of limited class space and with the hope of expanding learningopportunities for working students, a fully online section was developed to run concurrently withthe traditional face-to-face course; opening both sections every fall and spring semester, which are16 weeks long. As a bi-product, the online version now gives students the opportunity to take thiscourse in the 12-week summer term, which was previously unavailable live.This study will not attempt to compare the online delivery system with other systems, as it hasbeen widely proven that the system itself is not a determinant for successful learning experience[1], [2]. However, the comparison of students’ performance in the online course developed in 2016with the students’ performance
correspond to ASTM standards for various materialproperty tests but do not accurately represent many real structures [1, 2].To increase students’ learning interest, enhance the understanding of knowledge, andimprove their learning outcomes in beam deflection while highlighting the effects of realprocesses, a group laboratory project has been designed and implemented at the PurdueUniversity Kokomo campus. Students here are primarily commuters, with up to 15students in a typical engineering technology class, and most classes taught in a studioformat. The campus culture tends to emphasize efficient completion of all educationaltasks performed by students. As a side benefit of the designed beam deflection laboratoryproject, students gain experience with
solution card were available for each room; however, each hint added a time penalty (inminutes) equal to the total number of hints/solution cards used to the elapsed time. Additionally,a 30-second time penalty was assessed for each incorrect answer. Students were provided with aformula sheet, and were encouraged to use a calculator, blank paper, and writing utensils.The class consisted of 17 teams of 3-4 students. All teams successfully escaped all 6 rooms in anaverage (h:mm:ss) of 0:43:50 [range: 0:14:30-1:07:28]. Very few groups used hints, as moststudents did not want to be assessed a time penalty. None of the teams used a solution card toautomatically bypass a room without solving the puzzle.Our MATLAB-based escape room challenged students to
STEMeducation enterprise and broaden the pool of researchers that can conduct fundamental researchinto STEM learning and learning environments. This is motivated in part by the recognition thatimproved STEM education will benefit from qualitative and quantitative research [1], and for theneed to evaluate the effectiveness of various initiatives that are being explored [2]. Recent NSFawards have focused mostly on graduate students seeking to become STEM researchersincluding studies that established: 1) an Institute in Critical Quantitative, Computational, andMixed Methods Training for Underrepresented Scholars [3], 2) a Meta-Analysis ResearchInstitute (MMARI) to improve the quality of meta-analyses conducted in STEM education byproviding training to
a commongoal (a new way of being and relating requires imagining what non-hierarchical structures wouldlook like). The project of liberation is the project of daring to imagine.IntroductionTeaching takes place in a physical space with configured interactions of the instructor with thestudents. The traditional mode of education presupposes the instructor as an authority“depositing” knowledge into the “clean-slates” (students’ minds), who in turn regurgitate thatdeposited (memorized) knowledge in assessments. This is described as the banking concept ofeducation by Freire [1]. This model discourages creative engagement of the student with theworld and encourages uncritical acceptance of the oppressive power structures. This process
of 81 students from eight sessions over the past 2.5 years completed theassessment. This presentation will discuss the structure of the information sessions, preliminaryfindings from the assessment, and strategies taken to incorporate the identified needs into futuresessions.IntroductionInformation literacy support is well-established as a core component of university libraryservices, with many institutions providing subject specific information literacy instruction.Within engineering librarianship, providing information literacy support via one-shot, classroom-based instruction is fairly common within senior design or project-based courses. However,librarians supporting undergraduate engineering research is not as widespread [1]. Our paper
*NEToccupational data to determine current and future engineering technology skills neededby manufacturers.[1] As Paul Nutter et al states, “Academic programs can benefit byassessing their effectiveness to fulfill the needs and expectations of manufacturingindustries, gaining insights for appropriate curriculum revisions to enhance the job-readiness of students to serve these ‘customers’ of our academic services.” [2] Thecommittee supported the viewpoint that many students will find engineering technologya better educational fit than the existing engineering degree program offered at theuniversity.The steering committee aligned BSET goals, outcomes and proficiencies to ABETaccreditation guidelines, which will be used to track students’ mastery of the
engineering undergraduates to submit patent applicationsfor technologies that could help their local university communities achieve one or more of theSDGs. Because the United Nations defines sustainability in social as well as more traditionalenvironmental and economic terms [1], and many of the SDGs pertain directly or indirectly tomatters of social justice and equity [2], to write the new patent assignment students would needto integrate practical technical expertise with an understanding of social and ethical aspects ofengineering design. The new course scenario, then, coupled with the revised patent assignment,would help students appreciate the importance of integrating the practical and technical with thesocial and ethical. I also hoped it would
” lab exercises on topics frombasic circuits to data conversion to communications and software defined radio [1-2] that is usedby various schools to augment their existing programs. In addition, the company has beensupporting local universities in enhancing their electrical engineering programs [3-4],incorporating learnings from these collaborative efforts into new exercises.The power electronics section of the Active Learning curriculum was lacking in content, so anew effort was started in 2017 to address this gap. Since this effort was starting from scratch, itwas decided that lab material would be tested at local universities in a workshop setting as it wasbeing developed, in an effort to maximize quality and minimize potential pitfalls and
to the organization.This semester’s project is designing Little Free Libraries for the community partners. “Little FreeLibrary is a nonprofit organization that inspires a love of reading, builds community, and sparkscreativity by fostering neighborhood book exchanges around the world. Through Little FreeLibrary book exchanges, millions of books are exchanged each year, profoundly increasing accessto books for readers of all ages and backgrounds [1].”The PartnershipsThe partnerships with the organizations were all created differently. Two of the organizations(Metro Deaf School and Minnesota Children’s Museum) are current partners with the PlayfulLearning Lab. The Playful Learning Lab at the University of St. Thomas is a research group ledby
-first century has seen a spiraling in the costs of university tuition.The UK and the USA are now the most expensive countries in the world in which to educateoneself (see Figure 1). Figure 1: OECD 2017/2018 Fee Data by Country [1]Recent research shows that in many instances it is a struggle for middle class families to copewith these costs. Caitlin Zaloom shows that families “make college work at any cost”, whichtransforms family life, not necessarily for the better [2]. In the US, this prompts families toconsider alternative approaches to higher education, such as community colleges. The pressurefrom students is nonetheless for university education, rather than vocational education, despitehigh fees in the hope this leads to better paid
Paper ID #30876Developing a Bridging Language: Design Decisions in Informal MakingExperiencesKathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of Washington c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Developing a Bridging Language: Design Decisions in Informal Making Experiences1: IntroductionThe complex nature of design practice makes it both challenging to teach and to learn [1].Historically, engineering programs have had difficulty integrating design in their curricula. As aresult, both the positioning of design coursework within the curricula and the teaching practiceswithin this coursework vary
talentedlow-income students entering the STEM workforce, the NSF S-STEM program has grantedawards to various type of institutions in order to advance our understanding of how “evidence-based curricular and co-curricular activities affect the success, retention, transfer, academic andcareer pathways, and graduation in STEM of low-income students” [1]. To date there are anumber of publications that document effective practices and strategies to help talented low-income students succeed in different institutional and disciplinary contexts [2], [3]. Our projectbuilds on this literature by providing a combination of an academic scholarship and culturallycompetent mentorship for students at a Very High-enrolled Hispanic Serving institution (VH-HSI
,Google [1], DHL [2], and Amazon [3] are investing considerable effort in designing drones forrapid distribution of parcels from their warehouses to buyer’s doorstep. Moreover, Facebook [4]is designing solar-powered UAS to relay ultra-high speed wireless signals and allow fast internetaccess to secluded areas. In addition, UAS are being used to monitor the availability of waterresources, control the density and quality of crops on extended areas, and observe livestock overvast areas. UAS are now also employed in professional filmmaking and to gather footage insporting events. UAS are also becoming a key asset to support disaster relief [5], search and rescuemissions, and law enforcement [6] operations, since they can carry a large variety of
projects, international service trips, team competitions) for engineering students. Kolb [1]defines experiential learning as an iterative process involving conceptualization, activeexperimentation, concrete experience, and reflective observation. Experiential learning has alsobeen identified as an important pedagogical feature of current engineering education leaders inthe recent MIT report The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education [2]. Many believeexperiential learning provides more real-world learning environments and opportunities to buildcompetencies that may not necessarily be provided in the classroom such as leadership, problemsolving, and teamwork.As part of a recent strategic vision process in the College of Engineering at the
recruitment, retention, and progression is presentedalong with their positive or negative impact. Finally, the model was revised once more toincorporate the results of an ADVANCE program carried out at a minority-serving institution.I. IntroductionWhile females around the world continue to advance to leadership roles, they still facediscrimination and are treated unfairly in many different settings; particularly, the ones inScience, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) education. Females in STEM are mostlyunderrepresented and constantly face recruitment and retention issues. This phenomenon isaddressed as the “leak in the pipeline” [1] – fewer females over time advance to careers inacademia. Females in academia and many other engineering work
methods. This approach will operationalize the development of a comprehensiveinstrument that seeks to fill a lacunae in literature as it relates to conceptualizing and assessingthe entrepreneurial mindset. We began in early 2019 by developing an initial set of dimensionsof the entrepreneurial mindset by conducting a thorough review of extant literature. Thedimensions that we identified were grouped into the following categories: (1) Behaviors; (2)Examples; and (3) Educational Practices associated with the entrepreneurial mindset inengineering. Then, in the first few months of 2019, our team jointly developed researchprotocols that employed these dimensions, and then conducted qualitative workshops, which wedefine as a structured conversation
-surveys (quantitative and qualitative), as well as longitudinaltracking of participants (n=97 over 7 years). Assessment results suggest this multi-campus siteachieves participant-level and program-level impacts commensurate with those attained bysingle-campus REU Sites.IntroductionEngaging undergraduates in authentic science and engineering research experiences is widelyaccepted as a promising practice for promoting persistence in the discipline [1], increasingstudent interest in graduate school [2], and developing a student’s identity as a researcher [1].The U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) is a large supporter of such experiences through itsResearch Experience for Undergraduates (REU) Site and Supplements Program. Almost 150REU Site
Paper ID #30215Developing Virtual Reality Module to Improve Student Learning Experiencein Additive Manufacturing CurriculumProf. Jing Zhang, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. Jing Zhang’s research interests are broadly centered on understanding the processing-structure- property relationships in advanced ceramics and metals for optimal performance in application, and iden- tifying desirable processing routes for its manufacture. To this end, the research group employs a blend of experimental, theoretical, and numerical approaches, focusing on several areas, including: 1. Processing
), quantitative research tasks such asdesigning a survey instrument and choosing an appropriate statistical technique for data analysis(7 items), and qualitative research tasks such as creating an interview protocol and describingpatterns seen across a set of interviews (9 items). The instrument was electronically administeredin the spring of 2019 to three groups: (1) U.S. faculty members who conduct EER, (2) U.S.graduate students enrolled in engineering education doctoral programs, and (3) Indian facultymembers who are new to but interested in conducting EER.An exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors along the expected general, quantitative, andqualitative research dimensions. Cronbach’s alpha for the three dimensions ranged between 0.81and
of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University She teaches courses in the engineering and manufacturing engineering programs as well as programs in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program. Her research interests include topics related to student persistence, STEM doctoral student experiences, faculty mentorship and development, modeling and analysis of complex manufacturing systems, and the development of new discrete event simulation methodologies. Bekki is the co-director of the interdisciplinary, National Science Foundation supported CareerWISE research program, which strives to: 1) understand the experiences
// Site-based conference canceled due to COVID-19 // Presented in Online Venue provided by ASEE) https://tinyurl.com/Winiecki-etal-ASEE-2020 1 Developing and Applying Knowledge and Skills in Ethics & Professional MoralityAbstractEven without a focused interest in the topic, as we enter the third decade of the 21st Century onewould have a difficult time ignoring the steady flow of stories reporting tragic consequencesarising from engineering decisions that appear to have omitted ethical components, and of ethicaldilemmas arising from contemporary engineering
professional practice.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She enjoys serving as a ”communication coach” to students throughout the curriculum, and she’s especially excited to work with first year and senior students, as well as engineering project teams, as they navigate the more open-ended communication decisions involved in describing the products of open-ended design scenarios. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020IntroductionIn team support literature, it is not uncommon to suggest that faculty avoid strandingunderrepresented students, like women, on a team [1], [2]. However
experience of the new doctoral students and postdoctoralresearchers. Given the high attrition rates in graduate education, the retreat was also designed tofoster retention by integrating attributes of the Workforce Sustainability model.The retreat was framed around four objectives: (1) build community, (2) communicate groupnorms and expectations, (3) develop individual strategic plans, (4) and introduce research skills.The retreat encouraged individual and collective reflection on goals, deliverables, andexpectations. The experience was guided by the notion of beginning with the end in mind and, inthis case, meant aligning individual professional development plans with that individual’s long-term career goals and vision of the research group. The
Developing best practices for teaching scientific documentation: Toward a better understand of how lab notebooks contribute to knowledge-building in engineering design and experimentation.IntroductionThere are many reasons for various disciplines within the sciences and engineering to requirelaboratory (hereafter lab) courses or courses with labs associated with them. Perhaps paramountamong those reasons is that labs introduce students to the very specific knowledge practices thatenable “cumulative knowledge-building” related to those disciplines [1]. In a way similar tostudios and their connection with some of the visual arts, e.g., painting, sculpture, photography,printmaking, labs within the sciences and engineering provide
coupled with cultural stereotypesof who can become an engineer leave many at the margins of the field rather than at the center ofit. This research paper investigates how participation in the ENGR-Diversity course may buildstudents’ awareness of social aspects in engineering. Through an examination of students’ designconsiderations, we provide empirical data to two research questions (1) To what extent dostudents consider social issues in design problems? (2) What are the changes, if any, in students’social awareness after they participate in a course experience on culture, diversity, and equity inengineering communities?Participants included 74 students at a university in California enrolled in the course during the2019 winter quarter. Through a
engineering community.The peer mentoring program was formulated to foster interaction role modeling andinterdependencies among students. Studies show that such interactions and interdependenciesfoster students' positive perceptions of their future selves in the profession [1]. The peermentoring program provides the opportunity to create motivational preferences for collaboration,and to foster personal motivation for academic achievement. Specifically, the program sought todetermine: the change in students' attitudes toward peer mentoring activities during their years ofengineering study (from mentee to mentor); how participating in peer mentoring affects students'satisfaction with program experiences (i.e., transition, belonging, and academic success
fromthe traditional remote lab approach in that the whole lab environment is virtualized and hosted ona commercial public cloud (GCP) with better availability, scalability and usability [1]. A studentsurvey was conducted anonymously to evaluate the hands-on labs and lab environments. Theoverall feedback was positive. The whole experience may be useful for other institutions that areinterested in adopting commercial, public cloud platforms in laboratory education.2. MOTIVATIONOur Information and Computer Technology program focuses on learning by doing. Hands-onlaboratory is always a vital part of the curriculum. Laboratory courses serve not only on-campus,face-to-face (F2F) students, but also online, distance education (DE) students
. This paper focuses on the preliminary development of the groundedtheory model.IntroductionThere are limitations in the current understanding of leadership that necessitate further study ofhow the concept is defined and developed in civil engineering and construction (CEC). In theCEC literature, leadership focuses on who a leader is and their skills or actions, which maps tothe trait and behavior periods, respectively, in leadership studies [1]. These periods weredominant in the first half of the 20th century in leadership studies but still dictate the conversationin CEC education and practice. These leader-centric paradigms focus on leader development,training charismatic technical experts for supervisor roles, instead of leadership