(1), 21-51.3. Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. A Status Report for The National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education.4. Linenberger, K., Slade, M.C., Addis, E.A., Elliott, E.R., Mynhardt, G., & Raker, J.R. (2014). Training the foot soldiers of inquiry: Development and evaluation of a graduate teaching assistant learning community. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(1), 97-107.5. Bohrer, K., Ferrier, A., Johnson, D., & Miller, K. (2007). TA training workshops. In K.L. Chase (Ed.), Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE) Proceedings, 29, 67
Director for Health Policy at The University of the Sciences in Philadelphia and a Visiting Scholar at the Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions at the University of Pennsylvania. Additionally, she currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Cheyney University Foundation. As a researcher and practitioner, Janelle is passionate, collaborative, and innovative. Her scholarship investigates college choice at historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs), the intersectionality of race and college selection, culturally inclusive approaches to address challenges facing HBCU enrollment, and HBCU advocacy in the higher education landscape through qualitative inquiry. Her most recent work explores the
systems with building information models.” Proc.,13th Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), Hong Kong, 193–200. Page 26.1043.12[6] Wu,W., and Issa, R. R. A. (2010). “Application of VDC in LEED projects: Framework and implementation strategy.” Proc., CIB W-78 27th Int. Conf. on IT in Construction, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Rotterdam, Netherlands.[7] Barnes, S., and Castro-Lacouture, D. (2009). “BIM-enabled integrated optimization tool for LEED
technology; and teacher education and professional development. Due to her interest and background in teacher education, Dr. Yang designed, developed and coordinated the K-12 Online Teaching Endorsement Program at Boise State. Dr. Yang was a featured researcher of the Association for Educational Commu- nications and Technology (AECT) International Convention and the Young Researcher Award recipient from the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Recently she also received the Effective Practice Award (in online and eLearning) from the Sloan-Consortium. Page 24.1237.2 c
process, and will learn to approach innovation from a human-centered perspective. Combining design and engineering, students will develop origami products by adopting the process of re-framing problems in human-centric ways, creating ideas through brainstorming, prototyping, and testing. Part of the Global Engineering Leadership Minor, this course capitalizes on the design thinking approaches taught and links them to the leadership skills of team formation, empathy, team creativity, giving and receiving feedback, leading through conflict, and reflection.The course has consistently been in demand from students, with enrollments typically falling inthe 40-50 range over its tenure. For the first time, the
is fundamental thegrowth investment in education for all.Technological power may shift from the west to the east as India and China emerge as bigplayers in the global market. The two countries have the size and weight to transform the 21stglobal economy. This aspect will certainly have an impact on the education in western world too.Although the reality is that India and China will always have an advantage in their numbers, bythe other hand in western world there are the freest markets, the most highly trained workforce,the resources and ability to innovate, and the best universities in the world.History facts show the innumerous achievements of so many engineers all around the world whohave diligently built and transformed the environment
sensor development projectduring each summer as a multidisciplinary team, in addition to side independent researchprojects with individual faculty mentors. The primary goal was to teach the participants – mainlyelectrical, mechanical, and aerospace engineering undergraduate students and K-12 teachers –about systems engineering methodology, including design, build, integration, and test, with acomplementary benefit of the participants practicing their communication and teamwork skills.The systems engineering projects that the participants designed during the summer months willbe described, with an emphasis on lessons learned from recruiting and managing the team.1. IntroductionThe University of North Dakota hosted a Research Experiences for
AC 2008-653: THE BIOMASS BANDWAGON: THREE IDEAS FORENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS TO GET ONBOARDKurt Rosentrater, USDA-ARS KURT A ROSENTRATER is a Lead Scientist with the United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, in Brookings, SD, where he is spearheading an initiative to develop value-added uses for residue streams resulting from biofuel manufacturing operations. He is formerly an assistant professor at Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, in the Department of Engineering and Industrial Technology.Jerry Visser, South Dakota State University JERRY VISSER is Operations Manager of the Product Development Center at South Dakota State University in
employ in the product development industry.Key practices that the instructors wanted to emphasize in the course included: research skills togain understanding of stakeholders, contexts, and constraints relevant to a problem; a focus onproblem finding & framing, rather than jumping right into a solution; developing divergentthinking to facilitate fluent and fruitful concept brainstorming; building communication skillsbeyond technical writing, to include visual communication and the importance of storytelling.This paper will share a review of literature relevant to factors surrounding a design mindset andhow a design mindset can impact design practice in the world of product development.Additionally, this paper will share benchmarking of best
design of an innovative crutch. A predetermined (and controllable by the user) electrical signal was generated with each crutch impact with the ground and then used to control the “damping” constant of the system (through the MR fluid) to reduce the impact shock of the crutch. The design was fabricated but met with only limited success because a damper system with a satisfactory orifice opening was not found. The iron particles present in the MR fluid tended to plug up the orifice. Active Guide Wire for Angioplasty A method was developed and implemented (in principle, not in patients) to overcome the lack of control in current procedures for directing the guide wire into position in the artery for an
opportunities.Second the experience students obtain developing these business opportunities prepares them toparticipate and lead product development teams in industry. A flow chart of the strategy isshown in Figure 1.The iterative nature of the system allows students to tackle more complex, innovative andrealistic product development projects. This is important for the following reasons: 1. Potential employers desire student who have experience developing complex products. 2. Developing complex products forces students to confront difficult technical and market challenges. 3. The principles of product design and development are better illustrated with complex products than with simple products. 4. Complex products require iteration
Using Wikis and Weblogs to Support Reflective Learning in an Introductory Engineering Design Course Helen L. Chen1, David Cannon2, Jonathan Gabrio, Larry Leifer2, George Toye2, and Tori Bailey2 Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning1/Center for Design Research2 Stanford University, USAAbstract An observation and a pedagogical challenge often found in project-based design coursesis that students see what they have produced but they do not see what they have learned. Thispaper presents preliminary findings from an NSF-sponsored research project which experimentswith the use of weblogs and wiki environments, two
- ing practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Ms. Courtney S Smith, Virginia Tech Courtney S. Smith is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests span the mentoring experiences of African American women in engineering, campus climate and best practices for diversity and inclusion in the STEM classroom. Page 26.1425.1 c American Society for
Education: Innovations and Research, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008. [4] S. Adams and G. Okudan, “A comprehensive model for student design team formation and performance in the engineering classroom,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Education, July, 2003, pp. 21–25. [5] M. Klein, “Capturing design rationale in concurrent engineering teams,” Computer, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 1993. [6] M. J. Riemer, “Communication skills for the 21st century engineer,” Global J. of Engng. Educ, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 89–100, 2007. [7] J. A. Donnell, B. M. Aller, M. P. Alley, and A. A. Kedrowicz, “Why industry says that engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says,” in ASEE Annual Conference
to see the educational innovations of passionate and talented educators, but howdo these innovations get adopted? It is hard for even the best educational innovations totransfer to a colleague’s classroom16 It is less likely for an innovation to be adopted by adifferent university. As a result, many engineering educators are re-inventing the wheel andexcellent innovations are underutilized.If educators had unlimited temporal resources this would not be an issue. But manytransformative educational practices require teams of people to develop and test. Others arethe result of a personal passion and decades of building, coding, writing, and/or tweaking.Educators do not have the luxury of dedicating years of effort to a project that affects
Paper ID #43683Sketching Instruction in Engineering Design with an Intelligent Tutoring SoftwareDr. Hillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University Hillary E. Merzdorf is a postdoctoral researcher with the Institute for Engineering Education and Innovation at Texas A&M University. Her research interests are in educational technology, spatial reasoning in engineering, and educational assessment.Ms. Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University Donna Jaison is a PhD student under Dr. Karan Watson in the Multidisciplinary Engineering Department at Texas A&M College Station. She is a Graduate research assistant at the
have gone on to be hired as Graduate Teaching Assistants forECE’s technical communication-focused courses after being accepted into the School’s graduateprogram. Initial plans are underway to codify the peer leader pipeline into a fellowship program,institutionalizing the culture of peer mentorship that has been established.While student feedback following the first academic year in the intended residential, studioformat has been overwhelmingly positive, we continue to look for themes in course feedback topositively adjust the course moving forward. Course design is never truly done when relying onevidence-based practices. The future of ECE Discovery Studio is bright, paving the way tocrucial research as we learn more about discipline-specific
developments, best learning theoryimplementations and most effective teaching practices and innovations [14].Due to the fast evolution in electro-mechanical and electronic systems, and the ever-changingaspects involved in modern industry, the maintenance of professional and academic currency isabsolutely essential. An annual faculty professional development plan is proposed in a rotationschedule, in order to provide opportunities to faculty members to stay current. The plan followsthe framework proposed by Odden et al. [15] (where applicable) and it is depicted in Table 2. Table 2. Cost Structure for Professional DevelopmentNKU Existing and Proposed Facilities for the ProgramEngineering Technology Programs occupy 9 rooms on the
appropriate professional and ethical decisions.7. Demonstrate effective oral, written, and graphical communication skills.8. Demonstrate a commitment to learning and continued professional developmentoutside the classroom, incorporate contemporary issues during problem solving, anddetermine the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.9. Explain professional practice attitudes, leadership principles and attitudes,management concepts and processes, and concepts of business, public policy, and publicadministration.A diversion from the well known ABET criterion 3 a-k (Table 1, Outcomes 1-8) wasOutcome 9, that covers Outcomes 13-15 in the BOKI (answering the call for a broadercurriculum and additional focus on professional skills
description languages and microcontrollers. Formerly Mr. Van Ginneken was Chief Scientist and a co-founder of Magma Design Automation Inc. Before joining Magma, he was at Synopsys, where he worked in the Design Compiler group and the Advanced Technology Group. From 1989 to 1995 he was at IBM’s T.J. Watson Research Center, where he worked on logic synthesis. Mr. van Ginneken holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Eindhoven University.Nicholas James RiveraMr. Brian Michael Tugade, DigiPen Institute of Technology Page 26.90.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
external visibility and nurture her professionaldevelopment (e.g. mentoring by senior faculty, resources for research, additional travel funds,relief from administrative duties). The proposal must also provide evidence that administratorsunderstand factors that may hinder a woman’s career advancement and describe how institutionalpolicies and practices have evolved to successfully recruit, hire and advance women facultymembers. The grant is for the first five years of the professor’s academic career and covers Page 14.642.3salary, benefits and a career development fund (20% of base salary) to cover professionallyrelated expenses (e.g
fortune 500 companies throughout the world, including Cisco, Google, Visa, Barclays, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, Oracle, Visa, Xilinx, Nationwide Insurance, and Anadarko Petroleum. He is a certified Manufacturing Technologist (Society of Manufacturing Engineers). He is an active member of ASEE.Dr. Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young University Spencer Magleby is a professor of mechanical engineering and Associate Dean in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University. He came to BYU in 1989 after working in the aircraft industry developing tools for advanced aircraft design and manufacture. Magleby received his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin, where his research centered on design. He
clinical outcomes driven research.Dr. Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Amit Jariwala is the Director of Design & Innovation for the School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech. He graduated with a Bachelor of Engineering in Production Engineering from the Univer- sity of Mumbai, India, with honors in 2005. He received a Master of Technology degree in Mechanical Engineering in 2007 from IIT Bombay, India. He was awarded a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2013, with minors in Entrepreneurship. At Georgia Tech, he is responsible for enhancing corporate support for design courses, managing design and fabrication/prototyping facilities, coordinating the design
human centred engineering.The Project has been through a number of cycles based on action research methodology.Different levels of disciplinary activity have evolved during the course of the project, rangingfrom disciplinary: within the defined discipline, multidisciplinary: between the disciplines,through interdisciplinary: across the disciplines and finally to transdisciplinary: between, acrossand beyond the disciplines.This paper outlines the project and its outcome for the students and staff involved.BackgroundThis paper shares our learning from a broader research project which strived to inform a changedprofessional practice paradigm for engineering designers in Australia to effectively incorporatepeople as an integral design consideration
climate for LGBQ STEM faculty. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(1).[6] E. Wenger, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.[7] D. Cambridge, S. Kaplan, and V. Suter. (2005, 10 November, 2014). Community of Practice Design Guide. Available: http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/community- practice-design-guide-step-step-guide-designing-cultivating-communities-practice- higher-education[8] P. D. Sherer, T. P. Shea, and E. Kristensen, "Online Communities of Practice: A Catalyst for Faculty Development," Innovative Higher Education, vol. 27, pp. 183-194, 2003.[9] C. E. Cunningham, C. A. Woodward, H. S. Shannon, J
studentparticipation, and the impacts those activities had on the traditional lecture sessions. 2. Introduction In the past two decades, the extensive research on teaching methods has provided an increasingamount of insight in the most effective active teaching and learning processes1,2. The outcomes ofdifferent studies vary, but a major consensus is that active learning works3: at worst, active learningdoesn’t harm students’ outcomes; at best, it doubles students’ retention4. Consequently, activelearning was incorporated in fields such as STEM,5,6 history and political sciences,7 and business8.Each field, however, focused on different active elements: business school courses are traditionallyknown as mostly case-study based, while engineering courses
Polytechnic University). She manages the FITL Center, which encourages and promotes innovative teaching strategies and technologies for learning. The Center provides faculty with training on new classroom technologies, access to technologies and resources, opportunities for re- search and design, and collaboration on educational and technological projects. Ms. Jean-Pierre has taught Mathematics, Problem- Solving and Academic Success Seminars at Polytechnic University and Columbia University. In addition to her experience in academia, Ms. Jean-Pierre has practical experience in developing online technology and multimedia products having worked in corporate positions at Google Inc. and iVillage Inc.Ms. Ana Torres, New York
that existing engineering educationaccreditation systems predominantly rely on outcome-based evaluation for assessingstudents’ abilities. This approach is teacher-centered and certification-oriented, whereby thecontent taught and the evaluation methods used are solely determined by instructors. This hasled to a situation where many departments tend to allocate such courses to engineering or3Cultivating “global competency” in a divided worldadjunct professors in order to save on human resources. The former group often overlyemphasizes micro-ethical issues at the personal level or simply regard ethical codes ofengineering associations as the best practice and a dogmatic rule to be followed [1], [2],without providing students with broader
productivity, andteam cohesiveness, with several operational definitions (outcomes-statements) beneath eachcategory. This rubric will be completed twice during the semester by faculty advisors, the TWSconsultant, and industry representatives—as a primary indicator of team competence. PhaseThree data are being collected in Spring 2003 and will be analyzed in Summer 2003.Multidisciplinary teaming instruction and assessment Over a three-year period, our NSF team developed three models for multidisciplinaryteaming instruction and assessment. Each model was designed and redesigned in an iterativeprocess based on data from the prior semester. Ultimately, a tailored, competence-oriented modelfor teaming instruction and assessment seemed to fit best
institutions. Because interdisciplinary skills are sought by the engineering workforce, thefederal government, and members of industry, these results will be of interest to faculty andadministrators in engineering programs who seek to produce innovative, broad-thinking students.As graduates are asked to solve problems that transcend the boundaries of social, economic,political, environmental, and other realms, research such as this is a first step in furtheringknowledge of how to best prepare students for the world in which they will live and work.References1 Klein, J. T. (2010).Creating Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures: A Model for Strength and Sustainability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.2 US Department of Education (2006). A test