computer science, vol. 217, pp. 876-885, 2023.[13] M. Maksimović and N. Davidović, "The role of Digital Twin technology in transforming engineering education," in 9th International scientific conference Technics and Informatics in Education, 2022, pp. 264-270.[14] S. Zacher, "Digital twins for education and study of engineering sciences," International Journal on Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 61-69, 2020.[15] P. Arras and G. Tabunshchyk, "Implementation of digital twins for industry 4.0 in the engineering study program," in Grabchenko’s International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing Processes, 2021: Springer, pp. 677-686.[16] F. Guc, J. Viola, and Y. Chen, "Digital twins enabled
experienced instructor’sclass before they teach their own class, normally the following day. This provides additionalopportunities for observing and technical review prior to teaching the same content. Typically,after their second or third semester, new faculty will move on to teach other, higher-level coursesin their specific area of expertise.MethodologyNew and returning faculty who participated in the department NFO over the past three years(2022, 2023, and 2024) were surveyed. The survey was administered following the summer 2024NFO program. Four participated in the NFO program during summer 2022, six during summer2023, and eight during summer 2024. Participants who participated in previous years were askedto recall and answer survey questions
locus of control,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 305, Sep.2022, doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01328-9.[7] T. J. Nokes-Malach, J. E. Richey, and S. Gadgil, “When Is It Better to Learn Together?Insights from Research on Collaborative Learning,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 645–656, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8.[8] T. S. Roberts, Ed., Online collaborative learning: theory and practice. Hershey Pa:Information Science Pub, 2004.[9] J. A. Gray and M. DiLoreto, “The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction,and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments,” p. 20.[10] B. Hollister, P. Nair, S. Hill-Lindsay, and L. Chukoskie, “Engagement in Online Learning:Student Attitudes and Behavior
by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity,” Bureau of Labor Statistics. Accessed: Sep. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm[3] “Profiles of engineering and engineering technology, 2022.” American Society for Engineering Education, 2023. Accessed: Sep. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Engineering-and-Engineering- Technology-by-the-Numbers-cover-combined.pdf[4] U.S. Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau, “Percentage of women workers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM).” Accessed: Jan. 07, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/wb/data/occupations-stem[5] C. C
analysis of academic engagement,” Journal of engineering education(Washington, D.C.), vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 695–718, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20536.[10] R. A. Revelo, J. A. Mejia, J. Mejía, and I. Villanueva Alarcón, “Beyond the monolith: Asystematic review of the literature on Latiné/x/a/o students in engineering using a liberativeapproach,” Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 717–742,2024, doi: 10.1002/jee.20598.[11] I. Villanueva Alarcón, J. A. Mejia, J. Mejia, and R. Revelo, “Latiné, Latinx, Latina, Latino,or Hispanic: Problematizing terms often used in engineering education,” Journal of engineeringeducation (Washington, D.C.), vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 735–739, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20486.[12] C. F. Escobar, J
at Austin and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Arlington.Andrea Lidia Castillo, Arizona State University A.Lili Castillo is a second-year graduate student in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program at Arizona State University. Lili is a recipient of the 2022 National Science Foundation’s Graduate research fellowship. Her research interests include engineering identity formation, high-impact learning experiences, and Latino/a/x & first-generation college student pathways in engineering. Through her research, Lili hopes to amplify the voices of historically underrepresented populations in engineering to foster an inclusive space in engineering
effectively [7]. This scarcity of resourcescan hinder the integration of communication instruction within engineering courses andexacerbate existing challenges.Developing structured rubrics and training materials is essential to improving GTAcommunication instruction, yet such resources remain scarce [7]. For example, Tormey et al.(2020) highlight the development of a one-day pedagogical workshop aimed at improving GTAskills, which could be extended to broader resource development [6]. Additionally, there is a callfor more institutional support in the form of workshops, training programs, and collaborativeinitiatives that focus on communication skills, as discussed by Saxena et al. (2022) [2]. Suchresources could help bridge the gap between the need
Jul. 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x[2] J. Wood, M. Campbell, K. Wood, and D. Jensen, “Enhancing the teaching of machine design by creating a basic hands-on environment with mechanical ‘breadboards’,” Int. J. of Mech. Eng. Ed., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1-25, Jan. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.7227/IJMEE.33.1.1[3] L.E.J. Thomas-Seale, S. Kanagalingam, J.C. Kirkman-Brown, M.M. Attallah, D.M. Espino, and D.E.T. Shepherd, “Teaching design for additive manufacturing: efficacy of and engagement with lecture and laboratory approaches,” Int. J. of Tech. and Des. Ed., vol. 33, pp. 585-622, Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09741-6[4] C.O. Walker, B.A. Greene, R.A. Mansell
for Engineering Education, 2025 Building Curiosity and Competency: Designing and Evaluating Activities for Microelectronics Education (Evaluation)Introduction The U.S. share of global semiconductor manufacturing has declined from 37% in 1990 tojust 12% today, largely due to outsourcing to Asia [1], [2]. The COVID-19 pandemic exposedcritical vulnerabilities in the global chip supply chain. In response, the CHIPS Act of 2022 waspassed to reduce U.S. dependency on foreign semiconductor supply chains and addressvulnerabilities in the industry. To safeguard the economy and national security, the act hasspurred major investments in semiconductor manufacturing, design, and research, including newand expanded fabs in Arizona
Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, South Africa, 2022. B.Eng. in Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, University of Ilorin, Nigeria, 2016.VARUN KATHPALIA, University of Georgia Varun Kathpalia, born and raised in northern part of India, joined EETI as a PhD student in the Spring of 2024. He completed his undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Chitkara Institute of Engineering and Technology (Punjab Technical University, India) and master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering, specializing in Manufacturing & Materials Science Engineering, from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India. He has over 4 years of corporate experience with companies such as Hindustan Coca-Cola
meaning-making structures and conventions in EERand how they influence argument structures and patterns in common EER genres. References[1] A. Lin, “How Do Engineering Education Graduate Students Perceive and Negotiate Disciplinary Expectations in Academic Writing?,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Minneapolis, MN: ASEE Conferences, Aug. 2022, p. 41155. doi: 10.18260/1-2--41155.[2] K. Cunningham, “Graduate Engineering Peer Review Groups: Developing Communicators and Community,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32878. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32878.[3] P. Lala, F. Langevin Harnois, G. El
. Vidergor, "Effects of Innovative Project-Based Learning Model on Students'Knowledge Acquisition, Cognitive Abilities, and Personal Competences," InterdisciplinaryJournal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 16, no. 1, 2022.[5] X. Yang, "A historical review of collaborative learning and cooperative learning,"TechTrends, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 718-728, 2023.[6] W. Sarasua, N. Kaye, J. Ogle, M. Benaissa, L. Benson, B. Putman, and A. Pfirman,"Engaging Civil Engineering Students through a 'Capstone-like' Experience in their SophomoreYear," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 2020.[7] E. C. Todoroff, T. Shealy, J. Milovanovic, A. Godwin, and F. Paige, "Comparing designthinking traits between national samples of civil engineering and architecture
the faculty of record and enhances the quality of undergraduateengineering education.Nationally, TAs have shouldered an increasing portion of HEI instructional roles over the pastseveral years. At the University of Wisconsin-Madison, for example, the number of TA roles andthe percentage appointments held have both increased. From 2022 to 2024, the total numberof graduate students employed under the job title “Teaching Assistant” increased from 220 to240 – an approximate 9% increase in two years (Data Steward Information Request, Universityof Wisconsin-Madison). The total number of FTE (full-time equivalent) positions increased from83 to 911. “Many institutions are confronting the challenges of teaching ever-increasingnumbers of undergraduate
the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute ofMuseum and Library Services. We would like to thank our library partners and participants forsupporting this project.References[1] M. Munn et al., “Celebrating STEM in Rural Communities: A Model for an Inclusive Science and Engineering Fesitval,” J. STEM Outreach, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.15695/jstem/v1i1.4.[2] M. E. Lopez, L. Jacobson, M. Caspe, and R. Hanebutt, “Public Libraries Engage Families in STEM”.[3] K. Yuen and C. L. Liew, “Examining Public Library Collaborative Partnerships with School Makerspaces and ‘Making Programmes,’” J. Libr. Adm., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 793– 809, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1080/01930826.2022.2102381.[4] A. A. Tawfik, C. E
, “The Effect of School Funding on Opportunity Gaps for Students With Disabilities: Policy and Context in a Diverse Urban District,” J. Disabil. Policy Stud., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 3–14, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1177/1044207320970545.[22] J. B. Halkiyo, “Enhancing the Equity and Inclusivity of Engineering Education for Diverse Learnersthrough an Innovative Instructional Design, Delivery, and Evaluation: International Students inFocus,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/41209
commonsystemic barriers.References[1] M. Wanti, R. Wesselink, H. Beimans and P. den Brok, "Determining factors of access and equity in higher education: A systematic review," Equity in Education & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, 2022.[2] V. Tinto, Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.[3] G. Whiteford, "Participation in higher education as social inclusion: An occupational perspective," Journal of Occupational Science, 2017, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 54-63, 2017.[4] A. Logue, "Decreasing Structural Racism in Higher Education," Inside Higher Ed, 5 August 2021.[5] K. Czarnecki, T. Korpi and K. Nelson, "Student support and tuition fee systems in comparative perspective
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Exploring Perfectionism and Mental Health in Engineering Students: A Synthesis of Perfectionism Theories and Measurement Scales Abstract This theory paper addresses the growing concern about mental health among engineering college students in the United States, a trend that has intensified over the past five years, par- ticularly due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, during the 2022-2023 academic year, 65. 5% of the surveyed undergraduate students reported seeking counseling services for anxiety concerns. Such mental health concerns in addition to suicidal ideation, depression, and
participants of otherstudent experiences, to evaluate the potential difference in impact of various engineeringactivities.References[1] National Society of Professional Engineers, “Code of Ethics for Engineers” Publication#1102, National Society of Professional Engineers, 2019.[2] National Academy of Engineers, “NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering”, EngineeringChallenges, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx[Accessed: October 27, 2022].[3] E. Cech, “Culture of disengagement in engineering education?,” Science, Technology andHuman Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42-72, 2014.[4] W. Oakes, S. Khalifah, C. Sigworth, P. Fuchs and A. Lefebvre, “EWB-USA and EPICS:Academic Credit, Community Impact, and Student Learning
2 2022 3 4 7 2023 4 5 9 2024 5 4 9 College Mechanical Eng. 12 3 15 major1 Elec. Eng. & Comp. Sci. 5 5 10 Biological Engineering 0 8 8 Biology 0 3 3 Aerospace Engineering 1 0 1 Art and Design
Education and Training (ICSE-SEET), IEEE, 2020, pp. 49–60. [7] D. Kletenik and R. F. Adler, “Let’s play: Increasing accessibility awareness and empathy through games,” in Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education-Volume 1, 2022, pp. 182–188. [8] D. Kletenik and R. F. Adler, “Who wins? a comparison of accessibility simulation games vs. classroom modules,” in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, 2023, pp. 214–220. [9] D. Kletenik and R. F. Adler, “Motivated by inclusion: Understanding students’ empathy and motivation to design accessibly across a spectrum of disabilities,” in Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science
students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Chemical Engineering Education William H. Corcoran Award, 2022 American Educational Research Association Education in the Professions (Division I) 2021-2022 Outstanding Research Publication Award, and the 2023 AIChE Excellence in Engineering Education Research Award.Junhyuk Kang, Cornell UniversityDr. Beatriz Asfora, Cornell University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Transforming Engineering Education: Evaluating the Impact of Integrated, System-Based Learning Studios on Student Engagement and Learning OutcomesAbstractEngineering education frequently
, L.A. Giacumo, A. Farid, and M. Sadegh, “A systematic multiple studies review of low-income,first-generation, and underrepresented, STEM-degree support programs: Emerging evidence-based models andrecommendations.” Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 333. 2022.[10] Baisley, A., & Adams, V. D. (2019, June). The Effects of Calculus I on Engineering Student Persistence. ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[11] Mixer, M., & Donovan, D. Work in Progress: A Structural Change in Calculus Sequences. ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, 2023[12] G. C. Wolniak, M. J. Mayhew, and M. E. Engberg, “Learning's Weak Link to Persistence,” The Journal ofHigher Education, vol. 83, pp. 795-823, 2012.[13] Van Dyken, J., & Benson, L
University.Prof. Puspita Panigrahi , Norfolk State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Smart City REU/RET - Effective Index of Silicon Nanowires on Silicon Substrates Toriano A. Thomas1, Sunday Ajala1, Bini Ben1, Puspita Panigrahi1, Matthew E. Bickett2, Alberto Rivera3, Ryan D. Shahan4, Sacharia Albin1 1 Norfolk State University, 2Minnesota State University, 3Universidad Ana G. Méndez, 4Old Dominion UniversityAbstractAs the demand for renewable energy increases, developing a cost-effective method ofmanufacturing renewable energy systems can facilitate the growth
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[15] S. A. Licorish, H. E. Owen, B. Daniel, and J. L. George, "Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning," Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 13, p. 9, 2018/07/21 2018.[16] M. Pascu, D. C. Petculescu, and I. P. Stupariu. (2023, Investigating Students’ Perception of Online Assessment as a Result of the Interaction among the Extrinsic Assessment Factors on Students Psychological Characteristics. Education Sciences 13(2).[17] L. Parody, J. Santos, L. A. Trujillo-Cayado, and M. Ceballos. (2022, Gamification in Engineering Education: The Use of Classcraft Platform to Improve Motivation and Academic Performance
Methodology: The Affective Labors of Intervention in theLudic Economy. Games and Culture (2018), 1555412018764992[5] Manning, L. (1988). Erikson's psychosocial theories help explain early adolescence. NASSP Bulletin,72(509), 95-100.[6] Next Generation Science Standards, (2022). Next Generation Science Standards: Engineering Designaccessed from https://www.nextgenscience.org/pe/ms-ets1-1-engineering-design on 2/13/2023[7] Narvaez, D., Lapsley, D. K., Hagele, S., & Lasky, B. (2006). Moral chronicity and social informationprocessing: Tests of a social cognitive approach to the moral personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6),966-985.[8] Progression of Computers Science Teachers Science Standards Retreived fromhttps://csteachers.org
photovoice project. Given the exploratory nature of thisstudy, the researchers decided against applying a theoretical framework to the investigation.A. LocationThis study occurred during the spring 2022 semester at UF, a large, public PWI in the southeasternUnited States. Of the over 40,000 students enrolled at the institution in the fall 2021 semester, only5.36% identified as Black/African American, while 51.73% identified as white [18].B. ParticipantsAs of the fall 2021 semester, this university’s College of Engineering had over 9,800 students(including graduate students), with approximately 6% representing Black/African Americanundergraduate students [3]. The study’s original recruitment goal was to have at least 20sophomore or senior engineering
engineering-focused bio-inspireddesign curriculum. The participants included two teachers who implemented the curriculumwithin their classrooms. Teachers were purposively selected for this qualitative case study due totheir prior professional learning participation in Spring 2022. The findings of this pilot studyindicate that teachers’ implementation was influenced by their comfort with biology and/orengineering content knowledge. Yet, both teachers enforced active learning via discussions andgroup work. Some of the changes to the curriculum derived from teachers’ content knowledgeand experiences, while other changes were directly linked to the professional learning experienceand the curriculum.IntroductionEngineers have long used nature as a source
Paper ID #38817A comparison of shared mental model measurement techniques used inundergraduate engineering contexts: A systematic reviewMr. Gregory Litster, University of Toronto Greg Litster is a PhD student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto in the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice. He received his MASc degree in Man- agement Sciences (2022) and a Bachelor of Knowledge Integration degree (2020), both from the Univer- sity of Waterloo. His research interests are focused on mental models for engineering design teams, group dynamics and how collaboration