,and marital status). In addition, first and second year course instructors will provide lists of anyformal peer groups they facilitate in their courses at the end of each semester ( this timing willhelp to account for students’ course attrition and changes in groups throughout the semester). Wewill implement these data collection procedures during the Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022,and Spring 2023 semesters over a total of four consecutive semesters.Survey Data AnalysisResearch Question 1 To identify relationships between the performance outcomes and peer networkcharacteristics of freshmen and sophomore level engineering students qualitatively, we willdevelop sociograms that describe each SNA measure of interest using Gephi [19], (a
Design Series," 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[7] J. A. Mynderse, L. Liu, A. Gerhart, X. Xie, W. Jing and K. Yee, "Assessment of a Three- Semester Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Sequence Based on the SAE Collegiate Design Series," WCX SAE World Congress Experience, 2019.[8] J. A. Mynderse, L. Liu, A. L. Gerhart, R. W. Fletcher, H. Vejdani, W. Jing and K. E. Yee, "Development of an Entrepreneurial Mindset within a Three-Semester Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Sequence Based on the SAE Collegiate Design Series," 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[9] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 – 2022," [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation
held inWashington D.C. in February 2022. Hopefully, this event will allow participants to network inperson and establish closer and more supportive professional and personal ties to one another.Adopting an Energy Theme in Common. The decision was made to pivot to a topic that ispopular among undergraduates. Given CISTAR’s focus as an ERC, we choose Energy for OurGrowing World: How a wide range of energy sources (renewables, emerging energytechnologies—biofuels, solar, nuclear, wind—and fossil fuels and shale) serve the needs ofpeople, and how we balance those needs against the impact these energy sources differentiallyhave on our world. The advantages of having a common theme around Energy for Our GrowingWorld are five-fold:1. The topic of
ASEE Virtual Annu. Conf., pp. 22-26, 2020.[10] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 - 2022," [Online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting engineering-programs-2021-2022/. [Accessed May. 28, 2021][11] I. Kim and J. Kuljis, “Applying content analysis to web-based content, J. of Comput. and Inf. Technol., vol. 4, pp. 369-375, 2010.[12] H. Kim, J. R. Coyle, and S. J. Gould, “Collectivist and individualist influences on website design in South Korea and the U.S.: A cross-cultural content analysis,” J. of Computer- Mediated Commun., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 581-601, 2009.[13] M. Prince, “Does active learning work: A review of the research,” J. of
Education (ASEE). “Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education.” [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/member-resources/reports/Innovation-with-Impact 8[3] Accreditation Board for Engineering & Technology (ABET). “2021-2022 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2021-2022/ (accessed March 28, 2021)[4] B. Newberry and J. Farison. “The Current Status and Uses of The General (Undesignated) Engineering Program with A Case Study,” in 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville
industry representatives. Otherindustry engagements included IT Roundtable Events hosted by the Greater Phoenix Chamber ofCommerce and leveraging the Maricopa Community Colleges Foundation Board of Directors tohelp connect the PC IT Institute to other IT stakeholders.Conclusion(s)Despite Covid-19 setbacks the team has made significant progress towards its year 1 goals andlaid a strong foundation for the next four years.Future PlansYear 2: April 2021 - March 2022 ● PC: STEM-ESS baseline other STEM Departments Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Social Sciences ● PC: CIT course data from year 1 ● PC: CIT/STEM Faculty Professional Development (PD) (Equity, anti-deficit mindset, inclusivity) ● PC: 8 CIT Internships and 20 students participate in On
processes. Ananalysis by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, Bureau of Labor MarketInformation, June 2015, indicates significant growth in jobs and demand for skilled workers inSouthwestern (SW) Ohio in the additive and advanced manufacturing and related occupations foraerospace and bio health industries. Computer and mathematics occupations are predicted to bethe third largest growth area (6% increase) in SW Ohio by the year 2022. Sixty percent of thefastest growing occupations in SW Ohio are in the bio health industries. In North AmericanIndustry Classification System (NAICS) occupational categories, the overall growth in jobs inSW Ohio in these fields is predicted to be nearly 21%. Ohio in Demand Occupations projectionsindicate a
knowledge of the robust economic environment that the targeted regional employersoccupy. For example, New Jersey’s Professional and Business Services industry sector isprojected to grow at a rate comparable to the US as a whole. Specifically, the New JerseyDepartment of Labor and Workforce Development projects 7.5% employment growth for thissector between 2012 and 2022, which means 313,150 additional jobs. This sector is expected toachieve the second largest projected employment growth in New Jersey, behind educational andhealth services.Regionally, Professional, Scientific and Technical Services is a basic industrial sector, meaningit is a segment of the local economy that serves non-local demand, with a location quotient of1.45 and projected
industry and communities. Weshare results from an assessment of a pilot interdisciplinary pedagogical intervention in arequired petroleum engineering course at the Colorado School of Mines. It suggests that CSRmay be a fruitful arena from which to illustrate the profoundly sociotechnical dimensions of theengineering challenges relevant to students’ future careers.IntroductionThe ongoing boom in energy and mineral development is calling increasing numbers ofengineers into work in the mining and oil and gas industries, especially as the primary cohort ofmining and petroleum engineers reaches retirement.21 The Bureau of Labor Statistics forecaststhat the ranks of petroleum engineers will expand 26% by 2022 and mining and geologicalengineers 12% by
industry, the growth of international competition insecondary education (with resultant decrease in students coming to the US for an education and thenstaying), and the graying of our current aerospace workforce. Department of Labor projections predictan aerospace growth rate of over 7% for the period 2012-2022 [7]. Roughly 80% of the aerospaceworkforce is between the ages of 40-65 and over the next 20 years many are retiring or going to otherindustries. In addition, according to the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International’s(AUVSI) Economic Impact of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration in the United States (March2013), the UAS sector is expected to add 100,000 jobs and $82B to our national economy by 2025.Alaska’s share of the pie
students: A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences studying computer science at university in the UK,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 3079–3105, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10743-5.[15] E. D. Bunderson and M. E. Christensen, “An analysis of retention problems for female students in university computer science programs,” Journal of research on Computing in Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 1995.[16] W. DuBow, A. Kaminsky, and J. Weidler-Lewis, “Multiple factors converge to influence women’s persistence in computing: A qualitative analysis,” Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 30–39, 2017.[17] S. Cheryan, S. A. Ziegler, A. K. Montoya, and L. Jiang, “Why are some STEM fields
used for the content analysis.We acknowledge support from the U.S. Department of Defense [Contract No. W52P1J-22-9-3009].References[1] G. C. Hufbauer and M. Hogan, "CHIPS Act will spur U.S. production but not foreclose China," Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, no. 22-13, 2022.[2] The White House. "Fact Sheet: CHIPS and science act will lower costs, create jobs, strengthen supply chains, and counter China." https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing- room/statements-releases/2022/08/09/fact-sheet-chips-and-science-act-will-lower-costs- create-jobs-strengthen-supply-chains-and-counter-china/?utm_source=link (accessed 1/12/24).[3] L. Kasprzak, "Brush up on your interview skills," Chemical
, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis," Reviewof Educational Research, vol. 69, pp. 21-51, 1999.[8] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023," [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/.[9] J. Mott and S. Peuker, "Achieving High Functioning Teams Using Team Based Learning inFlipped Classrooms," Paper presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Seattle, Washington, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.23482.[10] D.R. Bacon, K.A. Stewart, and W.S. Silver, "Lessons from the best and worst student teamexperiences: How a teacher can make the difference," Journal of Management Education, vol.23, pp. 467-488, 1999.[11
8/1/2023 Illinois Community College 2301204 10/1/2023 Independence Community College 2301165 10/1/2023 Lake Area Technical College 2300497 7/1/2023 Linn-Benton Community College 2301294 10/1/2023 Merritt College - Peralta Community College 2300902 10/1/2023 Mount Wachusett Community College 2300641 10/1/2023 National Park College 2301183 7/1/2023 Santa Fe Community College 2300914* 8/1/2023 Southeastern Community College 2300513 10/1/2023 University of Arkansas Community College at Batesvllle 2300335 7/1/2023 West Kentucky Technical College *Participant from a collaborating project and not in the 2022 Mentor-Connect Cohort Table 1
education,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2023.[12] V. Perera, G. J. Strimel, and A. J. Magana, “using aladdin as a tool to empower engineering learning,” Technology and Engineering Teacher, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 36–41, 2021.[13] A. Mokhtarpour and C. C. S. de Freitas, “Engaging first-year engineering students: A technology-based approach using story-based learning and ai-generated content,” in 2023 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), pp. 358–365, IEEE, 2023.[14] A. E. Berndt, “Sampling methods,” Journal of Human Lactation, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 224–226, 2020.[15] A. Marradi, “Representative samples, random sampling,” Representative samples, random sampling, pp. 213–233, 2022.[16] M. C. Kim and M. J
challenges they will address(Leijon, Gudmundsson, Staaf, and Christersson, 2022). Since problem-based learning has been effective in learning and improving CT skills(Ulger, 2018), it is always recommended to be utilized within the projects and assign-ments of engineering education. Based on these definitions, the challenging feature ofproblems can impact the student’s critical thinking though they are completely dif-ferent concepts. That is our main motivation to investigate this issue and recommendapproaches to distinguish these two terms for instructors and students of computer andsoftware engineering courses. In this paper, we are looking for answering the followingresearch questions (RQ): • RQ1: Do students know the difference between the
," Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 169–175, 2021.[17] N. Thi-Huyen, P. Xuan-Lam, and N. T. Thanh Tu, "The impact of design thinking on problem solving and teamwork mindset in a flipped classroom," Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 96, pp. 30–50, 2021.[18] L. Ladachart, V. Radchanet, and W. Phothong, "Design-thinking mindsets facilitating students’ learning of scientific concepts in design-based activities," Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2022, https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.106.[19] L. Ladachart et al., "Ninth-grade students' perceptions on the design-thinking mindset in the context of reverse engineering," International
Framework for an Aircraft Flight Dynamics and Control Class,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020. Accessed: Mar. 07, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/implementation-of-an-inductive-learning- and-teaching-framework-for-an-aircraft-flight-dynamics-and-control-class[12] J. D. Novak and D. B. Gowin, Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press, 1984.[13] J. C. Nesbit and O. O. Adesope, “Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta- Analysis,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 413–448, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.3102/00346543076003413.[14] J. D. Novak and A. J. Cañas, “The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them,” p. 36, 2008.[15] J. E
students.References[1] P. Doerschuk et al., “Closing the gaps and filling the stem pipeline: A multidisciplinary approach,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 682–695, Apr. 2016. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9622-8[2] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, 2022 - 2023,” ABET, https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-technology-programs-2022-2023/ (accessed Feb. 6, 2024).[3] A. Carmeli, A. Levi, and R. Peccei, “Resilience and creative problem-solving capacities in Project Teams: A relational view,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 546–556, Jul. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.03.007[4] A. D. Owens
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2013, p. 23.674.1- 23.674.20. doi: 10.18260/1-2--19688.[19] M. A. Gregor, I. K. Weigold, C. A. Martin-Wagar, and D. Campbell-Halfaker, “Tenure Expectations and Career Aspirations Among Female Assistant Professors in STEM,” J. Career Dev., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 890–905, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1177/08948453211005032.[20] M. S. Alam, S. Sajid, J. K. Kok, M. Rahman, and A. Amin, “Factors that Influence High School Female Students’ Intentions to Pursue Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education in Malaysia,” Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 29, no. 2, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.47836/pjssh.29.2.06.[21] M. J. Naser, N. E
the motors by selecting sensor values and their corresponding motorpositions in the training mode. Subsequently, the motor determines the position based on thesensor input using a nearest neighbor algorithm in the running mode.MethodsResearch Question: What makes teachers’ confidence in using and teaching ML emergingtechnology tools shift?Background: Several participants in this co-design workshop had taught in themachine-learning workshop in the summer of 2022 with upper elementary school students[22].Based on their feedback and reflections we learned that they were confused about the curriculaand activities design, and they didn’t have enough confidence to teach emerging technologieswithout professional training. They suggested we improve
the Methods section.4. METHODS 4.1 ParticipantsThis study was approved by the university IRB. Study participants were purposively selected fromstudents who had previously completed several tests of spatial cognition, and comprised 13engineering undergraduate students of whom 7 (1 female, 6 male: 3 first-year, 4 senior-year) werehigh spatial visualizers while 6 (3 female, 3 male; 4 first-year, 2 senior-year) were low spatialvisualizers. They were selected to participate in the eye tracking study based on their responses toonline spatial tests administered in the Fall of 2022 and their further consent to participate in thestudy. The online survey was shared with the study participants in the College of Engineering atthe University of
. doi:10.17226/25284.[4]. A. C. Strong, C. S. Smith-Orr, C. A. Bodnar, W. Lee, E. J. McCave, and C. J. Faber, “Earlycareer faculty transitions: negotiating legitimacy and seeking support in engineering education,”Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 97, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.52.[5]. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “The Science of EffectiveMentorship in STEMM,” National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2019. doi:10.17226/25568.[6]. Perkins, J. H., Carberry, A. R., & Brunhaver, S. R. (2022). WIP: Perceptions of effectiveengineering faculty-to-faculty mentorship practices. Faculty Development Division – AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN
obstacles is the existence of unconscious and conscious biases in faculty searchprocedures, which put candidates from minoritized identities at a disadvantage (Roper, 2019;Sackett et al., 1991; Steinpreis et al., 1999; Wapman et al., 2022; Wenneras & Wold, 1997; Wu etal., 2023). Such biases may also exist when considering prospective faculty members’qualifications as to their day-to-day responsibilities – teaching, research, and service – which, inmost institutions, involves engaging with people from a wide range of identities in the classroom,in laboratories, and beyond. Thus, DEI-related qualifications such as the ability to employinclusive teaching practices is an important measure of merit for faculty members.Purpose and Research QuestionIt
in professional societies; and has received several awards and certificates from his home institution as well as professional societies. He has published more than 90 refereed articles in journals, book chapters, and conference proceedings. He has been involved with several divisions of ASEE including the Minorities in Engineering Division (MIND), and served as the division chair of the Energy Conversion, Conservation, and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNED) in 2016. He is a member of the technical committee of IEEE/ASME Mechatronics and Embedded Systems Application(MESA) and has served as the division chair in 2022. He serves as a program committee member of the Maryland Space Grant Consortium.Jackson Mitchell
] D. Gorham and B. C. Stoler, “Colleges of Engineering and Colleges of Education: SuccessfulCampus Collaborations,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2002.[3] W. McKeachie and M. Svinicki, McKeachie's teaching tips. Independence, KY: CengageLearning, 2013.[4] G. Ozogul, C. F. Miller, and M. Reisslein, “School fieldtrip to engineering workshop: Pre-,post-, and delayed-post effects on student perceptions by age, gender, and ethnicity.” EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 5, 745-768, Oct. 2019.[5] L. Ni, G. Bausch, B. Feliciano, H. Hsu, and F. Martin, "Teachers as curriculum co-designers:Supporting professional learning and curriculum implementation in a CSforAll RPP project,"2022 Conference on Research in Equitable and
, W. Oakes, and S. Chenoweth, “Teaching human-centered design with service-learning,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, 2010.[7] “Learn More About PEO,” Professional Engineers Ontario. Accessed: Jan. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.peo.on.ca/about-peo/what-peo/learn-more-about-peo[8] “Frequently Asked Questions About Engineering,” National Society of Professional Engineers. Accessed: Jan. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/press-room/resources/frequently-asked-questions-about- engineering[9] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 - 2022,” ABET. Accessed: Jan. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation
” that would guide a department committee in(eventually) redesigning the curriculum: Problem Solving; Communication; Professional Identityand Ethics; Teamwork, Leadership, and Inclusivity; Information Literacy, Judgement, andCritical Thinking; Character Traits and Self-Directed Learning.As all readers will know, the Covid-19 pandemic caused many workplace plans and initiatives togrind to a screeching halt. This curriculum renewal initiative of the mechanical engineeringprogram at Ohio State University was no exception. Over the course of 2020-2022, slowprogress was made on writing specific program goals to match each of the six guiding areasdeveloped during the 2019 retreat. Next, progress was made on developing the student learningoutcomes that
. 1. 2022. doi: 10.1186/s40594-022- 00389-1.[6] R. Hirst, G. Bolduc, L. Liotta, and B. Wai Ling Packard, “Two-Year Community: Cultivating the STEM Transfer Pathway and Capacity for Research: A Partnership Between a Community College and a 4-Year College,” J Coll Sci Teach, vol. 043, no. 04, 2014, doi: 10.2505/4/jcst14_043_04_12.[7] M. A. Haider, H. Ahmed, and M. K. Pallikonda, “Empowering Economic and Occupational Freedom through the Transformation of Engineering Technology education from 2 Years to 4 Years Degrees,” in ASEE CIEC, Santa Ana, Feb. 2023.[8] H. Ahmed, “A Review on Corrosion of All Aluminum Microchannel Heat Exchangers,” in Corrosion Engineering - Recent Breakthroughs and
Engineering Education, 105(1), 43-69.18. Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P., & Amelink, C. T. (2009). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x19. Leidig. P. A. (2023) Impact of Engineers Without Borders USA Experiences on Professional Preparation. [Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University] Purdue e-Pubs.20. Leidig, P. A., Holloway, E. & Oakes, W. C. (2022). Designing the Engineers Without Borders USA professional preparation study surveys. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.21. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2