of the country.During the time of the affiliations, from 1956 through 1978, an important part of theirmission was to train Afghan academic staff to become self-sufficient in their teachingabilities for the future. At the end of these affiliations, the Afghan faculties were able tocarry the academic operation of the school with enormous success, compared to non-affiliation-assisted higher-education institutions in the country. The majority of the facultymembers at the School of Engineering possessed Masters of Science (MS) degrees fromUS institutions and a good number of faculty members possessed Doctors of Philosophy(Ph.D.) degrees.3 The Civil Engineering departments which had the greater number ofPh.D.’s were seriously considering starting
expected to have more than 15 students, a small group of laboratorysections will be considered at different time schedules according to student interest.References[1] R. Hinrichs, M. Kleinbach, “Energy Its Use and the Environment,” 3rd Edition, Harcourt College Publishers, 2002.[2] R. A. Prabha, “An Advanced Fuel Cell Simulator”. Master of Science Thesis, B.E. College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, 2004[3] National Instruments “Fuel Cell Testing - The NI Way- Developer Zone”, Available online at http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/2759, accessed December 2007.[4] G. Hoogers, “Fuel Cell Technology Handbook”, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2003.[5] The online Fuel Cell Information Resource, “Fuel Cell Basics and Benefits
times, so students had a clear idea what was expected of them.A copy of the rubric was returned with each draft, noting the level attained in eachassessed trait. Page 13.344.6The rubric used in this case was based on Bloom’s taxonomy [14], which groupscognitive traits into six major categories. As in the King and Kitchener model discussedabove, these categories are hierarchical, arranged from the simplest cognitive behavior tothe most complex. Lower categories must be mastered before higher ones can beattained. Starting at the most basic, these categories are Knowledge (recall data or facts);Comprehension (understand meaning and state in one’s own
effortby the Institute.Auburn University: Auburn University operates a Sound and Vibration Research Laboratoryin the Mechanical Engineering Department, where several faculty members, visiting scholars andgraduate students conduct their research. Auburn University’s ME Department also has excellentfacilities for the characterization of materials and structures using non-destructive techniques.Since its founding, over 20 Ph.D.s and 40 masters students have graduated from theselaboratories, conducting research in the areas of acoustics, noise control engineering, non-destructive evaluation, and vibration. Sponsors have included: NASA Marshall; NASA Langley;NASA/JPL; IBM Charlotte, North Carolina; IBM Austin, Texas; the American Gas Association;the US
publicity and media relations for the department. He holds a B.S. in Manufacturing Engineering Technology and a Masters Degree in Technology Management from Brigham Young University and is currently pursuing a PhD in Educational Leadership from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. His dissertation research is focused on how to help engineers become leaders in a global environment utilizing capstone courses and other project-based curriculum. He worked for BD Medical for nearly13 years including work as a project/program manager, business leader, technical services leader, product development engineer, and quality engineer. In addition, he provided project management and ethics training to many
with sections designated to each year. For eachsubsequent design course, the expectations will be raised. Data from each year will be collected,progress will be tracked, and action taken when needed for individual students, sections or anentire class. The rubric will focus on collaboration, communication, documentations, criticalthinking and innovation. For example, collaboration and communication are emphasized in thefreshmen year with much less emphasis on documentation and critical thinking. By their seniordesign course, critical thinking and innovation are the core expectations where it is expected thatthey have mastered collaboration, communication and documentation.ConclusionAssessment of the sophomore design course over the last eight
been created to support each cognitiveobjective. After perusing each e-module, a student should know how to define thevocabulary associated with the mathematics concept (knowledge), master the computationalskills by going through the examples (comprehension), solve real-word problems associatedwith the topic (application), explain the mathematical process in deriving the answer(analysis), apply prior knowledge and skills to produce a new concept (synthesis), andcompare mathematical methods (evaluation).The versatility and availability of the e-modules allow engineering-technology students toconnect mathematics to the courses required in engineering. Each e-module can be accessedby students at any time and anywhere as long as they have Internet
. He did his schooling in Warangal, Andhra Pradesh, India. In 2005, he received his Bachelor of Engineering Degree in Computer Science from Osmania University, Hyderabad, India. In 2005, he moved to US to pursue his MS (Computer Science) at Northern Illinois University and successfully graduated in Aug 2007. He is currently working as a Software Engineer – QA at Broadcom Corporation, San Diego, CA.Mohammed Murtuza, Northern Illinois University MOMAMMED MURTUZA was born in Hyderabad (southern part of India) on November 25th 1984. He came to USA in July 2006 in pursuit of Masters in Computer Science with the Northern Illinois University (NIU), where he enhanced his expertise and skills that
the students were required to find independently) to build a small light-sensing robot from a recycled computer mouse. The parts were very inexpensive, and students found some in discarded Page 13.74.4 electronics. Certain aspects are completely left up to students’ ingenuity and development, such as the design of the wheels, the internal architecture of the “mousebot”, and the design of the “drive train” and choice of materials for structural support and connections. With only a minimal introduction and some background on basic electronics, student teams need to master the
approaches from STS that frame studio pedagogy. Page 13.767.7How a Telephone WorksIn opening his book Designing Engineers, MIT engineering and STS scholar Louis Bucciarelliprovides a thought-provoking exercise on what it means to understand how something works.18When asked “Do you know how a telephone works?” most people assume the correct response—whether they answer yes or no—involves sound wave propagation, the vibration of diaphragms,the transmission of electrons, and other esoteric matters mastered only by physicists andengineers. If one does not “know” such matters, we generally assume, one does not know how atelephone works. But why is it
engineering and biotechnologyprograms. Although only a minority of AFV graduates have gone on to work directly inalternative fuels, some went to work for automobile companies, some went to graduate school,and others started their own businesses. Although our assessment instruments are currently tooblunt to measure the success of AFV students, the anecdotal evidence strongly suggests that theprogram has prepared students well.The program is becoming increasingly popular, as the number of interested students nowsurpasses the number of students that the AFV can support. The AFV has even attracted interestin overseas students, including several Masters exchange students from Germany who afterwardswent to work for German automobile companies. The recent
: technology, finance, environmental, and international guidance and best practices”. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.[18] [Online] Template For a Readiness Review Report for the 2022-2023 Readiness Review Cycle, Extracted from 2021-22 EAC Self-Study Questionnaire, ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) https://www.abet.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/09/E005-EAC-Self-Study-Questionaire-for-Masters-Level-2022- 2023-cycle.docx [Accessed in 2021.][19] A. Azzouni, Abdullah, and J. Parham-Mocello. "Continuous Improvement in Academic Computing Programs is Rarely Comprehensive." In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. 2021.[20] T. Kunberger, K. Csavina, and R. O’Neill. "Scaffolding Assessment
21st century.” New York: Basic Books.5 Sarasin, L., (1998), “Learning style perspectives: impact in the classroom.” Madison, WI: Atwood.6 Bursi, O. S., and Jaspart, J. P., (1997), “Benchmarks For Finite Element Modeling of Bolted steel Connections.” Journal of Construction Steel Research, Vol. 43, No. 1-3, PP 17-42.7 Griggs, N.S., Criswell, M.E., and Siller, T.J., (1996), “Integrated civil engineering curriculum: implementation and management.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 122(4):1-5.8 Joyce, B., and Weil, M., (2000), “Models of teaching.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.9 Lowman, J., (1995), “Mastering the techniques of teaching.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.10
=Main.OmnetppInNutshell]17. S. Joseph Levine, “Writing and Presenting your Thesis or Dissertation”, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI, January 2005.18. Edgar H. Callaway, Jr., “Wireless Sensor Networks: Architectures and Protocols”, ISBN 0-8493-1823-8.19. Tarun Anand Malik, “Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks”, A Thesis, Submitted for Master of Science in Engineering, Louisiana State University, May 200520. DeLynn Bettencourt, “A System of Performance Measurement of Pico Radio Network Protocols”, SUPERB 2002, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley21. Lizhi Charlie Zhong, Rahul Shah, Chunlong Guo, Jan Rabaey, “An Ultra-Low Power and Distributed Access Protocol for Broadband Wireless Sensor Networks
theirknowledge and skills even if not completely mastering all the expected concepts. Additionally,students who may not perform well in a traditional academic-testing environment may excel atunderstanding real-world issues; for example, they may have worked on car engines and be veryfamiliar with practical considerations such as gear size and belt tensioning. Integrating PBL and PLCDeveloping the rich projects and dynamic learning environment for true Project-Based Learning(PBL) can be daunting. Common first reactions from teachers include: I do not have any good project ideas… I do not have time to develop PBL lessons…The integration of Professional Learning
means of the common courseoutcomes between the traditional and the Living with the Lab curricula. The performance meansfor the Living with the Lab curriculum were found to be significantly higher (p = 0.025738) thanthose for the traditional curriculum. It can be seen in Table 4 that students in the traditionalcurriculum did master some of the course outcomes to a higher degree; this was in part due to thefact that more instructional time was provided for several of the outcomes.We are convinced that the new project-based Living with the Lab curriculum is effective inoffering the students many more opportunities to develop the skill sets associated with “TheEngineer of 2020,” and we are enthusiastic about carrying this philosophy of blending
announcement described earlier.The next challenge was to develop the curriculum that would encompass the intellectual andacademic aspects the department had been grappling with. In January 2007, one of the authorsattended a local BIM seminar sponsored by Master Graphics (http://www.masterg.com/software-solutions/building-aec), a local Autodesk reseller. At this seminar contact was made with manylocal industry BIM practitioners (architects, structural engineers and construction engineers) whoexpressed their willingness to be engaged as guest speakers in the recently scheduled BIM class.Course Curriculum DevelopmentAlthough not explicitly formulated at the time, the discussion on how to achieve the broaderintellectual and academic goals focused on
students to gain experience in basic research tools and exposethem to the kind of work a graduate student is expected to perform. Also, beginning andadvanced graduate students can refine and expand their experience performing research-basedwork. Finally, students will have the opportunity to expand and improve upon basic andadvanced communication skills via laboratory interaction and written and oral presentations of Page 13.1214.2work. It is expected that each student can produce a conference publication from their work.This last point also serves as a great motivating factor in the students’ desires to really master thesubject matter.Problem
, the RET faculty expected theparticipant teachers to become knowledgeable about introducing and utilizing biomedicalengineering activities into their classrooms. Although there are myriad factors thatinfluence a student’s learning and interest, research has revealed that a major factor thatinfluences students is teacher quality6. The weekly mentoring by the university facultyand graduate students enabled the BMERET teacher to quickly master the skillsnecessary to become an integral member of the laboratory’s research team. Throughoutthe experience, the BMERET teachers investigate specific hypotheses using techniquesthat are well established. We posit that this will result in the teacher making anintellectual contribution to the research
and the number of engineering graduate degrees have beenbasically flat for the past ten years. The number of U.S. citizens earning graduate degrees inengineering has been declining, while the number of graduate degrees being earned byinternational students has been increasing. In 2002, less than 59% of the Masters degrees inengineering were earned by U.S. citizens or permanent residents.2 In 2003, only 36% of theengineering doctoral degrees in the nation were earned by U.S. citizens or permanent residents.2Many of the freshly minted doctors return to their homeland.In addition to the low numbers of U.S. citizens earning Master’s and Ph.D. degrees inengineering, the numbers of women and members of underrepresented minority groups continueto be
; graduate masters to doctoral candidates; every engineering discipline has been represented. • Topics most often selected: Heat Transfer, Moon and Mars Exploration, Biomedical Page 13.1271.9 Systems and Advanced Robotics Technology • Most common major represented: Mechanical EngineeringFigure 2 below provides a summary of the program’s level of activity.Figure 2: Design Challenge Program History and Outcomes 131 TEAMS AND STILL COUNTING . . . TSGC DESIGN • Fall 2002: Pilot program tested • 11 students / 3 faculty CHALLENGE • 3 institutions / 3 teams • 3 self-developed project topics
the ability to use multiple resources (notes, internet, other software) as a principal advantageof Tablet PCs. A second principal advantage noted was the ability to use different colors, linewidths, and even digital ink highlighters when taking notes. The principal disadvantage relatedto reliability of wireless connections. A few students noted the tendency of computers toperiodically freeze and require rebooting, which could cause the student to lose a file and missinformation.Several survey respondents appreciated the ability to learn new technology and to master itquickly. One student appreciated not having to carry to numerous binders for the differentclasses, and another noted that if Tablet PCs were used in more classes or if students
institutions, within and outside the state of Kentucky.There were 80 (out of the 195) students awarded the bachelors or masters degrees in engineering(41.03%). In the early years of the INSPIRE program, students who enrolled at the University ofLouisville also had the option of pursuing associate degrees in engineering. There were 4INSPIRE participants who acquired an associate degree. Including these students, thepercentage would increase to 43.08%. There were also other math/science based degreesgranted among INSPIRE participants; namely, 9 medical degrees, 11 degrees awarded inbiology, 6 in math and 1 in Computer Information Systems.As of spring 2007, there were 41 former INSPIRE participants currently enrolled at theUniversity of Louisville as
students) were slightly lower (4.1 out of 5 for the both the first and secondinstitute), in part because teachers had already mastered the material and because it containedfewer hands-on activities for teachers. As a result, the teachers’ second week next summer willhave more activities designed specifically for the teachers in the second week.During the first week of the institute, the teachers worked in groups of four and, during thesecond week, the students did the same, modeling what would happen in their classrooms. Boththe teachers during the first week and the students during the second week faced problems withgroup work, and considerable time was spent discussing these issues. As we will see below, thispractice experience affected how the
design documentations becomes increasingly important.• Project planning is an important part of the overall activities. Use project planning tools and expect delays in both task completion time and funding.• New team members will not stay around for long if they are not given an immediate project- related task to work on; ideally this is undertaken jointly with an existing team member to help them navigate through the current tasks.• Compile assessment trip data together in one ‘master file’ as soon as the team returns home. Data can be lost or scattered as individuals move and/or graduate.12. Acknowledgements The authors of this paper would like to thank the following people for their support of
, uncertainty analysis, inverse heat transfer, radiation heat transfer, applied math, theoretical and applied control systems, piezoelectric sensors, electrical power system generation and distribution, and redundant measurement systems.B. Hodge, Mississippi State University B. K. Hodge is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Mississippi State University (MSU) where he serves as the TVA Professor of Energy Systems and the Environment and is a Giles Distinguished Professor and a Grisham Master Teacher. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and an Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
AC 2009-833: ENCOURAGING CONCEPTUAL CHANGE IN SCIENCETHROUGH THE USE OF ENGINEERING DESIGN IN MIDDLE SCHOOLChristine Schnittka, University of Virginia Christine Schnittka is a 2009 graduate of the University of Virginia with a Ph.D. in science education. She has ten years experience teaching middle school science, plus masters and bachelors degrees in mechanical engineering.Randy Bell, University of Virginia Randy Bell is Associate Professor of Science Education at the University of Virginia.Larry Richards, University of Virginia Larry Richards is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Virginia
effectivelygather data from an even distribution of homes throughout the village and to not concentrateefforts in one specific area. The member of the team not fluent in Spanish would locate thecapped spring box and distribution tank to conduct analysis on these sites, as well as to take 10-digit GPS coordinates for each and photograph these locations. We also brought Hach DR/890portable colorimeters to determine chlorine residual concentrations in water from the taps of theaverage resident user. Chlorine is supposed to be applied to the system at the village distributiontank approximately every three days.At the conclusion of each day, survey data from all four groups was digitized and consolidatedon one master spreadsheet for further analysis at a later
normallysimulated about them. It is their life or abilities, their roles that are being examined or tested. Theauxiliary egos are anyone else who performs to place the protagonists within the situation. Theaudience is any onlooker who may provide feedback. The stage is wherever the practice isperformed or perhaps fictionally set. The director is the expert who guides the exercise, this canbe a therapist, instructor, trainer, coach, or, within role-playing games, a game master. Many students who have participated in role playing have expressed that immersion inthe topic, established through role playing, provides insight into real issues that they have facedand allows them to work through these issues in a meaningful way, thus providing them with
interdisciplinary design teams with Drs. Lisa McNair and Marie Paretti.Eloise Coupey, Virginia Tech Eloise Coupey is an Associate Professor of Marketing in the Pamplin College of Business at Virginia Tech. She received her PhD in Business Administration from Duke University in 1990, and a BA degree from Harvard University in 1983. She researches consumer and managerial decision making, and the nature and influence of information technologies on decision aspects related to the adoption of products and ideas.Ed Dorsa, Virginia Tech Ed Dorsa is an Associate Professor of Industrial Design in the College of Architecture and Urban Studies at Virginia Tech. He received his Master and Bachelor of Industrial