in the 2019-2020review cycle, to include “an ability to communicate effectively to a range of audiences”, wherethe “range of audiences” was introduced [11].ContextThe Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh isexploring the opportunity to develop a strategic outreach program to extend the work of faculty,staff and students beyond the teaching and research environment. The vision calls for a broaderimpact on the quality of life of the nearby communities with the ambition to reach beyond thenearby community. This effort looks for integrating well-established best practices and innovativeapproaches. Several initiatives are now in progress involving alumni and foreign partners. Acritical element of this
success requires four elements:authentic learning environments, authentic student assessments, knowledge integration outside ofengineering, and commitment to multidimensional assessment.In this paper, we briefly describe our academic structure and concentrate on the assessmentprocess. Throughout the paper we’ll use one project from our Venice project center as arepresentative example, specifically one from the summer of 2002 when three studentsconducted a boat wake energy impact study (1). This was one of six projects completed inVenice that summer, and one of several during the past few years that investigated the motoondoso problem.BackgroundFor many years WPI has found ways to graduate socially conscious, globally literate engineers.We do this
variousstakeholders on the practical measures to transform engineering educators to design andimplement innovative teaching and learning. Observations, discussions, and surveys will becarried out during educators’ training and their implementation of the new method of teachingand learning to study the transformation. Benchmarking visits will be carried out to discoverthe best practices. The qualitative data will be analyzed using thematic analysis to identify thegaps and the measures. Later, Delphi method will be employed to finalize the standards. Allthe data will be examined and triangulated to develop a framework containing the directions,actions, and transformation. This work-in-progress paper reports the research result of the first objective
Paper ID #35576Valuable Professional Learning and Development Activities for Black STEMPostdoctoral ScholarsDr. Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Dr. Sylvia Mendez is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She earned a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Kansas, a MS in Student Affairs in Higher Education from Colorado State University, and a BA in Economics from Washington State University. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on effective faculty mentoring practices, broadening
Session 2793 Information Technology Based Active Learning: A Pilot Study for Engineering Economy Sigurdur Olafsson, Mary Huba, John Jackman, Frank Peters, and Sarah Ryan Iowa State UniversityAbstractWe have recently designed a learning environment to add practical problem solving, increasedinformation technology content, and active learning to industrial engineering courses. Inparticular, we have successfully implemented and tested a computer-based module for anundergraduate engineering economy course. In this module, students are required
. students to the basics of programming before branching into This paper presents task force results from a collaboration major-specific computing courses. CS I covers the fundamentalbetween faculty and academic support specialists. The paper concepts and skills of programming in Java. Students learn andfocuses on two high-impact areas of improvement: standardizing develop skills in problem-solving, algorithm development, pro-curricula and building support scaffolding outside the classroom. gram design and structure, code documentation and style, andThe results, a comprehensive course blueprint, include coreresources for a first-semester computing course and recommen- testing and debugging. Topics include data types and
, with colleagues in Purdue’s College of En- gineering. The project focuses on developing a scalable and sustainable workforce development program for microelectronics that will serve as a model for other workforce development efforts (i.e., artificial intelligence, hypersonics). In this role, she examines organizational and leadership issues that span across an ecosystem of partners within the following areas: defense, government, industry, community colleges, and universities. Dr. Linvill’s research is strategically designed to address organizational challenges and create novel solutions to those challenges. Her work has been presented at national and international conferences and has been published in The Routledge
beconditioned to get the best out of the on-line instruction process.3.2 Methodology for Evaluation the Effectiveness and Quality of Instruction Nearly 20 years ago, Chickering and Gamson 6 identified seven principles, which werelater highlighted in a technology focused study sponsored jointly by the Education Commissionof the States, the American Association of Higher Education (AAHE), and the JohnsonFoundation7. These researches stressed that good practice in learning must. - Encourage student-faculty contact, - Encourage cooperation among students, - Encourage active learning, - Give prompt feedback, - Emphasize time on task, - Communicate high expectations, and - Respect diverse talents and ways of learning
, leadership and practices to support the design,implementation and large-scale implementation of programs. Her work has centered on cross-sector programs(education, health, and human services) designed to enhance the quality of services for vulnerable populations ofchildren from birth through the early grades. Her research in this area has included accountability and standards,inclusion, online and hybrid learning, professional development, quality initiatives, and transition/school readiness.Beth also serves as a research and policy associate at the Human Development Institute, serving as the founding Directorfor the Kentucky Partnership for Early Childhood Services from 1996 through 2017. To date, Dr. Rous has generatedover $97 million in grants
. in Electrical Engineering.Dr. Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma Dr. Randa L. Shehab is a professor and the Director of the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She was recently appointed as Director of the Sooner Engineering Education Center dedicated to engineering education related initiatives and research focused on building diversity and enhancing the educational experience for all engineering students. Dr. Shehab teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in ergonomics, work methods, experimental design, and statistical analysis. Her current research is with the Research Institute for STEM Education, a multi-disciplinary research group investigating factors
Learning, Projects that Matter: Concepts and Models for Service Learning in Engineering, AAHE, E. Tsang, ed., Washington D.C., (2000).6 Design Criteria for Sustainable Development in Appropriate Technology: Technology as if People Matter Robert C. Wicklein, Ed. D. University of Georgia, USA7 Hazelton, B, Bull, C. Appropriate Technology: Tools, Choices and Implications, November 1988.8 Wilk, et. al., Preparing Engineering Students to Work in a Global Environmen: The Union College Model,, Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition9 Mayes, et. al., ABET Best Practices: Results form Interviews with 27 Peer Institutions, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and
newengineering knowledge. Knowing how to do design requires a synthesis of knowledge, skills,and attitudes that are best learned by doing17. These components are discussed in the nextsection. By doing design (through heuristics), an infrastructure is provided for learning other coreideals o16f engineering practice, including ethical development, understanding that engineeringaffects the world, codes of conduct, the many publics of engineering, teamwork, andcommunication1,17. Engineering practice drives the philosophy of learning engineering to onethat is focused on “real” engineering work16. What Content Should Be Learned? In the previous section it was established that the philosophy of learning engineering calls
statistical thinking for engineering in general andthe design component in particular.3) Estimation: A main challenge of a project design is the number of variables and theirinteractions during the design process. Often, the system stretches beyond designers’ capabilityto grasp all of the details simultaneously [1] .One strategy for coping with the many variables is:to bring the system back within the limits of human mental capacity by focusing selectively on alimited number of factors, preferably the most significant ones. Designers are usually good atestimation. They are able to size up parameters, sort them out in terms of their relativeimportance, and neglect the ones that have less impact on the project. Today’s graduates are notgood at
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”level and moving forward in incremental steps as they master the material they arecurrently working on. This individualized approach not only builds academic skills, butalso strengthens study habits, improves concentration, and increases self confidencethrough daily comfortable practice with steady, small challenges.Students typically visit a Kumon Center twice a week with a parent to study under theguidance of their Kumon Instructor (franchisee) for about one half hour per subject.Students do from fifteen to twenty minutes of Kumon homework at home on the otherfive days of the week that they do not attend the center. This daily practice method,which continues throughout the year, is a
Washington, College of Education LIFE Center Current research interests involve socio-cultural perspectives on cognition, learning, graphical represen- tation, and use of technology in formal and informal learning environments. I explore diffusion of inno- vations systemically across multiple learning environments and stakeholder communities. In particular, I am interested in teacher/learner interaction across various settings, including multi-dimensional design- based implementation research (DBIR) in various workplaces and academic institutions. In addition, my work looks at the impact of co-constructed methodologies in settings that are a mix of informal sites as well as traditional (but evolved) classrooms. I am
. She continued this work as a Postdoctoral Research Asso- ciate and then as an Assistant Research Scientist until transitioning to teaching. She has also worked as an algorithmic consultant in digital oral care, leveraging her research experience in modeling motion.Dr. Charles Patrick Jr, Texas A&M University Charles Patrick Jr. is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University (TAMU). He is also a teaching and research fellow at the Institute for Engineering Education Innovation, TAMU and a member of the Engineering Education Faculty, TAMU. He has worked in higher education for more than 30 years at state and private universities and a NCI comprehensive cancer
as state agencies orprofessional associations.”11Due to this increasing demand and limited resources, certificates may not be free in the future,however. [Berkeley] is considering whether to charge a small fee that could vary depending onstudents’ means.”10Impacts on Colleges and UniversitiesThe long term impact will be interesting in terms of researching how universities enhance theirunderstanding of how people learn through online education and how students can be graded,especially through evaluations that don't require relatively simple scoring techniques from multi-ple choice tests, for example.35Online education could greatly affect how colleges offer higher education, particularly at thegraduate level.11 Universities such as the
Paper ID #37400Effectiveness of a Virtual-Physical Robotics TeachingPlatform on Engaging Middle-to-High School Studentsduring COVID-19 (Evaluation)Anurag Purwar Dr. Anurag Purwar's research interests are in bringing together rigid body kinematics and machine learning for design of mechanisms and robots. He has published 82 peer-reviewed conference and journal papers and his research has been funded by National Science Foundation (NSF), NY-state SPIR, NY-state Center for Biotechnology, Sensor-CAT, SUNY Research Foundation, industry, Stony Brook University, and SUNY Office of Provost. He received A.T. Yang award for the
management, and initiative. Engineersgo through 16 weeks of training during which they share their current research through two setsof four-session Family Science Courses. Their training addresses: how people learn, audiencetypes and motivations, strategies for working with various age groups and designing engagingmulti-media experiences61. The training also gives engineers a model for effective directinstruction, opportunities for them to practice their new skills and ways for them to self-evaluatetheir teaching.Engineers are given a lesson plan template that helps them break down complex ideas intosimple lessons, identify learning objectives, design learner-directed experiments and assesslearning. Engineers limit direct instruction to 15
. Page 25.89.2A primary goal of this research is to develop a model for widespread use of portable laboratoriesthroughout the curriculum as a way of enhancing lecture-based courses. This approach has thepotential to have extensive impact on student learning and mitigate the challenges and resistancefaced by other engineering education reforms. The limited development required forincorporating hands-on experimental platforms for engineering students to use in the classroomor to take home shows promise towards reaching a realistic modification of lecture-onlyengineering courses6-11. The Finite State Machine Module described in this paper is one of the modules developed aspart of a project funded by the NSF CCLI program to develop labs
strategically deploy existing and new resources. The LCBP isdesigned to address these six recommendations.Improved Teaching Methodologies In 2012, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) published ‘Innovationwith Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in EngineeringEducation.’vii Innovation with Impact calls for several areas of focus: career-long professionaldevelopment of faculty; expanded collaborations and partnerships; make engineering programsmore engaging, relevant and welcoming; increase, leverage, and diversify resources; raiseawareness of proven principles and effective practices of teaching, learning and educationalinnovation; conduct periodic self-assessments within our individual institutions
with concentrations incivil, electrical, industrial, and mechanical engineering disciplines. Implemented on a semesterschedule, the degree program consists of a 50-hour core curriculum for all concentrations, 51hours of general education requirements, and 27 hours of concentration-specific upper divisioncurricula, including 9 hours of electives. Thus, the degree comprises 128 credit hours. Passingthe NCEES Fundamentals of Engineering Exam is a further requirement for graduation. Thereare approximately 250 students and ten full-time-equivalent faculty members.Need for CourseTo provide wider educational breadth for upper division mechanical and industrial concentrationstudents, engineering department faculty in those concentration areas
increases in cumulativeGPA scores range from 0.02-0.25 for various studies. Schuurman et. al. showed that theseincreases, while small, were independent of prior GPA.4 Moreover, the number of co-opexperiences seemed to correlate positively with increased GPA. For students at the lower end ofthe grade scale, the benefits of co-op have been shown to have a proportionally greaterinfluence2. This research indicates that after three co-op experiences, many students have learnedskills that translate into improved academic performance.One weakness of some of the established studies is that the indicators of academic performancefocus on cumulative GPA, which is based on all courses combined. Capstone design courses, bytheir nature, have a different focus
Paper ID #41052There’s a Textbook for this Class? Scaffolding Reading and Note-taking in aDigital AgeDr. Timothy A Wood, The Citadel Timothy A Wood is an Associate Professor in the Dr. Emmett I. Davis, Jr. ’50, Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering at The Citadel. He acquired a Bachelor’s in Engineering Physics Summa Cum Laude with Honors followed by Civil Engineering Master’s and Doctoral degrees from Texas Tech University. His technical research focuses on structural evaluation of buried bridges and culverts. He encourages students through an infectious enthusiasm for engineering mechanics
is a Fellow of ASEE, a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Phi Kappa Phi, and Upsilon Pi Epsilon. Dr. Estell is active in the assessment community with his work in streamlining and standardizing the outcomes assessment process, and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium. He is also active within the engineering education community, having served ASEE as an officer in the Computers in Education and First-Year Programs Divisions; he and his co-authors have received multiple Best Paper awards at the ASEE Annual Conference. His current research includes examining the nature of constraints in engineering design and providing service learning opportunities for first-year
carryout research and assistance to institutions and universities in developing thecompetency based curriculum for engineering courses at various levels viz, Diploma,Degree and Post Graduate. The use of Information Communication Technology in the teaching learningprocess is promoted in India through a nationally coordinated project – National Projecton Technology Enhanced Learning. As part of this project, e-contents are developed forvarious courses and virtual laboratories are being established across the country. This paper discusses the above and similar practices in achieving qualityeducation in India and the areas of mutual collaboration with other countries
from 6-17%. As a first step inmeasuring the effectiveness of techniques used in the program, this is promising and is helping toestablish a framework for more detailed assessments in following cohorts.The Gordon Institute of Engineering Leadership at Northeastern University is enthusiastic aboutsharing any of the techniques or approaches with other institutions involved in engineeringleadership development. The background material and use of it in structuring this yearlongassignment is an example of a best practice and it is hoped that the description and frameworkcan be of use by other leadership programs.In summary, as an assignment in a select graduate program in engineering leadership, studentsare tasked to strategically practice and
30 refereed journal articles and over 50 refereed conference papers. Emphasis in all his teaching and research was on human-centered, model-based design, with a balance between theory and best industry practice. At RPI, he received the two highest awards conferred for teaching: the 2006 School of Engineering Education Excellence Award and the 2006 Trustees’ Out- standing Teacher Award. From 2007 to 2014, he wrote a monthly column on mechatronics for practicing engineers in Design News magazine. Over the past 20 years, he has conducted hands-on, integrated, cus- tomized, mechatronics workshops for practicing engineers nationally and internationally, e.g., at Xerox, Procter & Gamble, Rockwell Automation, Johnson
Michigan. Her current research focuses on idea development and ideation tools, divergent thinking, and engineering curricular practices and culture. Her research interests include front-end design practices, sociotechnical knowledge and skills in engineering, and queer student experiences in engineering. Their work is motivated by their passion for and experiences with inclusive teaching and holistic mentorship of students, seeking to reimagine what an engineer looks like, does, and who they are, especially for queer folks, women, and people of color, through empowerment, collaboration, and co-development for a more equitable world. Shannon is also a Senior Graduate Facilitator and Lab Manager with the Center for
include serving in the U. S. Army Special Forces in Asia and in the Reagan White House as a policy special assistant. Dr. Jones research interests include adult learning in work and educational systems, social systems effects on leadership, and adult moral development. Page 12.181.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Addressing the Career and Professional Development Needs of Experienced Project ProfessionalsAbstractThis paper presents a new non-degree graduate program in technical project management (TPM)that employs innovative teaching strategies to meet the needs of