reform effort risks being undermined by the curricular and cultural practices thatpervasively shape student experience and outcomes and drive away too many could-be engineerswith diverse interests, aptitudes, lived experiences, and values.PDI’s response to the bait-and-switch problem employs design-oriented logics of engagement inparallel with the fundamentals-first approach, which provides a partial corrective to the logic ofexclusion. This configuration offers educators new avenues for thinking about explicit andimplicit connections between the design-centric emphasis in K-12 and the content-driven modelof fundamentals first. Moving forward, we hope to conduct empirical research using participantobservation and interviews to compare students
Carnegie Foundation forthe Advancement of Higher Education. Initially, 15 graduate students expressed interest in theprogram. These students were divided into two separate peer groups. Over eight consecutiveweeks, these groups met and each participant built their own teaching portfolio. The programwas completely voluntary; participants did not receive course credit or compensation for theirparticipation.We designed a qualitative, ethnographic research study9 to formatively evaluate the EngineeringTeaching Portfolio Program and to understand the meaning of the program for its participants.Consistent with ethnographic approaches, we collected data from a variety of sources in order toenhance the rigor, or trustworthiness of our results9. We used
for building the S&E workforce.7-10 Nearly 80% of surveyed underrepresented chemistsand chemical engineers believed that women and underrepresented minorities do not participatein the STEM fields because they are not encouraged to do so at a young age. The problem isexacerbated in college with 60% responding that college is a place of active discouragement. Thestudy found pervasive stereotypes “that STEM isn’t for girls or minorities” as one of the majorcontributors to underrepresentation in the sciences.11 Many researchers working toward the common goal of increasing recruitment,enrollment, and graduation of African Americans in engineering have attributed much of thedisparity between African Americans and White and Asian
area of study as they serve as anoptimal environment for visualization, configurations, versatility, and data collection. One racingsimulator in particular was widely used among researchers and that is TORCS, more detailsdiscussed in theme IV. Because of the ever-growing AI technology, there is a need for furtherresearch in the optimization of AI agents, using racing games as a platform for testing anddevelopment [6]. By incorporating additional research, we’re able to bridge the gap betweentheoretical concept and practical concepts, offering a unique and engaging medium for engineersto further apprehend their knowledge of AI principles.A systematic literature review (SLR) on the implementation of AI/ML algorithms in racing gamesfor
’ identities and motivations.” In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 2018. https://peer.asee.org/303193. Nunnally, B., Farkas, D., 2016, UX research: practical techniques for designing better products. Boston: O’Reilly Media, Inc.4. Choe, N., Borrego, M., 2019, “Prediction of engineering identity in engineering graduate students”. IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 181-187. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/86670455. Bahnson, M., Perkins, H., Tsugawa, M., Satterfield, D., Parker, M., Cass, C., and Kirn, A., 2021, “Inequity in graduate engineering identity: Disciplinary differences and opportunity structures”. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 110 No. 4, pp. 949-976. https
University of Houston as professor and chair of the Department of Engineering Technology (2002-09). He served as the College associate dean for research and graduate studies (2009-10), as a member of the Executive Council of the Texas Manufacturing Assistance Center (2006-11), chair of the Council (2007-09), and director of the Center for Technology Literacy (2006-10). In 2012, he joined the College of Engineering at the University of North Texas as professor and chair of the Engineering Technology Department. He is a Senior Member of IEEE – Control Systems Society and a Member of ASEE. Page 24.187.1
for Engineering Education, 2020 The Five I’s: A Framework for Supporting Early Career FacultyEngineering Education Research (EER) has developed into a field of expertise and a careerpathway over the past three decades [1-3]. In response to numerous reports in the 1990s andearly 2000s [4-7], multiple EER graduate programs were established in the mid-2000s and agrowing number continue to emerge to educate and train the next generation of EER faculty andpolicy makers. Historically, many came to EER as individuals trained in other disciplines, butwith an interest in improving teaching and learning [8]. This approach created aninterdisciplinary space where many could learn the norms, practices, and language of EER asthey became scholars
Paper ID #34878A Quarter Century of Minorities in Engineering: Design, Development andTeam Teaching of Institutional Core CurriculaDr. Peter Golding, University of Texas at El Paso Undergraduate Program Director in Engineering Innovation & Leadership, Professor in the Department of Engineering and Leadership at UTEP, and Director of the Center for Research in Engineering & Tech- nology Education at the University of Texas at El Paso.Dr. Diane Elisa Golding, University of Texas at El Paso Diane is a passionate educator and proponent for K-12 engineering education and the education of future teachers.She is an
tools and application and having also total quality management diploma and being quality master holder dealing with all quality systems as documentation , CAPA management , RCA , facility maintenance and also ISO 9000/2008 expert in addition to being certified from Bernard Castle in UK as sterile area facility Design expert as per ISO regulations . Egyptian pharmacist graduate of 2007 who started my career as a research and development pharmacist in SEDICO pharmaceuticals in EGYPT for about 2 years dealing with new dosage forms formulation and then rotated to Methodology and stability department in which i dealt with dosage form analysis and innovation of new methods of analysis dealing with all laboratory
]. Sustainabledevelopments are complex environmental and societal engineering challenges, which means thatsolving such challenges will require students to possess a creative skillset and mindset.Integrative design thinking, a human-centered design approach, has recently gained traction as anadvanced approach to innovation that identifies environmental and societal needs and integratesthem with technological and economic feasibility [4]. It encourages multidisciplinary teamworkand creates a favorable environment for collaboration.The literature defines design thinking as a unique problem-solving approach that creates valueand achieves innovation [5]. Universities can contribute significantly to fostering the transitiontoward a sustainable society by developing
mechatronicintegration is necessary to ensure engineering students can compete in the workplace of thefourth industrial age after graduation. Project-based learning engages students with a learningexperience that is hands-on and genuinely interesting.In addition to the abovementioned skills, it has become crucial for contemporary engineers toacquire a solid background and proficient ability to program computers as these skills are neededin industry and engineering designs [7]. However, it has been reported that learning to programis hard and programmers suffer from a wide range of difficulties and deficits [3], [8], [9]. Thisartifact is manifested by high dropout and failure rates in programming courses [9].In this evidence-based practice paper, we propose a
learn about middle and high school engineeringcurricula, engineering career paths, the College of Engineering, and student preparation for thestudy of engineering. Teachers received 20 professional development hours and were eligible forone hour of academic credit. Travel, lodging, and meal expenses were provided along with a$500 stipend.The University Engineering Initiative ActIn 2010, the Kansas Legislature called for an increase in the number of engineering graduates tostimulate economic development. Industry leaders in the state expressed a need for moreengineers to support planned industrial expansion. According to the Center for EconomicDevelopment and Business Research, one engineering professional creates 1.78 additional jobs,and
. TheEmerging Scholars Program involved students solving challenging calculus 1 problems inworkshops in which trained graduate students facilitated the problem-solving process usingSocratic questioning and offering help when necessary. Subsequent research by Treismanindicated that offering freshmen a non-threatening, small-group but challenging environment toexplore math concepts impacts participants' success in these subjects and motivates them topersist [10], [11], [12].Funded by the National Science Foundation, the PLTL model was first developed for GeneralChemistry at the City College of New York in the early 1990’s and later extended to math,biology and engineering courses. The PLTL model has become a nationally recognized andreplicated model of
smallprofit. More importantly, the teams were able to deliver a device that was in critical need duringthe COVID 19 pandemic. Engineering educators that have years of practical and industrialexperience may consider incorporating relevant societal issues which may motivate students tointensify innovation practices and manufacturing skill sets. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Design and Manufacturability of Medical Ventilators from the Perspective of a Global Automotive Footprint: A First Course Development H. Bryan Riley, Ph.D. Clemson University6.0 References[1] Zhou F., Yu T., Du R., Fan G, Liu Y., Liu Z, Xiang J., Wang Y., Song B., Gu X, et al. Clinical course and
Paper ID #38870Adopting a Common Product Design Process across the UndergraduateMechanical Engineering CurriculumKatherine MathieuDr. Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Micah Lande, PhD is an Assistant Professor and E.R. Stensaas Chair for Engineering Education in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Dr. Lande directs the Holistic Engineering Lab & Observatory. He teaches human-centered engineering design, design thinking, and design innovation courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn and apply design
lecture hall and place it instead in the discovery environment ofthe laboratory, the design studio, or the experiential environment of practice.” Addressing thisneed and helping to define a path forward in determining how we should educate in the 21stCentury differently than was done in the 20th Century represents an over arching goal for the MDProgram.As an institution with strong emphasis on research, large student populations, and a graduate toundergraduate student ratio of approximately 1:2, this engineering program must address twoimportant challenges: (1) scalability: the CoE currently enrolls nearly 5500 undergraduatestudents, and (2) breadth of programs: the CoE currently offers 15 academic bachelor degrees.The Multidisciplinary Design
Innovative Intervention to Infuse Diversity and Inclusion in a Statics CourseAbstractEngineering educators strive to prepare their students for success in the engineering workforce.Increasingly, many career paths will require engineering graduates to work in multidisciplinaryteams with individuals possessing a diversity of skill sets, backgrounds, and identities. Therefore,it is important not only for future engineers to have the opportunity to work in teams as students,but also to have specific instruction that teaches them about teamwork skills and the valuediversity and inclusion bring to engineering practice. Furthermore, it is important that thisinstruction occurs throughout their engineering coursework, giving
. Johnson, "Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 87-101, 2005.[15] K. A. Smith, "Cooperative learning: Lessons and insights from thirty years of championing a research-based innovative practice," Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011.[16] M. Prince, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.[17] A. Yadav, D. Subedi, M. A. Lundeberg and C. F. Bunting, "Problem-based Learning: Influence on Students' Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 253- 280, 2011.[18] C. Hsieh and L. Knight, "Problem-Based Learning for
. Universities are discovering a multitude ofapplications for IoT technology within their campuses, and the implications of this are profound.The integration of IoT promises to revolutionize operational efficiency in diverse learningenvironments.Simultaneously, informatics colleges within universities are well-positioned to educate studentson the intricacies of managing the vast volumes of data generated by IoT. Furthermore,collaborations between various departments within universities can yield exciting possibilities.For instance, business colleges can partner with engineering faculties to design IoT-centriccourses that explore the fusion of technological advancements with innovative business models.This interdisciplinary approach not only enriches the
´ di, Z. Kocsis, K. E. Kov´ cs, K. Kov´ cs, A. M¨ ller, K. Pallay, B. Eva Szab´ , F. Szigeti, and D. A. e o T´ th. The discovery of the possible reasons for delayed graduation and dropout in the light of a qualitative research o study. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 3(1):27 – 38, 2019. 2 E. Grieco and S. Deitz. Special report NSF 23-315: Diversity and STEM: Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities 2023. Technical report, National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), Alexandria, VA, 2023. 3 G. L. Heileman, C. T. Abdallah, A. Slim, and M
reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:” Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Chrysler Corporation. At Stanford she has served a chair of the faculty senate, and recently served as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Helping Engineering Students Get Jobs: Views from Career Services
campusactivities; as to teaching and learning, two-thirds of the institutions claim to have replacedclassroom learning with distance learning, facing major challenges such as technicalinfrastructure, competences and pedagogies for distance learning and study requirements, whilegaining some benefits of more opportunities for flexible learning possibilities 1 . Other challengesregarding affordability, life-long learning, education policy, and students with special needs arewell summarized in a 2021 literature review 2 . Till 2022, an abundance of researches have focusedon the general impact of campus closure and classes moving online 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 . Studiesfocusing on specific areas or needs of education, however, are gaining popularity recently as
). Ms. Sandekian joined the Engineering for Developing Communities Program (now known as the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Communities) in spring 2004, just as the first EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. In ad- dition to her management role in the Mortenson Center, Ms. Sandekian has taught an Engineering Projects course around the theme of appropriate technology and conducted research on social entrepreneurship and sustainable community development in Nepal in 2008. Ms. Sandekian earned a Specialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Northern
adoptionof instructional methods and materials that have been proven effective by classroom research; (2)to improve institutional support for teaching at each of the coalition campuses; and (3) to have asustainable engineering FD program in place on each campus by the end of Year 10.Many universities throughout the United States have faculty development programs, usuallycoordinated by a campus-wide teaching center. Some of these programs have played animportant role in raising the quality of instruction in colleges of engineering, but most have hadrelatively little impact on the engineering faculty. For various reasons, many engineers lackrespect for pedagogy as a discipline and consider programs sponsored by campus teachingcenters as largely
, encourage, and assiststudents in the development of their professional competencies and efforts to reach their goals.This approach to implementing the PFE course series helps faculty meet the following sixobjectives for the department’s undergraduate students:1. Improving career planning process by requiring active participation in industry, research and community organizations or experiential practical learning initiatives.2. Increasing engagement, retention, diversity, and potential for professional career success.3. Inspiring a greater interest in professional and social impact.4. Introducing engineering ethics and methods of evaluating risk and resolving conflicts.5. Increasing involvement in design-oriented projects during sophomore
capstone engineering courses.The long-term motivation for this research is to identify and develop pedagogical methods toimprove the proficiency of engineering students completing a capstone engineering designprogram, specifically, to make them more innovative, entrepreneurial, and able to meet the needs Page 14.364.2of their future careers. Additionally, the essential objective is to determine the best practicesover the long term that improve the design proficiency of engineering students so that institutionscan graduate students who are productive, highly skilled, and exceed performance expectations.The philosophy in conducting this research was
manyprojects that have some similarity to their own. Through forum sites such as XSimulator8 andMotionsim,9 the team was able to observe not only successful Stewart Platform designs, but alsofailures that had occurred in the making of those designs. Although these sites are nonacademic,they provided very valuable information pertaining to the structural geometry and electricalinterfaces of the system. While on these sites, the team mainly observed builds by usersSilentChill and GA-Dawg from XSimulator and Motionsim respectively.INTRODUCTIONA team of six engineering students, under the direction of two faculty members from OralRoberts University (ORU), is researching a new, innovative approach to deepen undergraduatestudents’ practical understanding of
a 600-level course it was dual-level,intended for the undergraduate seniors and first year graduate students in the ElectricalEngineering program.Students were assigned into laboratory teams with three students per team. The objectives ofteam assignments included: 1) placing students with previous experiences in computational fluiddynamics into different teams; 2) placing students with previous experiences in microfabricationmethods into different teams; 3) placing students with common interests in research topics intothe same teams.In Module 1: Modeling (weeks 1-4), students were introduced to the CFD ACE+ (ESI-CFD Inc.,Huntsville, AL, www.cfdrc.com) modeling software and learned the basics of microfluidicsimulation through step-by-step
development of the 2000’s aligned with meeting the call of theEngineer 2020 and developing a graduate that truly obtained the ABET Learning Outcomes.Hallmark strategies of this decade were: • Comprehensive regional recruiting model • A best practice living and learning community • Curricular focus on the three-legged stool (technical, professional, and design domains) for the body of knowledge addition in lower division. • A student learning process that was increasingly incorporating an iterative process and that reflected, what was described by Sheppard [14] as, the “ideal learning trajectory is a spiral, with all components revisited at increasing levels of sophistication and interconnection. In this
efforts at a large, public,research-intensive university located in the southeastern region of United States. The researchsite (henceforth referred to as The Center) has served engineering students for more than 20years and offers a variety of recruitment and retention initiatives. For current students, it providesresidential communities for men and women, a five-week summer bridge program, and multiplementoring programs. For pre-college students, it offers summer outreach programs, a recruitingweekend, and annual spring campus visits. It should also be noted that The Center administrationincludes a director, assistant director, numerous graduate students, and undergraduate studentleaders. While actual benchmarking (i.e., phase 8) was not carried