Ohio State University in Multicultural and Equity Studies in Education where she also earned an MA in Quantitative Research, Evaluation and Measurement. Dr. Patterson’s work in the educational field began as an elementary level inclusive special educator. She is committed to preparing educators who take up a critical lens to working with children and best serving their needs while seeking ways to deconstruct inequities woven into the US’s existing public school system and structure. To this end, Dr. Patterson serves as a co-coordinator for the newly (2020) established Social Justice in Education minor available to students across the University. Broadly, Dr. Patterson’s research interests consider intersections
Paper ID #27481Fostering a Relationship with a Corporate Sponsor to Grow an EngineeringLeadership Development ProgramDr. Elizabeth Michelle Melvin, Louisiana State University Elizabeth M. Melvin is currently the Director of Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. She earned her BS in chemical engineering from The Ohio State University in Columbus, OH in 2002 and her MS and PhD in chemical engineering from North Carolina State University in Raleigh, NC in 2008 and 2011 respectively. While NC State, the focus of her research was to design microfluidic devices for the
/grad, accessed: 2020-01-29. [8] J. G. Carroll, “Effects of training programs for university teaching assistants: A review of empirical research,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 167, 1980. [9] J. L. Jones, “TA training: From the TA’s point of view,” Innovative Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 147–161, 1993.[10] G. Ervin and J. Muyskens, “On training TAs: Do we know what they want and need?” Foreign Language Annals, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 335–344, 1982.[11] J. W. Nicklow, S. S. Marikunte, and L. R. Chevalier, “Balancing pedagogical and professional practice skills in the training of graduate teaching assistants,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 133, no. 2, pp
parts of engineering practice. In describing the foundation of the practice, Koen [19,p. 10] defines the engineering method as, “the strategy for causing the best change in a poorlyunderstood or uncertain situation within the available resources.” One could succinctly use thewords optimization or innovation in place of the Koen definition. Furthermore, change thecontext or application and this portrayal of the engineering method is equally meaningful to thepractice of leadership! In a nutshell, we have identified solid and robust common groundbetween engineering and leadership. To follow this theme in more detail, let us consider the Lucas and Hanson [20] list of sixelements that they call engineering habits of mind. In other words, the
efficiency improvements at a local microbrewery, implementing a “green roof” on a campusbuilding, a new watering system for the campus arborist, replacement of lighting in the campusaquatic center, and a summer shutdown of a lightly used campus building. Each year, threeprojects were selected to move forward with others likely to be implemented.The team with the “winning” pitch was able to convince the judges that their solution was notonly the best tripe-bottom-line return on investment, but the one most grounded and workable.Winning teams engaged stakeholders for feedback regarding implementing their project,performed a detailed cost analysis based on comparable implementation at similar universities,and documented a significant ROI in each area
for Success (ECLIPS) Lab. His research focuses on contemporary and inclu- sive pedagogical practices, emotions in engineering, competency development, and understanding the experiences of Latinx and Native Americans in engineering from an asset-based perspective. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State Uni- versity. Prior to this appointment, she was an Associate Professor in the School of
focused on the design and implementation of a course using a student-led laboratory method which supports the development of authentic and courageous leaders. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 How Do Human Interaction Labs Contribute to Engineering Leadership Development?AbstractThis paper outlines the impact of a small group experiential learning course (Human InteractionLab) that cultivates authentic engagement between participants. Unlike many experientiallearning environments, this course is fundamentally learner-centered, where students designateboth the content of discussion and the norms that dictate
design to research that applied engineering and molecular biology approaches to the study of the skeletal response to mechanical loading. As a Mechanical Engineer, she worked on facility design projects involving mechanical systems that included heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and energy conservation systems, as well as R&D of air conditioning equipment for Navy ships. Additional research interests have included the investigation of relationships among components of the indoor environment, occupants, and energy usage. Specifically, the effects of the indoor environment on occupant health and well-being and in parallel, how socially-mediated energy-saving strategies can increase awareness of energy use and/or
publications, and is co-author with Elaine Millam of the 2012 McGraw-Hill book ”Leadership for Engineers: The Magic of Mindset.” He has been active in SME’s Manufacturing Education & Research Community and its Accreditation Com- mittee. Bennett has served as an ABET Engineering Accreditation commissioner and has been leader of SME’s Center for Education. Bennett is one of the founders of the Engineering Leadership Development Division and past Chair.Dr. Eugene Joseph Audette, University of St. Thomas Currently, Professor and Associate Dean, Emeritus, School of Education, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul-Minneapolis, Minnesota; and a licensed consulting psychologist in limited private practice with emphases in
learning, inquiry-based laboratory instruction, and any ini- tiative that empowers students to do hands-on learning. Additional service interests include teaching and leadership training for graduate students, enhancing communication education for undergraduate en- gineering students, developing evidence-based design project team formation strategies, and improving engineering design curricula.Dr. Molly H Goldstein, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Molly H. Goldstein is an engineering design educator and researcher at University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign. She previously worked as an environmental engineer specializing in air quality influencing her focus in engineering design with environmental
] I. Chan, A. Liu, and R. Fellows, “Role of leadership in fostering an innovation climate in construction firms,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 30, no. 6, p. 6014003, 2014.[29] D. R. Simmons, N. A. Clegorne, and T. Woods-Wells, “Leadership paradigms in construction: Critical review to inform research and practice,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 33, no. 4, p. 2517001, 2017.[30] J. Nagaoka, C. A. Farrington, S. B. Ehrlich, and R. D. Heath, “Foundations for young adult success: A development framework,” no. June, pp. 1–110, 2015.[31] Handley, M.H. “Interpersonal behaviors of early-career engineers identified by engineering leaders across three engineering disciplines,” Penn State University, 2017.
Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 125(3).[9] Cherrington, B., Freeman, E., Lacy, A., & Novas, A. (1995). The engineering leader and leading change: A report from the ASEM team. Proc., 1995 National Conf. of the American Society for Engineering Management, Washington, DC.[10] Stogdill, R. & Coons, A. (1957). Leader behavior: Its description and measurement (1957). Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University: Columbus, OH.[11] Ekvall, G., and Arvonen, J. (1991). "Change-centered leadership: and extension of the two dimensional model'. In G. Yukl. Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall. (p. 64).[12] Fleishman, E. (1953), Leadership Climate, Human Relations Training, and
and Exposition, June, 2016.[2] E. Crawley, J. Ostlund, and D. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, Heidelberg, DE: Springer, 2014.[3] B. L. Hartmann and C. T. Jahren, “Leadership: Industry needs for entry-level engineering positions,” Journal of Stem Education: Innovations and Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 13- 19, 2015.[4] B. L. Hartmann, C. M. Stephens, and C. T. Jahren, “Validating the importance of leadership themes for entry-level engineering positions,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 143, no. 1, 2016.[5] R. Graham, E. Crawley, B. R. Mendelsohn, “Engineering leadership education: A snapshot review of international good
Detroit Area Pre-College Engineering Program board of directors member, a faculty advisor for Tau Beta Pi, a member of the American Society of Engineering Education, participant in the North American Deep Drawing Research Group, and has co-chaired the 2005 Numisheet (International) Technical Conference. Most recently, Dr. Smith brought to Oakland University CLIC-form (Chrysler Learning and Innovation Center for Sheet Metal Forming), which is a first-of-its-kind program for producing ”work-ready” gradu- ates who plan to enter into a career in sheet metal stamping.Prof. Susan L. Holl, College of Engineering & Computer Science, California State University, Sacramento Director, Hornet Leadership Program, College of
. Ford et al., “Transitioning from capstone design courses to workplaces: A study of new engineers’ first three months,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1993–2013, 2019.[28] D. W. Knight, C. Gewirtz, and T. M. Chowdhury, “The Impact of Capstone Design Courses on New Engineering Graduates Preparation for Teamwork : A Mixed Methods Investigation,” in Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 2019.[29] R. Komarek, D. Knight, and A. R. Bielefeldt, “Evolution of leadership behaviors during two-semester capstone design course in mechanical engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2018-June, 2018.[30] M. Feiner, The Feiner points of leadership : the fifty basic laws that will make people
over thenext decade. First, the program will provide a rich, focused suite of fundamental engineeringleadership development courses. The second facet of the certificate requires each student to chooseone of four career directions he/she is likely to pursue after graduation. These are Research,Industry, Pathways that are non-engineering, and Entrepreneurship (RIPE). The efforts to designthis new curriculum and revamp our program will be presented, along with the challenges thathave emerged to date.*Corresponding author: C. Fred Higgs III, higgs@rice.edu 1BackgroundThe Rice Center for Engineering Leadership (RCEL), within the Rice University School
on communications, teamwork and leadership skills.These materials are being designed in a modular fashion that allows them to be adjusted fordifferent audiences (undergraduates, graduate students, professionals) and the project includesfunding for a “train the trainers” program that will enable the EF materials to be deployednationally at little or no cost to hosting organizations.This paper provides a historical context for the EF program, describes the recent efforts to updateand expand the curriculum, and provides insights from several years of participation andprogram evaluation data.IntroductionStrong, collaborative leadership methods can increase innovation [1], improve productivity [2],and leverage diverse perspectives, particularly
. 5–6, pp. 351–357, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11251-008-9059-4.[9] E. Soloway et al., “Learning Theory in Practice: Case Studies of Learner-centered Design,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, 1996, pp. 189–196. doi: 10.1145/238386.238476.[10] A. Briliyanti, J. Rojewski, T. J. Van Nguyen, K. Luchini-Colbry, and D. Colbry, “The CyberAmbassador Training Program,” in Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (learning), New York, NY, USA, Jul. 2019, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1145/3332186.3332218.[11] A. Briliyanti, J. W. Rojewski, D. J. L. Colbry, and K. Luchini-Colbry, “STEMAmbassadors: Developing Communications
design and implementation of a student-driven laboratory method which supports the development of authentic leadership skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 But how do you Feel?Authentic Leadership Development for undergraduate students through a student-driven,experiential, and emotion-laden course using a laboratory method addressing the whole person.AbstractBased on 324 reflections written by 27 undergraduate students from two independent cohorts,this study examines the effectiveness of a semester-long authentic leadership developmentcourse which is based on a student-driven, student-centered, and experiential laboratory method.This study shows firstly