Paper ID #30157A Mechanical Engineering Technology Baccalaureate Degree via the ”3+1”PathwayDr. David I. Spang, Rowan College at Burlington County Dr. David Spang is the Sr. Vice President and Provost at Rowan College at Burlington County in Mt. Laurel, NJ. Prior to being named Sr. Vice President and Provost, Dr. Spang served as Interim President, Provost, Vice President of Academic Programs and Dean of the Science, Mathematics, and Technology division. Dr. Spang holds a PhD degree in Materials Science and Engineering and a MBA degree, with a concentration in Innovation and Technology Management. Prior to joining academia
students must be “calculus ready” when they arrive. Alas, a large fraction (60.0%) of admitted students who initially express interest in engineering do not place into calculus after taking the university’s math placement exam just prior to the start of freshman year, and many of them ultimately choose another major besides engineering. This situation impacts many engineering programs nationally [1–4], and it disproportionately impacts Pell-eligible engineering students at WWU. • Students who successfully complete the second year of the engineering programs are retained through graduation at a relatively high rate (95.4%). However, retention from the point of expressing initial interest in
Paper ID #31705Why Don’t Undergraduate STEM Students Pursue Combined (4+1) BS/MSDegrees?Ms. Mais Kayyali, Florida International University Mais Kayyali is the Associate Director of Academic Support Services in the Office of the Dean at Florida International University’s (FIU) College of Engineering and Computing (CEC). In her current role, she oversees all aspects of Graduate Education and Admissions for all the schools and departments under CEC. Her duties vary from admissions, recruitment, marketing, data analysis, graduate funding, etc. She also provides administrative support to the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs
Paper ID #30340Implementation of a Future Faculty Development Program: Impact andEvaluation of Years 1 & 2Dr. David Gau, University of Pittsburgh David Gau, PhD is a Postdoctoral Associate in the bioengineering department. Dr. Gau earned his BPhil in bioengineering and BS in Mathematics from the Pitt in 2012. After, he was awarded a Whitaker Fel- lowship and Rotary Ambassadorial Scholarship to study and work in Australia for a year before returning and completing his PhD in bioengineering at Pitt in 2018. His pre-doctoral research focused on screening and developing novel agents to target aberrant and excessive
-based activities and virtual laboratories, all of which have been shown to improvestudent learning. This wealth of educational materials stored on the CW has resulted in broadadoption by the chemical engineering community, with over 1200 faculty and 30,000 studentusers to date. We now seek to expand this tool for use by mechanics instructors and to study itsadoption by this community.Project ObjectivesThe objectives of our IUSE project are to:1. Extend the use of the Concept Warehouse (CW) to Mechanical Engineering (ME) and grow by 50,000 student users from diverse populations. To achieve this objective, we will: a. Develop content [at least 300 new ConcepTests] for Statics and Dynamics. b. Continue development of ME research-based
complexity and scale of the types of problems engineers solve[1]. Students’capability of working effectively in engineering teams is cognizant among employers in industrywho seek to hire new talent into their organizations [2]–[4]. One of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) student outcome criteria is to have the ability to functioneffectively in high performing teams. This requires universities to better prepare students withteamwork skills and to incorporate teamwork as an important part of engineering curriculum [5]In today’s world of engineering, companies are shifting towards working in larger team sizes dueto the complexity of solving engineering problems [6]–[8]. Engineering programs need to findways to effectively
futureresearch. Lastly, unexpected component inclusions/exclusions are discussed as a final point ofinterest. This work serves as a first step towards validation of this new mental model elicitationmethod and the related scoring rubrics and is a contribution to ongoing research on mentalmodels of engineering systems. As we continue to explore how students learn about engineering,it is important that educators and researchers have a way to reliably measure studentunderstanding of various systems during their undergraduate and graduate degree programs.1. IntroductionAll of us have mental models of the world around us. These mental models help us understandhow things work, where things are, and what things do. However, we each have unique mentalmodels
PROJECTSAmy E. Trauth, PhD1; H. Gail Headley, PhD1, Sarah Grajeda, PhD1; Dustyn Roberts, PhD3; Jenni M. Buckley, PhD2 1 University of Delaware, College of Education and Human Development 2 University of Delaware, College of Engineering 3 University of Pennsylvania, College of EngineeringIntroductionTeam-based projects are widely used in engineering courses, particularly product or processdesign courses in disciplines such as mechanical, chemical, civil, and biomedical engineering[1]-[6]. While the intention of team-based design projects is to provide all students with adiversity of technical and non-technical
portable web-service.While there are other works on efficient ways to create teams for the senior design project, ourapproach combines the robustness of some prior approaches with the portability of modernsoftware solutions. A genetic algorithm was used by researchers at the University of NorthCarolina, Charlotte 1 for the same problem, to varying degrees of success. The inputs to thealgorithm were binary choices (yes/no) for each project, based on the student’s ranked top 3preferences. Our approach, however, allows students to bid on projects, dividing up their points tobetter indicate their relative interest in projects. Typically, the form will enforce splitting uppoints across at least 4 − 6 projects, allowing us to gauge more than just the
the protocol of the sensor array instrumentation.As a team, they helped their professor successfully continue the hunt to answer the query ofwhether a Mach Effect (inertial reaction force) is actually detectable. Due partly to their effortsthe science around this instrument is now quite robust and this novel device provides consistent,replicable and predictable results. During the summer research, the students got to apply much oftheir theoretical electrical engineering training to a real-world application in sensor arrays andinstrumentation.Background and MotivationThe roles that our undergraduate engineers played in this research during the summer of 2018was written up in a recent (2019) ASEE Zone 1 conference publication. [1] That paper
Engineering and Bio-engineering. Whilethermo-fluidics and aerospace go hand in hand with each other, the joint materials and manufacturingsection relates more to machine design. Bio-engineering includes biomaterials and their manufacturingprocesses whereas the conventional manufacturing processes in the macroscale level give a generalintroduction to the processes that are often used in the metalworking industries. This general introductorycourse is offered to the fourth year undergraduate students in both Mechanical Engineering (ME) andIndustrial Engineering (IE) in their Bachelor’s Degree programs; and the course is compulsory for both theprograms [1]. This paper addresses this joint venture of ME and IE undergraduate students in acompulsory course
programenrollment in the United States. Additionally, for the fall 2019 semester, only 13% of freshmenstudents in the COE were women, as compared to an average 26% for all engineering programenrollment in the United States [1]. The increase in variability of the new student highereducation experience, and the goals of the COE, have led to the creation of new freshmen studentsupport programs. Within OSDS, this has created an evolving partnership between new andexisting freshmen student support programs to work toward optimizing student outreach,community connection, and ease of transition. The primary goal of this outreach effort is tomaximize inclusivity and connection by providing a comprehensive set of resources for allstudents.Experimental Project
modules [1]. The modules are 4.5 weeks long. Modules meet threetimes a week for 50 minutes. Engineering departments usually offer 2 to 3 sections of thisintroductory module focusing on a specific interest for the major. There have been 13introductory modules offered previously. The main goal of the modules is to showcase tostudents, what they will learn and give students enough information about the major so they candecide what major to study. At Vanderbilt undergraduate students are not required to takedepartmental courses until the start of the second year. Chemical engineering historically hasoffered only 2 sections of this introductory module. The chemical engineering sections have beenpredominately lecture only. Focus areas that have been
Engineering and Director of the Texas Sustainable Energy Research Institute at The Univer- sity of Texas at San Antonio. Her research expertise is in: (1) mathematical programming and optimiza- tion techniques for analyzing large-scale, complex systems under uncertainty, and (2) big data analytics for manufacturing processes. She is member of INFORMS, IISE and ASEE.Dr. Timothy Yuen, The University of Texas at San Antonio Timothy T. Yuen is an Associate Professor and Assistant Chair in the Department of Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching with a joint appointment in the Department of Computer Science and a courtesy appointment in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Texas at San
over graduate school. Thepaper provides an in-depth discussion on the findings of the REU program evaluation and itsimpact on undergraduate students with respect to their future plans and career choice. The analysisis also done by gender, ethnicity, academic level (sophomore, junior, senior), and type of homeinstitution (e.g., large research universities, rural and small schools) to explore if there was anysignificant difference in mean research competency scores based on these attributes. 1. IntroductionToday’s manufacturing operations are more complex and globally scalable compared to those inthe last century (Lee et al., 2016). This complexity in manufacturing operations is due to a shift inmanufacturing from craftsmanship model in the
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Collaboration and Design Practices in First-Year Project-Based EngineeringFostering first-year project-based learning (PBL) environments helps to engage students inengineering design practices and broaden their participation pathways in engineering fields [1].PBL collaborative design activities provide unique opportunities for students to develop,negotiate, and finetune designs. These design activities represent several engineering procedures,from planning projects and improving a production process to developing new materials [2].However, the collaborative design process in PBL is not well understood. Although researchershave conceptualized engineering design process among engineering
members describe the resources that serve as key supports as well as the barriers that hinder support in their community?RQ4. What strategies do community members perceive their community should implement to enhance their ability to support engineering as a potential career choice?RQ5. How are these supports transferable or adaptable by other schools? What community-level factors support or inhibit transfer and adaptation?To answer the research questions, we employed a three-phase qualitative study. Phase 1 focusedon understanding the experiences and perceptions of current [University Name] students fromhigher-producing rural schools. Analysis of focus group and interview data with 52 studentshighlighted the importance of interest and
mentored new freshmen forone year. This paper will describe demographics of each S-STEM cohort, the activities usedduring the peer mentoring, observable differences between direct admit and college-readyfreshmen with respect to peer mentoring, and possible peer mentoring activities that can beimplemented at other institutions.IntroductionIn 2018, 622,502 undergraduates enrolled in Bachelor of Science (BS) engineering programs inuniversities across the U.S. That same year women, African American, Hispanics, NativeAmerican and Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders earned 21.9%. 4.2%, 11.4%, 0.3% and 0.2% of theB.S. engineering degrees, respectively [1]. Women are often drawn to engineering disciplineswhere they can ‘help’ or give back [2], therefore, it was
the University of Michigan in 2008. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Critical Educational Theory: Applications in Engineering Education Corin L. Bowen 1 and Aaron W. Johnson, Ph.D. 2 1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, clbowen@umich.edu 2 Instructor, Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, aaronwj@colorado.edu Critical theory is
Paper ID #31607Delivering Contextual Knowledge and Critical Skills of DisruptiveTechnologies through Problem-Based Learning in Research Experiences forUndergraduates SettingGurcan Comert, Benedict College Associate Professor of Engineering at Benedict College, has interest in teaching and researching intel- ligent transportation systems and development of applications of statistical and computational models. He is currently serving as associate director at the Tier 1 University Transportation Center for Connected Multimodal Mobility. Supported by different NSF and DOT funded projects, he has been working with
Chair of Pre-Engineering. Since 2015, he has been employed at the University of Southern Indiana as an Assistant Professor of Advanced Manu- facturing. He holds three patents, has served as an IEEE section officer since 2004, and has been a Licensed Profes- sional Engineer in the State of Indiana since 2005. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Design and Development of a Sensor/Actuator Module to Enhance Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Laboratory Activities1. AbstractIn industry, Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) are used to automate industrial processes ormachines [1]. Typically, the processes or machines being automated perform a series of stepsthat
, humanitarian practice, peace, and sustainability. We have developed thesematerials to support our Mechanical (ME), Electrical (EE), Integrated (IntE), and Industrial &Systems Engineering (ISyE) degree programs. New courses include Engineering and SocialJustice, Engineering Peace, Community-Based Participatory Apprenticeship, User-CenteredDesign, and an Integrated Approach to Electrical Engineering. Modules or other content havebeen incorporated in courses including Circuits, Materials Science, Operations Research, SixSigma - Process Improvement, and Robotics. Existing courses in the curriculum whichincorporate materials designed to help students become Changemaking Engineers byincorporating sociotechnical elements are summarized in Table 1
Paper ID #30740Does stereotype threat affect creative thinking in female engineeringstudents? A behavioral and neurocognitive studyDr. Rafal Jonczyk, (1) Adam Mickiewicz University; (2) Pennsylvania State University Rafał Jo´nczyk (PhD) is an Assistant Professor of Linguistics at the Faculty of English of Adam Mick- iewicz University in Poland. His main research interests concern the behavioural and neurocognitive cor- relates of emotion anticipation, perception, and production in the first (L1) and second (L2) language(s). His recent research interests include the investigation of brain dynamics during creative ideation and
well as future directions will beexplained.Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopic Imaging SystemFTIR spectrometer and microscope are important tools for chemical characterization of sampleswith infrared active molecules. An infrared spectrum of a sample shows absorption peaks whichcorrespond to the frequencies of vibrations between the bonds of the atoms making up thematerial [1]. This system employs an interferometer and uses Fourier Transform process whichimproves the quality of the IR Spectra and makes the data acquisition much faster. When theabsorbance (or transmittance) intensities from all the spectra at a specific wavelength are insertedtogether in a matrix, the chemical image at that wavelength is formed. FTIR
grant awarded in 2013. The program developed atargeted pathway for academically talented and women with financial need interested inengineering to successfully enter the STEM workforce. The program targeted three criticalstages: 1) recruit talented women into the ABET accredited engineering program at Elizabethtown College by forming a cohort of scholars, 2) leverage and expand existing high impact practices (including an established matriculation program, living learning community, collaborative learning model, focused mentoring, and undergraduate research) to support women scholars during their college experience, and 3) mentor scholars as they
connection to industry. This paper reviews theactions taken to develop this culture based on the four essential areas of change. It also providesinsights on lessons learned thus far and plans to reach long term goals in the coming years.IntroductionIn 2017, the Mechanical Engineering Department at Seattle University was awarded a NationalScience Foundation grant to revolutionize the department. The project leverages thedepartment’s small size and close ties with industry to create a culture of “Engineering withEngineers.”This paper summaries the current status of the five-year project and is an updated version of theNSF Grantees Poster papers presented at the 2018 and 2019 ASEE Annual Conferences [1], [2].The project background and objective are
best answer their research question, hypothesis, orpurpose of the study [1]. A mixed methods research methodology that a researcher may select isQ methodology. Q methodology is a social science research methodology focused onsystematically studying subjectivity utilizing both qualitative and quantitative researchtechniques [2]–[6]. While Q methodology has had limited use in engineering education research,it has been used in studies regarding the career paths of engineering education doctoral graduates[7], competencies for nanotechnology [8] and IT [9], curriculum design for information systems[10], construction engineering technology program assessment [11], and undergraduateengineering students’ out-of-class activities [12]. However, Q
of future REU sites as wellas undergraduate research projects in general.Background & Program Details [1]On soliciting feedback from the manufacturing and energy industry nationwide, as well as fromIndustrial Advisory Board members that hire Texas A&M University (TAMU) students, arecurring concern brought up over the years was that often the incoming workforce did notexhibit the necessary knowledge and skills in metrology and inspection. Metrology, the scienceof measurement, and inspection transcends scales, materials, and disciplines; yet, rarely are itssalient aspects emphasized. This NSF-REU site titled “Interdisciplinary Research Experiences inMetrology & Non-Destructive Inspection” was a direct response to address this
Mathematics(STEM) to inspire their female successors in this field.The following sections of the paper describe the literature review, the methodology adopted tocollect data, the results and analysis, and the conclusions drawn.Literature ReviewNumerous studies have been conducted in different parts of the western world to understand theimpact of faculty’s gender on students and how students of different genders perceive their maleand female professors. Bettinger and Long [1] investigated the data of 54,000 college students inOhio to find the impact of female faculty on students’ choices of course in their early collegeyears. The study concluded that female faculty have the potential to increase the interests offemale students in a subject. This was
designrequirements and takes either 1 or 2 weeks to complete, depending upon the scope of the project.Each project is completed by a student team which consists of either 1 or 2 students (somestudents prefer to work by themselves). Students pick their team members at the beginning of thesemester.For all of the projects, students are expected to work outside of the scheduled lab time in order tocomplete the design objectives. A listing of the lab projects for the course is shown in Table 1.The first four lab projects utilize LabVIEW with the myDAQ, while most of the remaining labsutilize the PSoC 5LP. Table 1. Lab Project Schedule. # of weeks