Student Inquiry," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[2] J. C. Bruhl, J. L. Klosky, T. Mainwaring, and J. P. Hanus, "Accelerating the Development of Engineering Judgment in Students through Inquiry-Based Learning Activities," presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[3] Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. (2017). Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Available: http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/[4] R. W. Welch, S. J. Ressler, and A. C. Estes, "A Model for Instructional Design," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 131, July 2005 2005.[5] T
as “a central component of interdisciplinary research byencouraging students to understand and pursue multiple disciplines and to addresscomplex problems from the perspective of multiple fields.”6 Students that learn within aninterdisciplinary environment will be better equipped to address the evolving needs of thebiotechnology industry.Therefore, courses that are a part of the biotechnology curriculum provide education onskills unique for life sciences manufacturing. The biotechnology labs cover severaltechniques employed in biotechnological research and emphasize experimental design,technical applications and the use of appropriate instrumentation. Graduates of thebiotechnology program are unique because they have both manufacturing and
in the new curriculum, a common interactive learning station, which integrated theMEP systems, was developed in order to enhance student learning.Course Approach, Learning Objectives, and Delivery MethodThe integrated course described above was designed to introduce students to the scope and impact ofMEP systems for buildings. The mechanical and plumbing systems included in the course contentincluded: heating, ventilation, air conditioning, plumbing, and fire protection, while the electricalsystems include power, grounding, lighting, communication, and fire detection. Primarily designedto give students detailed knowledge of the active building systems which form a key part ofbuildings and plants, the approach taken was to analyze the need
of 10+ Best Paper Awards from majorinternational conferences, including IEEE CPSCom-2019, IEEE ICII 2019, IEEE/AIAA ICNS 2019,IEEE CBDCom 2020, WASA 2020, AIAA/ IEEE DASC 2021, IEEE GLOBECOM 2021 and IEEEINFOCOM 2022. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023NSF REU Site— Drone Swarms in the Age of Artificial IntelligenceAbstractDrone swarms, the ability of drones to autonomously make decisions based on shared information,create new opportunities with major societal implications. However, future drone swarmapplications and services pose new networking challenges. A resurgence of artificial intelligence(AI) and machine learning (ML) research presents a tremendous opportunity for addressing thesenetworking
progression using the engineering design cycleABET Student Outcome ComparisonAt the beginning of this work, learning outcomes from the first-year Cornerstone and senior Capstonecourses were compared to find which ABET outcomes they shared in common to link the first-year andsenior year design experiences. ABET Student Outcomes 2, 4, 5 and 6 were identified in the best linkingcourse outcomes as indicated in Table 2. ABET Student Outcomes was determined as the optimalmeasurement tool because of its reputation and universal measurability across universities. Research[1, 2, 3] has shown ABET criteria as having a positive impact on programs and graduates who have theprescribed design skills, ability to work in teams, and communicate effectively [4
theJoanneum University of Applied Sciences in Graz, Austria demonstrated a strong link betweenpoor performance on mathematics exams and the ability to succeed on first engineeringmechanics course exams.[2] For these reasons, many universities have recognized the need tofocus on methodologies for improving mathematics and physics success rates as well as manyother practices with the goal of impacting retention and graduation rates. A literature review ofthe many different improvement methodologies tried by universities was done by Desai andStefanek at Purdue University Northwest and demonstrates the success possible usingapproaches such as changes in freshmen engineering courses, enhanced mathematics and sciencepreparation, community building
is a Professor at the University of Wuppertal. He researches online and intercultural engineering education. His primary research focuses on the development, introduction, practical use, and educational value of online laboratories (remote, virtual, and cross-reality) and online experimentation in engineering and technical education. In his work, he focuses on developing broader educational strategies for de- signing and using online engineering equipment, putting these into practice, and providing the evidence base for further development efforts. Moreover, Dr. May is developing instructional concepts to bring students into international study contexts to experience intercultural collaboration and develop respective
graduate school. As a result of the program’s success, two biotech giants,Amgen and Eli Lilly, have made UPRM investments in the thousands of dollars toestablish the Biotech Learning Center. The outstanding human resource capabilities ofUPRM have contributed to make Puerto Rico attractive to these kinds of investments.Where else has this project had an impact? Most definitively in the College ofEngineering accreditation process. Ever since the approval of the new AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria (EC 2000) by theBoard of Directors of ABET on November 2, 1996, and its mandatory application as ofFall 2001, educational institutions across the United States have had to assess andevaluate their undergraduate
Region IV, is bringing together researchers in the ECE field covering such ECE research topics as Wavelet Transforms, Soft Comput- ing, Power & Energy, Intelligent Control, Wireless Communications, and Fuzzy Logic. Keynote/Invited speakers included Drs. H. Adeli, M. Sloan, M. J. T. Smith, and L. Zadeh. He was part of the group pro- moting economic development in Michigan, MEDC and was responsible for bringing Innovation Forums to Western Michigan University, January 21, 1999. These forums were a series of meetings and seminars focused on university and industry collaboration initiated by the Michigan Governor. The Forums were sponsored by the Kellogg and Dow Foundations and were designed for finding strategies to
Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. Matusovich has authored a book chapter, 10 journal
, VA as a result of a winning proposal submitted from theAIAA and a 6-university team in response to a broad agency announcement. Our proposalemphasized these four imperatives to: • Conduct leading edge aerospace & atmospheric science research and develop revolutionary new technologies by creating innovative, collaborative, synergistic partnerships among NASA’s Langley Research Center, academia, and industry, • Provide comprehensive graduate and continuing education in science and engineering by using both a local campus and exploiting innovative distance-learning concepts, • Incubate and stimulate the commercialization of new intellectual property developed through the Institute's activities, including radical ideas and disruptive
Paper ID #38522A Comparative Literature Review: Comparing Approaches to TeamworkAssessment in Engineering Education in the US and ChinaMiss Yi Cao, Virginia Tech CAO Yi is a Second-year PhD student at the Department of engineering education in Virginia Tech with the guidance of Dr. Jennifer Case. She has been working as research assistant at the International Center for Higher Education Innovation(ICHEI), a UNESCO Category 2 Center for two years. She did several researches related to project-based learning, teamwork assessment and comparative education research.Dr. Qin Zhu, Virginia Tech Dr. Qin Zhu is Associate Professor
of Engineering, Design andComputing at the University of Colorado Denver with representation from each of the fivedepartments, as well as faculty at multiple stages in their career (instructors, assistant, associate,and full professors in clinical, research, and tenure tracks). This cohort represents a broadsampling across the college, and provides a foundation for the FLC to influence, transform, andlayer a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion throughout the college.Initial results from this project center on findings that address the research question: How canparticipation in an FLC nudge engineering faculty to adopt and personalize mindful reflectionand DEI best practices? This paper includes initial findings from participant
students in engineering to conduct leading edge research athigher education research laboratories. This paper covers the summer 2017 Electrical andComputer Engineering (ECE) research project. The research project consisted of four communitycollege interns, a graduate mentor, and faculty advisor from the sponsoring four-year universityto design a real-time live digit recognition system (RTLDRS) using Nvidia’s Tx1 in theBioelectronic Research Laboratory.The 2017 summer ECE project aimed to develop a robust fast training neural network (NN) forlive digit recognition utilizing industry standard deep learning software. The NN model would beimported to Nvidia’s Jetson Tx1 for real time live digit recognition (RTLDR) on the go. Thestudent interns used a
University at SalinaAbstractIn recent years engineering and technology programs are challenged to prepare graduates to meetthe globalization of the engineering profession and the real world demands of the globalworkforce. For the past several years, mechanical engineering and technology programsembarked on reforming the curricula by introducing new courses at the freshman level toenhance student motivation and improve retention. This paper talks about how the existingcourses at freshman level in the area of mechanical detailing, technical graphics andmanufacturing methods were used innovatively to provide the real world experience of productdesign, manufacturing and operation. It also shows how the program addresses part of the CDIO(Conceive, Design
thereare many variables that lead to different effects which can be desireable or undesireabledepending on what aesthetic the user is intending. In order to better understand these variablesand explain how they can impact the fluid art that is generated, background research wasconducted for the techniques. The goal of these efforts was not an attempt to make a science ofthe artistic process, but rather to understand cause and effect relationships whose understandingcould serve as a starting point for somebody new to a painting technique. This research was thenused to create short videos for students interested in pursuing a given technique. Even with theresearch conducted it is clear that one benefits greatly from hands-on experience. However
, and it may be difficult tocontrol the time required to complete the activity. Instructors must have a command of thesubject matter that allows them to be agile in dealing with such situations. Another view of thissituation is that instructors should not always directly answer a student’s question but shouldencourage the student to explore for the answer on their own. This practice leads the student tobecome a more independent learner and that will serve her or him well in the future. Indeed, thatis a skill that employers seek.Availability of Instructional Materials: This is a real issue because most text material availabletoday is designed to support lecture-based courses. Some activity-based, modular materials arebeing developed through
University of Notre Dame. She holds a BS in Chemical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and a MS and PhD in Chemical Engineering from Notre Dame. Her research focuses primarily on Engineering Education issues, especially focused within the first-year engineering experience.Mr. Gary Allen Gilot P.E., University of Notre Dame Gary A. Gilot is the Director of Engineering Leadership and Community Engagement at the College of Engineering at the University of Notre Dame. Gary is a Fellow at the University Center for Social Concerns. Gary earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Clarkson Uni- versity in Upstate New York (1978), and Masters in Business Administration from
Paper ID #30113Work-in-Progress: A Delphi Study of Skills and Competencies for theHydrocarbon IndustryDr. Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer Cole is the Assistant Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering in the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University and the Associate Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research. Dr. Cole’s primary teaching is in capstone and freshman design, and her research interest are in engineering design education.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant
Paper ID #15201Charting the Landscape of Engineering Leadership Education in North Amer-ican UniversitiesMr. Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is a Leadership Programming Consultant with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto where he develops leadership programs and industry partnerships for engineers. His research interests include engineering leadership, organizational culture, and higher education. Mike has a Graduate Diploma in Social Innovation from the University of Waterloo and a BASc in
development of soft-skills and attributesvalued by the student and future employers or graduate schools. Mentors will also interact withscholars at CAM activities. They will submit documentation on these activities for assessmentand tracking progress. Faculty mentors also meet annually to discuss and review their efforts.The CAM Project Management Team will also investigate the impact of these mentoring andgroup-based activities on faculty workload. It is noted that each faculty member of the CAMProject Management Team will devote 1 month of his/her 9-month annual contract to thisproject.Peer mentoring is recognized as a best-practice strategy for promoting college student success(Collier, 2017). Undergraduate mentors may provide student-relevant
questions 1 to 4 229 47 22 11 n for questions: 5 to 8 in 2006/9 to 12 in 2007 76/153 38/9 22/0 0/111 The technology that is used in the U.S. is likely the besttechnology to use to solve similar technical problems in 3.66 3.55 3.44 1.73other countries2 There is a single best solution to an engineering problem 1.92 1.81 1.59 1.823 It is important for engineers to consider the broaderpotential impacts of technical solutions to problems on 4.66 4.60 5.06 5.27minority racial and ethnic groups in the effected population4 Technical constraints and criteria are the most importantelement determining the success of an engineered solution
Paper ID #6048A Robotics Summer Camp for High School Students: Pipelines ActivitiesPromoting Careers in Engineering FieldsDr. Mehmet Ayar, TUBITAK Dr. Mehmet C. Ayar is a scientific programs expert in the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK). He received his PhD. in Curriculum and Instruction with specialization in STEM education at Texas A&M University in 2012. His research is in ethnographic studies of science and engineering practice, curriculum development, design of learning environments and robotics activities. He offers a graduate course in METU on communities of practice. Dr. Ayar
. Service Research and Innovation Institute [SRII], http://thesrii.org/mission).16. IBM. (2009). Beyond IT: IBM’s role in creating the workforce of the future. Retrieved from http://www-03.ibm.com17. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2008). Project 2016. Retrieved fromhttp://www.project061.org/18. National Science Resources Center. (1997). Science for all children: A guide to improving elementary scienceeducation in your school district. Washington, DC: National Sciences Resource Center, Smithsonian Institution.19. National Science Teachers Association. (2010). Exemplary science for resolving societal challenges. Retrievedfrom http://nsta.org
, itself, lastten minutes, followed by a five to six minute question and answer period. On theevaluation day, Thursday in the plan, students would respond to a survey written by theFellows (see appendix), and discuss which power plant would best solve Las Vegas’senergy problems.4. The Execution of the ProjectBecause the activity was designed for implementation at Hughes Center, its executionthere very closely followed the plan. The main differences between plan and execution atHughes were that the responsibility lists and materials lists were combined. Also, ratherthan the group being responsible for a total of five rebuttals, each person becameresponsible for one rebuttal. This evened up the work load for groups with fewerstudents.At Amelia High
Survey of Student ExperienceAbstractThis paper is a report on evidence-based practice in a first year engineering program forMechanical Engineering Students. We adapted a year-long curriculum called Living with the Lab(LWTL) that uses a project-based, hands-on instruction to introduce students to engineeringfundamentals, programming, sensors, controls and engineering design. While adhering to thespirit and much of the content of the original curriculum, we added material, created newhands-on projects, introduced a flipped instructional model for the first course in the sequence,and experimented with an alternative final project model. We briefly describe our key innovationsto the LWTL curriculum.Introduction of this curriculum has coincided with
, recognizing the importance of technology in the progress of underdeveloped regions,and understanding the role of the future engineers in the advancement of technology, it wassuggested to offer a workshop as a forum for exchanging best practices, creating networks forinternational engineering educational experiences involving the Americas (research projectcollaboration, design projects collaboration, entrepreneurial project collaboration, andinternational internships) and sharing resources for promoting engineering design, innovationand entrepreneurship in the engineering institutions of the Americas.Workshop ProgramThe NSF sponsored workshop entitled The Global Engineering Education Challenge for theAmericas was held in Tampico, Mexico May 29 – June
the LEWAS into freshman- level courses at Virginia Western Community College and a senior level hydrology course at Virginia Tech.Mr. Daniel S Brogan, VIrginia Tech Daniel S. Brogan is a PhD student, advised by Dr. Lohani, in Engineering Education with BS and MS degrees in Electrical Engineering. He has completed several graduate courses in engineering education pertinent to this research. He is the key developer of the OWLS and leads the LEWAS lab development and implementation work. He has mentored two NSF/REU Site students in the LEWAS lab. He assisted in the development and implementation of curricula for introducing the LEWAS at VWCC including the development of pre-test and post-test assessment questions
Project-based learning (PBL), recognized as a high-impact practice [1, 2], is an increasingly commonfeature in US engineering programs, with implementations ranging from first-year experiences throughcapstone design projects. The Buck Institute of Education, whose work focuses mostly on K-12 education,has articulated a set of essential elements of “Gold Standard PBL” [3] that are readily applicable to thehigher education context: 1. Key Knowledge, Understanding, and Skills: Make clear the learning goals for PBL assignments. Often these are a combination of disciplinary knowledge and transferrable skills and abilities. 2. Challenging Problem or Question: Engage students with a driving problem or question with a suitable level of
member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the SAFE Association. Prior to receiving his Ph.D. in 1983, Dr. Nelson worked as a design engineer in industry and taught as an adjunct professor at the University of Houston and Texas A&M University at Galveston. In industry he was primarily involved in design of floating and fixed structures for the offshore petroleum industry. After receiving his Ph.D., Dr. Nelson joined the civil engineering faculty at Texas A&M University. He joined the civil engineering faculty at Clemson University in 1989 as Program Director and founder of the Clemson University Graduate Engineering Programs at The Citadel and became Chair of Civil Engineering in 1998. In