- Conference Session
- New Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Cheryl B. Schrader, Boise State University; Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University; William L. Hughes, Boise State University; Kotaro Sasaki, Boise State University; Teresa Cole, Boise State University, Computer Science Department; John N. Chiasson, Boise State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
guidelines toassist faculty members during the process of institutional transformation from a teaching-basedto a research-based university.IntroductionRegardless of whether it is primarily teaching-oriented or research-oriented, a university needsdedicated teachers, productive researchers, and effective administrators1. In engineering collegesin particular, where research productivity often outweighs teaching effectiveness, facultymembers might struggle to maintain balance among a multiplicity of roles and responsibilities.Lacking the skills to effectively balance teaching, research, and service workloads, with limitedpedagogical training at the graduate and/or post-doctoral level, novice faculty often adopt trialand error techniques2. Although
- Conference Session
- Educating Students for Professional Success
- Collection
- 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Robert J. Gustafson, Ohio State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators, Student
Programs In a review of the development and characteristics of future faculty preparationprograms2, it is pointed out that they can provide a smooth transition between graduate schooland faculty positions. These programs evolved from TA training programs that proliferatedbetween 1960 and 1990. Establishment of the Preparing Future Faculty (PFF) program in 1993formed a base for a sustained national initiative to transform doctoral education. The PFFprogram has three core features3 of 1) addressing the full scope of faculty roles andresponsibilities, 2) students have multiple mentors and receive reflective feedback and 3) bothare addressed in the context of a cluster of institutions typically involving a doctoral degree-granting institution
- Conference Session
- Research on Diversification & Inclusion
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Michael Brewer, University of Georgia; Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia
- Tagged Divisions
-
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering
Paper ID #11811Into the Pipeline: A freshman student’s experiences of stories told about en-gineeringMr. Michael BrewerDr. Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia Dr. Nicki Sochacka received her doctorate in Engineering Epistemologies from the University of Queens- land, Australia, in 2011. She is currently a member of the CLUSTER research group at the University of Georgia where she holds a research and teaching position. Nicki’s areas of research interest include: STEAM (STEM + Art) education, diversity, interpretive research quality, the role of empathy in engineer- ing education and practice, and student reflection.Dr
- Conference Session
- Best of the NEE
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Brian Swartz P.E., University of Hartford
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
engineering instructor. The recommendations fall into five categories: 1. Establish rapport with the class 2. Articulate clear learning objectives for the course 3. Structure the content and delivery to facilitate learning 4. Involve students in class time 5. Hold students accountable for learningThe lessons learned and the recommendations summarized here have led the author towardsimplementing the “classroom flip” strategy. The paper concludes with a summary of ongoingwork to evaluate the effectiveness of the flip approach.1.Establish Rapport with the ClassOftentimes students have a distorted perception of the educational process and the role of theteacher and learner in that process. They might hold the assumption that the
- Conference Session
- NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Dustyn Roberts P.E., Temple University; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Allen A. Jayne P.E., University of Delaware; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Andrew Novocin, University of Delaware; James Atlas, University of Delaware
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
clicker-question and collect results. If <25% correct, further lecture/example may be needed, if >80% correct, move on to next topic; if in between, have Links to known conceptests - for Peer students form groups and example the AIChE Concept Instruction / 3-10 defend their answer, then Warehouse ConcepTests minutes poll again. Give students a list of items/properties/features Example: statements that
- Conference Session
- Best of NEE
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Thomas Shepard, University of St. Thomas; Alison B. Hoxie, University of Minnesota Duluth; Matt Anderson, Milwaukee School of Engineering
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
between acts that are cheating and actsthat are unethical but not cheating14. Minichiello et al. suggest that greater ethical training ofstudents starting their freshman year may help to align students convictions regardingmisconduct11 and hits on ABET General Criterion 3 Student Outcomes (f) which is “anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility22.” This may have the added benefit ofpromoting not just an individual’s understanding of the issue, but also creating a culture in thecommunity which looks down on cheating.Simply expecting students to do the ethical thing appears to not be working and thus faculty andinstitutional involvement is needed. Amongst engineering students, results have shown that only21.6% agree that it is their
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators: Off the Beaten Path
- Collection
- 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Robin Adams, Purdue University; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Tori Rhoulac Smith, Howard University; David Socha, University of Washington; Dawn Williams, Howard University; Ken Yasuhara
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators
interests include multicultural education, identity construction, and interdisciplinarity.Tori Rhoulac Smith, Howard University Tori Rhoulac Smith began her appointment as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at Howard University in 2003. In this position, she fulfills a number of research, service, and both graduate and undergraduate course instruction roles. Dr. Rhoulac Smith’s primary area of research is in traffic operations and multimodal school transportation systems. She engages not only in transportation engineering research, but regularly conducts engineering education research projects and serves as the campus coordinator for the Learning Communities for Scientific