languages need to be mastered quickly to be applied, and school, where foundations are built andstudents “learn how to learn”. In general, students felt well-prepared for their internships and expressedgratitude for school for helping them get ready to learn new technologies and languages quickly andtackle problems with persistence and critical thinking. I have come to realize that no matter what [school] teaches me in regard to coding, it has foremost taught me to work hard and work consistently. I believe this is the biggest skill and a habit that I have developed through the constant assignments and approaching daily deadlines. At work whenever I was working with something that was new to me and I was having a hard time I
Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder.Dr. Chris Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is Dean of Undergraduate Education for the School of Engineering and an associate professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts University. He has additional appoint- ments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on community engagement, service-based projects and examining whether an entrepreneurial
Paper ID #31558Can Empathy Be Taught? The Results of an Assignment Targeted atImproving Empathy in Engineering DesignDevanshi Shah, University of Georgia Devanshi Shah is currently a PhD student in Engineering at the University of Georgia, under the advise- ment of Dr. Beshoy Morkos. She received her masters degree in Mechanical Engineering from Florida Institute of Technology in 2019. She graduated with her bachelors in Mechanical Engineering from India in 2016. Her research area is focused in design engineering and engineering education.Miss Xiaoou Yang, University of Georgia Xiaoou Yang is a graduate student from College
Paper ID #30127Conceptualizing a theory of ethical behavior in engineeringMr. Luan Minh Nguyen, Iowa State University Luan M. Nguyen is an MA/Ph.D. student in Anthropology/Civil Engineering, who completed his Master of Science in Biochemistry at Iowa State University and his Bachelor of Science in Chemistry at Hartwick College. His first master’s thesis focused on the structural analysis of the schizophrenic gene DISC1 using transmission electron microscopy and hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. For his second master’s thesis, he focuses on identifying the individual and institutional factors that contribute
to a plastic molding companywould help to show the class why the phone case they drop all the time doesn’t break, but theLCD display does, and how the case is actually manufactured.The Graduate Segment – Skipping the post-secondary, college segment for the moment,technical masters and doctorate theses are either pure science, utilitarian, or some combination ofboth. In any case, in this segment of the education process, both teaching narrowly focusedadvanced subjects, as well as leaving the realm of teaching existing material to enter work oforiginal discovery and study are pursued. For the electronic product assembly field, practicaltopics are usually chosen, e.g., the study of new doping additives in lead-free solder alloys. Here,the
the joint doctoral program at San Diego State University and the University of California San Diego.Kalani Kithuliya Rubasinghe Kattadige, Clarkson University, New York Kalani Rubasinghe is a third year Ph.D. student in Mathematics at Clarkson University, New York and she obtained her Master degree in Mathematics from Clarkson. Her research focuses on numerical solutions for PDEs, using Radial Basis Functions (RBFs).Dr. Wen Li, Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles Wen Li is an Assistant Adjunct Professor of Mathematics at University of California, Los Angele. She is teaching mathematics upper-division courses. She also has several years of experience in teaching lower- division
program, high-impact action learning projects, regular feedback, coaching, and so on); • Plans for an additional advanced-level program with the US university; • Plans for nomination of exceptional managers for Masters and PhD programs in quantitative methods; • Visibility at the top and senior management level in the company.To further solidify support for the CoP, a session was organised for the business leadership team(BLT) to showcase the program and the potential power of CoPs. During this session, the BLTmembers have listed challenging strategic priorities to be focused by the CoP in the comingyears. It was agreed that the CoP model will be leveraged for strategic and breakthrough projectsof the
capable engineers. The underlying idea of making creativity exercises moreregular is valid, but instructors must be careful that students are still provided with theopportunity to master the important technical content within the course. Striking the rightbalance requires careful thought and discussion with other faculty.The second category of comments was interesting. Of the exercises on homework assignments,five of the eight (items 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in Table 2) were directly related to civil engineering.Thus, these comments were most likely addressing the in-class exercises. Incorporating thissuggestion may actually enable doing more exercises helping to satisfy the desire of students formore frequent in-class creativity exercises. If the
that industryneeds and that this is not often taught in university programs. Trevelyan writes on thisextensively in his 2019 paper [20].The goal of establishing a basic teaching credential was again discussed and its importance wasagreed upon. John iterated that there is a body of knowledge about education, and that to be aprofessional educator, one must master it, as well as the technical area of expertise. Again, allthree workshop facilitators verbally offered to engage in ongoing communication withparticipants through email, Skype or phone calls, and that they welcomed participants to contactthem during the coming year.Reflection on the fourth workshop:Mani, acting as workshop participant/observer related that this workshop reemphasized
awards, including the Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and Engineering Mentoring, and the Anita Borg Social Impact c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #30783 Award. She has authored and presented numerous papers, presentations, and workshops. She earned a bachelors degree from Dartmouth (majoring in philosophy), and masters and Ph.D. degrees in education administration and policy analysis at Stanford, and continues to build upon research in the design and implementation of programs.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D
transportation systems, and traffic safety and operations. He has been very active in engineering education research as well.Md Tawhidur Rahman, West Virginia University Md Tawhidur Rahman is pursuing PhD in Civil Engineering at West Virginia University. He has com- pleted his Masters in Civil Engineering from the same university in 2018. Mr. Rahman has been awarded CEE PhD fellowship cap for the academic year of 2019-2020 for his research contribution in the field of transportation engineering. Research interest of Mr. Rahman include winter roadway maintenance, shared-use mobility, social-media data analysis, traffic operation at intersection, and connected and au- tonomous vehicle.Dr. V. Dimitra Pyrialakou, West Virginia
Bachelors, 12.6% of all Masters, and only 8.3% of all U.S. Doctoratedegrees awarded, even though URMs are 29.3% of the U.S. population [1]. It is imperative thatscience educators increase awareness and interest in STEM to our students. It is no longerenough to rely solely on in-class instruction. Instead, effective informal STEM experiences canbe organized. These informal experiences have shown to have positive impact on the recruitmentand retention of young students in STEM [2]. Increasing effectiveness of informal sciencelearning can be accomplished by providing students with unique undergraduate researchexperiences utilizing course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) as well as by
nevertheless seemed to miss the mark in terms of what participantsexpected from me. They seemed to have an implicit model for what creativity was (namely, aninternal cognitive act) and how it should be taught (using a traditional didactic approach), butthey felt they lacked the content of what should be conveyed within that model of creativityeducation. In other words, creativity was like statics or circuits, with a handful of orientingprinciples and problem-solving protocols that could be identified, conveyed discretely, practiced,mastered, cumulated, and ultimately integrated with other engineering analytic skills. What Ipresented about what made PDI students creative and successful problem solvers bothmisaligned with what my engineering peers
development and education research for DC Colorado’s hands-on initiatives.Dr. Nathan E. Canney, Dr. Canney’s research focuses on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsi- bility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seat- tle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Ethics and Societal Impacts Education of Chemical
Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on struc- tural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Dr. Canney taught in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Seattle University for four years and now works in private consulting. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Faculty Perceptions of Challenges to Educating Engineering and Computing Students About Ethics and Societal ImpactsAbstractEvaluating ethics and societal impacts (ESI) is an integral part of engineering in anincreasingly globalized and technology dependent world. Despite the recognized
responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sus- tainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on struc- tural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Dr. Canney taught in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Seattle University for four years and now works in private consulting.Dr. Chris Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is an associate professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts Uni- versity. He has additional appointments in the
project.Rather than understanding the methodology as a means for elucidating their thoughts andfeelings, they viewed the method as a repetitive exercise, which often resulted in them providingredundant responses. This highlights the need in engineering education for greater explanation ofhow and why engineering professionals find value in engaging in such reflective exercises. Inthis instance of the course, it suggests that more face to face scaffolding time may be required tohelp students develop their skills and abilities in this area. Providing such intervention in thefuture may help students see potential long-term professional benefits of mastering the method.AssessmentIn the domain of educational assessment, there is a balance to strike between
interacted with them one-on-one toidentify the source of their error, encouraged them to learn from their mistake, and asked them toplan and complete the same task correctly. As the participants experienced success in completinghands-on activities, it contributed to the growth in their self-efficacy score in the anxiety section.An area of future study is to target the component of verbal persuasion, the verbal affirmation thatan individual can master or complete assigned task. We note that there was a drop in the motivationsection of the robotics self-efficacy survey. One reason for this may be because we integratedmotivational talks, i.e., verbal affirmations of participants’ abilities, only in the first few days ofPD. Following daily reflections
University (NYU), NY, USA. His research and teaching interests in- clude robotics, mechatronics, control systems, electro-mechanical design, human factors/ergonomics, en- gineering psychology, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, computer vision, biomimetics and biomechan- ics with applications to industrial manipulation and manufacturing, healthcare and rehabilitation, social services, unmanned autonomous vehicle (aerial and ground, indoor and outdoor) systems and STEM education.Mrs. Veena Jayasree Krishnan, New York University Veena Jayasree Krishnan received a Master of Technology (M. Tech.) degree in Mechatronics from Vel- lore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India in 2012. She has two years of research
his B.S. in Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University, and his Masters and PhD in Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania. Before coming to Wake Forest, Michael was an Associate Professor of Chemical En- gineering at Bucknell University. He has broad research interests in materials and composite processing and design, primarily for solid oxide fuel cells, but also for batteries, solar absorbers, and gas adsorp- tion. However, he also has a passion for designing educational experiences that support student intrinsic motivation. Using the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS), Basic Needs Satisfaction (BNS) survey, and cluster analysis, Gross helps faculty understand the types of
Paper ID #21796Implementing Civil Engineering-specific Requirements for Professional Li-censureDr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He obtained his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech and then worked at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridge research. He is currently an associate professor of Civil Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). He teaches engineering mechanics
paper.References1. Rosin, H., The end of men: And the rise of women. 2012: Penguin.2. Beede, D.N., et al., Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. 2011.3. Chen, X., STEM Attrition: College Students' Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. National Center for Education Statistics, 2013.4. Mayer, P., Guidelines for writing a review article. Zurich-Basel: Plant Science Center. Dostupné z http://www. plantscience. ethz. ch/education/Masters/courses/Scientific_Writing, 2009.5. Gough, D., S. Oliver, and J. Thomas, An introduction to systematic reviews. 2012: Sage.6. Cook, D.A. and C.P. West, Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach. Medical
such a lengthy process.Graduate course in Advanced Thermodynamics (Spring 2016) Your external problems are wonderful. Please give more external. Problems in the external sections were very good.First course in thermodynamics (Fall 2017) Agree with use of external problems, however should have the same weight as textbook problems External problems are confusing The external problem solutions should be posted.Project AssignmentsThermodynamics problems involving cycles with numerous states and components are especiallydifficult for students to master as well as for instructors to assess student mastery of the material.It is common practice to assign homework problems which take the average student severalhours to complete. An example
learning management system (Desire2Learn). Pre-class problems wereassigned on the online assessment system (Mastering Engineering) accompanying Hibbeler'sEngineering Mechanics: Statics textbook [12] and the in-class problems were mostly assignedfrom this textbook. An online discussion forum (Piazza) was available and daily instructor officehours were offered.The auto-graded pre-class problems were worth 10% of the course grade, and completing the in-class problems was worth 5%. There were three 2-hour tests (spaced approximately a monthapart), and a 3-hr final exam that altogether accounted for the remaining 85% of the coursegrade. During in-class sessions, students could get help from their peers, instructor and anundergraduate teaching assistant
-time. Through this position, she was encouraged to earn her Master of Arts in Science Teaching, also at Northern Arizona University. During this time, Christina discovered a love for research, prompting her to pursue a Ph.D. She is a recipient of both a Graduate School Recruitment Fellowship and a Texas New Scholar’s Fellowship. She is a member of the National Science Teachers As- sociation, and currently serves as the STEM Education representative to the Graduate Student Assembly at UT.Hannah Smith Brooks, University of Texas at Austin Hannah Brooks is a doctoral student at the University of Texas at Austin. Her research focuses on promot- ing equitable access through collaboration and instructional design. She is
Physics. Currently, he teaches introductory mechanics and electrodynamics for physics majors and a course in musical acoustics, which was specifically de- signed for elementary education majors. He is director of the ASU Physics Teacher Education Coalition (PhysTEC) Project, which strives to produce more and better high school physics teachers. He is also director of Master of Natural Science degree program, a graduate program designed for in-service science teachers. He works on improving persistence of students in STEM majors, especially under-prepared students and students from under-represented groups. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
Degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Washington, in Seattle, and the Master of Science and Ph.D. degrees in Chemical Engineering, both from the University of Michigan. He teaches a number of alternative energy courses at Lawrence Tech. Dr. Fletcher and his student research team is focusing on energy usage and efficiencies of several traditional and alternative energy systems.Dr. Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Engineering Society of Detroit. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American
Evaluation from Virginia Tech. Her research and scholarship are focused on exploring the implementation of mixed methods, qualitative, and arts-informed research designs in studies examining issues of social justice and educational equity. Currently, she is on a research team examining the impacts of an out-of-school STEM summer program for racially underrepresented youth.Dr. Homero Gregorio Murzi, Virginia Tech Homero Murzi is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at Vir- ginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive ped- agogical