EngineeringProf. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School. She is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range, Twin Cities and Bell Engineering programs.Dr. Emilie A Siverling, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Emilie A. Siverling is an Assistant Professor of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato, and is also a faculty member in Iron Range Engineering’s Bell Program. She has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education and an M.S.Ed
Paper ID #28792A Design Thinking Approach to Increasing Student Efficacy in theInternship Search ProcessDr. Katherine McConnell, University of Colorado Boulder Katherine McConnell is a Senior Professional Development Advisor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her work focuses on the integration of experiential learning, industry connections, and career-oriented education across the curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Design Thinking Approach to Increasing Student Efficacy in the
previously participated, acted as peer-mentors for‘Juniors’. Findings from Year 3 saw an initial rise in ‘asked help’ and ‘intervened help’ instancesduring the earlier stages of the school year but later saw a decrease school year progressed asJunior students master M2 practices through guidance by Seniors. Our work, through thisEAGER, demonstrates an approach to providing a situated and scalable curriculum that modelspractices in real world industries and those that are yet to come.2 IntroductionMaking has the potential to expand students’ understanding of STEM topics [1], this throughdirect interaction with physical materials for personalized designs [2]. More-so, Making has thepotential to inspire the Maker Mindset in Makers, meaning that they
, designing solutions with communities rather than for communities.We propose that the HCD could facilitate a platform to buy-in for engineering educators withrespect to educational reform, and open up a broader space for thinking, dialogue, reflectivepractice, and innovation in teaching engineering.We plan to address the topic of engineering educational reform in India in partnership with NITRaipur, through an integrated, participatory, and iterative manner while: 1. understanding the culture, pedagogy, and students in engineering programs at NIT Raipur, 2. identifying significant barriers to adopting effective and / or innovative educational practices, as experienced by the engineering faculty of NIT Raipur, 3. understanding how these
exploratory studyto evaluate the student’s perception in the BIM adoption in the construction management curriculum andused students’ perception of BIM modules in their curriculum. The authors concluded that the exploratorystudy of students’ perceptions provides motivations for integrating BIM in the construction managementcurriculum. Moreover, Azhar et al. analyzed perceptions of students in an ACCE accredited constructionprogram who completed a BIM centered capstone project (thesis) at the culmination of their undergraduatedegree [6]. Through the survey with students who completed the BIM in the undergraduate capstone project,the authors found that the students lack understanding of all aspects of the BIM technology and the BIMallows them to
-formal learning environment. In thebeginning of the workshop, teachers and students were positioned as learners who received shortlectures and presentations about robot components, robot building, and robot programming.Moreover, teachers and students worked in teams to engage in hands-on structured learning, whichaugmented the robotics fundamentals from corresponding lectures, reinforcing and imparting agreater sense of understanding. Next, the teacher-student teams were directed to solve a givenchallenge by designing, building, and programming an integrated robotics solution. Within eachteam, teachers and students had the freedom to organize their teamwork with no guidelines fromthe research team. Thus, within each team, an informal learning
Paper ID #31333Work in Progress: Project and Design-Based Introductory EngineeringCourse using Arduino KitsDr. Demetris Geddis, Hampton University Demetris L. Geddis is an associate professor and Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Hamp- ton University. He has extensive research experience in the areas of Integrated optoelectronics, Optics, Microelectronics, and Electromagnetics. He has worked as a Research and Design Engineer at Motorola and Bell laboratories. Also, he worked at NASA Langley Research Center as a NASA faculty fellow for the Nondestructive Evaluation Sciences Branch where he performed research
microstructure and an analysis of how structure relatesto the material’s mechanical response behavior. This often requires the application of complexmodels. Hands-on experiments are ideal to illustrate these challenging concepts and thus constitutean integral part of the science and engineering curriculum. An ideal experiment involving a systemin which responses depend on multiple parameters should be constructed such that individualcomponents can be altered arbitrarily to understand their significance to the response of the system.Unfortunately, such experiments are often not realizable in classroom or even laboratory settings.Computer simulations can remediate some of the problems associated with the visualization ofcomplex processes; however, do not
, R., and Hirsch, J. (2020) “Integrating Sustainability into a Freshman Engineering Course Through an Institute–level Initiative: A Teaching–Learning Model with Authentic Activity and Context”. In Integrating sustainable development into the curriculum: vol.18. Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning Series. Patrick Blessinger (Ed). Emerald Publishing Limited. ISBN: 9781787699427.[5] D. R. Krathwohl, "A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview," Theory Into Practice, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 212-218, 2002/11/01 2002.[6] G. Ottinger, "Rupturing engineering education: Opportunities for transforming expert identities through community-based projects," 2011, pp. 229-247.[7] G. Trencher
education and practice towards accelerating theiradoption. To this end, Section 2 will provide an overview of the available open-source softwarepackages that can be used in the modeling and analysis of MRE systems. Real-time data acquisitionand control will be studied in Section 3 and hardware platforms that can be used for these purposeswill be reviewed. Finally, Section 4 provides a summary of the paper along with a roadmap forfurther integration and utilization of the open-source platforms in MRE education.2 Open-source Software Packages for Modeling and Analysis of MRE SystemsModeling refers to mathematical representation of certain characteristics of the system which areof interest for a specific application. It is widely used in the
a‘bottom-up’ approach, starting with elementary logic gates and Boolean algebra and only later inthe curriculum reaching the level of microprocessor development or networked applications [2],[3]. The recent availability of increasingly powerful, yet low-cost, wireless networked devicesmakes it much more feasible to adopt a ‘middle-out’ approach, where students get to experienceand use embedded systems and IOT, before delving deeper into the details of how such systemsare constructed at the circuit level or integrated in a networked environment. This paperdescribes a new hardware kit and sequence of exercises which aim to support this approach bygiving students hands-on experience with Embedded systems and IOT at an early stage in theiracademic
formation andinterest amongst underrepresented girls. With a focus on K-12 participants, this researchbroadens our understanding of the role that informal educational communities and networks playin supporting identity formation. The inclusion of STEM Academy alumni will broaden ourunderstanding of STEM persistence through transitions from high school to college. References[1] National Science Foundation, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019. Arlington, VA: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, March 2019.[2] M. Honey, G. Pearson, and H. A. Schweingruber, Eds., STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an
engagement in the learning process, theinstructor decided in summer 2019 to embed weekly CIQs in the course. Her initial thought was,the CIQs would encourage students to reflect on their learning while informing the instructorabout the students’ learning experiences. The data collected by the instructor indicated studentsbiggest frustration was with 1) the first site visit report (course assignment requiring that theyapply sustainability evaluation on a real site), and 2) with the amount of new knowledge theyacquired.The CIQ was offered as an integrated part of a five-week long online course, offered to studentsfrom three majors: construction management, architecture, and agricultural engineering. Studentscompleted the CIQ each Friday. Qualitative
and Exposition, Austin, Texas, 2009.[9] Y. Chang, K. Devine, and G. Klitzing, “Can virtual reality enhance user performance and experience by reducing an individual’s cognitive workload?” presented at the ASEE EDGD 74th Midyear Conference Proceedings, Norfolk, VA, 2019.[10] D. C. Niehorster, L. Li, and M. Lappe, “The accuracy and precision of position and orientation tracking in the HTC vive virtual reality system for scientific research,” - Percept., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 2041669517708205, 2017.[11] K. Devine, “Integrating robot simulation and off-line programming into an industrial robotics course,” in Proceedings of the 116th American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Austin, Texas, 2009.
, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30521 3. Terenzini, Patrick T et al. “Collaborative Learning Vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students’ Reported Learning Gains*.” Journal of engineering education / 90.1 (2001): 123– 130. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00579.x 4. Park, H. (2017, August), Fostering and Establishing an Engineering Entrepreneurial Mindset through Freshman Engineering Discovery Courses Integrated with an Entrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML) Pedagogic Approach Paper presented at 2017 FYEE Conference, Daytona Beach, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/29413 5. KEEN, engineeringunleashed.com [Accessed Jan. 15, 2020] 6. Wang, C. (2017, June), Teaching Entrepreneurial Mindset in a First-Year
Spatial Information Science (CSIS) at the University of Tokyo and active collaborator of the Group of Complex System at Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain. His main research interests are Machine Learning, Engineering Education, and Complex Networks.Rachelle M Pedersen, Texas A&M University Rachelle Pedersen is a first-year Ph.D. student pursuing a degree in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Engineering Education at Texas A&M University. Her undergraduate degree is in En- gineering Science with a concentration in Technology Education. She previously taught for 5 years in Connecticut at a high school teaching technology education, including robotics, video production, and AP Computer
cybersecurity education including the participation of women. She is an author or co-author of over 30 peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings in these areas. She is a member of the IEEE Computer Society, ACM, ACM-W, Women in Cyber Security (WiCys), SWE(Society of Women Engineers), and NCWIT(National Center of Women in Technology).Brandon Earwood, Texas A&M University-San AntonioDr. Young Rae Kim, Texas A&M University-San Antonio Young Rae Kim, youngrae.kim@tamusa.edu, is an assistant professor of mathematics education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education and Human Development at Texas A&M University-San Antonio. His research interests focus on how students
Paper ID #31662WIP: Using neuro-responses to understand creativity, the engineeringdesign process, and concept generationTess Hartog, University of Oklahoma Tess Hartog is a graduate student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. Her inter- ests include creativity, engineering education, and neuroimaging. Her research focuses on understanding creativity and divergent thinking in engineering students via the use of electroencephalography (EEG).Megan Marshall, The University of Oklahoma Megan Marshall is an M.S. Aerospace Engineering candidate at the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The
presentation skills in an Introduction to TechnicalCommunication course. In this initial study, we aim to: (1) provide a set of curricular materialsthat engineering educators can use to integrate reflection in any presentation assignment and (2)discuss self-reported student data regarding development of presentation skills. Students reportedthat viewing their recorded presentation and reflecting on their performance helped them gainconfidence and improve their presentation skills for future use.Although effective communication skills are required for success in all engineering disciplines,many programs do not teach technical communication for a variety of reasons, including lack ofinstructor experience or buy-in regarding the value of teaching
offered as a part of this initiative was Statics. Statics (called ME270:Basic Mechanics I at PUWL) is a core requirement of the ME program and is a prerequisite for anumber of later course offerings related to engineering mechanics. It is often taken during the firstsemester of students’ Sophomore year, making it one of the first formal ME courses taken aftercompleting the integrated First Year Engineering (FYE) curriculum offered to all PUWLFreshmen engineering students. In order to offer Statics as a study abroad option during May of2019, the instructional team for the course needed to quickly redesign the existing Staticscurriculum to fit an accelerated schedule within an international context. More specifically, thecourse schedule was limited
influence survey design; the SSCI pre/post data will helpanswer RQ#1; and the SSCI post and 4th year data will help answer RQ#2. All of the data will help answer RQ#3.3.1 Study populationWe will study undergraduates at University of Michigan (UM) and University of Virginia (UVa) during their secondthrough fourth years. At UM, there is a single SS class aimed at second year students. The class emphasizes continuoustime analysis and has an associated lab section that meets roughly five times a semester. At UVa, there is a series ofthree Fundamentals courses (abbreviated FUN 1-3) that intermix the curriculum typical in Linear Circuits, Electronics,and Signals and Systems courses. The classes emphasize connections between the subjects and mix
itself, and build on a growing effort at the K-12 [10]–[12],introductory [1], [2], and teacher education [13] levels to include these discussions in our upperlevel classrooms.We present on a two-pronged instructional approach in a Modern Physics for Engineers course atthe University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder) in which we: a) construct an inclusiveenvironment through course structure, policies, and practices and b) implement a course unitengaging students in explicit discussions around representation and diversity in STEM. In thispaper, we describe the goals and implementation of this integrated approach to fosteringinclusion and teaching equity in a Modern Physics class (N=120). We report results of somepreliminary analyses to assess the
, andprinciples within an emergency management framework. The curriculum focuses on such topics asemergency planning and decision-making, homeland security, disaster response and recovery, andhazard identification and mitigation. Emergency Management Technology will serve as the lead andfocal point of this project.The Department of Psychology: The Department of Psychology works to enhance student’s knowledgeof psychological principles and practices through scholarship, research, undergraduate service-learning,and graduate clinical training. The mission of undergraduate education in the department is to exposestudents to the breadth and depths of the various fields of psychology. Students are encouraged andtaught to think critically about psychological
mentioned areas that allowed opportunities to be inclusive. Inside theclassroom, there were opportunities to create an inclusive environment by how the educatorsinteracted with students and how they conducted themselves when students were present andteaching was in action. Finally, educators also talked about what things they thought about orconsidered (mindsets), similar to Integrity of practice, in that educators had a reason for theirpractices [4] when doing any preparation or working with students. Practices are found in Table1 with the following codes: ● CS- Inside Classroom- with Students ● CE- Inside Classroom- by Educators ● OC- Outside the Classroom ● IP- Integrity
Professional DevelopmentThe professional development workshops aim to promote the Fellows’ professional developmentand knowledge in areas that are key to the professoriate. The curriculum for the professionaldevelopment includes: • Faculty Careers at CC: environment, policies, student population. • Getting an Academic Job at a CC: application and interview processes, how to prepare an effective application, differences between applying to a CC and to a four-year or a research institution. • Developing STEM Research and Educational Programs at CC: identifying opportunities, applying for external funding, understanding different university environment, development of scholarship. • Professional Environments
retention must be addressed not only at the college level but also inthe K-12 space, specifically around increasing exposure to and an understanding of engineeringamong students. Teacher preparation programs are slowly adapting their curriculum to train pre-service teachers with the skills needed to integrate engineering into their classrooms, but most K-6 educators have little or no background in STEM disciplines. This has led to schools reachingout for expertise from their local communities to incorporate STEM education experiences (Oziset al. 2018). A variety of experiences have been implemented and linked to increased interest inSTEM careers in the last two decades ranging from after-school programs/clubs to one-dayworkshops. Most of these
Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Crayowulf: A Multidisciplinary Capstone ProjectABSTRACTSenior capstone projects provide an excellent means of having students apply and integrate manyof the topics they have learned over the course of their undergraduate education. In this paper, wedescribe a two-semester (10-month) senior capstone project in which a multidisciplinary group—one computer science student, one electrical engineering student, and two mechanical engineeringstudents—worked as a team to implement an innovative Beowulf cluster design. The clustercommemorates the Cray-1 supercomputer, with a small hexagonal aluminum case enclosing adistributed multiprocessor consisting of five Nvidia Jetson TX2 single board
introduces a method of using multidisciplinary teams to enhance levels of higher-order thinking and innovative problem solving within higher education. Traditional educationmethods may sometimes hinder the curiosity and inquisitiveness that drives innovation. Forinnovation to occur current knowledge must be questioned, solutions discussed, and ideasattempted and learned from regardless of success or failure in the outcomes. Our Innovation-Based Learning (IBL) framework provides students with both the freedom and responsibility todefine their own learning within an environment that applies innovative thinking to currentchallenges. By assembling multidisciplinary teams, students are forced to rethink and reframeconcepts that are familiar or dogmatic
funded initiatives; the Pathways to Innovation in 2015 and the PIPELINENetwork; an NSF collaborative research grant in 2016. One of the outcomes of these efforts is anew course on Technical Innovation and Entrepreneurship, a cross listed course by Physics,Computer Science, and engineering. In this course students are introduced to innovation andentrepreneurial mindset through “User Innovation” concept, which is the focus of this report.Physics, computer science, and engineering students, as well as those majoring incommunication, business, chemistry, biology, and psychology often take this as an electivecourse.The “User Innovation” module introduces Innovation and Entrepreneurship (I&E) concepts incontext of students’ passion and their
: Redesigning an ESL programto meet the needs of both L2 and L1 graduate students," Simpson et al.(Eds.), Supporting graduatestudent writers, pp.139-158, 2016.[23] M.B.B. Magolda, Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students'intellectual development, Jossey-Bass, 1992.[24] J.A. Moon, A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice.Routledge, 2013.[25] P.C. Wankat, "Reflective analysis of student learning in a sophomore engineering course,"Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), pp.195-203, 1999.[26] N. Barr, "Starting from scratch: Incorporating communication instruction in a revisedMechanical Engineering curriculum," In 2017 IEEE International Professional CommunicationConference (ProComm), pp. 1-5