– 2412, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1612352.[2] J. M. Sullivan, “Affirmative Action Bans: Assessing Impacts in a Cross-State Affirmative Action Bans: Assessing Impacts in a Cross-State Context,” Undergrad. Honor. Capstone Proj., vol. 446, 2018, Accessed: Feb. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/honors.[3] M. Goodwin, “The Death of Affirmative Action? ,” Wis. L. Rev., vol. 715, Jun. 2013, Accessed: Feb. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2284958.[4] “Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College,” Docket No. 20-1199, 2022. https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20- 1199
States. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf4491. - Lane Haley M., Rachel Morello-Frosch, Julian D. Marshall, and Joshua S. Apte (2022) Historical Redlining Is Associated with Present-Day Air Pollution Disparities in U.S. Cities, Environmental Science & Technology Letters Article ASAP, DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c01012. - Sabapathy, A., Saksena, S. & Flachsbart, P. (2015). Environmental justice in the context of commuters’ exposure to CO and PM10 in Bangalore, India. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 25, 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2014.34
the ways that people interact and the role that engineering and technology play in society. To this end, she continues to promote social competencies, such as empathy, within engineering education and practice. Her research spans a variety of areas including empathy in engineering, character education, community engagement and design education. She is also passionate about helping young people find their place as valuable contributors in society and is enthusiastic about further fostering this passion in her current role, research and outreach experiences.Joseph Wiinikka-lydon (Dr.) (Wake Forest University) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
Paper ID #36663Teachers’ Beliefs in Enacting an InterdisciplinaryEngineering Project in Inclusive and General ClassroomContexts (Fundamental, Diversity)Sarah Catherine Lilly Dr. Sarah Lilly is a graduate student in the Department of Curriculum, Instruction and Special Education at the University of Virginia. She holds a B.S. in Mathematics and English and an M.A.Ed. in Secondary Education from The College of William and Mary. Sarah defended her dissertation on March 14, 2022 in celebration of Pi Day. Her research centers on STEM+CS education, particularly using qualitative methods to understand the integration
Advanced Electric Vehicles, and a thriving partnership for student recruitment with several universities in China. He has also been the dissertation advisor for and graduated many Ph.D. students. Dr. Das’s areas of research interests are modeling and simulation of multi-disciplinary engineering problems, modeling multi- physics problems in manufacturing, engineering education, and curriculum reform. He has worked in areas ranging from mechatronics system simulation to multi-physics process simulation using CAE tools such as Finite Elements and Boundary Elements. He has authored or co-authored five books on these topics. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
engaged in the action steps resulting from her study, continuing to interact with faculty and students about their experiences of well-being on college campuses and advocating for reforms that better support students and faculty as whole people. Email cholles@mines.edu or text 303-250-5490 to connect! © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A Short Course in Engineering Ethics: Opportunities and Challenges for Pedagogy and AssessmentEthics and engineering: problem of practiceThis evidence-based practice paper presents findings from a one-semester pilot of a short coursein ethics for students in
) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Vertically Integrating E-portfolios and Cooperative Educational Experiences to Develop Students’ Entrepreneurial MindsetThis paper addresses how small coordinated curricular changes can promote the development of anentrepreneurial mindset in engineering students. An entrepreneurial mindset helps students makeconnections, learn from mistakes, and identify opportunities to create value – behaviors that help themmake greater contributions to society, and more successfully navigate their educational process. Wepresent an approach that involves integrating e-portfolio experiences across the curriculum, aligning e-portfolio
Paper ID #37110Reflecting while doing: Integrating active learning andmetacognitive activities in a fully online thermodynamicscourseAndrea Gregg (Director of Online Pedagogy) Director of Online Pedagogy and Assistant Teaching ProfessorJacqueline O'connor © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Reflecting while doing: Integrating active learning and metacognitive activities in a fully online thermodynamics course IntroductionIn this paper we
real- world problem solving within undergraduate curricula. His research interests lie in advanced manufacturing methods. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Co-Designing Design Activities with Undergraduate Students1 IntroductionThe literature on expertise and expert performance describes the process of “deliberate practice”as an important mechanism for learning complex cognitive skills [1]. Deliberate practice isdescribed as being an effortful process where individual skills are isolated and practiced withexpert feedback to correct errors in performance. In the realm of engineering, design is one ofthe most
manufacturing methods. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Industry Hubs: Integrating Industry Perspectives in Design Education1 IntroductionThere is growing recognition globally that universities will need to adapt their curricula to ensurethey are graduating students who can succeed in our increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex,and ambiguous world. This call to action is being driven by many stakeholders includingindustry [1]; accreditation bodies who are beginning to require outcomes-based assessment [2];and internal university stakeholders [3], including students [4]. While there are manyframeworks which describe the
) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com How interdisciplinary collaboration helps communicate engineering research to community audiencesFunding/supportThis study was supported by the National Science Foundation, Advancing Informal STEMLearning Grant No. 1811119AbstractDoes interdisciplinary collaboration make a difference when it comes to communicatingengineering concepts to community audiences? This research focuses on the effect ofcommunication strategies on community attitudes toward engineering research. Two cohorts offour academic researchers each, representing eight different disciplinary backgrounds (aviationplanning, cancer research
dozengraduate students to deliver the core 2nd-year statics and mechanics of materials courses at anEastern University in the United States. Even though the fundamental principles of mechanicsdidn’t change, I would continuously update my course structure and activities based on animproved understanding of effective pedagogy and student feedback, conducted learningoutcome studies with my students, and regularly presented at ASEE on relevant teaching topics.In January 2014, I moved into a full-time administrative role focused on undergraduate studentsupport that did not include teaching responsibilities. But the itch was always there, so in the Fallof 2022, I volunteered, on top of my administrative responsibilities, to teach a 90-student sectionof
datasets relatively quickly, but also can reduce the details ofstudents’ perspectives [16]. More work is needed using qualitative methods to detect CSstudents’ deeper interpretations and explanations.C. Current Study In the current study, we use data gathered from college students enrolled in CS courses inthe fall 2022 academic term at a large public Mid-Atlantic university. As part of their courses,students completed a survey related to their CS and course-specific motivation and learning. Forthe purposes of the present study, we used students’ responses to two open-ended questions onthe survey about their viewpoints toward CS courses and curricula. The study was approved bythe university’s Institutional Review Board. The data were used
SHA256 with SHA384. (4) Robust management frame protection: 256-bit Broadcast/Multicast Integrity Protocol Galois Message Authentication Code (BIP-GMAC-256). The algorithm validation is performed according to Exercise 5 procedure with the exception of replacing BIP-CMAC-128 with BIP-GMAC-256.6 Discussion, Conclusion & Next Steps6.1 DiscussionThe original material of the lab exercises was developed by the instructor and tested by the studentsin the Fall 2022 semester. Section 5 of this paper represents the updated version of the lab exercisestaking into account the students’ observations and suggestions on the original material. Givenbelow are the observations and suggestions offered by our students who tested the original
. Ultimately, her work aims to build bridges between those designing and those being designed for.Patrick Hancock Patrick I. Hancock is a Doctoral Fellow at the University of Virginia in the Department of Engineering Systems and Environment (ESE). His research focuses on developing collaborative engineering practices that facilitate processes and generate outcomes that meet community definitions of social justice. Patrick’s work has appeared in Nature Sustainability, American Psychologist and iScience.Bethany Gordon (PhD Candidate) (University of Virginia) Bethany Gordon is an incoming assistant professor at the University of Washington (Fall 2022). Her research is focused on applications of behavioral science to improve the
hasdecided to conduct all 2021-2022 reviews virtually and it expects to review over 1080 programsacross all four commissions during the accreditation cycle. Over 730 of these programs will beevaluated by EAC.The objectives of this study were to: • gather input on best practices and opportunities for improvement in all elements of the virtual review, including pre-visit preparation, virtual “on-site” operations, team dynamics, communication and training, and • provide recommendations for future virtual reviewsResults of surveys, author(s)’ observations, and recommendations to improve future reviews -whether in-person or virtual - are presented in this paper. Lessons learned address suggestionsfor improvement for future virtual reviews
getting the program set up during the entire 2022-2023academic year. In order to launch the program and recruit applicants we met with five differenteducational experts, contacted 19 non-profit organizations and high schools for potential partner-ships, researched similar outreach programs, read and reviewed 59 applications, and selected 10students. We also recruited and trained mentors, developed workshops and found speakers to facil-itate them, and performed various administrative tasks like ordering food, booking rooms, helpingmentors get background checks, and managing funding from different sources. After we plannedout the program during that academic year, my lab-mate then ran the program over the summerwhile also mentoring two program
–61, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1145/3330794.[3] R. T. Javed et al., “Get out of the BAG! Silos in AI Ethics Education: Unsupervised Topic Modeling Analysis of Global AI Curricula,” J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 73, pp. 933–965, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1613/jair.1.13550.[4] L. Tuovinen and A. Rohunen, “Teaching AI Ethics to Engineering Students: Reflections on Syllabus Design and Teaching Methods,” 2021.[5] J. Lönngren, “Exploring the discursive construction of ethics in an introductory engineering course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 44–69, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20367.[6] R. F. Clancy, Q. Zhu, and Philosophy Documentation Center, “Why Should Ethical Behaviors Be the Ultimate Goal of Engineering Ethics Education?,” Bus. Prof
, moderately negative, neutral, moderately positive, and very positive.The score for each word determines its place on this scale; however, the score can change ifpreceded by a modifier (like “more” or “somewhat”). Words with a neutral sentiment are notcoded [17].To quantify differences in IP creation, the Office of Technology Ventures provided data on thenumber of invention disclosures, patent applications, and patents awarded. Long term, IPgeneration can be better quantified via actual awarded patents and this will be tracked in futurework. We ran a query against all the Biomedical Engineering undergraduate students from 2013to 2022 to obtain these numbers.The survey, which was administered through Qualtrics, also collected demographic
Performance in the First Two Years of Engineering,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26884. doi: 10.18260/p.26884.[8] J. A. Leydens, J. C. Lucena, and D. M. Riley, “Engineering Education and Social Justice,” in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, Oxford University Press, 2022. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1772.[9] B. Christe, “The Importance of Faculty-Student Connections in STEM Disciplines: A Literature Review,” vol. 14, no. 3, 2013.[10] J. J. Park, Y. K. Kim, C. Salazar, and S. Hayes, “Student–Faculty Interaction and Discrimination from Faculty in STEM: The Link with Retention,” Res High Educ, vol. 61, no. 3, pp
designproblem by listening to the sponsor and considering user needs. This emphasis was followed byboth students working on nursing projects or non-nursing projects. Engineering and nursingstudents have inherent empathetic qualities unique to their disciplines.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Dr. Carol Kostovich, LUC Marcella Niehoff School of NursingAssistant Dean of Innovative Education Strategies and Simulation, for establishing the first-yeardesign collaboration with LUC Engineering in 2015, and for personally sponsoring projects untilthis current academic year.References[1] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2023 – 2024," ABET, Baltimore, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads
addition to her scholarly work, she is co-author of the undergraduate textbook, Psychology of Women and Gender: Half the Human Experience+ (Sage, 2022). She is a Fellow of the American Psychological Association and is Associate Editor of the journal Stigma and Health.Dr. Joe Roy, American Society for Engineering Education Joseph Roy has over 15 years of data science and higher education expertise. He currently directs three national annual data collections at the ASEE of colleges of engineering and engineering technology that gather detailed enrollment, degrees awarded, research expenditures, faculty headcounts, faculty salary and retention data for the engineering community. He is PI of a NSF Advanced Technological