community.IntroductionEngineering Technology programs, including both two year and four year tracks, continue togrow. Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers [3] published that there were14,312 degrees awarded in the year 2019 alone. These degrees come from 111 institutions thatgrant Engineering Technology degrees [3]. Despite the considerable number of degrees awardedin Engineering Technology disciplines, there is little research conducted on the experiences ofEngineering Technology students.Like Engineering Science degree earners, Engineering Technology students may test forprofessional engineering licensure in 35 states. Although the procedures in testing for a licensemay vary, Engineering Technology graduates may pursue careers as professional engineers
“Best Measurement” Award j. Outreach to alternative education venues frequented by target groups such as regional science centers, libraries, and museums k. Target science and math magnet schools or other career academy programs l. Measurement Bus- traveling interactive laboratory; learn by doing m. Focus efforts by region; follow cohort of students through consecutive school years to reinforce exposureC. Outreach to Vo-tech, Community Colleges & Universities a. Promotion of metrology programs b. Sharing of curriculum content, texts, and resources among metrology programs; identify best practices and text books; benchmark program content (assessment and
. Some of these include engineering and design,production and operations, research and development, quality management and improvement,information technology, marketing and sales, management, human resources, and evenworkplace safety and health. Thus, bio-based industries are very germane to engineering andtechnology disciplines. Bio-based operations require skill sets similar to traditionalmanufacturing settings, but also have a need for additional knowledge in biological sciences,which can vary according to the specific product(s) produced at a given facility (i.e., energy,fuels, chemical, or products). For example, equipment, processes, and unit operations must bedesigned; these systems must be optimized, modeled, and simulated; and
Council-US AFRL Summer Faculty Fellow for the Human Effectiveness Directorate (2002- 2004), an invited participant of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers in Engineering Education Symposium (2009), and a Fulbright Scholar to Ireland (2010).Dr. Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, West Lafayette Michael Dyrenfurth is professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation in the Col- lege of Technology at Purdue University. He is co-PI of two FIPSE-funded Atlantis projects: DETECT exchanging undergraduates with Ireland and German and Atlantis 2009 a concurrent Master’s degree project with Ireland and Spain. He collaborates frequently with ProSTAR to deliver industry-oriented graduate
USA.2. Jamieson, L. and J. Lohman, Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education, ASEE, Editor. 2012: Washington, DC.3. Loshbaugh, H. and B. Claar. Geeks are chic: Cultural identity and engineering students’ pathways to the profession. in Proc. ASEE. 2007.4. Lord, S. and J. Chen, Curriculum Design in the Middle Years, in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B.M. Olds, Editors. 2014, Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.5. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice., et al., How people learn : bridging research and practice. 1999, Washington, DC: National
Convocations Volunteer Network (CVN) and is a Tau Beta Pi member.Miss Meher Rusi Taleyarkhan, Purdue University Meher R. Taleyarkhan is a graduate student earning her Master’s in Engineering Technology degree from Purdue University, West Lafayette Indiana. She received her Bachelor of Science degree from Purdue University and majored in Mechanical Engineering Technology. During her undergraduate she was an un- dergraduate research assistant studying renewable energy with an emphasis on solar energy for residential and utility use. Current research as a Master’s student is in curriculum development for engineering tech- nology programs, notably at Purdue University. Her thesis is on conducting an engineering and financial
graduate womenengineers. Regardless of the reason, a comprehensive study into the sociological, cultural andpsychological reasons for the lack of persistence has not been completed. The field has been leftwith an incomplete scope that has yet to provide understanding of the underlying issues or theculture of engineering programs.Once the experience of women in undergraduate engineering programs is more understood,universities and the field can make steps to alleviate the discrepancy in attainment rates betweenmen and women and broaden participation. The use of a critical lens and qualitativemethodology will allow for a basis of understanding from which leaders in the field can examinetheir own practice, and authentic, deep, meaningful discussion
Leaving Engineering: Gender Differences Harriet Hartman, Moshe Hartman Rowan University/Ben-Gurion UniversityAbstractThe paper focuses on retention in an innovative undergraduate engineering program with many“female-friendly” features despite its design as best practices for all students. Both male andfemale “stayers” in the program are compared to “leavers” on a variety of characteristics,including pre-college and family background, grades, satisfaction with the Rowan program,engineering self-confidence, and future expectations about their engineering major and career.Data come from a special 2000-1 survey of all Rowan engineering students.IntroductionStudent
excellence and innovation in teaching and broader faculty development programs.Prof. Elizabeth Long Lingo, Worcester Polytechnic Institute c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Transforming the Associate-to-Full Promotion System: Wrestling with Strategic Ambiguity and Gender EquityAbstractWomen faculty remain under-represented among all academic ranks within STEM fields, andespecially at the rank of (full) Professor. While researchers have studied the underlying, systemicfactors that contribute to these outcomes, and a range of possible interventions, how reform ofthe Associate-to-Full promotion system unfolds within a STEM-intensive university remains ablack box. Drawing from
laboratorysettings.Current Learning Trends and MotivationConclusions reached over the past two decades by multiple national reports indicate thatundergraduate education in STEM fields needs improvement.12 We are reminded, that despite theburgeoning technology that has provided additional access and capacity for learning, that theconcept of the classroom is still the center of the learning interaction and engagement. Whilecalls for online assessment tools that link students, faculty and administration continue,educational and sociological research still subscribe to the prevailing quality of student-facultyinteraction. ATLAS provides a peer intermediary in the form of a Quality Manager thatenhances the quality of the educational connection between instructor and
of career developmental and personally supportiverelationships to design career experiences for individuals and to respond to the issues that theseindividuals, or mentees, express.1,15 Developmental networks are valuable for achieving a variety of career outcomes rangingfrom promotion and career advancement39 as well as clarity of professional identity,16 to morevariability of advice than a primary or sole mentor can achieve.22 In addition, developmentalnetworks are found to be gendered and racialized in the sense that women and individuals ofcolor more often experience challenges in gaining access to and maintaining reliable andmeaningful mentoring networks. Current research mainly focuses on mentoring in corporatesettings. In academe
Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with engineering course innovations. She is a faculty development consultant with previous experience in instructional design and instructor of the Graduate Assistant Seminar for engineering teaching assistants. Page 22.906.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Integrating Ethics into Undergraduate Environmental Science and Economics Education Abstract Good
other topics. All work at the TENN TLC is carefully researched and planned in order to bring best practices and innovative methods to UTK faculty, lecturers, and GTAs. Olsen earned her doctorate in american and twentieth century literature at UNC-Chapel Hill in 1997, after which she taught at a private college for 12 years, eventually serving as Full Professor and Department Chair. She published Transcending Space: Architectural Places in works by Henry David Thoreau, E. E. Cummings and John Barth, Bucknell UP, 2000, has published numerous articles in her field, and has presented regionally and nationally on faculty development and assessment issues.Dr. Stan Guffey, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Stan Guffey
technical community have called for systemic changes in engineeringeducation that include a shift to integrated and multidisciplinary approaches; an emphasis onunderstanding of societal impacts of engineering; increased teaming skills, includingcollaborative, active learning; and an improved capacity for life-long, self-directed learning.1,2,3This study focuses upon two of the critical skills listed above: self-directed learning andcontextual understanding.Calls for educational reform emphasize the need for new student-centered learning approachesthat aid development of broader skills and attitudes to complement traditional knowledgeacquisition.1,2 A capacity for self-direction and life-long learning is often identified as a criticaloutcome for
, ITand communications, agricultural and medical technology, working with others and learning aboutoneself. Each component included a series of activities and challenges specifically developed to meet therequirements and needs of the program and the Dominican students. The activities were group-specificadjusted to the various levels. They included elements from the Boston Museum of Science, CarnegieMellon and Tufts LEGO NXT curricula, LEGO Education, and ideas from accepted best-practices in K-12 engineering and technology education curricula. The engineering design process (EDP) is the themethroughout all the curriculum projects.The curriculum development process in 2014 focused on the review and improvement of designedactivities, design of new
. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, designs research focused on broadening par- ticipation in computer science through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and disciplinary identity; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and computer engineering courses) in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women (specifically Black and His- panic women) in computer-related engineering fields. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
activity showing students the water cycle and illustrated the amount of available freshwater for human use. This was done in the hope of increasing their appreciation for the scarcityof usable water. The results of this activity showed up many times in the students' daily journalsin which they wrote that they learned more about the importance of water conservation.Following the water cycle activity was a fish tagging activity. This included how the fish taggingworks, the importance of it, and how scientists and engineers use the process to determine thehealth of streams and movement of fish in the stream. Thanks to the aid of a graduate student inFisheries Biology, students had the opportunity to engage in the practice of tagging fish.During the
curricula and associated learning environments. The Foundation Coalitionwas designed to permit diverse higher education institutions to work together from theirstrengths and to function as a supportive network, as they set about the task ofreconceptualizing the undergraduate engineering experience of their students. In such amanner, these institutions collectively could serve as “change agents” for the largerengineering community. The vision was that over time, through their programmaticinnovations, they would be able to attract and retain the very best of a“…demographically diverse student body; and to graduate a new generation of engineerswho can more effectively function in the 21st century.” [1]From its founding to the present, although the
traditional groupwork, inthat most cooperative learning models adhere to the following principles (TheConsortium for Instructional Innovation, 1995):1. The tasks are carefully designed to be suitable for teamwork.2. Positive interdependence and cooperation is necessary for students to succeed.3. Students are individually accountable for learning and participation.4. The role of the teacher changes from being the “sage on the stage” to “the guide on the side,” hence our reference to the etymology of the word pedagogue.Team formation strategy is an important aspect of the cooperative learning process,because successful accomplishment of the exercises depends upon the structure of theteam.Multimedia Educational ApplicationsDuring the past decade
expe- rience. I plan to continue on a path of lifelong learning as I hope to obtain a graduate-level education in the future. My engineering identity and career are underpinned by a hunger for knowledge and a desire to serve.Dr. Nathan E. Canney, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stan- ford University with an emphasis on
. Although this system usesLEDs, future systems may use red, green and blue lasers to produce white light of variable colortemperature.Challenge 2: FloDesign, Inc.FloDesign Corporation15 located in Wilbraham, MA, is a research and development companyutilizing state-of-the-art aerospace technologies to develop, prototype, patent and market newproducts for other companies. Since 1990, FloDesign has successfully developed products forcompanies such as Rolls Royce, Sikorsky Aircraft and others.FloDesign Wind Turbine Corporation is a spin-off from the parent company. Its mission is todevelop, fabricate and test a novel mixer ejector wind turbine that uses an innovative shroudeddesign to draw more wind flow into the machine. The new design can potentially
Institute (ADI), now the American Society for Information Scienceand Technology (ASIST).After a few years at Princeton, Takle decided on a major career change. In November 1962 sheaccepted an appointment as an assistant professor in the Graduate School of Library Science atthe Drexel Institute of Technology in Philadelphia. In addition to teaching courses in the MLISprogram, Takle conducted research on foreign technical information. From 1963-64, she was theassistant director and senior investigator of the Foreign Engineering Literature Research Project.At the 1963 ASEE conference in Philadelphia, she presented her research on Germanengineering literature.[17] Takle’s academic career was short-lived. In late 1965 or early 1966,she left Drexel to
innovative, relevant from athermodynamic perspective, and that it widened their view of thermodynamics. It can benoted, however, that the spreading in student opinion is relatively large since a part ofstudents was not very positive to the project. From the teachers’ perspective, the new projectwas a source of many interesting discussions with students that were really relating andapplying their new thermodynamic knowledge to their own experience. In conclusion, theproject fulfills its purpose to increase motivation and widen the understanding ofthermodynamics.Active learning and the phenomenographic approach in engineering thermodynamicsThe project idea follows the phenomenological approach3, which is recognized for stimulatinga deep-level instead
outcomes of students engaged in these experiences. She is also involved in student outcomes research in the BME Department and with the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education Office, College of Engineering at Michigan. Cassie received a B.A. in Engineering Sciences at Wartburg College (Waverly, IA) and a M.S. in BME from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor).Kevin Cai Jiang, University of Michigan Kevin Jiang is a staff member in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan where he works on the design, development, and change of experiential learning, first-year programs, and biomedical engineering curriculum. He also leads a team of undergraduate students engaged in curriculum design and development
generally do not address barriers embedded within the curriculum design, and may or may not increase faculty understanding of best practices for [students with disabilities] (p. 182).27As is the case in other instances of identity-based discrimination in America, even the mostenergetic and best intentioned practitioners continue to operate in settings that tolerate limitedreform.Critical social scientific work on disabilities has offered important framing for understanding thisongoing inequity. To my mind, foremost among its contributions is the idea, developed duringthe 1990s, that that which a culture treats as physical or mental capacity derives from socialvalues and conditions. This “social model” of disability to a degree displaced
Paper ID #8815Career Self-efficacy of the Black Engineer in the U.S. Government WorkplaceMr. Scott Hofacker PE, US Army Dr. Hofacker is a recent graduate of The George Washington University’s Graduate School of Education and Human Development. His research area is the career self-efficacy of racially underrepresented mi- norities in the engineering workplace. Dr. Hofacker is also the Concept Design and Assessment Focus Area Lead for the US Army’s Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. He is responsible for the strategic planning of science and technology efforts
Paper ID #26059Development of Curriculum in Technology-related Supply Chain Manage-ment ProgramsMs. Panteha Alipour, Purdue University Panteha Alipour is a PhD student at Purdue University. Her background is in industrial engineering with a focus on supply network analysis. Her research interests are optimization, network analysis, data analysis and predictive modelling.Dr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic Institute at Purdue University. She is a Professor of Supply Chain Management Technology in the
Ledlie Klosky, United States Military Academy, West Point J. Ledlie Klosky, P.E., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at West Point, where he also serves as the Deputy Director of the Center for Innovation and Engineering. Led is the 2010 winner of the National Outstanding Teaching Medal from the society, and, in addition to traditional engineering pursuits such as infrastructure modeling, he works in communication in education, course design, and the interface between engineering and other disciplines.Dr. Bobby G Crawford, U.S. Military Academy Colonel Grant Crawford is currently the Director of the Mechanical Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy, West
dialogues. However, instructor facilitation may result in an instructor-centered discussion whichlimit students’ participation and voice [18], and student-facilitated discussions provide analternative approach. Peer facilitation can foster a sense of student ownership and help studentsfeel more at ease in expressing their opinions [19], and allow practical hands-on experience ofbeing a discussion facilitator [18]. Compared to instructor-facilitated discussions, research onstudent-facilitated discussions is still limited focusing more on the student facilitation techniques[11], [20]. This study aims to explore how overall design and management of student-facilitateddiscussions influence peer interaction and critical thinking in engineering
teacher educator, she has added engineering to her elementary and early childhood science methods courses, and developed a Teaching Engineering Design course for middle school pre-service teachers in a science track. Since 2008, she has partnered with Harford County Public Schools in Maryland on the SySTEmic Project, a district-wide project to implement elementary engineering instruction using EiE units of instruction. More recently, she has provided science and engineering professional development to Tunbridge Public Charter School, Baltimore City, and to Cecil County Public Schools, Maryland. Her research largely examines factors that support and those that hinder elementary teachers as they learn to teach