critical domain, “Interpersonal” builds on the Personal domain. In our prototypework, we effectively used the Kolb as a springboard to an appreciation of individual differencesand their impact on team performance. Beyond the introductory level, material on more complexgroup dynamics and conflict resolution is presented in the intermediate and advanced modules: Interpersonal – The basic mode of operation of any team is interactions between individuals. Appreciation of the diversity of learning styles and performance modes is necessary for success. Communication skills are the fundamental tools that need to be mastered in this domain.The third key domain is the “Project Management"—not only in the sense of producing a
.html[18] Photo from Funtraps. Online: http://www.funtraps.com/web01/page_common/book_tbimc.aspMAUSUMI SYAMAL is an undergraduate teaching fellow at Rogers Herr Middle School in Durham, NC whereshe teaches mechanical engineering concepts. She develops and teaches computer programming labs for first-yearengineering students at Duke University and has been teaching gymnastics for over 8 years. She will receive herbachelor of science in mechanical engineering degree in May 2003 and plans to pursue her Masters in Mechanical Page 8.399.11Engineering at the University of Michigan.Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for
behaviors via geometric constraint definition.Finally, it will depend on correct translation of the initial design constraints and engineeringchange orders into geometric definitions.This approach, however, is not without challenges. First, can a taxonomy be developed thatidentifies the core geometric behaviors that all students should master? Second, given theinherently open-ended nature of most design problems, can a robust enough set of activities bedeveloped that allows for assessment within a practical amount of time and with a high degree ofreliability? That is, can modeling problems be designed that have students incorporate thesebehaviors in a systematic and controlled fashion. The remainder of the paper will address thisfirst challenge
ii.4 Nancy K. Gautier, “A Reporting Mechanism to Identify, Establish, and Modify Business/Industry Linkages”, Alabama Quality Award Conference Proceedings, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, October 4-5, 2000. Page 8.175.9NANCY K. GAUTIER is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at the University of South Alabama. She“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition AnnualCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”received her doctorate in Computer Science in 1993 and Masters in Mathematics in 1983 from Louisiana StateUniversity. She is listed in the 2002 Edition of
in May of 2002 and have moved on to either careers in industry or graduateschool. Jaimee Bohannon was hired into an engineering management position with RaytheonAircraft Company in Wichita, KS. Kimberly Burton, after a short stint as an InformationTechnology (IT) consultant has been employed as an avionics engineer with Cessna AircraftCompany also in Wichita, KS. Doug Joseph is completing his Master of Science degree inMathematics from Pittsburg State University. Page 8.13.12 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationTERRY R. COLLINSTerry R. Collins, Ph.D., P.E., is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Engineering department at the University ofArkansas. Dr. Collins is the Director and Chairman of Studies for the Masters of Science in OperationsManagement program, and Co-Director of the Arkansas Productivity Center. His focus in the teaching and researchareas is in Engineering and Technology Management. Dr. Collins also has 19 years experience in the Agriculture,Telecommunications, and Transportation industries.MANUEL D. ROSSETTIManuel Rossetti is an Associate Professor in the Industrial Engineering
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education” 2. Supervising and advising responsibilities. Number of Graduate Students Undergraduat e Students* Number of Masters Theses/Reports** Doctorate Dissertations** Graduate Students* Reviewed Supervised Reviewed SupervisedSummerSessionFallSemesterSpringSemester * See IV. D. 1. Student advising and career counseling; 2
participants are enthusiastic about this program.1. IntroductionMentoring relationships have the potential to help women engineering students master specificskills (e.g., giving talks, writing proposals, writing dissertations / theses, managing one’s career,supervising and mentoring students, running a lab); explore career choices; obtain a differentperspective on research problems; and learn how to cope with stress, manage time, and meetfamily and work responsibilities. A mentor can also be a role model to encourage the student tocomplete her degree, and can provide valuable information on how to establish oneselfprofessionally. Because of the unique research advisor / student relationship and the isolation in a
, his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University,and his DPhil at the University of Oxford, UK. At Baylor he teaches courses in laboratory techniques, fluidmechanics, thermodynamics, and propulsion systems, as well as freshman engineering.STEVEN EISENBARTHSteven Eisenbarth is Associate Dean of the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Baylor University. Hereceived his B.S. in Mathematics and Physics from Albertson College of Idaho and a Masters and Ph.D. in Physicsfrom Baylor University. He teaches courses in electrical and computer engineering including embedded computersystems design, computer organization, electrical materials, and microprocessor systems.CINDY FRYCindy Fry is a Lecturer in the Department of Computer Science at
our students far outweighs the challenges, we as educators face with theimplementation of these kinds of projects. This paper discusses the challenges, changes andaccommodations we incorporated as part of this course for executing those multidisciplinary /international projects where students are from different engineering departments and countries. Itexplains how these challenges are addressed in the capstone design courses between departmentsand Universities.IntroductionGoing global? Increasingly more US companies in order to keep up with the business growth andto stay competitive are going global, which has created a demand for a new breed of workforceengineers, including engineers that not only master the engineering field but also
., “Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s So Darn Hard).” New York Times, 6 November 2011. Available at http://nytimes.com/2011/11/06/education/edlife/why-science-majors-change-their- mind-its-just-so-darn-hard.html?_r=3&pagewanted=1&hp. Page 25.595.13 4. Lowman, J. 1995 Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. Jossey-Bass Publishing, pp. 232-236.5. Waters, C., Taher, A., Messiha, S., Oneyear, S. 2006. “Preparation, Attendance and Note-taking, How to Promote Student Buy-In.” Proceedings of The American Society of Engineering Education, Chicago, Illinois, 18-21 June.6. Daniel, J. W., “Survival
variable, and j being the site number corresponding to theposition r. The compilation of the matrix was a bit aggravated by the fact that, due to thehexagonal grid, odd rows have one more site than even rows.Another difficulty the students had to master was the definition of proper boundaryconditions. Dirichlet, freestream and reflection boundary conditions were implemented. Abounce back scheme was used for no-slip conditions, while reflections led to a slip boundary.The Dirichlet boundary conditions were set as random variables on the boundary, with aprobability distribution indicating the values at the boundary.The routine that processes the collision phase refers to a collision look-up table, which iscreated in the initialization part of the
Mellon University, Touretzky and his team developed a robot programming languagecalled Tekkotsu which provides a unified framework that undergraduates can master in two-thirds of a semester and then move on to working on an interesting final project. He believes thatrobotics is the leading candidate for the next dramatic change in the CS curriculum, provided thatthe understanding of robot programming will broaden in the coming years.Mataric briefly surveyed his experiences of using robotics as an educational tool at theUniversity of Southern California8. He considers robotics a growing field that has the potentialto significantly impact the nature of engineering and science education at all levels, from K-12 tograduate school. He concluded that
primary polytechnicengineering provider in the region. This partnership is non-competitive in that VUW offers aBachelor of Engineering (BE) (a four year degree awarded with honors), Masters ofEngineering (ME) and PhD degrees whilst WelTec offer a two year Diploma and a three yearBachelor of Engineering Technology (BEngTech) degree – both more trade-orientated andhands-on than the various VUW offerings. Page 25.745.2WelTec currently offer three majors for their BEngTech degree, Electrical (with a specificspecialization in Mechatronics), Civil and Mechanical. The partnership between theinstitutions concentrates on the overlap of course offerings in
Department of Education (ED) Grant 9031C080057-09. Any opinions, findings andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of NSF and/or Department of Education.Bibliography [1] Cisco Academy, (2009), “Master a Language that Increases Your Career Potential”, Cisco Academy Report,[2] Council of University Presidents: New Mexico Universities, (2011), “Performance Effectiveness Report”, NewMexico, USA. [3] Fleming, L., Engerman, K., and Williams, D., (2006), “Why Students Leave Engineering: The unexpectedbond”, Proceedings of the 2006 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition,Chicago, IL.[4] Fujinoki, H., Christensen, K.J., and Rundus, D
AC 2012-3236: IMPROVING STUDENT LEARNING IN DISTANCE-BASEDGRADUATE PROGRAMS: A RESIDENCY LIVE CASE COURSEDr. Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Ismail Capar, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Barry Lawrence, Texas A&M University Page 25.751.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012IMPROVING STUDENT LEARNING IN DISTANCE-BASED GRADUATE PROGRAMS: A RESIDENCY LIVE CASE COURSEABSTRACTA case study of a real world project-based course designed for Master of Science in IndustrialDistribution (MSID) program at XXXX1 University is presented. It primarily focuses on a week-long residency course offered as a part of fall
components of learning are addressed in the initial curriculum and schedule developed for this research program. The author believes that if a supplemental programs such as this one were offered across the country to cover the shortfalls in leadership skills it would benefit everyone involved, most importantly, students. To secure the author’s understanding of the current problems CTE programs are facing, the author spent one year immersed in the CTE community. The course of action the author traveled included attending a craft instructor’s certification with 43 CTE instructors, speaking at two regional CTE administrator symposiums on the topic, obtaining a NCCER Master Trainer
students were alsoenrolled in the CEE 3235 course concurrently.As a starting point to better assess the impact that information literacy is having on our students,the same quiz used in CEE 4224 Transportation Facilities Design was also tested on thegraduate-level Civil Engineering Materials (CEE 8439) course in 2011. This course included amixture of transportation and structural engineering students, 35% of whom are full-time mastersstudents and 65% of whom are part-time masters students working professionals (some of whomare licensed professional engineers). It should also be noted that 40% of the students in the classobtained their BSCE from Villanova University and 60% of the students obtained their bachelorsdegree in engineering at another
Page 25.778.2undergraduate disciplines that benefit most from experiential learning. Despite acomprehensive classroom and laboratory curriculum, program outcomes are bestachieved when course content includes elements of contextual teaching andlearning (CTL) as even the most complex academic engineering exercises fail tocapture the project and work –based learning experiences that are found inindustry.To address both the outcomes of the program and the expectations of industry, theSoECS embarked on a pilot project with Quanser which led to collaborative andproject-based learning in senior and master level capstone projects. This industrypartnership provided our students with career-oriented education as well as acommitment to practical
] Jobs, S. (2005). Commencement address delivered at Stanford University on June 12, 2005. StanfordReport, June 14, 2005.http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2005/june15/jobs-061505.html . Retrieved on April 17, 2008 APPENDIXThe following documents are the master syllabi for the three freshman honors coursestaught across the first year (fall, winter, and spring quarters). Edited sections (in red)reflect changes made after the course ran for the first time.DOCUMENT 1GS 1010 Honors Seminar I – City as Text – “Reading the City” (humanities focus)4 credits 4 - 0 - 4Prerequisite: enrollment in the Honors ProgramStudents will explore the “city as text,” learning to “read” the city. Readings fromhumanities
of successful integration of sustainability into the CEM curriculum. Thepaper proceeds with a detailed description of the project undertaken by the students. The paperhighlights the need for sustainable development in the local context of Saudi Arabia. Studentevaluation results and feedback are presented at the end.Case Study – Green Building ProjectThe case study focuses on a project that was conducted by students as a part of the graduatecourse “Construction Project Management” at the King Fahd University of Petroleum andMinerals. The course is routinely offered as a capstone course for students pursuing a Masters Page 25.810.3degree in
Management (ETCC 499R) includes six weeks of intensive safety trainingin a two-hour lab class setting. Part of the teaching pedagogy in ETCC 499R is to show thestudents the facts about construction safety. This is done by using the US Department of Labor,Bureau of Labor Statistics, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration data. A separateETCC 499R safety mid-term was introduced to the class in 2008 to reinforce the idea thatconstruction safety is about human life and that CET students will be responsible for not onlytheir lives but several others whom they supervise. In 2010 a safety final was added to parallelthe safety mid-term exam, placing even further emphasis on the mastering of safety standardsand laws.Upon review of similar programs
. 0.00%granting institutions, eight (32 percent) offer Ph.D. Granting Masters and Undergraduate Only Undergraduateboth Master’s and Bachelor’s, and four (16 Page 25.967.3 Figure 1: Demographics of Responding Schoolspercent) are undergraduate-only institutions.When asked if they currently have a major 60%design experience, 99 out of the 101
Altera MAX + PLUS II using the schematic design interface, create symbols. Reuse of the symbols created in part a) and designs a 3-to-8 decoder. Verify the truth table using the Altera MAX + PLUS II simulator tool. 6. Flip-flops: part a) Implement a D latch using NAND gates in Altera MAX + PLUS II Page 25.973.6 using schematic design interface, verify their behavior using the simulator, create a symbol for the D latch, part b) implement a Master-Slave flip-flop using the symbol created in part a) and verify the result using the simulator, part c) Verify the truth table of a D flip-flop, edge-triggered
certificate in engineering. The MES offering willalso be coordinated with Rice’s existing masters in science teaching degree taken by manyworking teachers.The second strategy is to design the minor so students have multiple reasons to explore the earlycourses and develop motivation to pursue the entire program. Rice requires all undergraduates tosatisfy a breadth requirement of 12 semester hours in each of three areas: humanities, socialscience, and science, engineering, and mathematics. Only specified courses can be used to satisfythe breadth requirement, and presently there are only a few courses in engineering accessible tonon-engineering majors. Rice will design at least the initial courses in the MES to meet thebreadth requirement, giving
potential to berewarding to both programs. However, to establish the level and scope of the collaboration itwas necessary to conduct a comparative evaluation of program objectives and course content. Itwas believed that the outcomes of the evaluations will help identify any preliminary activities interms course alignment, available resources faculty and student needs, and thereby provide aninsight into the extent and scope of collaboration.Program objective and course contentThe geomatics program at UNILAG was established in 1973 as an undergraduate program. In1997 its name was changed from surveying to geomatics. Over the years, masters and doctorallevel programs have been added. In this evaluation, attention was focused on the baccalaureatedegree
AC 2010-1077: USING A MOUSETRAP-POWERED VEHICLE DESIGN ACTIVITYTO CONVEY ENGINEERING CONCEPTSJohn Fitzpatrick, Drexel University John Fitzpatrick received his Bachelors of Science in Physics Engineering from Washington and Lee University (Lexington, VA) in 2005. Matriculating to Drexel University for graduate studies, he received his Masters of Science in Mechanical Engineering in 2008, with an emphasis on soft-tissue biomechanics. John expects to complete his doctorate in Mechanical Engineering by the end of 2010, with a dissertation topic focusing on simulating cardiovascular mechanics.Adam Fontecchio, Drexel University Dr. Adam Fontecchio is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department
an associate Page 15.410.1 professor of instructional technology in the College of Education. He holds bachelor and masters degrees in computer science from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. He completed a doctoral degree in Instructional Technology at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Williams worked as a programmer for more than 10 years in the United States, Sweden and Australia.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Page 15.410.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Development of a Virtual Hydrologic
such as quality, timeless and continuous improvement. Page 15.172.7 Figure 2- Data Collection Phase and Frequency of MeasuresThe first column in this rubric identifies the performance categories or skills that are beingaddressed by this assignment. The next four columns indicate the ratings a student can receivefor this category based on their demonstration of mastering the skill. Using a generic template,program faculty develops appropriate rubrics for the course level outcomes in their respectivecourses. These course-specific rubrics are then collected as an appendix of the ContinuousImprovement Effort (CIE), so future faculty
courses, foundational andmainstream, must be credit-bearing. They then made available a separate pot of money tosupport extended degree programs. In this way, they hoped to encourage universities to view theprovision of extended degree programs as part of their core business, and not relegate it to a few,relatively junior, enthusiastic teachers.Experiences at the University of XXIn 1994 the School of Engineering at the University of XX launched an extended degree programin which the first two years of the four years of coursework were spread out over three years.Extended degree students thus had a much lighter load than mainstream students. The rationalebehind this structure was that students on the program needed more time to master the