professional engineering environment [11]. All other opportunities provide“at best, a simulation of engineering practices” [11, p. 2].Program Outcomes A student’s completion of coursework requirements is no longer the primary measure foracademic success; it is now measured by achievement of program learning outcomes [5].Assessment on achievement of learning outcomes has been adopted as a method to evaluateoverall program effectiveness and improve student learning. Program outcomes provideexpectations for the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) that students should possess bycompletion of their undergraduate program. Proficiency in these KSA is vital to future successfor graduating students [4]. The ABET Criterion 3 (a-k) Student Learning
experiences.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
Page 10.1112.4commonly encountered trial-and-error (or “junkyard wars”) methodology. The strategy we useis to limit the scope of the project, simplify the problem, and provide the basic information that is “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education”just enough to solve the simplified problem. In fact, this is another practice we wanted thestudents to experience and appreciate. That is, for a preliminary design, it is often best tosimplify the problem, and grasp the main thread to give a close approximation before spendingtime and energy to solve the full scale question.At the beginning of the
supported after the partnership was initiatedAs a practical matter, almost all of the Cohort 3 students represent very difficult cases thatextend over a very long period of time. These cases also span the two support service structures.Since this research focuses on the role of the SAA partnership in student academic outcomes, we Page 26.1049.8will focus our analysis on Cohorts 1 and 2 only.Data for the cohorts are parsed by a number of different factors, including: number of semestersbefore graduation of our first contact with a student, academic major, gender, race, and status aseither a first-year admit or a transfer student to the school of
students to draw on the human-centered design tools they had been exposed to in theirSTS program. From past collaborations, we were aware of a grocery store design prompt that ourcolleague, Dr. Ayush Gupta, had adapted from engineering education researchers and educators(credit for the design of the original prompt goes to David Radcliffe, Robin Adams, and MonicaCardella at Purdue University). The original (2011) formulation of this prompt was: “A grocerystore is losing customers because they have become annoyed at how long it takes to check out.There is not space in the store to add more checkout lanes, but something must be done. You arehired as a consultant to help the company” [10].Through Dr. Gupta’s use of this prompt in his own introduction
scholarship awards.Literature ReviewAn essential component of any modern economy is a well-educated and versatile workforce ableto design and produce innovative products, processes, and services.1 The American engineeringworkforce demands special attention because of its importance in contributing to the nation’seconomy through research, design, development, and implementation of innovative products,processes, and services.1 However, the U.S. engineering workforce has two significant problems:the United States has been unable to produce a sufficient number of domestic engineers, and ithas been unable to produce a sufficiently diverse engineering workforce.2, 3In 2003, Gibbons reported that the demand for engineers is increasing, but the production
teaching and learning for engineering faculty. In his research Dominik May focuses, inter alia, on future requirements for science and engineering graduates, such as interna- tional competence, in order to become successful engineers in a globalized professional world. Therefore he designs and investigates respective educational strategies with a special focus on online solutions and the integration of remote laboratories. For his research and the development of several transnational on- line courses he benefits from his working experience in international companies and a broad international professional network. Furthermore Dominik May is founding member of both the Engineering Education Research Group at the Center
ABET Evaluators Team site visit in 2013. EEET received excellent comments for the display materials presented by Dr. Subal Sarkar ABET team chair which was managed to completion by Wajid. He is Digital Integrated Quality Management Systems Expert for Automated Academic Student Outcomes based Assessments Methodology He has taught several courses on electronics, microprocessors, electric circuits, digital electronics and instrumentation. He has conducted several workshops at the IU campus and eslewhere on Outcomes Assessment best practices, OBE, EvalTools R 6 for faculty, E learning with EvalTools R 6 for students, ABET accreditation process. He is a member of SAP Community, ISO 9001, Senior Member IEEE, IEEE
the 2008 President’s Service Learning Award for innovations in the use of service learning at Cal Poly. In 2004 he was named a Templeton Research Fellow by the Center for Academic Integrity. Dr. Harding received both the 1999 Apprentice Faculty Grant and 2000 New Faculty Fellow Award for his contributions to engineering edu- cation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Stories of Change: Faculty in reflective dialogsAbstractOver a two year period, a group of faculty from California Polytechnic State University, SanLuis Obispo (Cal Poly), met monthly to explore the role of reflection in transformingengineering education. This dialog group at Cal Poly was part of
ofEngineering Education, 82, 171-173.3. Evans, D.L., Beakley, G. C., Crouch, P. E., & Yamaguchi, G. T. (1993). Attributes of engineering graduates andtheir impact on curriculum design. Journal of Engineering Education, 82, 203-211.4. Bjorkland, S. A. & Colbeck, C. L. (2001). The view from the top: Leaders’ perspectives on a decade of change inengineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 90, 13-19.5. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. www.abet.org.6. Ford, J. D. & Riley, L. A. (2003). Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula,courses, and support systems. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 325-328.7. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity
engaged in team projects. This integration ofengineering with other disciplines would further enhance the experience of students and betterprepare them for teamwork after graduation by enhancing learning and facilitating self-efficacyand innovation.References 1. Holley, K.A., 2009, "Best Practices Related to Interdisciplinary Education," ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(2), 89-99. 2. Hotaling, N., Hermann, C. D., Fasse, B. B., Bost, L. F., and Foresta, C. R., 2012, “A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 630-656. 3. Zohar, Ori. Letter to the author. 25 Jan 2015. TS
Movie and Recreation Presentation 8:00 PM Game Night Center Practice 8:30 PM Throughout the week, participants attended classes taught by faculty and graduate studentsfrom the six engineering disciplines involved in this program. While the goal was partially toprovide students with a realistic college classroom experience, the classes were intended to behighly active and generally consisted of a short introductory discussion of the concepts involved,followed by an activity allowing students to explore the concepts more deeply or encouragingthem to solve a small, open-ended design
that would be attractive to students, and effective at introducing themto STEM topics. This partnership led to several NSF grants that helped to grow the program.Since the pilot program in 2004, Louisiana Tech has been actively partnering with a growingnumber of regional schools and research centers in order to provide meaningful professionaldevelopment to high school teachers, as well as engaging projects for their students. It is ouropinion that for any effort like this to be successful at least three key elements must beconsidered. First, the effort must be sustained. Second, the effort must be threaded. Third, theeffort must be connected. The project presented in this paper, Launching into Engineering,addresses the three key factors listed
Paper ID #12207Including Universal Design in Engineering Courses to Attract Diverse Stu-dentsDr. Brianna Blaser, University of Washington Brianna Blaser is a counselor/coordinator at the DO-IT Center at the University of Washington where she works with the AccessEngineering program. She earned a bachelors degree in math and psychology at Carnegie Mellon University and a PhD in women studies at the University of Washington. She has a background in broadening participation and career development in science and engineering fields. Before joining DO-IT, she was the project director for the AAAS (American Association for
Paper ID #22096Strategies for Flipping Geology for Engineers with Limited Time and Re-sourcesDr. Kristin M. Sample-Lord P.E., Villanova University Dr. Kristin Sample-Lord is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at Villanova University, with expertise in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. Her research focuses on soil barrier systems for protection of human health and the environment and geotech- nical aspects of stormwater control measures. Dr. Sample-Lord teaches a number of undergraduate and graduate courses, including Geology for Engineers, Soil Mechanics and
respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. He is currently the chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and an associate ed- itor for the Journal of Engineering Educaiton (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WIP: Experts’ perceptions of engineering intuitionIntroductionThis work in progress paper describes preliminary
technical skills as well as the professional or "softer" skills such ascommunication, working as a team and customer interaction 3-5. The need for such experienceshas spawned many innovative approaches to senior capstone design courses 6, 7 as well as designcourses for underclassmen 8-11. The most common model for these courses has been a onesemester experience intended to give the students an intense exposure to the design process. Page 10.578.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThe model that guided the creation of
focuses on student problem-solving pro- cesses and use of worked examples, change models and evidence-based teaching practices in engineering curricula, and the role of non-cognitive and affective factors in student academic outcomes and overall success.Mr. Gireesh Guruprasad, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Gireesh Guruprasad is a graduate student at Purdue University. As part of his research, he explores factors that affect the Professional Formation of Engineers, based on students beliefs and preferences and the beliefs of the faculty who teach them. Gireesh obtained his Bachelors degree in Mechanical Engineering and is currently pursuing his Masters degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics
reservoirs, housing construction, among others. He was also a Project Management Associate for a Habitat For Humanity housing project in the USA. (ii) RESEARCH: MiguelAndrés' research focuses on (1) decision-making for the design and construction of infrastructure projects, (2) the planning of sustainable, smart and resilient cities, and (3) the development of engineers who not only have solid technical and practical knowledge, but also social understanding for, through infrastructure, address local and global challenges on humanitarian, environmental, social and equity issues. (iii) EDUCATION RESEARCH: Related to STEM education, Miguel Andrés is developing and applying contemporary pedagogies and tools for innovation and
Dean of Academic and Student Affairs in the Tickle College o Engineering at University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She has over 15 years of academic experience in various leadership positions. Prior to joining academia, she was an Electronics Engineer at U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi MD where she managed Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Programs for the develop- ment of hybrid numerical electromagnetic tools. Dr. Kilic has over five years of industry experience at COMSAT Laboratories as a Senior Engineer and Program Manager with specialization in satellite com- munications, link modeling and analysis, and modeling, design and test of phased arrays and reflector antennas for satellite communications
2006-2205: WHAT’S SO IMPORTANT ABOUT PEER REVIEW OF TEACHINGPORTFOLIO COMPONENTS? AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OFPEER-REVIEW EPISODES WITHIN ETPPJennifer Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an assistant professor in the Department of Technical Communication at the University of Washington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests include engineering education, learner-centered design, user-centered design, and audience analysis. Dr. Turns is currently working on multiple NSF grants dealing with engineering education including an NSF Career award exploring the impact of portfolio construction on engineering students
and perspectives on human development and cognition articulated by Cultural Historical Activity Theory. Putting theory into practice, she teaches a service-learning course at UCSC wherein interdisciplinary teams of students work in an layered apprenticeship model with community mentors to design and implement sustainable solutions to water, energy, waste, transportation and social challenges using ”green technology”. Dr. Ball has worked as a research fellow with two NSF Centers for Learning and Teaching and most recently on several NSF projects that focus the integration of engineering and social science to support the advancement of experiential learning for sustainability in higher education.Mr. Zachary W Graham
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationimportant to contemplate different approaches to accommodate different learners, particularlyafter having learned about one’s own learning style. An instructor with some understanding ofdifferences in students’ learning styles is well on his/her way in making his/her teaching moreeffective.(28)A viable learning style model must be grounded in research, periodically evaluated, and adaptedto reflect the developing knowledge base.(19) Implementation of learning style practices mustconform to accepted standards of ethics, and be carried out by competent instructors, who canprovide suitable activities that appeal to each learning style. To promote effective learning,within the context of varied
). This program wasdeveloped at the NASA Ames Research Center, and many graduate students from theaerospace engineering program have been funded to develop its user-interface.22 Flight datais used by this program to develop transfer function models of the aircraft. This type ofexperiment requires a flyable aircraft, and thus it will be the last one to be implemented forthe RV-7 aircraft. However, the modeling process can be simulated by generating “test” data Page 12.918.10with stability derivatives identified from the previously described experiments.Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference * Exposition
] S. Nakasuka, N. Sako, H. Sahara, Y. Nakamura, T. Eishima and M. Komatsu. “Evolution from education to practical use in University of Tokyo’s nano-satellite activities,” Acta Astronautica 66, pp.1099-1105, 2010.[10] J. Piattoni, G. P. Candini, G. Pezzi, F. Santoni and R. Piergentili. “Plastic Cubesat: An innovative and low-cost way to perform applied space research and hands-on education,” Acta Astronautica 81, pp.419-429, 2021.[11] A. Scholz and J. Juang. “Toward open source CubeSat Design,” Acta Astronautica 115, pp.384-392, 2015.[12] K. Woellert, P. Ehrenfreund, A. J. Ricco and H. Hertzfeld. “Bubesats: Cost-effective science and technology platforms for emerging and developing nations,” Adv. Space
, the continuingneed for environmentally friendly systems, the increasing use of limited natural resources, thetechnical innovations in the design and simulation of power systems, the need for “quality”power, and the potential of very small generating plants (micro-turbines, fuel cells, etc.) in ornear load centers have begun to effect the generation and delivery of electric power in wayspreviously not envisioned.The California crisis of the last few years, the blackouts in the northeast in the summer of 2003and the continuing blackouts across the world have brought the electric generation, transmissionand distribution network back into world engineering and political thought and debate. Thispaper will summarize the yearlong study undertaken
Paper ID #26186Recognizing Engineering Students’ Funds of Knowledge: Creating and Vali-dating Survey MeasuresMs. Dina Verd´ın, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dina Verd´ın is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education and M.S. student in Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. She completed her B.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at San Jos´e State University. Dina is a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and an Honorable Mention for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit
, software engineering and innovation management. Recently his paper won the Best Teaching Strategies Paper award at the most respected international conference in the area of engineering education - Annual conference of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE).Gautam Akiwate, University of California, San Diego Gautam Akiwate is currently a graduate student at the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of California, San Diego with broad areas of interest. He got his bachelor’s degree from the College of Engineering, Pune. While in COEP, Gautam was involved in a lot of activities including a CUBESAT mission. Gautam’s current research interests are systems and networking in addition to
David S. Taylor Service to Students Award and Golden Apple Award from Boise State University. He is also the recipient of ASEE Pacific Northwest Section (PNW) Outstanding Teaching Award, ASEE Mechanical Engineering division’s Outstanding New Edu- cator Award and several course design awards. He serves as the campus representative (ASEE) for Boise State University and as the Chair-Elect for the ASEE PNW Section. His academic research interests in- clude innovative teaching and learning strategies, use of emerging technologies, and mobile teaching and learning strategies.Samantha Schauer, Boise State University Samantha Schauer is a graduate student at Boise State University, pursuing a Master’s degree in Mechani
…Many of the students who make it to graduation enter the workforce ill-equipped for the complex interactions across many disciplines of real-world engineered systems…What’s needed is a major shift in engineering education’s center of gravity, which has moved not at all since the last shift, some 50 years ago, to the so-called ‘engineering science’ model…Engineering is creativity constrained by nature, by cost, by concerns of safety, environmental impact, ergonomics, reliability, manufacturability, maintainability…To be sure the realities of nature is one of the constraint sets we work under, but it is far from the only one, it is seldom the hardest one, and almost never the limiting one