different types of engineering courses. Rather than evolving fromlearning theory or research, current grading practices have primarily arisen from canonicalpractices created three centuries ago, originally created to rank students against each other. Suchranking or competition derived practices are out of alignment with modern outcomes-basedengineering assessment practices. Specifications grading, an alternative, is a framework forassessment grounded in learning theory as well as student agency. The cornerstone ofspecifications grading is treating each assignment as a pass/fail marker of mastery using clearlydefined and transparent criteria. With limited examples in engineering, this paper provides aclear introduction to specifications grading for
alternative. Page 25.1413.2IntroductionWith the rapid evolution of communication and computer technologies, the number of onlineengineering programs has also grown substantially. Graduate online engineering programs havebecome more and more plentiful as compared to undergraduate programs owing to the suitabilityof the target audience in terms of accessibility and flexibility, and maturity. The online student istypically a lifelong learner, more concerned with commuting and non-academic responsibilities,and motivated to complete assignments individually.1 Moreover, graduate courses are morecontent and design centered with less needs for laboratory
Society for Engineering Education, 2024Benefits of the Culture of Inclusion SurveyAbstractIn the pursuit of addressing critical societal challenges, National Science Foundation (NSF)Engineering Research Centers (ERCs) strive to create a culture of inclusion that will empowerindividuals to harness their full potential, creativity, and expertise. This Work-in-Progress paper willoutline the development and implementation of a Culture of Inclusion (COI) survey instrument thatwas designed to evaluate the inclusivity of ERCs and other large multi-institutional organizationsthat are education focused.The COI survey differs from a wealth of other inclusion-related surveys because of this focus, aswell as its reliance on social psychological constructs
/Distance delivery at the ME Department at VT. In 2010, with an education grant from Nuclear Regulatory Com- mission (NRC) she completed the online design of the Graduate nuclear engineering certificate program. In 2011, the new education grant from NRC, allowed initiating the design of two new nuclear graduate courses for the Master program. She maintains research and publishing tracks in nascent interdisciplinary trust concepts, eLearning, and innovative teaching, learning in fields of statistics and research methods, engineering, medical fields, and assessment methods.Prof. Clifford A. Shaffer, Virginia Tech Dr. Shaffer received his PhD in Computer Science from University of Maryland, College Park in 1986
thatprovide similar benefits in the classroom, we can better ensure all of our students have theopportunity to acquire this much-needed skill. Developing intuition is not only a majoreducational advance in creating stronger problem-solvers and critical thinkers, but also narrowsthe opportunity gaps that persist in engineering. Furthermore, by creating effective interventions,we will give useful tools to engineering educators that can help promote intuition development.As we prepare students to become practicing engineers, we must also equip them with both theconcrete and abstract technical skills necessary for not only personal success but also positivesocietal impact. While catastrophic failures of engineering intuition are not often reported
].For the first time the academic credits are the unit of measurement of academic work to expressall the activities that are part of the curriculum that must be met by students. An academic creditis defined as a 48-hour academic work that includes the hours with direct accompaniment of theprofessor and the hours of independent work that the student must dedicate to the realization ofstudy activities, practices or other tasks that are necessary to achieve the learning goals.Although this law was designed for facilitating the national and international mobility of studentsand graduates, and curricular flexibility, among other aspects, also the academic activitiesassociated with research training that may be developed in contents or options of
Paper ID #16327Student Self-Perceptions of Design and Creative Thinking (Fundamental)Mr. Andrew Jackson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Andrew Jackson is currently pursuing a PhD in Technology through Purdue’s Polytechnic Institute. His previous middle school teaching experience informs his role as a graduate teaching assistant for TECH 120, an introductory course in design thinking. He recently completed his Master of Science in Technol- ogy Leadership and Innovation from Purdue University with a thesis investigating middle school engi- neering self-efficacy beliefs. His research interests are engineering self
Engineering Educa- tion.Dr. Sophia T Santillan, Duke University Sophia Santillan joined Duke as an assistant professor of the practice in summer 2017. As a STEM teacher and professor, she is interested in research in student learning and classroom practice. After earning her bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees from Duke, Santillan taught at the United States Naval Academy as an assistant professor. She has also worked at the high school level, where she taught across the four-year math curriculum, including advanced courses. She also designed, proposed, and taught two introductory engineering courses for high school students.Michael Rizk, Duke UniversityDr. Jessica Sperling Dr. Sperling is an applied social
- ing System Directorate at Los Angeles Air Force Base, contributing to the acquisition of next generation advanced satellites.Dr. Michael Anderson, U.S. Air Force Academy Lt Col Mike Anderson is Associate Professor and Deputy Department Head of Engineering Mechanics, US Air Force Academy. He has been researching autonomous systems for fourteen years, authoring several papers relevant to the field including design of terresDr. Phillip Cornwell, U.S. Airforce Academy Phillip Cornwell is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy and is an Emeritus Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received his Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1989 and his
is certified as an EFL and ESL teacher as well as a School Principal. Ari’s research and language revitalization interests include Mikasuki, Salish Ql’ispe (a.k.a. Salish-Pend d’Oreille, Montana Salish, and Flathead Salish) and Safaliba. His ethnographic work documents situated practice in grassroots policy initiatives and school-based activism among the Safaliba in rural Ghana. His language documentation includes conceptual metaphors and formulaic language in Salish Ql’ispe and Safaliba. He also explores applications of task-based language teaching in the pedagogy of revitalization. His practitioner papers analyze integrated content and language instruction, academic English instruction for graduate students, and
Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Grant. She also was an NSF Graduate Research Fellow for her work on female empowerment in engineering which won the National Association for Research in
Paper ID #34590Assessing the Effectiveness of a Flex Model for a Sustainability Coursein the COVID-19 Learning EnvironmentDr. David V.P. Sanchez, University of Pittsburgh David Sanchez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and the Assistant Director for the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation. He is the PI for Sustainable Design Labs where research is focused on fusing analytical chemistry, sustainability design principles and data analytics to address Water and Sustainability grand challenges. Dr. Sanchez directs the Sustainability education programs which include
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How PBL Graduates Experience Self-Directed Learning: A Phenomenographic StudyAbstractThis research paper describes the study of the impact of a project-based learning (PBL)curriculum on the learners’ development of self-directed learning abilities. Themotivation for this study is that self-directed learning (SDL) ability is positioned as oneof the essential outcomes of engineering education. This can be seen in the followingquote from the International Engineering Alliance1 “The fundamental purpose ofengineering education is to build a knowledge base and attributes to enable the graduateto continue learning and to proceed to formative development
modeling framework, does not account for the interaction between components asit aims to individually immune components susceptible to known threats. As a result, it fails toaccount for threats that may materialize when components of a system are connected with eachother [21]. Furthermore, prior research in systems engineering shows that decomposing a systeminto components and analyzing each component separately (as done in STRIDE and other threatmodeling frameworks) limits the solution designers’ ability to understand how the overall systembehaves [31], [32]. Hence, along with component-level analysis, threat modeling frameworksneed to incorporate system-level threat analysis as well. Currently, to the best of our knowledge,none of the approaches
after completing a post- doctoral fellowship at Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) and three years as a faculty member at Olin College of Engineering in Massachusetts. Alexandra’s research aims to amplify the voices and work of students, educators, and Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these institutions. Specifi- cally, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical transitions in education and career pathways, and (3) design as central to educational and global change. ©American Society for Engineering Education
Research Methods. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1990.[4] Czaja, Ronald and Blair, Johnny. Designing Surveys: A Guide to Decisions and Procedures. ThousandOaks, CA : Pine Forge Press, 1995.[5] Lind, Douglas A., Mason, Robert D. and Marchal, William G. Basic Statistics for Business andEconomics. New York City, NY : McGraw-Hill, 2000.[6] Lesko, Charles and Pickard, John. Design Considerations for VIrtual Classroom and LaboratoryEnvironments. Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE National Conference, American Society for EngineeringEducation. June 2009. Page 22.1666.18 17[7] Heiphetz, Alex and
engineering talent through innovative curricular and co-curricular experiences. Jennifer has always explored broad, multi-disciplinary engineering solutions earning her Doctorate and Masters in Materials Science and Engineering from The Johns Hopkins University study- ing nondestructive electromagnetic techniques for materials characterization. Dr. Schlegel received a strong engineering foundation graduating from Virginia Tech in 1992 with an Engineering Science and Mechanics degree. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Implementing an Entrepreneurial Mindset Design Project in an Introductory Engineering CourseAbstractAt Florida Institute of Technology (FIT
control. His research interest includes sensor based condition monitoring of CNC machining, machine tool accuracy characterization and enhancement, non-invasive surgical tool design, reverse engineering and bio materials.Dr. Warren Rosen, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Dr. Warren Rosen received his Ph.D. in physics from Temple University. He has served as Assistant Professor of Physics at Colby and Vassar Colleges where he carried out research in solar physics, medical physics, and instrumentation. Following this experience he was a research scientist at the Naval Air Warfare Center in Warminster, PA where he established a laboratory for research in high-performance computer networks and architectures for
). The 21st-Century Engineer: A Proposal for Engineering Education Reform. ASCE Publications.4. Sheppard, S. D., Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Macatangay, K., & Colby, A. (2008). Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass.5. Richter, D. M., & Paretti, M. C. (2009). Identifying barriers to and outcomes of interdisciplinarity in the engineering classroom. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(1), 29-45.6. Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2010). Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 34(1), 61–84.7. Lattuca, L., & Knight, D. (2010). In the eye of
studentsincluding the ones detailed below. Others are not within the reach of smaller schools such asDefense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA)’s Grand and Urban Challenge3. Someothers like SAE’s Formula Series4 may require greater resources compared to the ones below. The Institute of Navigation (ION)’s Robotic Lawn Mower Competition will be held June 2-4, 2011 in Beavercreek, Ohio5. The objective of the competition is to design and operate a robotic unmanned lawnmower using navigation to rapidly and accurately mow a field of grass. NASA’s 18th Annual Great Moonbuggy Race will be held April 1 - 2, 2011 in Huntsville, Alabama, at the U.S. Space & Rocket Center. Each Moonbuggy will be powered by two
AC 2010-890: ENGAGEMENT IN AN UNDERGRADUATE HEAT TRANSFERCOURSE OUTSIDE OF THE CLASSROOMSarah Parikh, Stanford University Sarah E. Parikh is a fourth year graduate student at Stanford University working on her PhD in mechanical engineering with a focus on engineering education. She received a BS in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2006 and received a MS in mechanical engineering with a focus on microscale heat transfer from Stanford University in 2008.Helen Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is Research Scientist at the Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning and Research Associate in the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. Her current
approaches,and negotiate with their peers on the best way forward [7]. Collaborative problem solving alsopermits the opportunity for peer-coaching, which may synergistically lead to deeper, moreinnovative learning for both the tutor and the tutored than classroom instruction and individualproblem sets alone. Practicing engineering learning in this way prepares a student to integratewith real-world teams and work to solve complex, multi-faceted problems upon graduation. However, the incorporation of digital technology in the classroom is not enough to keepcollege education relevant in the long-term to digital natives and the increasingly-digital society.Nor is collaborative problem solving a triple win for the digital native student, the school
course for future goals were used. Procedures regarding saliva collectionspecifically followed best practices guidelines provided by the Institution of InterdisciplinarySalivary Bioscience Research (IISBR) at Arizona State University. Upon entering the classroom, students were given a packet of materials that describedthe study. This packet also included a saliva collection kit, a self-report survey, consent formand a bottle of water. The saliva collection kit contained two oral swabs and two collectionvials marked with the participants’ unique identification code. After collecting signed consentforms, a researcher explained the saliva collecting process and instructed students to rinsetheir mouths with water and to place the oral cotton
for STEM Equity (CERSE). Cara serves as project manager for program evaluation on several NSF- and NIH-funded projects. Her research interests include community cultural wealth, counterspaces, peer mentoring, and institutional change.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She directs research and evaluation projects from conceptualization, methodological design, and collection of data and analysis to dissem- ination of findings. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive
. in educational leadership and policy studies with a focus on higher education. She has over six years of research and professional experience in the field of higher education. With a dedication to diversity, equity, and inclusion, she is committed to using qualitative and quantitive research to inform impact-driven decisions.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as
Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 125(3).[9] Cherrington, B., Freeman, E., Lacy, A., & Novas, A. (1995). The engineering leader and leading change: A report from the ASEM team. Proc., 1995 National Conf. of the American Society for Engineering Management, Washington, DC.[10] Stogdill, R. & Coons, A. (1957). Leader behavior: Its description and measurement (1957). Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University: Columbus, OH.[11] Ekvall, G., and Arvonen, J. (1991). "Change-centered leadership: and extension of the two dimensional model'. In G. Yukl. Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall. (p. 64).[12] Fleishman, E. (1953), Leadership Climate, Human Relations Training, and
for the globalworkforce is a national priority in the U.S.1 In order to address this need, educational institutionshave made great efforts to increase the recruitment and retention of students in engineering andimprove students’ professional skills through engagement in educational purposeful activities.Involvement in out of class activity has been believed as an effective way of promoting students’cognitive, affective, and career development in higher education.2, 3 The Final Report for theCenter for the Advancement of Engineering Education posits that research on student experienceis fundamental to informing the evolution of engineering education.4 College impact researchsuggests that focusing on what students do during college, both inside
only increasing and defendingpolicies designed to create diversity, but also advertising the diversity that already exists withinthe field and practicing other forms of inclusiveness [24], [35]. However, as with the 4S and theCIS, the critical vision scale is also science oriented, and thus administering a modified versionof the scale would likely find much stronger results.LimitationsThese results confirm that the 4S does not function poorly for Engineering/Technology, but thedeflated effect sizes indicate that a more refined measure of engineering identity and engineeringcareer intentions are still needed. The age of the data (collected in 2010) and the focus on sciencestudents are also drawbacks of using the current data in this analysis
the Integration of Research and Education at Georgia Tech, a Georgia Research Alliance Eminent Scholar, and director of the Arbutus Center for the Integration of Research and Education. Page 15.459.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Enabling and Evaluating the Collaboration of Distributed VIP Teams with High-Definition Collaboration SystemsAbstract: The Vertically-Integrated Projects (VIP) program creates and supports large-scale,long-term, vertically-integrated teams that pursue design projects embedded in the researchefforts of faculty and their graduate students. The
AC 2008-402: IDENTIFYING AND REMEDIATING DEFICIENCIES INPROBLEM-SOLVING IN STATICSThomas Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University Tom Litzinger is Director of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State, where he has been on the faculty since 1985. His work in engineering education involves curricular reform, teaching and learning innovations, faculty development, and assessment. He teaches and conducts research in the areas of combustion and thermal sciences. He can be contacted at tal2@psu.edu.Carla Firetto, Pennsylvania State University Carla Firetto is a PhD student in Educational Psychology at Penn State. Before