S. in Materials Science from the University of Connecticut and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue
using 3D printing. Inthe first implementation of the project, only 2 teams out of 12 were able to produce a successful3D print on their first attempt. In order to increase the success of the 3D printing, a mentorshipprogram was developed between mechanical engineering students taking an additivemanufacturing lab as a technical elective and first-year engineering students. Prior to submittinga design for printing, the first-year student teams were required to submit it to their assignedmentor, who provided feedback on the design. In the first semester (fall 2018), only studentteams in the honors section of the EDSGN course were partnered with senior mentors. In thefollowing semesters, this mentorship program was offered to all students in the
-strain relation by applying the formula to the processed data.4) Data Matching module: User can match (synchronize) data collected from different testing devices with Cross-Correlation technique7. For example, the tissue strain information deduced from the Mechanics of Material module may be synchronized with stress information measured and evaluated from a mechanical testing machine in this module. Fig. 1. Video analysis steps in Virtual Mechanics Laboratory3 Biomechanics projects with Virtual Mechanics LaboratoryThe following projects may be used for the laboratories in our Biomechanics course. However,students are allowed to pick any topics by submitting a simple proposal with the justification.1) Sports
programs or assist in the enhancement of existing programs. To gain a greaterunderstanding of mentoring, a subset of interviews from the SPRITE (Student Perspective onResearch Identity and Transformation of Epistemology) project, a larger research project aboutundergraduate students’ experience in research, were analyzed and coded in relation to the topicof mentoring. The larger project focused on the identities and epistemologies of undergraduateresearchers, but various data collection measures, allowed for information regarding mentorshipin undergraduate research to also be collected. By reviewing the mentorship informationcollected in the large study, we were able to develop a deeper understanding of three pillars ofmentorship, including
and communication with technical and non-technical peers. Students worked in teamsof three and four to solve ill-defined problems presented by the instructor. Topics coveredConstruction Waste, Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Recycling Education, PublicTransportation, and Campus Transit. Deliverables, including a technical report, an oralpresentation, and an analytical reflection, were used as data for this project. Students weresurveyed to assess their perceptions of problem-based learning. There were seventy-twoparticipants over three semesters. One preliminary result from both the survey and qualitativedata is that students felt confident about working with others from different disciplines. Studentsmostly commented positively about their
serves as an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT). His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Academic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching
NSF Advance-PLAN projectdesigned to address gender equity through policy change on a statewide level. The project isbased on the model of change that identifies effective change as a top-down policy drivenapproach through a central authority, in this case, a statewide board of regents that oversees allpublic universities. The model for top-down change is particularly suited to a small, rural statewhere a) n-values for gender related statistics at any institution may not be statisticallysignificant b) institutional relations allow for cross-state cooperation and c) size of theinstitutions allows for timely implementation and assessment of policies. In addition,intercollegiate cooperation allows for provosts of all six institutions to serve as
support students in their STEM education and career pathways pursuits. Ms. VanIngen-Dunn served as President of CVID Consulting, building on years of experience as engineer and project manager in human crashworthiness and safety design, development and testing, working for contractors in commuter rail, aerospace and defense industries. VanIngen-Dunn has an MS degree in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University and a BSE degree in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Iowa. She serves on the University of Iowa’s College of Engineering Advisory Board, the Arizona Career and Technical Education Quality Skills Commission, and on the YWCA Metropolitan Phoenix Board of Directors whose mission it is to
Paper ID #28512Enhancing graduate education by fully integrating research andprofessional skill development within a diverse, inclusive andsupportive academyDr. Eduardo Santillan-Jimenez, University of Kentucky Dr. Eduardo Santillan-Jimenez is co-PI and project coordinator of a National Science Foundation Re- search Traineeship (NRT) program designed to enhance graduate education by fully integrating research and professional skill development within a diverse, inclusive and supportive academy. Originally from Mexico, Dr. Santillan-Jimenez joined the University of Kentucky (UK) first as an undergraduate research intern
c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Scaled Omni-Directional Solar Tracking Unit Abstract — The goal of this project was to design and implement an omnidirectional solartracking system with the integrated capacity to charge multi-cell batteries with a balancedcharging rate to allow for stable power delivery to a smart grid model. The intent of the trackingsystem is to maintain a perpendicular angle from the surface of the panel cells to the sun’semitting light rays in-order to maintain optimal power storage throughout the course of the day. Improved design and development of an omni-directional solar tracking system can beconsidered for implementation at an industry scale for achieving optimal power
- anStats Project studying violence against women, the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars studying the 2011 Arab Uprisings, and Brigham Young University’s Political Science Department study- ing marriage and family practices of the Middle East. She graduated with a Bachelor’s Degree in Middle Eastern Studies and Arabic from Brigham Young University where she received the Middle East Stud- ies/Arabic Student Research Award in April 2017.Shawn Grimes, Unaffiliated Shawn Grimes has nearly 20 years of experience as a technologist in a variety of fields including mobile app development, cyber security, and software engineering. Through his passion for working with and serving youth, he served as the Director of
Paper ID #30371What Can We Learn from Character Education? A Literature Review ofFourProminent Virtues in Engineering EducationDr. Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University Dr. Jessica Koehler is a Postdoctoral Assistant for the Wake Forest Department of Engineering supporting with the development and assessment of character and ethics education in the engineering program. Since 2015 until her current position at Wake Forest she worked as the Director of Research at a youth develop- ment non-profit, The Future Project, which has worked with tens of thousands of underserved high school students nationwide to support their
learning is becoming more common in engineering education. Litzinger et al.argue that expertise is developed through significant learning experiences such as applyingknowledge to real-world problems [1]. Solving real-world problem increases student motivationas well as promotes deep learning and development of expertise. Improvement in engineeringeducation can be realized by the introduction of more “authentic” learning experiences.Authentic learning is social as well as cognitive and includes interpersonal communication, self-directed research, and a focus on the customer just like in a real workplace [2]. Business contextis another element of authenticity. Projects that enhance the ability to create value areworthwhile for both budding
team’s design and construction of an APVAWT, total eightdecision gates (stakeholder requirements, system requirements, system operations, systemfunctions, system architectures, implementation, verification and validation) are set for theproject from inception to completion in order to satisfy the need of a client who asks to make anAPVAWT. This process includes technical and artistic designs considering functionality, beauty,safety, economics, and ethical implications, ensuring the functionality and beauty for thecompleted physical unit. Through this project, students will have an enriched opportunity for aninterdisciplinary design process combining engineering and arts. 1. IntroductionAccording to recent reports on renewable energy, although
immersion and educationalexperiences that simulate a real-world industrial design process and encourage creativity,innovation and teamwork [2-5].In line with modern practices, our program’s design sequence focuses on system engineering,and includes key design phases of project definition, system-level design, prototypedevelopment, and verification and validation. In the most recent revision, we restructured ourdesign curriculum to ensure better continuity of design topics, to facilitate collaborative projectswith industry partners, and to alleviate various academic challenges noted by faculty andindicated by students in the course evaluation questionnaires. To this end, we reduced theduration of the capstone design sequence by three academic
Engineering Management Program at the United Arab Emirates University. In addition to his experience in the academia, Dr Zaneldin has more than thirteen years of work experience in areas related to design, construction supervision, and project man- agement of mega size projects in North America and the Middle East. He has authored and co-authored several journal and conference publications in topics related to engineering education and course man- agement, design coordination, change management, site layout planning, constructability, claims and disputes, and simulation of design and construction operations. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020
project guided byfunding opportunity announcements (FOAs) from federal agencies such as the National Institutesof Health (NIH) and/or the National Science Foundation (NSF) that possess a cardiovascularinfluence [13]. Students then pitch their project ideas to classmates and form multidisciplinarycollaborative teams that work together to find unique and innovative solutions to their chosenproblem. Not only are students able to enhance their problem-solving skills, they also developprofessional skills such as research, communication, team collaboration, and projectmanagement. ABET, an accreditation agency for engineering programs, lists the attainment ofthese skills under Criterion 3 for desired student outcomes which prepare graduates to
learning and online instruction, requires instructors to use a wide variety ofeducational techniques. Such methods include the use of both non-technology andtechnology-based activities, including group problem-solving, educational games, and virtualreality (VR). Research on educational games has increased steadily over the past two decades,and numerous studies have illustrated their benefits with respect to student learning [1]–[4]. Forexample, Squire and Barab found that simulation games helped students increase theirknowledge of history, politics, and geography [5]. Castronovo et al. found that educationalgames can support students to develop the metacognitive skills necessary to manage civilengineering projects [6]. One particular
interdisciplinary core of the first-year program introduces students to topics spanning thearts, humanities, engineering, and the social, natural, and computational sciences. The initialengineering focused course, Creating & Making, is focused on practicing skills in ideation,project scoping, project management, reporting, communicating, and other aspects of designmethodology. The course content is community driven and while nucleated with concreteexamples of course material from the instructors, allows the student body to explore and reflectupon the benefits and drawbacks of the provided examples and to organically investigatealternative approaches through their practice. In this approach, rather than outlining a discretesubset of material, the
project management; and 12) Life-long learning,where every one of them can be measured as introduced (I), developed (D), or applied (A) [6].The school of engineering currently requires the instructor of every course to map the courseoutline learning outcomes to the graduate attributes. This can be a one-to-one or many-to-one,but not many-to-many relationship. Also, every learning outcome is ideally evaluated in two ormore assessment items (e.g., quiz or exam questions, laboratory assignments) or other learningand teaching activities. Basically, evaluating students’ performance for a specific learningoutcome is used for measuring their achievement level for the corresponding graduate attribute.If, for a particular graduate attribute, a certain
degree at University of Florida in Environmental Engineer- ing. She has over 8 years of experience developing international and national research experiences for STEM majors, as well as project management.Mr. Yin Huang, Vanderbilt University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work-in-Progress: An Evaluation of a First Year Chemical Engineering Module on Students’ Curiosity & ConnectivityAbstractThis project is a work in progress. This project will focus on a Chemical Engineering moduleof Introduction to Engineering. In the Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Dept., two sectionsof the course have been offered previously. The style of the
. Dr. Colbry earned his Ph.D. in Computer Science and his principle areas of research include machine vision and pattern recognition (spe- cializing in scientific imaging). Dr. Colbry also conducts research in computational education and high performance computing. From 2009 until 2015, Dr. Colbry worked for the Institute for Cyber-Enabled Research (iCER) as a computational consultant and Director of the HPCC. Dr. Colbry collaborates with scientists from multiple disciplines including Engineering, Toxicology, Plant and Soil Sciences, Zoology, Mathematics, Statistics and Biology. Recent projects include research in Image Phenomics; developing a commercially-viable large scale, cloud based image pathology tool; and
extrinsicmotivations and self-efficacy in learning programming [11]. Duckworth has reviewed the role ofgrit and self-control [12]. Data was collected in this study related to these topics, retention, andachievement of learning outcomes and is currently being analyzed for future papers.Project Approach & Experimental MethodsOverall Project StructureThe study started as part of an internal grant from the NSF-funded grant initiative at ourinstitution to increase evidence-based teaching practices in STEM courses. It implementedseveral active learning strategies to improve student satisfaction and engagement in an entry-level MATLAB programming course. The tools were implemented in all sections of the course,each taught by a different instructor. Materials
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Mechanical Engineering Technology Baccalaureate Degree via the “3+1” PathwayAbstractInstitutions of higher education that seek to provide affordable degree pathways that are alignedwith the needs of industry, and ultimately prepare students for employment, must strive todevelop innovative partnerships and educational delivery modes. This paper details thefulfillment of the goals and objectives of a multi-year project, between a two-year college and aresearch university, that has resulted in the creation of an associate to baccalaureate degree“3+1” pathway in mechanical engineering technology. The degree pathway is based on a strongalignment