both undergraduate and graduateeducation should reflect that change [1], [2], [3]. This commitment to a shift in the educationalapproach within MSE departments is highlighted in the strategic plan of the National Scienceand Technology Council’s Materials Genome Initiative, which posits that the next generation ofthe MSE workforce will need to master three competencies: experimentation, data management,and computation [4].MSE educators have worked to construct educational offerings that develop competencies in theareas identified by the Materials Genome Initiative. Several departments have developedcomputational courses or add-on computational modules for existing courses [5], [6], [7], [8],[9], [10]. However, while inroads have been made in
technical concepts students are mastering in theirsociopolitical context. Thus, discussion and debate around equitable infrastructure topics shouldbe expected and encouraged. Learning assessment could include individual reflection, groupreflection, and/or concept mapping.The courses at Lafayette College and Gonzaga University both covered the construction of theinterstate highway system beginning in the 1950 as an equity issue. This case study has both astrong historical lens as well as contemporary framing since the Federal InfrastructureInvestment and Jobs Act has a funding program called Reconnecting Communities andNeighborhoods, which is targeting investment in areas that were negatively impacted by pastprojects like the interstate highway
engineer-in-progress is respected in different contexts How the participants experienced being seen as engineers-in-progress concerning respectvaried if the faculty were their engineering course instructors or if they were mentor figures inthe cohort program. The participants believed recognition from instructional faculty was orientedaround knowledge of engineering and that there was "a lot of focus on being a master of yourcraft (Darryl)." While participants felt recognized by instructional faculty as engineers inprogress, their respect for students fluctuated depending on how the faculty member interpretedstudent progress toward acquiring this knowledge. A shared sentiment was that faculty saw themas potential engineers "until you make a
Paper ID #42973Understanding Federal STEM Education InitiativesDr. Jessica Centers, The MITRE Corporation Jessica Centers is a communications engineer at the MITRE Corporation. She joined MITRE in 2023 after completing her Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering with a focus on signal and information processing at Duke University. Upon beginning her role at MITRE, she also completed her Master of Arts in Technology Ethics and Science Policy. Prior to graduate school, she received her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Milwaukee School of Engineering in 2018. She currently splits her time between STEM workforce and
, leadership, teamwork, innovation, and civic andpublic engagement. The survey aimed to understand students’ “attitudes towards professionalskills is to predict their intention to master those skills during college and enact them aftergraduation” [13, p. 1430]. This recent work is focused on helping universities develop curriculathat incorporate professional skill development within technical courses and seems particularlyuseful for engineering educators. Another option might be using the Miville-GuzmanUniversality-Diversity Scale—Short form (MGUDS-S) to determine their openness to andappreciation of cultural diversity [14].Students should be taught creativity theories and methodologies in engineering design courses toincrease creativity in
ability to managetime properly, exist across all classroom settings.Students utilize recordings to support and improve their learning and further engage withcourse content.To further understand the ways in which students utilize classroom lecture recordings, we askedstudents to provide all the ways in which they utilize classroom recordings in an open-endedquestion and binned responses by category (Figure 5). Students reported that they primarily uselecture recordings to edit or fill in partially missed lecture notes even after attending class (n=63,58%), review lecture notes to master material or improve understanding (including the use ofclosed captions) (n=53, 49%), review for exams or quizzes (n=45, 42%), catch up when sick orotherwise unable
at West Virginia University. David believes that being a Christian and a civil engineer is an exciting pairing, as civil engineers get an opportunity to participate in God’s redemptive work on the earth and serve people by helping provide them with safe solutions to their most fundamental needs.Mackenzie Booth, Cedarville University Mackenzie Booth is an assistant professor of civil engineering at Cedarville University, where she has served since 2020. Prior to joining the faculty at Cedarville, Mackenzie completed a Master of Science degree in Environmental Engineering at Purdue University. She completed her undergraduate studies at LeTourneau University. Mackenzie believes environmental engineers are tasked with
. Grinter from the University of Florida; and the 1968Goals Report, as coordinated by Penn State President Eric A. Walker. The Grinter Report, whichwas itself quite controversial in its time, is widely recognized for having given better articulation Page 22.1015.4to the notion of engineering science, and for establishing a more science-based curriculum as thepostwar norm for engineering education. The 1968 Goals Report, meanwhile, was an even morecontroversial document that recommended that the master‟s degree ought to be the firstprofessional degree in engineering. Both studies placed considerable emphasis on generaleducation, including, quite
at the Uni- versity of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez. Subsequently, she graduated from Carnegie Mellon University with a PhD in Chemical Engineering and a Masters of Science in Polymers, Colloids and Surfaces. Her disserta- tion work presented a novel technique to allow for the control of mass transport in crosslinked hydrogels with applications in the fields of biosensors and microfluidics. Under a fellowship from the National Research Council, Marvi worked as a postdoctoral fellow at the National Institute of Standards and Tech- nology (NIST). Her project at NIST involved the study of encapsulated neural stem cell’s viability and differentiation under AC electric fields. More recently (2008-2010), she worked as a
presentations from my wheelchair in ways that no other professor at my school could. This summer also gave me the opportunity to mentor someone else helping an intern who was just about to go off to college learn some of the independent navigation skills to be active in the community by herself. On the technical side, I was given a chance to see the field of Assistive Technology at work and allowed me to finalize my decision to pursue AT in not only a Masters Degree
andAdvanced Manufacturing (EDAM). Each of the four focus areas involves at least threePortuguese universities plus MIT, and involves multiple industry partners. The four areas wereidentified during a 1-year assessment period by the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technologyand Higher Education (MCTES) in coordination with MIT as strategically important forPortugal‟s future with a high chance of international competitiveness. The confinement to fourfocus areas stands in contrast to a Portuguese equity tradition university funding, which has oftenlead to a sub-critical dispersion of funding across many fields and places.The four focus areas have created a total of 7 new graduate degrees, 4 Doctoral programs and 3Advances Studies/Masters programs
AC 2011-1069: STUDENT-CREATED WATER QUALITY SENSORSLiesl Hotaling, University of South Florida-St. Petersburg Liesl Hotaling is a senior engineer at the College of Marine Science, University of South Florida. She holds a B.S. in Marine Science, and Masters degrees in Science Teaching and Maritime Systems. She is a partner in Centers for Ocean Science Education Excellence - Networked Ocean World (COSEE-NOW) and specializes in real time data and hands-on STEM educational projects supporting environmental ob- serving networks.Rustam Stolkin, University of Birmingham, UK Dr. Stolkin is a Research Fellow at the Intelligent Robotics Lab, University of Birmingham, UK. He is an interdisciplinary engineer, with diverse
MEAs, Paper Plane Challenge, Just-In-Time Manufacturing, and Travel Mode Choice,were implemented in Fall 2008. For MEA 1: Paper Plane Challenge student teams used data toconstruct a procedure (model) for judging paper airplane contests, for MEA 2: Just-in-TimeManufacturing student teams provided a model for ranking shipping companies, and for MEA 3:Travel Mode Choice student teams developed a model from data to make predictions aboutstudents’ transportation choices in order to inform a university’s master development planningprocess. A more detailed description of these MEAs is provided by Zawojewski, Diefes-Dux,and Bowman3. The MEAs were part of a required problem-solving and computer tools course inthe first-year engineering program
engineering faculty first to rank how important or useful these skills are forengineering students to master. Forty-one faculty took the survey, and they ranked “giving clear,organized, and credible presentations” and “creating a well-organized document” as the mostimportant skills for engineering students to have. (Figure 1 shows how faculty ranked seven ofthe 17 skills.) Page 22.579.7Figure 1. Sample faculty responses to the Spring 2009 College of Engineering Faculty Survey. This questionasked faculty to rank the importance of 17 communication skills. (Only seven of those 17 skills are shown here.)After faculty ranked the usefulness of those skills
face-to-face collaboration, andseveral drawbacks were associated with this mode of communication. First of all, students foundthat relying on distant correspondence was not as efficient and slowed research progress: When I was in (her home country) I was all on my own. I managed to get through it for my Masters but it wasn’t easy to be honest. I did struggle a lot because sometimes I would get just stuck for like weeks and weeks and not be able to move forward because he (the student’s advisor) can’t really help me.Working on campus was considered more advantageous to provide easy access to physical andhuman resources and can hasten degree process: Um, well, it’s been quite interesting actually
mastering knowledge incertain areas as well as the integrative and social skills for combining their knowledge with thatof others in hybrid learning formats. Companies like IBM and IDEO refer to people with bothdomain-specific and integrative skills as “T-shaped” people,31, 61 and find them key to theinnovation process.b. Integration grooms entrepreneursEntrepreneurship is the ability to marshal resources in order to realize an idea or cluster of ideasthat creates value for a stated stakeholder set. As Schumpeter106 explained, entrepreneurs exploitnew inventions or ideas, or they find new ways to exploit existing ones. Entrepreneurs are able tosuccessfully change established routines by orienting people and markets to produce new formsof value
. 10 The U.S. occupation authorities actually jump-‐started the whole process by allowing small and medium-‐sized enterprises to trade in their existing machinery for equipment that had been seized in the reparations program. This continued after independence in 1952 with prefectural governments and cooperative organizations playing the key role of matching the needs of local firms with available machinery. Prefectures also supported small local laboratories for improving production practices in industries of local interest (Morris-‐Suzuki 1994). There was no master plan. Rather a multitude of overlapping ministries competed with one another to
, preserving nature [13] Unity with nature, fitting into nature [16] Respecting the earth, harmony with other species [14] Altruistic values Equality, equal opportunity for all [12] Social justice, correcting injustices, care for those who are less privileged [17] A world at peace, free of war and conflict [15]Methods of Instrument AdministrationThe instrument was administered in three parts at a private research university in the northeasternUnited States (E-group), a public research university in the southern United States (S-group) anda public masters university in the pacific coastal United States (P-group). Students wererequested to take the survey by the faculty in their courses. The
help identifythe key elements of technology-supported active learning strategies. With the course subject andthe selected redesign model in mind, we followed each guiding principle in the manner notedbelow.1. Redesign the Whole CourseStatics is traditionally taught as a 3-hour credit course using a lecture format. Besidesintroducing various topics, the instructor also works example problems that clarify mechanicsconcepts while describing the analysis procedure. Much of the learning, however, occurs outsideof class as students master the material by working homework problems. Our course redesign isbased on three integrated activities that can be categorized as: 1) pre-emporium, 2) emporium,and 3) post-emporium, where the word “emporium” refers
. This commitment however makesthem less open to critical review. They neglect to learn from their own experiences and that theseexperiences are not valued. Learning from experience is an important avenue for knowledge thatcan be expensive but without this knowledge, organizations are doomed to continue to fail.IS/IT trainingThe ever expanding skill set for the IT professional to master has created a new array of issuesfor the IT profession. The IT organization, to remain successful, must foster IT competencewhich requires not only attracting competent IT professionals but provide training for theseprofessionals. This training comes in many forms including: academic IT programs, ITworkshops, self motivated training, vendor training, and
AC 2010-745: A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION OF FACULTY BELIEFSRELATED TO ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATIONKirsten Hochstedt, Pennsylvania State University Kirsten Hochstedt is a Graduate Assistant at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education. She has received her Masters degree in Educational Psychology, with an emphasis in educational and psychological measurement, at Penn State and is a doctoral candidate in the same program. The primary focus of her research concerns assessing the response structure of test scores using item response theory methodology.Sarah Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Sarah E. Zappe, is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional
, there simply was not enough time or resources to devoteindividual attention to each student. This impacted the teaching and learning of teamwork,communication, and writing. There is a personal aspect to writing, even in teams. Oralcommunication takes time and practice to master and teamwork cannot be sufficiently, activelytaught via large lecture periods. We were challenged in such a large class that provided verylimited lecture time.To combat these challenges, students were repeatedly offered individualized help during officehours, but few took advantage. It is recommended that students be required to sign up for teamconsultations early in the semester, to facilitate development of their communication skills and
– Professional & Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fullyimplement.The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the University of Louisiana’scivil engineering curriculum with respect the BOK2 outcomes associated with the baccalaureatedegree. Specific emphasis is given herein to these identified “challenging” outcomes.Institutional ProfileThe University of Louisiana at Lafayette is a public institution of higher education offering thebachelor, master, and doctoral degrees. It is the largest member of the University of LouisianaSystem with an enrollment of approximately 16,000 students. Within the Carnegieclassification, [University A] is designated as a Research University with high research
Taiwan in 2002 and her Masters in I/O Psychology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 2005. Her research interests include measurement and evaluation issues, individual differences, leadership, cross-cultural studies, work motivation, and the application of technology on human resources management. Page 15.302.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Computational thinking: What should our students know and be able to do?AbstractA NSF funded project on our campus has two overarching goals: (1) to create a computationalthinking thread in engineering
Arab Emirates and many other countries.Jean Hodges, Virginia Commonwealth University Qatar Branch Since Fall 2004, N. Jean Hodges has been an Assistant Professor of Writing and Writing Center Instructor at Virginia Commonwealth University Qatar (VCUQatar) in Doha, Qatar. Hodges works on writing assignments individually with VCUQatar students in all three of the university’s design majors as well as in the liberal arts courses. She earned her degrees in North Carolina: a Master of Science in Technical Communication from North Carolina State University; a Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration, magna cum laude, from Queens College (now Queens University); and an Associate of Applied Science
opted to allow students to self-select their own teams. We do recognize thevalue in carefully establishing teams following a variety of well-research suggestions. However,due to time constraints and class focus, we worried that too much time spent on the teamformation process would distract from the main purpose of the course (mastering concepts offluid dynamics). Since the team-based and project-based assignment of creating a storyboardproposal was only one portion of the class (constituting only 6.5% of the overall course grade) itseemed to us more valuable to let students be motivated to work together with friends and peoplethey knew (this was a small class of majors) than to distract students with a lot of team buildingactivities. We
,evaluated, and mastered. When employed in concert with the Discipline Competencies anddomain knowledge of traditional Engineering and technical education, and the model basedSystems Competencies commonly associated with systems engineering, the innovators’Discovery Competencies of associating, questioning, observing, experimenting, and networkingeffectively posture new Engineering, Mathematics, and Science graduates for success in thecontemporary innovation environment. Appendix A provides a potential assessment platform forthe Discovery competencies, including Learning Outcomes and Rubrics.The use of model-based methods in engineering of systems has become prominent in recentyears. However, based on the literature on innovation, we believe that