a solid connection between the use of CLDs and leadershipdevelopment. The role of analyzing systems is to promote agency [39], that is to act upon the results of theanalysis and in so doing improve the situation. A fundamental element of leadership is action.Senge underscores this theme with the choice of the title in one of his book sections, “How OurActions Create Our Reality… And How We Can Change It” [3, loc. 145].Course Overview Gonzaga University in Spokane, Washington, USA offers an online Master of Arts degree inOrganizational Leadership (ORGL). One of the core courses for this degree is OrganizationalTheory and Behavior (ORGL 615). This course design incorporates a heavy emphasis on asystems thinking approach to leadership and
and I guess even from my growing up, I had two working parents. My mom I think was a very good role model for me…A Hispanic female that was able to achieve success, not in an academic setting, but in an entrepreneurial setting and was very much the power dynamic like between my like parents…It was like normal for me to see, a woman of color, achieve, go for these like high goals and achieve success in her career while also having a family and keeping that as an important part of her life as well. So, I think that was very instrumental for me growing up. And I think even though she's not in the academic field, I think just because of seeing her example and then her helping me make connections, even though she's in a
., 2013, Rohde and Shaffer, 2003,Shaffer, 2006). Epistemic games are simulations that allow students to act as practitioners in a simulatedreal-world environment while gathering data on students’ development as practitioners within agiven epistemic frame (Chesler et al., 2013). In engineering epistemic games, students role play asinterns for a virtual company and are tasked with a real-world design problem to engage them inthe engineering design process. Within the engineering epistemic game Nephrotex (Chesler et al.,2013), students are tasked with designing a dialysis membrane for therapeutic blood ultrafiltration.The design process involves the participation of multiple students (i.e., design teammates) and adesign mentor as students
PBL, students apply the concepts and skillsacquired in the classroom to solve real-world problems, thereby enhancing their understandingand retention of knowledge. To make the PBL process more effective, the integration ofcontinuous feedback at various stages of the project plays a crucial role 2 . This feedback providedto students acts as a guiding tool, helping them to refine their approaches and encourageprogressive thinking 3 , alongside motivating and ensuring they are moving in the right direction 4 .For courses that require both theoretical understanding and practical hands-on implementations,PBL has proven to improve students’ learning outcomes 5 . For example, through PBL withcontinuous integration of feedback in Computer Science
students, employers, and the department. The engineering technologyprograms were all strong in that they were attracting large numbers of students (at least relative toour resources) and the graduates were getting good job opportunities, but we also saw many areasfor improvement such as advancement opportunities for graduates, the ability to attract students tothe programs, and the ability to attract new industrial partners and employers. This paper thenoutlines what we believe are the key lessons for: 1) curricular planning and implementation, in-cluding the role of Industrial Advisory Committees (IACs) in that planning, 2) hiring large num-bers of new faculty and integrating them into the experiential learning culture of the department,3) the
solving skills” (Alcalet al., 2018, p. 137),but if there is no symmetrical relation , or what Baoler (2008) refers to as “relational equity”, then it is difficult to achieve joint activity. In thisstudy we report on a research conducted with multilingual young people from Black and Brown communities residing in SouthcoastMassachusetts. The study is based on a larger longitudinal research which examined the relationship between language and science andengineering identity development among middle school students from multilingual Black and Brown communities (also known as Englishlanguage learners). Drawing on qualitative methods of data collection and analysis, such as video recordings of the classroom events,interviews with students, and
examine and identifysuch robotics-based teaching practices. Prior research [9] suggests that effective classroomteaching practices encourage interaction between educators and learners, embed opportunities foractive participation of learners, impart motivation to them, and offer timely feedback. Moreover,educators ought to be intimately familiar with and have a deep understanding of commonmisconceptions of content knowledge held by students and should proactively address them [10].This paper is concerned with identifying and analyzing teaching practices that can supportsuccessful integration of robotics-based lessons and activities in middle school science and mathclassrooms. To do so, a survey was administered to 23 teachers who have implemented
interview [44]. Interviews lasted between about 30 and 60 minutes, were conductedusing an interview protocol, and covered a range of topics regarding participants’ preparationfor, implementation of, and reflections on the task and discussion they facilitated. In total, therewere 13 questions, many of which include sub-questions or probes. For the present study, weexamined participants’ responses to two questions: 1. Did the discussion that we asked you to facilitate seem reasonable and typical for what you might do as an elementary teacher? If so, how? If not, why not? 2. To what extent did the student avatars act and/or respond in ways that you would expect real students at this grade level to respond?These questions were discussed
progressive, public, land grant university in the upper greatplains, has been undergoing dramatic institutional transformation since the late nineties. Theinstitution has moved from a Carnegie-classified Research Intensive University to a ResearchExtensive University. This move accompanied new doctoral programs that advanced researchand extramural funding. Further, North Dakota State University’s efforts have resulted in recordenrollments for ten consecutive years, and the number of graduate students has nearly doubled ineight years. Research expenditures have increased 108% in only six years, significantly outpacingthe national average. According to the NSF data on academic research and developmentexpenditures, North Dakota State University is one
team of over 40 academics and practitioners investigated methods for quantifying benefits from automation; the results of this project were published in a manuscript. Dr. Marlin is currently director of the McMaster Advanced Control Consortium (MACC), which develops relevant research through collaboration among university researchers and numerous companies. MACC consists of five professors, 17 industrial members and 25 university researchers, principally graduate students and post-doctoral fellows. He teaches university courses in process control, process analysis, problem solving, and optimization and has published a textbook in process control (Process Control, Designing
stakeholder claims are taken up by engineering students in conversation. As such, we willnot comment on whether and how students are taking up one another’s perspectives.We see Janine as constructing relationships between the different actors and taking up epistemicand moral stances that highlight the economic plight of the workers. Her stances embed her moreclosely into the situation than the other speakers. In contrast, James and Simon are more distant.James and Simon both emphasize environmental impact as a moral stance without mentioningthe economic plight of the informal workers, and that value plays a role in how they rhetoricallystructure the relationships among stakeholders. For Simon, the additional value of control andsystematicity becomes
,methodology, or conclusions.The Long-Suffering and Unrecognized Graduate Assistant Co-AuthorIn working in their mentor relationships with graduate students, some faculty members do notframe a research problem for their students but, rather, tend to assign them a general topic (XYZ)to work on during their studies. This broad direction is an effective means for fostering graduatestudents’ independence, innovation, and creativity, which are needed skills for both theireducational experience and development and their future careers as academics. However, insome cases, the students are instructed, under the disguise of getting experience, to writeresearch proposals including the literature review, problem definition, objectives, methodology,and often even
only by women engineers; a qualitative study of engineers from themillennial generation (those who entered the workforce after the year 2000) identified this as themost important concern of men and second-most important for women [60]. Beyond generalwork pressures, this category of barrier is often associated with how well engineering careersfacilitate a work-life balance that is supportive of family responsibilities. A quantitative studyconcluded that it was “empathic support from their managers for their work-life roles … whichserve[d] to characterize and catalyze the persistence and attrition decisions of women engineers”[69]. However, while family-supportive policies are appreciated (by men and women), it seemsto be a common and convenient
what types of Making are valued and central to the Makercommunity. Moreover, data collected during studies conducted at the 2014 Bay Area MakerFaire and the 2014 World Maker Faire in New York City also suggest that the most commontopics that attendees “regularly read about, or actively pursue interests” about are generalscience, computers and mobile technology, 3D printing, and electronics (Maker Media, 2014a;2014b). In addition, these studies also reported that the vast majority of attendees were male,nearly all had at least a college degree and roughly a third had obtained a post graduate degree,and had a median household income over $124,5000 (Maker Media 2014a; 2014b). Thus,considering the central roles held by MAKE Magazine and Maker
problem solving techniques in methods that will achieve synergy between technical andsocial systems.Sternberg introduces the “triarchic theory of human cognition,” involving a three-part modelcorresponding to analytical, creative, and practical cognitive skills5,6,7,8,9,10. Interestingly, theNAE’s three main attributes for the Engineer of 2020 coincide with the three attributes thatSternberg claims will help students achieve “successful intelligence”6,7. According to Sternberg,intelligence is demonstrated when one is capable of balancing one’s skills in adapting to,shaping, and selecting the environment that best matches one’s strongest skills, values, anddesires7,8. Success is ultimately achieved through harmonizing three aspects of
factor. This table structure reveals that ABET criteria do not explicitly address leading others, being a high achiever, or relating inclusively. Relating inclusively and adapting to change also were not explicitly addressed in the TIDEE roles. Numerous references for each performance factor testify to the importance of all twelve factors. The twelve Professional Development performance factors are summarized in Table 1 with definitions derived from the respective references of Table A-1. Note that four performance factors are labeled technical, four are interpersonal, and four are individual. This balance makes a statement about the breadth of professional skills and abilities important to the engineering profession. Thus, capstone
diversity efforts because of the low numbers ofwomen in departments and a highly masculinized culture. Academia, in particular in theengineering and science disciplines, remains inhospitable to the representation, advancement,and inclusion of women.1,2 Many, if not most, diversity efforts focus on students instead offaculty. Arguments for a student centered-approach include the idea that the pipeline of possibleunderrepresented faculty members must increase in order for there to be successful recruitment.However, women tend to disproportionately drop out of the pipeline, so that fewer apply for jobsat institutions than are present in postdoctoral positions or graduate schools. Our work focuses ongendered dynamics in departments. Our goal is to
CoE and the WCOB chose to address these needs by recruiting a team tointegrate innovation for engineering and business students, partnered, into pedagogy, curriculum,and real-world experiences with other-than-your-own professions. Creating a program thatincludes opportunities for those who need to be able to work together to allow them to do so andto understand each other and their roles in successful innovation better prepares them forpersonal and professional success post-graduation. [5]Literature ReviewIn a recent survey of the needs for aligning education systems for 21st century skills [16], threekey skills were frequently identified by national education systems: collaboration, criticalthinking, and problem solving. These are
operations for combining them into more complex structuresand actions within the architecture.21 When left to their own devices, students tend to gravitatetoward bloated and brittle ad hoc solutions made up on the fly, whereas this approach requiredsolutions that demonstrated at least the following characteristics:• compositional: larger parts hierarchically consist of smaller parts• modularized: parts are integrated into well-defined, cleanly organized and justifiable units with distinct roles and no gaps or overlaps• integrated: the different parts work together as a system• unified: the system appears to the user as a single entity, not as discrete parts• reusable: parts can be transplanted into other projects
computers into the mathematicscurriculum provides many “higher-order” learning opportunities for students. It gives studentsreal life problems to solve and gives them insights into the methods that real mathematicians usein the quest for answers.10 A strong correlation has been found between the number and types oftechnologies used in a classroom and teacher access to his or her own computer beyond theschool day. An additional factor that impacts integration is the number of technology trainingworkshops teachers have attended.10 Research has given numerous ways computers canpositively affect the learning environment in a classroom and by increasing computer use in themathematics classroom elementary professional development programs can
level and the literary history of science and technology. She has served twice as the chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society (LEES) Division of ASEE and received that division's Olmsted Award for outstanding contributions to liberal education for engineers. Her current research projects focus on humanistic education for engineers as a system that transcends particular courses and institutions; the interdependence of ethics, communication, and STS in engineering; and establishing a collective identity for the diverse community engaged in teaching and researching engineering communication.Sofia Zajec Sofia Zajec is a rising fourth-year student at the University of Virginia majoring in systems
information The ability to understand the interrelatedness of design and manufacture The ability to apply tolerancing concepts to an assembly The ability to inspect and rework to meet a tolerance specification The ability to evaluate acceptable overall quality The ability to work closely in a resource-limited environment Experience the challenges and complexity of manufacturingWhile it could be argued that these learning objectives are manufacturing or mechanical engineering-specific, at Cal Poly, we strongly believe all engineering graduates should have practical, hands-onexperience with fabrication techniques. ABET assessment criteria suggest students would benefitfrom experience with concepts such as tolerancing, creating
a school work with students who are “under-prepared”? (unspoken cultural expectations + academic preparation) 2. How can we increase buy-in among ECE faculty? 3. How can we get students actively involved with each other in a lecture setting? 4. How can we build connections/bridges between/among students? 5. How can we get faculty, graduate students, and undergrads to see empathy, diversity, and inclusion as part of their day jobs?______________________________________________________________________________This ECE Session 4 invoked Discourses of DEI, university and school missions, student survivaland success, community, belongingness, time, “day jobs” (i.e., work for which one is responsibleand has priority over other
society can provide,technical solutions gain potential impact. Van den Beemt et al. observed: “one of the important roles forinterdisciplinary education efforts is to help students develop the kind of flexible adaptive expertise that will preparethem to solve a range of complex problems and work with scientists trained from a variety of perspectives as isincreasingly becoming the case in cutting-edge research fields” [7].Collaboration deepens an engineer’s understanding of what’s needed and the effects of a technological solution onceit’s deployed, especially as they relate to complex challenges, coined wicked problems [8] of our times, such asclimate change [9]. Collaboration enables us to make tools with a better fit-to-purpose. Interaction
the world sees the human species,” work that wouldbecome the basis of his Olmsted Award.8 We focus today on the productive tension between hisinterest in teaching and research.9In this respect, probably the most important thing to note in this necessarily abbreviated paper isthat, having promised the moon, Koen, like so many PhD students, received no real training as ateacher while in graduate school. Undaunted, Koen applied the same heuristic he used during hisstudies in nuclear engineering, which was to canvass the state of the art in the discipline withinwhich he wished to claim expertise. It was through this process, and through informationprovided by a classmate, that Koen discovered the Personalized System of Instruction.10PSI’s Origin
Paper ID #38168What Do Engineering and Other STEM Faculty Need? Exploring the Nu-ancesof Psychological NeedsDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on eDr. Jennifer J. VanAntwerp, Calvin University Jennifer J. VanAntwerp is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin University in Grand Rapids, Michigan. She earned an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University
Paper ID #18624Getting ”There”: Understanding How Innovation and Entrepreneurship Be-come Part of Engineering EducationMrs. Elizabeth Nilsen, Purdue University Liz Nilsen is a Senior Program Director at the Purdue Agile Strategy Lab, helping nurture change efforts in engineering education, innovation, and beyond. Previously, she was a Senior Program Officer at Ven- tureWell, where she co-developed and co-led the Epicenter Pathways to Innovation initiative, an effort to engage with a cohort of colleges and universities to fully embed innovation and entrepreneurship in under- graduate engineering education. Her experience
accountability.(c) Recommendations for the professionWe maintain that teaching is something more than classroom practice – it relates to both theecologies of the classroom, department (school) and institution. Research supports the view thatthe way the college is organized to help the students with their relationships with their peers,teachers, and staff is the single most important factor in the quality of student’s education [17].Ironically the relationships that teachers have with their students is not mentioned in thecharacteristics of an extended professional by Hoyle. Nonetheless the social capital andsupportive relationship between learner and teacher is very important for the quality of learning.As a sum, the professional is responsible for the
collaboratory is defined as being “virtual” and promoting “working together apart”5 (Kouzes,Myers, & Wulf, 1996), which has been perceived to significantly increase the output andproductivity of researchers. Collaboration is at the heart of science. NU finds satisfaction inbeing involved in community service and supporting advanced education of U.S. militarypersonnel. This paper reports a collaborative research effort between (a) NU and its communityservice support of wildfire management, (b) the SOEC Master of Science in Computer Scienceprogram, (c) a graduate student with vision (author Allen), who is a recognized national subject-matter-expert on MAFFS, and (d) Colonel Brian Kelly, Vice Wing Commander of the 146thAirlift Wing, Channel Islands
projects were asked to complete weekly “audio diary” entriesresponding to discursive verbal prompts posed to them during bi-weekly visits by a student-researcher. Youth apprentices were given control of the recording devices, and each recorded“audio-diary” session lasted three to five minutes taking place one-on-one, away from the rest ofthe group. Individual sessions were organized around a selected “set” of prompts (see Table 1.).The student-researcher was able to complete between two and five sessions per visit. Promptswere generally organized around three types themes 1) comprehension of sustainability and/orwicked sustainability problem contexts 2) perspectives on learning (hands-on, schooling, groupactivities, etc.) and 3) interest in or