resist this standardization. ● Energy efficiency is not the be-all and end-all: Reflection questions that are built into class activities begin to reveal to students that energy efficiency is not always the answer. For example, while the U.S. has a fixation with maximizing the energy efficiency of appliances, much of Europe passively cools buildings by manipulating air flow during certain times of the day. Students learn to consider how heating and cooling are actualized based on culture, climate, and resources.In our poster, we will also report on how students respond to this approach (this data is currentlybeing collected.). In the final year of the project, we plan to offer the course a second time,improving our
, planning, scheduling, budgeting, Character etc.) Qualities Adaptability Teamwork skills and ability to function on multidisciplinary teams Leadership Entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship Social and Cultural AwarenessThese three lists derived from three sources show how remarkably similar the skills are eventhough the ASEE list is specific to engineering. A consensus
curricula, K-12 STEM programs after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from a multi-level evalua- tion plan designed to assess program impact to methods such as program monitoring designed to facilitate program improvement. She received her Ph.D. in Research, Measurement and Statistics from the Depart- ment of Education Policy at Georgia State University (GSU).Ms. Jasmine N Patel, Georgia Institute of Technology Jasmine Patel graduated from Georgia Institute of Technology with a Bachelor’s in Biology along with a concentration in Business. In her last year at Georgia Tech, she had the privilege of conducting research in
Project Proposal FormFigure 2: Capstone Project TimelineProject Deliverables Deliverables for the capstone project are comprised of the following: a. Project Proposal: specifies user/problem requirements and specifications, proposed solution(s), and relevant industry standards, such as IEEE standards. b. Project Management Plan: a Gantt chart that lists all tasks, deliverables, and milestones, as well as the breakdown of duties and responsibilities by team member. c. Hardware and Software Acquisition: corresponding to the adopted design. d. Weekly Presentations and Progress Reports. e. Interim and Final Reports. f. Documentation: developing documentation in the form of [separate] user and developer manuals: the user
initial implementation of theframework, concluding with a summary and plans for future work.Review of Prior Work, Objectives and ApproachThe ABET requirement to include capstone projects as a critical component of engineeringeducation necessitated engineering programs to embrace active experiential learning. However,making fair and accurate student assessment in this kind of learning environment can bechallenging, even for the best teachers. While past efforts to develop assessment methodologiesfor engineering capstone design have shed light on the subject [10, 11], it still remains unclearwhat truly makes one capstone team successful and others, perhaps less so. This very lack ofclarity is a call for additional investigation into the relevant
of ABET as a major contributor[10], [11]. Barry & Ohland [12]have elaboratedon the university or departmental policy as pre-planned curriculum redesign before ABETEngineering Criteria 2000 criteria, influence from administrators, and input from advisory boardsand employer surveys as additional important factors shaping undergraduate engineeringcurricula. Despite accreditation criteria, professional license exams, national reports, andprofessional organizations of engineering have been major factors for incorporating engineeringethics education in undergraduate curricula. Walczak et al. [13]have cautioned that engineeringprograms still struggle to incorporate ethics into the curriculum and there exists a large variationin integrating
. Following procedures for qualitative data analysis [21, 22] transcripts were thencoded and emergent themes identified by one of the researchers and discussed with the researchteam. In addition, student comments and suggestions about their experiences in RAMP werereflected upon and program adjustments made on an ongoing basis. In this way, our use of focusgroups departed from the “group interview” approach used in many qualitative studies, andinstead aligned with typical PAR cycles of initial planning (designing the focus groups), action(facilitating and participating in the focus groups), observation (observing, coding, and analyzingthemes from the focus group activities and discussions), and reflection-informed planning(reflecting on student
did. Thank you for making it happen!Plans for the FutureGiven the increasing demand, the course may need to be offered every quarter, depending on thenumber of students who enroll. Also, a survey will be conducted during the next offering of thecourse in order to rate the topics that are covered, perhaps replacing one of the topics with a topicsuggested by the students should the feedback indicate that. Many students have already expressedinterest in interview training. While a one-unit course does not allow sufficient in-class time forthis, an extra assignment may be added, in collaboration with the Internship and Career Center,which takes advantage of the mock interviewing services offered there. Finally, starting for thisyear’s UC Davis
(i.e., whether or not still at Penn State). Students were matched ongender, race, campus assignment, and SAT Math score (within 1 standard deviation).Results: Compared to a matched comparison sample, the Engineering Ahead students earnedstatistically higher grades in their first college math course by half a letter grade, were less likelyto drop their first math course, and earned a higher grade point average at the end of their firstyear of college.Conclusions: The significantly higher math course grades for the bridge students compared to thematched comparison students suggest that the bridge programming and cohort buildingbenefitted the students. We will continue to track Cohorts 1 to 3 as well as Cohort 4 (2019).Plans are underway to
) maximize efficiency of their solar cells using various fruitdyes; and (4) measure the voltage and current output of DSSCs in comparison with silicon solarcells. Data collected from implementing the developed curriculum in high school classrooms isdiscussed and plans of both formative and summative assessment are presented.1. IntroductionIn the late 1960s it was discovered that illuminated organic dyes can generate electricity at oxideelectrodes in electrochemical cells. In an effort to understand and simulate the primary processesin photosynthesis the phenomenon was studied at the University of California at Berkeley withchlorophyll extracted from spinach (bio-mimetic or bionic approach). On the basis of suchexperiments electric power generation
means to be a professional (n=12), 3) developing a career plan byreflecting on experience (n=11), and 4) learning from a role model (n=8). Students withdiverging style gathered information by working with other people and talking about variousfield experiences. They used these perspectives to build a better idea of the work environmentand the type of work they are going to be doing. For example, Kaitlyn shared a story about oneof her internship experiences and how she learned about work environment through interactionwith professionals stating, “there are things and opportunities for me to kind of get out in thefield and look at something to actually see it, to measure it, those kinds of stuff. But I guessknowing that comes from talking with
, pp. 1-17.Appendix SOLAR URBAN DESIGNDesign SpecsThe Boston Redevelopment Authority has opened bids for redesigning a city block (100 m x 100 m) in thedowntown area. As the chief engineer of a startup company focusing on sustainable city planning,winning the bid is important to you. Your job is as follows:1. Design new construction buildings in the empty, leveled city block: ● At least two high-rise buildings: These are for residence and offices. They should be at least 60 meters tall but should not be taller than the highest existing building in the neighborhood. ● At least two low-rise buildings: These are for shops or services such as restaurants, book stores, or pharmacies. They should not
experience included surveying thestudents about their feelings on diversity and engineering both before and after the activity, anin-class activity focused on design and diversity of teams, and a reflection and discussion periodabout the students’ experiences. A discussion of the successes and opportunities forimprovement within the activities is included, along with changes planned for the second trialduring the current academic year.MethodsFor the pilot run of the activities, the professors each developed an in-class project that tookplace during one class period. Each activity contained a technical aspect, a design aspect, and areflection period. Both projects chose a product to design that had an aspect which wasinfluenced by the background of
students relate to each course's learning outcomes. Theinstructors must dedicate time to planning the logistics, aligning the syllabi, and homeworkprojects. Any overlap between courses reflects real life, so faculty must embrace how thoseoverlaps can be utilized to correlate Social Media homework for the benefit of the students. Amajor concern was that one student was registered for two of the courses at the same time, yetthe faculty decided to ask the student to conduct each course's deliverable separately.Integrating such innovative technological tools that are engaging to learners not only creates asense of appreciation and belonging but also provide real connections to the world. Minoritystudents who are less aware of issues in the U.S
topredict career plans in engineering [4]. Thus, the objective of this paper is to explore howstudents describe the usefulness of a newly implemented introductory engineering design class asthey navigate their subsequent years in college.This paper seeks to answer the following research question:How useful do students perceive what they learned in an introductory engineering design coursefor their successive years in college or for what they want to do after graduation?We aim to answer this question by analyzing survey responses from students who have taken theclass since the first course implementation in the Summer 2018 semester.BackgroundIntroductory engineering courses are a common element in several engineering programs. Thereis growing
; such as when students feel comfortable raising new perspectives andchallenging tradition. Prior research recommends “strategic planning and intentionalimplementation” to increase diversity of engineering teams and the integration of such teams [7].For example, the authors of [1] strongly advise the instructors to form the teams and base theirdecisions on the characteristics of the individual students. Characteristics may include gender,experience level, students’ schedules [1], race/ethnicity, major, and ability. It may also bebeneficial for the instructors to assign and rotate team roles to prevent gender biases fromperpetuating students’ roles in teams and to facilitate inclusive teamwork [1]. Others suggestavoiding isolating minority
Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #29467 Thomas Becnel is working towards his Ph.D. in the Laboratory for NanoIntegrated Systems, led by Pierre- Emmanuel Gaillardon, in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. He received the electrical engineering degree from the University of Utah, and the M.Sc. degree in computer engineering from the University of Utah in 2018. His areas of research involve the design of large-scale sensor networks, low-noise capacitive CMOS sensors, and advanced low-power communication techniques. He plans to graduate with a Doctorate of
industry and teaching. Paramount to E4USA was the construction of PDexperiences that would prepare and support educators with varying degrees of engineeringinstructional training as they implemented the yearlong engineering course. One component ofthis was a weeklong, intensive E4USA PD. The PD involved focus groups, hands-onopportunities to explore, plan, and teach components of the E4USA Curriculum, and buildcollaborative relationships. The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives of fourpilot E4USA educators during this PD. The sample of eductors includes novice and experiencedengineering educators. ‘Novice’ in this instance was defined as having less than a year ofexperience teaching engineering, while ‘veteran’ was defined as
performed in pre-requisite coursework (physics-mechanics andcalculus), length of time transpired between MEEN 221 and its pre-requisite courses, and whetheror not physics was transferred or taken at Texas A&M.Preliminary results of the implementation of a new class evaluation and in-class format started inthe fall 2019 indicate average the DFQ rate was approximately 4.5% higher than the overallaverage of the fall semesters, but it had the lowest standard deviation. However, some decreasesin DFQ rates for several majors were observed compared to previous fall semesters, which provideencouraging results that can eventually reduce DFQ rates in MEEN 221. Our plan is to continueusing the new in-class quiz format to better prepare students for exams
. The student body primarily studiesengineering, applied sciences, and architecture and construction fields. Class sizes are typicallysmall, averaging around 20-25 students per class, with no teaching assistants. Students arerequired to take two co-ops, one each during their junior and senior years, with an optional co-opduring the sophomore year. Co-ops can be paid and off-campus with industry and academicpartners, or the students can do on-campus research and work with faculty/staff (paid orunpaid).The rest of the paper is as follows: Section 2 describes the project from a technical perspective;Section 3 describes the planned student and technical outcomes; Section 4 details the results ofthe project, with Section 5 providing lessons learned
M.S. in Clinical Behavioral Psychology from Eastern Michigan University. He conducts research on a Strengths, Opportunities, Aspirations, and Results (SOAR)-based approach to strategic thinking, teamwork, and coaching. He is also interested in the neuroscience of mindfulness and strategic thinking. Consulting con- tracts include state and international organizations to provide coaching and workshops on the application of diversity, SOAR-based strategy, and teamwork to strategic planning, and organization development and change. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020A Mixed-Method Longitudinal Study of Entrepreneurial Mindset in an
-Processing PipelineCultivate ACCESS participants interact with each other in a continuous and dynamic system wecall the ACCESS Community. The main circle of the ACCESS Community includes scholars,mentors, and ambassadors. These participants interact on a weekly basis to discuss topicsprovided to them by the Cultivate ACCESS leadership team and dive deep into their explorationof agSTEM careers and personal development. Outside of the main circle are parents andteachers. These participants do not engage as frequently with ambassadors and mentors butinteract frequently with scholars at home and during school hours. Cultivate ACCESS providessupport to these participants through resources focused on career and college planning. Parentsand teachers are
administering the assessment as an assignment early and latein the same course at University 1 to see if there are measurable pre/post differences in students’problem-solving. This will be used as a control group for studying an intervention designed toteach problem-solving. The intervention consists of a worksheet that students complete whenthey are doing a design exercise in the course. They are asked a number of questions that requirethem to plan out their approach for solving the problem, and then reflect on their solution oncethey have reached it. Salehi and Wieman have shown that this leads to improved problem-solving that may even transfer to different contexts [22].Another way to increase the reliability of the assessment is to make it shorter
performance” [3]. Planned repetition ofexperiences, information, testing, and material in a design course supports the learner as theyexpand their understanding of how best to solve the problem at hand.The literature contains significant discussion of the role of scaffolded assignments in engineeringand engineering design courses [4], [5], and [6]. As described by Tom Eppes et al., scaffoldingorganizes learning into progressively challenging modules in which assistance is graduallyremoved as students develop and practice new skills [7]. Each time students revisit a particularskill or concept, they become more confident in their ability to use it in their coursework. AtPurdue University, Lisa Bosman combined the concept of connected, scaffolded
lost. It is not reasonable to expect the studentsto develop a new business idea and undertake the venture during just one semester. As such, thefocus should be on what the students learn, rather than what they produce. Shifting focus to theprocess instead of the output also affects what is graded, e.g. instead of grading the business plan,the process should be graded [5].The goal of this paper is to present pedagogical approaches to help with the above objectives. Thecase studies presented here have been designed with junior/senior electrical engineering studentsin mind, but can be applied to other disciplines or levels with proper modifications.Project ApproachThe pedagogical approaches proposed here are intended to help students achieve
. Level 1 entry modules introduce the students to the basics ofprototyping boards, their usages, coding, and understanding. Multiple sensors are introduced atthis level with full descriptions of the circuits, the voltage, amperage, and power requirements.Time is spent educating the students on deciphering the sensor datasheets. Level 2 modules(modules 4-5) involve less detailed instruction sets with references to Level 1 circuit diagrams,constraints and procedures. In level 2 modules students need to plan an experiment anddetermine the necessary procedure to complete the experiment and attain the learning objectivesof the module. The level 3 module (module 6) required the student to read technical specificationsheets for the sensors and actuators
Board, and c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #28973Curling Club; and served on the Human Services Planning Council, United Way, Chamber of Commerce,and Capital Fund Drive Boards of Directors. Erdman has lectured on leadership topics at Penn State andRPI. He served as a recruiter (25 years) for GE and Lockheed Martin, on the Penn State College of Engi-neering Advisory Council, an Alumni Advisory Board, and as the President of the College of EngineeringAlumni Society. Affiliations include Fellow of ASME, member of ASEE, AIAA, the Penn State AlumniAssociation, Centre County Chapter Board of Directors
to being comprehensive, the search must betransparent and reproducible; it is common to have the search strategy for a systematic reviewundergo peer review by another librarian before searching is carried out. This emphasis onquality search has led to the adoption of a variety of librarian roles in the execution of asystematic review. A 2018 scoping review [19] identified eighteen roles filled by librarians insystematic reviews. In addition to the expected roles of searching, source selection, andevaluation, the authors also documented librarians acting in planning, question formulation andpeer review roles. The roles described are not mutually exclusive; often a librarian will take onseveral of these roles as part of a given systematic
assess how students feel about the course project experience, as well as whether thisteaching practice is effective and achieves the projected benefits. We acknowledge that theassessment data collected in this work are subjective data based upon students’ perceptions aboutthe project experience. Other assessment measures such as grades of exams would be moreobjective. We plan to include students’ grades in our future data collection and assessment.Assessment Data Collection:Each student who took EE210 in fall 2018 and fall 2019 was asked to respond to ten questionswith each question having five possible answers. Each answer was mapped to a numerical value,specifically, 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3- no opinion, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree.The
Office to keep WPSstudents engaged with WPI. For the HS students who complete WRAMP, they will also get $500towards any summer program at the university and may become a WPS Summer Scholar thatcan attend a summer program for free each year. In regards to WRAMP being a recruitmentstrategy for WPI, 8 out of the 13 WRAMP high school women that are old enough to apply tocollege did so (which is a 60% yield and surpasses national averages). Two of them wereadmitted, but did not enroll. One stated it was due to financial reasons. We are investigating howwe might provide more support for WRAMP and WPS high school students to be accepted toWPI. Many of the WRAMP participants have yet to graduate from high school and we plan totrack them if they apply to