obfuscation; and will discuss thedesign of the project, the implementation of the design, code obfuscation techniques used, and whichobfuscation techniques were used to produce the mystery executable presented to the class as theirclass project. IntroductionGroup projects in engineering and computer science coursework are a critical part of the educationprocess. Not only do they enforce the concepts being taught, they also provide an environment inwhich essential professional skills (aka, soft skills) can be understood, culminating in a synergisticlearning experience. The value of such group learning has been well documented in bothengineering and computer science courses [1]-[5], and is a cornerstone to the
final score (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). These results raisequestions concerning the baseline skill level of some graduating engineering undergraduates, andwhen combined with prior literature also question adequacy of low-stakes standardized tests formeasuring complex cognitive skills.1 IntroductionBoth employers and students expect the post-secondary system to enhance and hone students’abilities, knowledge, and skillsets, ultimately enabling them to contribute productively in theworkplace. Professional programs such as engineering are held to an even more exactingstandard through program accreditation requirements. The Business Council of Canada [1] citesadequate literacy and numeracy, problem solving and critical thinking, effective
UniversityDr. Stephanie Cutler, The Pennsylvania State UniversityProf. Dawn McFadden, The Pennsylvania State University Abstract Working in teams is a vital component within the chemical engineering profession [1]. For senior chemical engineering students, the capstone design course provides an opportunity for students to work in teams to develop their teamwork skills in preparation for their future career. To better emphasize that necessary professional skills, especially teamwork, the Penn State Chemical Engineering capstone design course was redesigned for the 2017-2018 academic year. This paper aims to investigate student perceptions on their teamwork
andInstrumentation, and Prototype Development) while others (Process Improvement andEngineering Analysis) align more closely with engineering technology or engineering teams.Important considerations for interdisciplinary capstone programs team are discussed.1. IntroductionThe College of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University is composed of two(2) academic Schools and an economic development and prototyping design Center. The Schoolof Engineering + Technology contains ABET accredited EAC and ETAC programs housedtogether in one academic unit. There are currently four (4) programs: Bachelor of Science inElectrical Engineering, Bachelor of Science in Engineering with Concentrations in Mechanicaland Electric Power, Bachelor of Science in
Collaborative Research: Designing an Immersive Virtual Environment for Chemical Engineering Process Safety TrainingIntroduction & BackgroundIndustrial process safety incidents are unfortunately a fixture in the daily news cycle [1]. Inresponse to these incidents, universities are now required by ABET to include process safetyinstruction as part of their chemical engineering (ChE) program’s curriculum, specifying thatprograms must “include the engineering application of these basic sciences to the design,analysis, and control of chemical, physical, and/or biological processes, including the hazardsassociated with these processes” [2]. Typical approaches to address this ABET requirement inclassrooms include education related
collectiondevelopment, training that runs the gambit from in-depth to informal, and reviews that show theevolution of selection and collection development processes over time.Jensen [1] describes how the University of Alaska Fairbanks, as a result of budget cuts,retirement and attrition, moved from liaison collectors to a patron-driven model where facultyare allotted a budget to purchase materials. This article questions the hard data suggesting thatliaisons are better able to build a collection than other models. While a faculty driven model isfar removed from the current method used at UTL, where increasing numbers of liaisons aretaking on selection duties, it is interesting to note the direct involvement by faculty was howselection occurred at the
asfrom underrepresented minority groups. An integrated model, based on Lent’s et al. SocialCognitive Career Theory [1], combines several strategies that include faculty mentoring,communities of learners, reflection, apprenticeship, peer-led team-learning, and cooperativelearning to target attrition and improve graduation rates.Peer-Led Team LearningThe Peer-led Team Learning model [2] was created to address retention and enhance in-depthknowledge of students in chemistry courses. In PLTL student leaders are trained to teach otherstudents the core or fundamental concepts in a course. Students who have done well in previouscourses are selected to be peer leaders and to run weekly workshops on fundamental topics in acourse. Leaders are trained in
University and a Masters and PhD from Princeton University. Her current research interests include 1) clarifying the effectiveness of video distribution and the use of exit tickets in oral communication instruction for engineers, 2) identifying the mental models engineering students use when creating graphical representations, and 3) learning the trends and themes represented in the communication-related papers across various divisions of ASEE. As part of this effort, Norback is working with Kay Neeley of U of VA to start an ASEE Communication across Divisions Community, now numbering 80 people.Mr. Charlie Bennett, Georgia Tech Charlie Bennett is the Public Engagement Librarian for Georgia Tech, working with Georgia Tech
curriculum changes to help align studentexpectations with the lived experiences of practicing engineers.IntroductionCommunication skills are crucial for success as a practicing engineer, with survey data showingthat working engineers spend up to 64% of their time at work on communication [1]. Further,communication across the disciplines scholars (i.e., a focus on how communication skills may fitand translate in a variety of majors) have stressed the importance of embedding communicationinto program curriculum [2]. More specifically, they call programs like engineering to considerhow these skills will prepare their students to communicate with various audiences and throughdifferent communication channels (i.e., types) [3].Despite the importance of
communication efforts [1].One of the major trends in higher education is supplementing traditional modes of education withonline learning platforms and environments [2]. Schools have collaboratively developedasynchronous learning environments that allow for up-to-date lectures with on-demand access,making courses available to students with differing schedules [3]. Beyond a lecture-exam modeof instruction, institutional programs are creating courses that allow students to engage ininnovation-based learning. In addition to learning course basics, students are required to formgroups to tackle a group-defined project where success is marked by the degree of impact outsideof the classroom and beyond the university.This paper seeks to provide a case study of
Florida AM Curriculum Framework aligns to theDepartment of Labor’s Advanced Manufacturing Competency Model, we used text mining toextract and compare the key competencies found in both documents. Through this approach, wecompared these documents and identified: 1) frequently addressed topics; 2) verbs that guidedthe complexity (i.e., Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Learning Objectives cognitive level) of thecourse learning task versus workplace competency; and 3) overall match between the documents.Our results suggest that the documents overlap very little, with significant misalignments inhigher-level Bloom’s verbs. We present implications for educational institutions, AM policymakers, and industry; suggest a revision cycle and process; and propose
engineering education, modeling is fundamental for manycore concepts, though it is rarely explicitly taught. There are many benefits to explicitly teachingmodeling, particularly in the first years of an engineering program. The research questions thatdrove this study are: (1) How do students’ solutions to a complex, open-ended problem (bothwritten and coded solutions) develop over the course of multiple submissions? and (2) How dothese developments compare across groups of students that did and did not participate in a coursecentered around modeling?. Students’ solutions to an open-ended problem across multiplesections of an introductory programming course were explored. These sections were all dividedacross two groups: (1) experimental group - these
, theEntrepreneurial Mindset (EM) has become of increasing concern for engineering educators.Recently, the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), a consortium of thousands ofengineering faculty [1], has been central to integrating EM into the engineering classroom.Defined around six core values, or the 6 C’s of EM, Curiosity, Connections, Creating Value,Communication, Collaboration, and Character [2], EM has been hypothesized to increase studentinterest in engineering [3].The Ohio State University is in the process of incorporating EM into its engineering courses andis interested in evaluating existing curricula against the principles of EM. Unfortunately, littleconsensus exists on a comprehensive method for evaluating curricula through the lens of
departments provide a diverse and broadcurriculum for students. Students may take courses based on their faculty’s research interests, and eachinstitution provides different courses based on their department’s focus. Stakeholders require additionalresources and efforts to look carefully for BME graduates’ engineering competencies compared to othertraditional engineering majors, including civil, chemical, electrical, and mechanical engineering. However,there is little empirical research that provides a broad understanding of graduates’ interests in industry andengineering job opportunities.RQ 1: How are the industry work opportunities different between different engineering majors at a largeMidwest institution?RQ 2: How do job fair participants and
. The mentors work closely with female middle schooland high school students in the robotics clubs on monthly basis. The mentors also help femalemiddle school and high school students with their math and science coursework. In addition tomonthly in-person meetings, virtual meetings are held in which the mentors post videos onlinefor middle school or high school students. 1For this education research project, we are working with two research questions as provided below.Research question 1: “Does being mentored by undergraduate female students increase thestudents in the middle school and high schools’ interest in STEM disciplines?”.Research question 2: “Does increasing the parents’ STEM awareness
they arepresented with assignments requiring quality academic sources. It is crucial to reach studentsearly in their college career to instill IL skills into their scholarly endeavors. To help remedy thisdeficiency, academic librarians collaborate with teaching faculty to provide IL instructionsessions to their classes, providing students with a basic introduction to the library to advancedresearch skills. While important to an engineer over the course of their studies and professionalpractice, little has been done to integrate IL to engineering curriculum.Those studies that have examined IL, focus on the self-perceived skills of upper-divisionstudents in design courses [1]; are for a singular major course [2] or are focused on
engineering students are not prepared by current pedagogies to actethically? To frame this question this paper questions how well rules-based, or deontological,ethics provides useful guidelines in the case that the domain in which decisions are made becomecomplex or when technology is changing rapidly. Given that some companies report the half-lifeof information is as short as six months [private communication], can engineering ethics alwaysprovide useful guidance to action, or are there situations where other ethical frameworks aremore appropriate?Engineering ethics is an often-discussed subject, and substantial work in engineering educationaddresses how to effectively teach ethics [1]–[3], evaluate learning outcomes [4], and identifyissues and
in Colombia (Universidad del Valle) wanted to receivespecialized academic advice and support in the field of composite materials manufacturing foraerospace applications.The Fulbright Specialist Program is a unique opportunity for U.S. academics and establishedprofessionals to engage in two- to six-week, project-based exchanges at host institutions acrossthe globe [1]. Steven McNeil wrote: “being a Fulbright Specialist was a fantastic experience forme, not just for the increase in cultural awareness and exposure to different learningenvironments, but also the interactions with the wonderful Italian students and faculty thatforged life-long friendships” [2]. Doris MacDonald found during her specialist program inIndonesia that working was
computational modelingacross the physics and engineering curriculum will be covered. Issues incorporatingcomputational modeling across the curriculum will also be discussed.1 IntroductionModern scientific research relies on three equally important tools; theory, experiment, andcomputational modeling[1]. Despite the importance of computational modeling, and while thenumber of departments incorporating computation into homework and projects has grown, fewshow consistent use of computation in active engagement in the classroom or exams[2].The American Physics Society, in conjunction with the American Association of PhysicsTeachers released a report titled ”Phys21- Preparing Physics Students for 21st CenturyCareers”[3], looking at what skills our students
, samples for anengineering math scavenger hunt, andtips for creating scavenger hunts for avariety of STEM fields. Contact Informaiton:Grade Level Recommendations: ►s-coffman-wolph@onu.edu ►kimberlyn.gray@mail.wvu.eduMiddle or High School, College Freshman Google Drive with Materials:Need Materials: https://tinyurl.com/r6gw5rtMaterials: (1) colored printer ink or
shorten thefeedback cycle between student learning and feedback from assessment and enables the use offrequent testing and second-chance testing in large courses, which has been shown to lead tosignificant improvements in learning outcomes.However, in some courses involving mathematical problem solving, an important studentdissatisfaction with computerized testing is that numerical-answer questions are typically gradedsolely on the correctness of the final answer. The two major concerns reported by students are:(1) limited access to the assessment and corresponding learning opportunities post-assessment,and (2) the lack of partial credit given for correct solution procedures with incorrect final answers.To address these concerns from students, a
Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering from Elizabethtown College, a Master’s degree in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University, eleven years of experience in industry as a software engineer, and seven years as a full-time faculty in the departments of computer science and engineering. Her interests focus on broadening participation in engineering through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity in the engineering workplace; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and computer engineering courses) in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related engineering fields.Prof. Zahra Hazari, Florida
gas, to demonstrate technology to utilize Dairy cow derived renewable natural gas (RNG) as a transportation fuel. Viking 40 and Viking 45 were built to demonstrate lower cost and higher rate composite production processes for the body and monocoque chassis. Hybrid electric Viking 45 participated in the Progres- sive Automotive X Prize as the only U.S. university vehicle and hybrid vehicle to participate in the finals round. The vehicle achieved 172 MPGe for 100 km at 95 km/hr. The latest full size vehicle is Lyn Okse (Norwegian for ”Lightning Ox”), a 1/4 ton electric pick-up truck with 300 mm of off-road ground clear- ance for campus grounds crews. The vehicle demonstrates the future of lower cost, more powerful
the profession, and ethicaldilemmas with a limited scope [1], [2], [3]. In contrast, macroethics concerns sustainability, publicpolicy, and broader impacts such as human rights [1], [4], [5]. At many institutions, ethics is not arequired course for engineering students; instead, students are often instructed to memorizeabstract ethical codes, likely causing them to take ethics less seriously [6], [7]. That is, memorizingabstract ethical codes does not provide a solid foundation for providing solutions to ethicaldilemmas. As such, many students tend to draw from personal experience rather than from theirprofessional ethical education when facing ethical dilemmas, which can lead to undesirableoutcomes [6], [7], [8]).Troublingly, Cech (2014
Tech Electronic Product Design and AssemblyAbstractThis paper presents a new engineering education model that employs the principles ofConcurrent Education [1]. The four-year post-secondary program will result in a B.S. in AppliedEngineering and Production Sciences. All traditional engineering major areas of specialization(e.g., M.E., E.E., I.E., etc.) are eliminated. The paper makes the case that, in all these areas, theengineering is essentially the same. The difference is the artificial focus on particular segmentsof the continuous physics or science spectrum. Unlike the traditional post-secondary engineeringeducation model, this new model wraps an engineering college around a contract engineeringbusiness, or full service
potentialfindings. For this case, the intervention led to a change in the sketches as well as in how thestudent was talking about people who would use the designs. This case study suggests that achange to instructions during conceptual sketching—requiring representations of people—mayfoster engineering students’ engagement in human-centered design practices.IntroductionHuman-centered design (HCD) requires a deep understanding of people in the design context[1]–[3]; however, research documents that engineering students have struggled to consider thepeople who will use their designs [4]–[9]. Empathy is a key mindset in human-centered design inorder to effectively understand people’s experiences and incorporate them into design decisions[10]–[12]. Empathy
, 2020 Constructing and Refining Engaging Objectives Computer Science Outreach V olunteers focused on three main objectives: 1. Engage the participants during sessions through associating lessons with familiar concepts and suitableShaya Wolf, Rafer Cooley, Mason Johnson, Andrea Burrows, Mike Borowczak applications. These real-world
Paper ID #31779Construction Safety Training: Exploring Different Perspectives ofConstruction Managers and WorkersDr. Mostafa Namian, East Carolina University Dr. Mostafa Namian is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management at East Carolina University. Mostafa completed his Ph.D. in 2017 from North Carolina State University (NC State). He worked in the construction industry for several years before joining academia. His research interests include 1) Construction Safety Management, 2) Hazard Recognition and Safety Risk Perception, 3) Human Behavior in Construction, and 4) AI in Construction. He is also an OSHA
significant andvaluable, but otherwise absent in their engineering education. This paper serves as a call toengineering education community to engage with contemplative practices as a way of creatingmore inclusive learning environments for all of our students.1. IntroductionThis Work-in-Progress paper describes a collaboration that aims to integrate art, teaching,learning, research and activist work through the union of four instructors, three undergraduateteaching assistants, and their seven unique ways of knowing that are grounded in our differences- ethnicity, cultures of origin, first language, education, artistic craft, age, class, gender, wisdomtraditions. This project brought together our differences to co-create a new educational paradigmfor
has probably beenmost pronounced in engineering, as engineering activities typically involve consumptionof energy and resources, and create changes in the physical environment [1]. A growingbody of literature is available, addressing and discussing the definition and use of variouscompetences including systems-thinking and critical thinking for sustainabledevelopment [2,3] . Systems-thinking is identified as an important learning outcomerelated to incorporating sustainability in engineering classroom. Additionally, systems-thinking provides an understanding of a system by examining the link and interactionsbetween the elements that comprise the whole system. Sustainability systems-thinkingskills include (i) identifying dynamic relationships