-based, pedagogically appropriate approaches and curricula including Peer Instruction 6,Workshop Physics7, Real-time Physics8 and Studio Physics9.But, what about circular mechanics? Arnold Aron’s observes 10, “The kinematics of circular motionin a plane is usually glossed over very quickly because of the obvious parallelism to rectilinearmotion. For students who have genuinely mastered the concepts and relations of rectilinearkinematics, this is appropriate since unnecessary repetition would waste their time.” Thisphilosophical approach has pervasively infiltrated introductory textbooks. Whole chapters aredevoted individually to the topics of velocity, acceleration, etc. while all of rotational kinematicsand sometimes even dynamics are crushed
try to constructproofs that support those conjectures 24.The navigation buttons in CSA modules and programs enable gradual presentation ofinformation to learners so that new information can appear step-by-step. For the CSA moduleused in a Soil Mechanics course at the University of Arizona 34, interactive animations of keytopics, especially “difficult” ones, allow students to participate in the learning process rather thanbe passive learners. A problem can be repeated with different values and as many times asnecessary for a student to master its solution. If students have difficulty in visualizing certain keyconcepts at certain steps, within a mouse click, he or she receives instructions, and witnesses avisualization of that step 34. As
solution. 2. Format worked examples in ways that manage cognitive load in multimedia through audio narration of steps and cueing of related visuals (Clark, Nguyen, Sweller, 2006).2.The use of step The software allowed students to solve Novices need support from theby step problem well-defined multiple step problems instructional environments to substitute forsolving strategy one step at a time for mastering the their lack of prior knowledge of thefollowed by algorithm of
Engineering Technology (Weber State University) Masters in Construction Manage- ment (Purdue University)Dr. Thomas James Paskett, Weber State University Dr. Thomas J. Paskett. I have a Ph.D. in Education with an emphasis in Adult Organization and Learning from the University of Idaho. I also have a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from the Uni- versity of Phoenix. I hold a Bachelor Degree in Architectural Studies from the University of Utah. My drafting experience began with my Associate Degree in Architectural Drafting Technology from Ricks College, now Brigham Young University-Idaho. I have been designing residential buildings since 1992 and have had home plans built for the Salt Lake County Parade of Homes. It
b.) Engineering science courses should result in this outcome. O Strongly Agree O Agree O Neutral O Disagree O Strongly Disagree c.) Students such as those in my classes can learn this performance. O Strongly Agree O Agree O Neutral O Disagree O Strongly Disagree d.) On average, how well do students who have completed their junior-year engineering science courses carry out this performance? O Masterful O Very Well O Satisfactory O Poor O Incompetent Table 2 Example of a Scenario From the Survey (questions worded for a student respondent) Scenario Ten. Michael has completed his
English composition course: Page 8.974.9• Developing a clearly stated, restricted thesis“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”• Organizing ideas effectively through planning strategies, such as topic or sentence outlining• Revising the tentative thesis as required by subsequent review and research• Using standard English and generally accepted conventions of usage and grammar• Achieving structural unity• Arguing logically and supporting contentions with attributed facts.Engineering students who have mastered
freshman that strives to be morethan just an engineering student.”DiscussionThe FEP program was started by the ESSAP Office with the goal of enhancing studenteducation, professional and personal development, and overall retention in engineering. In themodern marketplace, “soft” professional skills are often considered to be of commensurate valueas “hard” technical skills.10 This provides a challenge for educators, as professional skills oftenmust be mastered through experience, which may be difficult to achieve within the constraints ofa classroom or a single semester. These freshman engineering projects are designed tocomplement students’ classroom education, while supplementing it with team based,collaborative problem solving in a professional
Appendix C.When asked about the past or expected effects of LTS on their pedagogical practice, over 90% offaculty participants said that the following increased or strongly increased as a result of LTS:knowledge of issues and resources in the community, emphasis on community issue/problems inmy class or program, belief that students can make a difference in their communities, theexistence and strengthening of partnerships between my institution or program and otherorganizations in the community.Other positive statements were endorsed by the majority of theparticipants (70% or over) as increasing or strongly increasing. A complete break-down of theresults can be found in Appendix D.When asked to endorse which ABET “3a-k” criteria were mastered by
organizations and educational societies are imploring their membersand stakeholders to adopt more flexible, active, collaborative, and welcoming pedagogicalpractices that will reach out more effectively to diverse learners. Baldwin continues the dialogueon STEM learning, agreeing with Wieman who notes, “The traditional lecture is not an effectiveway to help students master basic scientific concepts essential to advanced study and work inSTEM fields.”2,12 Despite its idealistic intent, it is not without challenges. Lack of resources to Page 15.219.3support instructional development, absence of incentives to research teaching and learning,growing class
University of Missouri - Rolla, her M.S. in Industrial Engineering from Purdue University, and a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh.Kara Santelli, University of Pittsburgh Kara Santelli is a masters student in Administrative and Policy Studies Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She will be receiving her Master of Education degree in May 2010. Her focus is in education and social policy research particularly policies related to the Black-White Achievement Gap and the resegregation of American public schools. In addition to being a student and researcher, she is the Swim School Director and Swim Coach for the Woodland Hills Aquatics Team
methods were used to ensure that sufficient content areas were assessed so facultywere confident that students had mastered the intended outcomes. First, faculty were asked todescribe their grading practices. Second, instructors were asked to depict the levels of proficiencylast year’s graduating seniors had attained.For 71% (n = 67) of the respondents, senior capstone design course grades were individuallyassigned based on integrated individual performance. In contrast, nine percent (n = 8) of the facultysaid the final grades received by their capstone students were the same for all team members basedon integrated team performance. Nineteen percent of the faculty (n = 18) explained that theirgrading practice was a combination of these approaches
of achievementfor comparison purposes.All proficiency levels were rewritten in first person to emphasize the expectation that studentsassume personal responsibility for advancing their own level of skill. The six levels are given inTable 6. Level 1 is the highest level of proficiency and requires that students independentlyidentify and master new knowledge and skills. Level 6 indicates that a student has little or noexperience in an area. We informed students of a general tendency to overstate one's abilities.To further discourage exaggeration, we required them to report that they had actuallydemonstrated skill levels. Simply thinking that one could accomplish a task was insufficient towarrant a greater proficiency score. It was also decided
● Explaining ● Honors BIOE Degree->Med School->Dr. & Mom ● Critical Thinking ● Masters in BIOE->Orthopedics R&D->Owner ● Creativity ● MSE Degree->Ph.D.->National Lab-> Cure for cancer ● Masters in BIOE->Creating Biologic Implants Time Orientation Axis Instrumentality AxisFigure 2: Sugar Cone represents those students who have a defined future career that is both
Director – Doctorate in Psychology, 80% teaching and 20% CR&I Administrative Manager – Master of Business Administration, 100% CR&I Research Engineer – 50% engineering lab support and 50% CR&IThe CR&I provided the personnel, processes, facilities, and funding to support the program andactivities associated with the CR&I’s integration of research, entrepreneurship, and businessassistance. A chart showing the CR&I structure is below.As seen in the Student Impact section below, the strong link with the classroom provedadvantageous for identifying opportunities, teaching innovation to students, andcreating/maintaining links with other faculty.The Science Research Training Program (SRTP) provided faculty with
anengineering identity and become more confident in their professional skills.Student engagement is comprised of factors such as collaborative learning, participation inacademic experiences, communication with faculty, and feeling supported by the institution6.Researchers studying school engagement have proposed a multifaceted model that includesbehavioral, cognitive, and emotional domains7. Behavioral engagement represents students‘participation and involvement in academic and extracurricular activities that will have a positiveimpact in their academic achievement. Cognitive engagement encompasses willingness tosucceed academically and mastering the material. Emotional engagement is described as thepositive and negative feelings and attitudes students
mastered both the Level-upquestion and had submitted a suitable lab report.Level 5The highest Level in each mission was a task that students could choose on their own, but had toget approval from the instructor and/or lab technician if the Level required additionalexperimentation. This task was a complex and original piece of work unique for each mission.Each student who attempted a Level 5 task came up with the concept and worked with the labinstructor in order to ensure safety was assured, as well as asking for frequent input from theinstructor. The graded portion of the activity was based on a formal report submitted online.It was possible to receive 1-5 points for the submission, depending upon the quality of theattempt. Like any of the levels
, Purdue University RANJANI RAO is a doctoral student in Organizational Communication in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University. She earned her masters in Media, Technology and Society from the same department in 2008. Prior to joining Purdue, Ranjani worked as a journalist with Indo-Asian News Service in New Delhi, India after obtaining her BA (Honours) in Economics from Delhi University and Post Graduate Diploma in Journalism from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication, New Delhi. Ranjani’s research explorations in communication have included careers in the context of immigration, media and family communication, work-family dynamics and qualitative research methods in engineering
Paper ID #9670Big Picture Thinkers in Industry—Who Are They?Hadi Ali, Purdue University, West Lafayette Hadi Ali is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University and a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Jordan. He earned his Masters degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue Univer- sity (majoring in aerospace systems design, with a minor in astrodynamics and space applications), and a Masters degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue (majoring in artificial intelligence
measures the belief that “future outcomes can be influenced in apositive way.” 21 An example item is “I master difficult problems.” The items were measured ona five-point Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always).MachiavellianWe included a Machiavellian scale, since a Machiavellian personality is posited to be related tosuccessful entrepreneurship or management 22,23. A Machiavellian personality is conceptualizedas “one’s propensity to distrust others, engage in amoral manipulation, seek control over others,and seek status for oneself” 24. The scale was adapted from the Machiavellian Personality Scale(MPS) 24 with three sub-scales: Morality (5 items), Control (3 items), and Status (3 items).Participants were
(feedback), Online Catalog Search Plus, Find it @ nameUniv, Univ. Quick Links, NewsFeeds, and Credits (site master).They can be broadly grouped as boxes for tutorials and help tools, library services, asking forusers feedback, resources available at the university and awareness services, no effort has beenmade to clearly identify and group them accordingly because most of the labels are self-explanatory.For the purpose of evaluating the home page, tabs and boxes (see section on assessment)attention was paid to technical and pedagogical aspects. Examples of technical aspects are: thehome page was well organized, the appropriate use of headings, and the appropriate use of space(not too crowded, too many tabs, etc.). Examples of pedagogical aspects
the differences between attendees and non-attendees. For example, although some studiesfound “no inherent preexisting differences” between the groups, other studies found “inherentlyless able” students and those with “low self-efficacy” were more likely to attend supplementalinstruction.2,4 It has been shown that students who are not confident in their ability to performwell in a course are more likely to seek help than their more confident peers.5 Self-confidence isa factor in seeking out extra help, as often the act of seeking out extra help can be demoralizingas students realize that they cannot master the material on their own.6Our study also examines what current factors deter students from utilizing supplementalinstruction resources. A
Paper ID #8687Defining engineering and technological literacies within the framework of lib-eral education: implications for the curriculumDr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood MA MSc LittD (Dublin) M.Litt (Lanacaster). Professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College – The University of Dublin and formerly Professor and Director of Teacher Education in the University (1977 – 1996). In addition to a higher doctorate he is the holder of a Masters degree in engineering education (MSc). He is a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Educa- tion, a Senior
Paper ID #8823Incorporating Oral Presentations into Electrical and Computer EngineeringDesign Courses: A Four-Course StudyMs. Nabila A. Bousaba, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Nabila (Nan) BouSaba is a faculty associate with the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte since 2008; she is the senior design instructor for the department, additional courses taught include Basic Circuit for non- majors, and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship course ECGR4090/5090. Nan Earned her BS and Master Degrees in Electrical Engineering (1982, 1986) from North
. 14 I feel confident that I can master the material in my engineering courses. 79 There are important relationships between my engineering coursework and my coursework outside of engineering. 64 Students should be required to use ePortfolio in all classes. 5 Students should be required to maintain an ePortfolio from the time they begin their college studies until they graduate. 14 I will maintain and update my ePortfolio in coming semesters even if I am not required to do so for a class. 9 Determining my learning style and
Page 9.83.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationarea. The University offers Bachelors and Masters degrees in a variety of non-engineering fieldsand has an average enrollment of 5,2003 students. Undergraduate programs offered by FSUinclude physics, mathematics, computer science, business administration, biology, chemistry, art,and education. The Department of Physics and Engineering is one of the seventeen departmentswithin the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences. The Department offers a B.S. degree in physicsand participates in collaborative programs with other sister institutions in the