the ProTrack Co-Op Coordinator at Florida Institute of Technology. His research interests include applications in automo- tive/transportation safety, electro-mechanical systems, data analysis strategies and techniques, dynamic modeling, and engineering education.Dr. Anna KT Howard, North Carolina State University Anna Howard is a Teaching Associate Professor at NC State University in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering where she has led the course redesign effort for Engineering Statics. She received her Ph.D. from the Rotorcraft Center of Excellence at Penn State University in 2001.Dr. Sherry Jensen, Florida Institute of Technology Dr. Sherry Jensen is an Assistant Professor of Economics at the Florida Institute
Paper ID #11146Incorporating a Graduate Research Activity in an Undergraduate VibrationsCourse Design ProjectDr. Richard F. Keltie, North Carolina State University Dr. Richard F. Keltie, NC State University Dr. Keltie is a Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engi- neering at NC State University. His research activities include the vibro-acoustic response of submerged shells, structural acoustics, energy propagation in large structures, and the transient response of complex mechanical systems. In support of these activities he has taught and developed courses in machine dy- namics, mechanical vibration analysis, acoustic
, industrialengineering, and aeronautic/aerospace engineering. The participants had taken an average of4.58 (S = 2.83) college level science courses and 4.42 (S = 2.40) college level mathematicscourses.MeasuresThe overarching question of our research was “why do students want to be engineers?” We Page 24.1379.5developed a brief demographics and engineering focused survey to gather information that wefelt was necessary to answer our research question. As a team we created an initial list of items,keeping in mind the desire for the survey to be completed in about 10 minutes. After severalrounds of item development, we vetted the survey with a dean and a coordinator
stakeholderssuch as industry, clinicians, and patient groups in an effort to understand the current state of theart in the industry as well as to understand the risk associated with the devices. Patient groupswere invited to gauge the benefits desired by patients from the technologies and what risk maybe acceptable to patients.The first workshop topic was the use of additive manufacturing for production of medicaldevices. Several industry representatives, both from companies who develop the additivemanufacturing equipment as well as those in the medical and aerospace industries who currentlyproduce additively manufactured products, presented information on the capabilities of thetechnologies and benefits compared to traditional manufacturing. The workshop
principlesto college campuses. Business and engineering students were recruited and approximately 25students were admitted to the program after submitting an application and participating in aninterview. After the grant expired, the University of Maryland committed to support a majorityof program finances. Additional funding is contributed by the organizations sponsoring projects.In addition to changes in program sponsorship, QUEST has expanded to include students frommathematics, computer science, and physical and natural sciences in addition to those studyingbusiness and engineering (aerospace, biomedical, civil, fire protection, materials, and mechanicaldisciplines). This has enabled more diversity in project topics and the incorporation of
Paper ID #12745A different view: An inquiry into visualization of bibliometric dataMrs. Daniela Solomon, Case Western Reserve University Daniela Solomon is Research Services Librarian for Biomedical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electri- cal Engineering and Computer Science, Materials Science and Engineering, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Kelvin Smith Library, Case Western Reserve University. She is interested in bibliometrics, altmetrics, data management, and library instruction. Page 26.36.1
Industrial Electronics, 2008.[2] N. Papanikolopoulos, “Integrating computer vision and control for vision-assisted robotic tasks,” American Control Conference, 1995.[3] K. Sage, and S. Young, “Security applications of computer vision,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol.14, no.4, 1999.[4] G. Bebis, D. Egberg, and M. Shah. “Review of computer vision education,” IEEE Transaction on Education, vol. 46, no. 1, 2003.[5] R. Broussard and J. Piepmeier, “Undergraduate computer vision curriculum to complement a robotics program,” ASEE Annual Conference, 2004.[6] J. Macedo, K. Colvin, and D. Waldorf, “Machine Vision Course for Manufacturing Engineering Undergraduate Students”, Journal of
the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 2014 with a Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering. Currently attending graduate school at Georgia Institute of Technology perusing a PhD in Aerospace Engineering. Page 26.157.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Additive Manufacturing of Robot Components for a Capstone Senior Design ExperienceAbstractThe University of North Carolina at Charlotte competed in the 5th Annual NASA RoboticMining Competition with a robot that included several additively manufactured (AM) parts. Theteam used a
]. Deliberate practice has received attention fromengineering scholars. The two key processes in deliberate practice include identifying whichknowledge and/or skills to be proved and selecting a learning approach resulting in the desiredimprovements. The need for two types of practice, practice that develops component skills andpractice that requires skills to be integrated to address more complex problems, has been discussed[19].The research findings from CLT and DP have provided guidelines for us to design practices toenhance effective learning experiences.3. ImplementationES 204 Dynamics (three credit hours), the second mechanics course following ES 201 Statics, isrequired for students in aerospace, civil, and mechanical engineering at Embry
Paper ID #12888Developing T-Shaped Professional Engineers through an Advance EnergySystem CourseMr. Ryan L Falkenstein-Smith, Syracuse University Ryan is a Ph.D. candidate at Syracuse University whose research interest range from carbon sequestration to engineering education.Prof. Jeongmin Ahn, Syracuse UniversityDr. Kang Wang, Syracuse UniversityMr. Ryan James Milcarek, Syracuse University Ryan Milcarek is a Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering PhD student at Syracuse University with a focus in Energy Systems Engineering. He worked for the Department of Energy’s Industrial Assessment Center at Syracuse University for 2
Paper ID #11331Effects of a Structured Prototyping Strategy on Capstone Design ProjectsMr. Tanmay Gurjar, The University of Texas at Austin Tanmay Gurjar is a second year Master’s student at University of Texas at Austin. His research deals with prototyping strategy development.Dr. Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy Dr. Dan Jensen is a Professor of Engineering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (Mechanical Engineering), M.S. (Applied Mechanics) and Ph.D. (Aerospace Engineering Science) from the University of Colorado at Boulder. He has worked for Texas
3-Dprinting technologies are employed in the design and development process.3.4 Software and Systems Project Management Teaching Pedagogy. Both the “EngineeringProject Management” and “Software Project Management” courses are introductory graduatecourse designed for students coming from different engineering disciplines, such as Electricaland Computer Engineering, and Software Engineering. In addition, many times the courses arepopulated with students coming from Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Engineeringgraduate programs. There are certain aspects of the courses that traditionally make the combinedsection more of an abstract, dry, course rather than an engineering hands-on course. First, thecombined course covers the entire systems
Paper ID #11591Engineering Students’ Understanding of PlagiarismDr. Susan L. Murray, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Susan Murray is a Professor of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. Dr. Murray received her B.S. and Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Texas A&M University. Her M.S. is also in Industrial Engineering from the University of Texas- Arlington. She is a Professional Engineer (P.E.) registered in Texas. Prior to her academic position, she spent seven years working in the aerospace industry. Dr. Murray’s research interest
graduation, he enrolled in the Graduate University for Advanced Studies and researched at Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency(JAXA). Then he received master’s degree by research in control and guidance systems for launch vehicles. Now he works as an assistant professor in Innovation Center for Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Tottori University. There he engages in the engineering education and the researche of control systems. Page 26.952.1Ms. Ayano Ohsaki, Tottori University Ms Ayano OHSAKI is an assistant professor at the Innovation Center for Engineering Education, Tot- tori University since
reduced time to markethave all created a need for a greater understanding of systems engineering concepts, which mustnow be introduced at early stages of engineering curriculum. These practices would enhancepreparedness and marketability of engineering graduates into the twenty-first century work force.Systems engineering is a relatively new approach to the design of large and complex engineeringsystems. The engineering community and the aerospace industry initiated this new approach tothe design of large systems in 1960s. As the systems became large and complex the conventionalengineering design approach for such systems was not adequate. There were questions about thecost, schedule, and performance issues for the entire life cycle of such large
. Katsioloudis is an Associate Professor and the Industrial Technology Program Leader, Depart- ment of STEM Education and Professional Studies, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA. His research focuses on improving teacher and student performance in STEM education, and enhancing the develop- ment of a national STEM-educated workforce.Prof. Nathan John Luetke, Old Dominion University Nathan Luetke Received his BS in Mechanical Engineering Technology from Old Dominion University followed shortly after by an MS in Mechanical Engineering. While Pursuing his Masters degree Nathan spent two years at Swales Aerospace followed by one year at Lockheed Martin contracting for NASA Lan- gley Research Center in Hampton, VA. While there
this study attended a multidisciplinary session for rising 9thand 10th grade students. Student campers must pay to participate in the engineeringsummer camps. Financial aid is provided to those in need. Approximately 144 studentswere placed in design teams of three students, providing the study with 48 studentgroups. Participants were provided with $20 gift cards as remuneration for theirparticipation in this study.Three high school teachers with backgrounds in science and/or math were selected asinstructors for the engineering summer camp. Instructors were divided among theengineering disciplines of Aerospace, Biomedical, Civil, Mechanical, Industrial andChemical engineering with instructors teaching 24 students each equaling 48 studentgroups
Engineering was by far the most frequent visitor, with 276 (44.09%) of the totalcheck-outs recorded, followed by Electrical Engineering with 66 (10.54%), Library Staff with 41(6.55%), Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering with 37 (5.91%), and Computer Science with18 (2.88%). Unsurprisingly, of the 40 departments recorded, the vast majority are engineering orhard science disciplines. However, we were encouraged by some significant numbers from non-traditional fields. Humanities and Social Science had 12 checkouts, Agriculture and LifeSciences had 11, and the Ph.D. program in Communication, Rhetoric, and Digital Media had 10checkouts. While we are uncertain whether these checkout numbers represent one or two devotedindividuals or a broader cohort within
still students (53% of responses) andthose who already graduated (47% of responses). Figure 3b illustrates that the participants aredistributed in wide-range of industries from aerospace to research and development. That is, theskills attained from the new course redesign can be assessed from academic and industrialperspectives. Page 26.1102.7 6 Figure 3: Percentage of (a) student and graduates; and (b) industry sector.Table 1 shows the survey questions, where each participant were asked to rate (on the scale 1 to5, where 1 represented “not well” and 5 indicated “extremely well”) the
Paper ID #13651MAKER: Applying 3D Printing to Model Rocketry to Enhance Learning inUndergraduate Engineering Design ProjectsDr. Sven G. Bilen, Pennsylvania State University, University Park SVEN G. BILEN,´ Ph.D., P.E. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design, Electrical Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering at Penn State and Head of the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs. His educational research interests include developing techniques for enhanc- ing engineering design education, innovation in design, teaching technological entrepreneurship, global product design, and systems
-economic systems, renewable resources, and sustainable development; control of semiconductor, (hypersonic) aerospace, robotic, and low power electronic systems. Recently, he has worked closely with NASA researchers on the design of scramjet-powered hypersonic vehicles. Dr. Rodriguez’ honors include: AT&T Bell Lab- oratories Fellowship; Boeing A.D. Welliver Fellowship; ASU Engineering Teaching Excellence Award; IEEE International Outstanding Advisor Award; White House Presidential Excellence Award for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring; Ralf Yorque Memorial Best Paper Prize. Dr. Rodriguez has also served on various national technical committees and panels. He is currently serving on the following
Paper ID #11549Musical Analogies as a Teaching Tool for Engineering ConceptsProf. Matthew Rhudy, Lafayette College Matthew Rhudy is currently a Visiting Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lafayette College in Easton, PA. He received a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering (AE) at West Virginia University (WVU), a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering (ME) from the University of Pittsburgh and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (ME) from the Pennsylvania State University (PSU). His primary research focus is sensor fusion.Prof. Tobias Rossmann, Lafayette College Tobias Rossmann is an Assistant Professor in the Department of
innovation can transform the materialsindustry is the emergence of the steel mini-mill, the rapid cost-down of poly silicon based solarcells, and the increased use of carbon composites in the aerospace industry. For rare andcontrolled materials, business cases are more difficult to find but examples exist that connect therarity or market scarcity to high costs associated with extraction or capital investment.Both the technical and the business spheres are influenced greatly by policy; governmental,public, or private. The success of a materials innovation therefore must include consideration ofthe market and all business factors related to processes of manufacture, use, and disposal.Factors can include design, sustainability, life cycle
Paper ID #14084Texas versus California: Trends in Gender Diversity and Impacts by Engi-neering DisciplineProf. Keith J Bowman, Illinois Institute of Technology Keith J. Bowman became Professor and Chair of the Department of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) in August, 2011, immediately following nearly five years of experience leading the Purdue School of Materials Engineering as Interim Head and Head. His first faculty appointment was as an Assistant Professor at Purdue University in 1988 after receiving de- grees from Case Western Reserve University (CWRU), (B.S. 1981
),Aerospace and Ocean Engineering (AOE), Biological System Engineering (BSE), ElectricalEngineering (EE), Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE), and undecided. The participantsrepresent all undergraduate academic levels and represent a diverse pool of experience types anddevelopmental stages (e.g., freshman design vs. senior design, assigned vs. self selectedteammates, and mini two week vs. extended two semester projects).Data Collection and AnalysisData collection consisted of three individual interviews with each participant to understand hisexperience on a multiracial student team. Each three interview sequence was conducted over thecourse of a spring semester. In some cases, the team project was completed within this semester;but in other
Paper ID #12517Using an Experience Design Approach to Curriculum CreationDr. Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Patrick E. Connolly, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Patrick Connolly is a professor and interim department head of the Department of Computer Graph- ics Technology in the College of Technology at Purdue University. He has extensive experience in the aerospace design and CAD/CAE software industries, and has been serving in higher education for almost twenty years. Dr. Connolly has a BS degree in Design and Graphics Technology and an MS in Com- puter Integrated Manufacturing from Brigham
engineering programs such as mechanical, aerospace, civil, biological, andbiomedical engineering programs. Extended from college physics mechanics courses, the coursecovers numerous fundamental concepts; for example, displacement, force, velocity, acceleration,mass momentum of inertia, work, energy, impulse, momentum, the Principle of Work andEnergy, the Conservation of Energy, the Principle of Impulse and Momentum, and theConservation of Momentum.1-3Engineering dynamics, however, is also widely regarded as one of the most difficult courses tosucceed in. Many students use phrases such as, “much harder than statics,” “extremely difficult,”“very challenging,” and “are afraid of it,” to describe their perspectives about this course. It wasreported that
understanding of the fundamental Newtonian concepts when compared to courses not using the intervention. 2. Determine whether i-Newton demonstrations affect students’ self-efficacy, intention to persist in the major, and sense of inclusion. 2.0 MethodsThe course ME240: Introduction to Dynamics and Vibrations is a required course at theUniversity of Michigan for undergraduate majors in three programs; namely, MechanicalEngineering, Aerospace Engineering and Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. The mainunits of the course cover topics in the three-dimensional motion of particles, the planar motion ofrigid bodies, and elementary vibrations. This is a traditional lecture-based course offered in fivelarge sections
2009 and he is currently the Director of the Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Group (TAMG). He received his undergraduate 5-year Diploma (2002) from the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics at University of Patras (Greece), and his MS (2005) and PhD (2007) degrees from the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science at Rice University (Houston, TX). Page 26.1300.1 He also held a 2-year Post-doc position at the Center for Mechanics of Solids, Structures and Materials in the Aerospace Engineering & Engineering Mechanics Department at the University of Texas at Austin
Paper ID #11965Reinforcing Communication Skills through Participation in a Team-basedWeekly Innovation ChallengeMr. Federico Garcia Lorca, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng. Federico Garcia Lorca is pursuing a PhD. in Aerospace Engineering with his research focusing on en- trepreneurial engineering in higher education. Currently Federico is involved in the design of innovation challenges outside the classroom.Dr. Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is the recipient of four NSF awards for research in engineering education and a research associate at Purdue University. Prior