oftenrequiring interdisciplinary teamwork. Students need to negotiate a range of viewpoints, including avariety of specialties, and balance their unique contributions to form a coherent whole. Teamworkis a necessary skill for engineers with its significance recognized by ABET (Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and Technology): Criterion 3, Student Outcome 5 - “Students should be able tofunction effectively as members of a technical team, and as leaders on technical teams”.Teamwork is often the key to solving the complex problems engineers face. One goal of higher education is to prepare students for their professional lives. Teamworkis imperative to solve “real-world” problems [3]. Teamwork is a highly important skill forengineers to have
theLeader, and 5) Emotional Balancing Act of Leader. All five pictures include a summarized setof emerging themes and suggestions for best practice during next research steps.A. Gender Distinctions in Leader or Entrepreneur ConstructsFirst, while men and women may differ in pre-dominance as senior level managers, they tend toagree in their definitions of leader and entrepreneur. Participants’ use of intriguing words andword phrase definitions of leader and entrepreneur were often similar to today’s definition ofbusiness or academic leader. While men and women have similar conceptions of productiveleader behavior, distinctions and similarities between leader and entrepreneur constructs, there ishesitation and confusion about making sense out of some
. Characteristics of recent science and engineering graduates: 2008. (2012).8. Noravian, A. (In review). How do well-structured projects influence the identities of technology students in community college? Journal of Technology Education.9. Jonassen, D. H. Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-Structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 45, 65–94 (1997).10. McLoughlin, L. A. in Eng. Soc. Justice - Univ. Beyond (Baillie, C., Pawley, A. L. & Riley, D.) 123– 142 (Purdue University Press, 2012).11. Strutz, M. L., Orr, M. K. & Ohland, M. W. in Eng. Soc. Justice - Univ. Beyond (Baillie, C., Pawley, A. L. & Riley, D.) 143–156 (Purdue University Press, 2012).12. National
establish baselines that are used for evaluating the reinforcement learningmodels.The dataset is nearly balanced between the two classes and is randomly split into a training set(70%), a development set (15%), and a test set (15%). Once the random split has been initialized,the training set is used as input for both conventional supervised machine learning models and thecreation of the RL environment. The development set is utilized for grid searchinghyperparameters for all models. The test set is exclusively used for reporting the final confusionmatrices to prevent any data leakage. Figure 6. Experiment workflow used in this studyWe adopt the standard performance metric for balanced binary classification problems: accuracy
most common (both on a weekly and overall semester level)? 2) How does participation change over time (both on an individual and aggregate-class level)? 3) What is the balance of in-class versus outside-of-class participation (both at an individual and aggregate level)? Does this change over time? 4) Is there any correlation between specific types or patterns of participation and summative assessment (e.g., exam) scores? 5) How do students perceive the impact of the participation logs on their engagement and learning? Do they believe it affected their engagement or success in the course?Preliminary Results (Mid-semester Survey Responses)The data entry and analysis of the individual student logs for the second
Paper ID #31359Women, Engagement, Stress, and Worry: Do they have to go hand in hand?Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non-cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability. American c Society for Engineering
.,● They found themselves in an unsupportive environment, four in Fall 2016 and six in Spring 2017). For each with professors announcing "only half of you will pass this workshop we had one of the mentors act as a facilitator and class." (stereotype threat) the supervising faculty assume the role of the note-taker.As a result, many students perceived obtaining CS skills as Everyone, including the faculty supervisor, was referred totoo daunting and elected to study something else. Other by first-name, in order to promote an equal powerstudents attempted CS courses but found learning the structure. The goal was to create an environment
feel analytically useful to us as a manifestation of dominantnorms that impact a range of social phenomena—including social roles, identities, and career paths. 5Shifting from the reproduction of dominant norms and fantasies to a mechanism that maybe responsible for reifying this reproductive process, we draw on the research of JeannieOakes, a critical education theorist studying the organizational features of secondaryschools. Oakes found that the century old practice of tracking students into academic andvocational classes led to a disproportionately high percentage of economically andracially minoritized students in vocational tracks
bodies as something to beconsumed, like a drug. Given that creativity is often defined as an inherent individual quality,contrasting it in this way reinforces violence as a personal act. The dichotomy between creatingand violence in engineering is not unique to this student. A senior engineering student explains, So I think that it is kind of weird in its history it was actually appropriated for violence all the time, but now when we think of it, we think of engineering as like a cornerstone of innovation and technology and, just of building and progress instead of destruction.47Not all students agree with the notion that creation, creativity, and building the material worldare devoid of violence. A junior engineering student
visualization course,after a semester of making images for art’s sake, emerge believing that fluid mechanics is more important tothemselves as engineers and to society, i.e. they have a positive shift in affect. The students in the traditionalfluids course which is packed with real-life engineering examples exhibit a negative shift in attitude, which istypical of other technical courses. The use of photography in improving student perceptions is being extended toa course on perception of design. Although many course elements were identical to the Flow Visualizationcourse, including an emphasis on aesthetics, results from the attitudes survey towards design indicate no shift inattitude, nor was there an attitude shift seen in the upper division
with a specialization in electrical engineering from Roger Williams University. Her research interests include developing professional skills for engineering students and understanding mathematics barriers that exist within engineering.Ms. Katherine Drinkwater, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Katie Drinkwater is a recent graduate of Duke University with a Bachelor’s in Mechanical Engineering. She is excited to begin working towards her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in the Fall. Her interest in Engineering Education began through a project where she helped to design a makerspace inside a shipping container. Since then, she has explored design and engineering education through
beprepared to help students plan for these types of careers, particularly through course selection.Therefore, it is important for us to not only understand the role of counselors, but to have a bettergrasp of their KAB regarding gender and STEM, and how this may potentially influence howthey counsel and engage with students. This paper examines the results of a five point Likert scale assessment tool developed usingthe KAB framework. The survey was administered as a pre and post assessment from a two hourprofessional development workshop on STEM occupations in November of 2010. Participantsincluded 120 counselors from a large Southwest school district. Eleven out of the original 45survey items are reviewed in this paper and N=71 participant
revealed: (1) Operationalizing all the time interfered with the excitement of firstmeetings and leaving a space for iterative promise, (2) Women were the ones that women andmen imagined led the operationalizing work during a virtual educational mode before a returnto in-person, (3) Compassion was amplified for students organizing groups with care, “Iknow what it feels like to be a straggler left behind because it happened to me,” and (4)Shock of the 2020 and 2021 pandemic diminishes over time with prophetic stories of a new,lasting kind of collaboration effect, “It’s difficult to make sure that everyone is actuallywilling to sit next to someone else in the room, many are still acting awkward and distantwith each other.” Results suggest that
example.The overarching purpose of the landscape analysis process is to have teams consider thestrengths and gaps on their campuses. This process provides team members with a sharedunderstanding of the unique opportunities and challenges on their campus, and forms afoundation on which to develop plans for growing their entrepreneurial ecosystem.The tool was originally designed as a spreadsheet for teams to document “assets” on theircampus (e.g., courses, extra-curricular offerings, spaces, champions). The tool alsodefined the terms “innovation”* and “entrepreneurship”† to support shared understanding.Finally, the tool guided teams in reflecting on various dimensions of their schools’ecosystem as a whole – the balance between electives and required
State University and Obafemi Awolowo University. With a passion to communicate research findings gleaned from experts in the field as he advances his ca- reer, Olaitan has attended several in-person and virtual conferences and workshops, and at some of them, made presentations on findings on air pollution, wastewater reuse, heavy metal contamination, and use of experiment-centric pedagogy in STEM fields.Dr. Oludare Adegbola Owolabi, P.E., Morgan State University Adebayo Olude is a doctoral student and research assistant at Morgan State University’s Department of Civil Engineering in Baltimore, Maryland. Adebayo formerly worked as a Graduate Research Assistant at Eastern Mediterranean University in North Cyprus, where
. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the intersection between motivation and identity of undergraduate and graduate students, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research, and innovative approaches to teaching. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Literature Review of Counterfactual Thinking and Career Motivation Theory for Early Career Women EngineersAbstractNavigating the workplace as an early
grateful for the support provided in this endeavor by his chair, dean, and Page 15.939.1other administrators. To their great credit and sometimes sacrificially, they did provide significantsupport, both tangible and intangible, within the constraints upon them.Probably the most pivotal method used to leverage existing resources was the heavy involvementof undergraduates in the research, essentially identically to how graduate students are used inlarger programs. Most were electrical engineering majors, but a few were mechanical engineering,chemistry, and physics majors. The set has also included women, minorities, and internationalstudents from
situations through the lens of their own self views and that individual differences exist in theway situations impact on people. Constructivist posit that humans actively create and construeour personal realities –that each person creates his or her own representational model of theworld and that this model does not simply act as a filter through which ongoing experience isperceived, but that the model actually creates and constrains new experience and so shapes whatthe person will perceive as “reality.”40Indeed research suggests a central role for the self in motivation and behavior.41 Thus, self viewsare important for understanding the persistent tendency for male and female students to separateinto different academic and career paths and the
” time – TV, video games, smart phones, etc. I also have recently worked outpatient mental health and have seen the same thing.Question 2: Could you provide a brief comparison between two populations: one that grew upwithout digital devices and another that grew up with them?Responder A: It seems that in my experience the population that has grown up with cellular device access struggles more with a sense of mental stability. Briefly, one notable change is the formation of identity in our population. For example, without a device, previous generations where able to formulate their sense of identity mostly from a center of family structure, social structures like religious
these under-represented students had been pushed to find uniqueways to make themselves indispensable to peers and teammates on projects, to proactivelycombat exclusion [19]. In later work drawing on survey data of U.S. STEM professionals(n=25,324), Cech found that white able-bodied heterosexual men (WAHM) experiencedenhanced social inclusion and professional respect compared to members of under-representedgroups [21]. Here, the under-represented groups Cech identified were 31 different intersectionalgender, race, sexual identity, and disability status groups [21]. These findings reinforce thatintersectionality likely plays a role in the mythical norm in engineering. It may not just be a man,it may in fact be a WAHM—similar to the mythical norm
ChatGPT”, highlighting a concern about students relyingon AI instead of their own understanding.Many survey respondents expressed concern about the use of GenAI, particularly in relation toacademic integrity and its potential impact on student learning. Similar concerns were echoed inthe interviews, where participants frequently cited cheating and the risk of students relying tooheavily on AI instead of developing their own understanding. Both data sources revealed ashared apprehension about the ethical and learning outcome implications of GenAI use and thechallenge of maintaining a balance between leveraging its benefits and preserving core learningobjectives.Figure 5. Future of GenAI in Engineering Education Almost 35% of the
and exploration. Relatednessrefers to the feeling of belonging and being significant in the eyes of others. SDT furthersuggests that people are naturally inclined to explore and dedicate much of their energies towardsactivities, role, and relationships that promote these basic psychological needs. “Of importance,from an SDT perspective, the social context – specifically relational partners’ support of needs –informs one’s self-concept, goals, and identity-related behaviors (La Guardia, 2009, p. 93)16.”Prosocial motivation, intrinsic motivation, and self-determination theory form the backbone ofour program and curriculum design. We believe that our projects should provide students theopportunity to act on their prosocial motivation while also
students to participate in the industries of the future?” Similarly, in rapidly changing socio-technical systems do universities have a role to play in worker retraining or more broadly to contribute in some way to broad public education of those who are past college age? 2) The College-Industry Gap There has been a succession of complaints by certain industrial organizations that the output of graduates from universities are not immediately suitable for work in industry. One of the persistent complaints has been that they lack interpersonal and professional skills. More recently the complaint has been made that graduates are not sufficiently adaptable in the sense they are unable cope with the learning requirements of the tasks with which they
society it desires to serve, then it must construct apluralistic identity that embraces more than one way of knowing and acting in the world. Whilethe pragmatic practice of engineering in industry is beginning to confront some of these issuesthrough environmental and societal dimensions of technology (e.g. the triple bottom line),academe, through scholarly endeavours, has a vital role to play in bring about a new engineering.A Pluralist Framework for Scholarship in Engineering EducationIf we are to encourage more faculty to engage in empirical research in engineering education andthus raise its profile as a legitimate field of research in engineering schools then we have toaddress the issues raised thus far. It seems clear that a pluralist
Paper ID #14697Exploring Interviews as Validity Evidence for the Engineering ProfessionalResponsibility AssessmentDr. Nathan E Canney, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and the role of the public in engineering decisions. Dr. Canney re- ceived bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis
. She is currently the William and Elizabeth Magee Chair in Chemical Engineering Design and leads the process design and first year design teaching teams. Her current research focuses on sustainable engineering design and leadership, the engineering graduate attributes and their intersection with sustain- ability, competency based assessment, learning culture, engineering identity and continuous course and program improvement.Dr. Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University Dr. Lucas Landherr is a teaching professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Northeastern University, conducting research in comics and engineering education.Dr. David L. Silverstein, P.E., University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein
student sentiments SE-Disconnect between school Experience (SE) about the program and industry SE-Struggling with academics Figure 2: Example of second cycle coding / theme buildingResults and discussionGiven the effect faculty can have on the inclusivity of their school via their interactions withstudents, we are interested in how faculty’s perceptions of their role align with their potentialimpact. We investigated this question by analyzing this ECE faculty’s intentions to make changefor diversity and inclusion. Using the reasoned action model, we claim that if a faculty memberdevelops such an intention, they will take some personal
often struggle with a range of issues related to teaming, including teamformation, the balance between evaluating overall product quality and evaluating team processes,and the relative importance of teamwork versus technical skills2. Finally, a recent study offaculty beliefs and practices around teaching teamwork and communication suggests that facultyoften rely on abstract or ad hoc approaches to teamwork, treat teamwork as something studentssimply learn “by doing,” and often avoid specific instruction in this critical skill3.Despite these gaps in teaching teamwork, the skill itself consistently emerges among the topskills requested by employers, and team issues surface repeatedly in design courses wheninstructors describe their teaching
% - forstudents initially entering as engineering majors [4,5], with both climate and lack of context for thebroader impact of the field being cited as reasons for attrition. The retention rates are evenbleaker for underrepresented groups in engineering, such as women and minorities [6,7]. Over50% of women graduates with professional engineering degrees leave the field within 5 years [8],and, in some part, narrow job focus, lack of creativity, and minimal societal impact of theprofession have been cited as deterrents for recruitment and retention of young people in theengineering [9,10]. As a field, it remains essential not only to recruit the highest caliber ofstudents but also to keep these students in the field. Engineering, as a discipline
structural material itself (wood, steel, reinforced concrete),”while extricating and distancing the big idea of lateral forces, “The problem of designing astructure to withstand the forces of gravity, wind, and earthquakes is usually addressed throughanother series of courses.”[7]The History of DiscourseThe pedagogical approaches shifted from the Beaux Arts to the Bauhaus tradition between 1925and 1950 thereby inducing an ongoing turmoil in architecture education. Henry Kamphoefnerdescribed the Beaux Arts education as having a focus on the rendered drawing of the façade withthe students being informed to “ignore the structure,” as this would be accomplished byothers.[10] He continued that structures pedagogy began a transformation as Walter Gropius