presents at national research conferences. Her research interests include STEM teacher preparation, engineering design education, and culturally responsive pedagogy. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comThe Intersection of Culturally Responsive Pedagogy and Engineering Design in Secondary STEM (Research to Practice)Rationale The purpose of this exploratory, mixed methods, multi-case study is to investigate teacherbeliefs and sense of agency upon implementing new instructional practices. The researchspecifically focuses on teaching secondary science or mathematics content infused with theengineering design process (EDP
participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity in the academy and industry; 2) discipline-based education research in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related engineering fields. She uses her scholarship to challenge the perceptions of who belong in computing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Need for Change: How Interview Preparation and the Hiring Process in Computing Can Be Made More EquitableAbstractMedia and literature frequently describe the need to increase the number of workers in computingto meet growing demands and
required sophomore course, "Biochemistry and Molecular Engineering" as a head TA in 2020 and 2021.Brooke Carolanne HardestyAkash PatilAmanda Ruci © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comImpact of lab experiences on student knowledge and confidenceAbstractDue to the COVID-19 pandemic, the sophomore class of 2021 spent very little time on campusas freshmen and missed the benefits and advantages of in-person learning. Three labs were addedto a required sophomore biomedical engineering (BME) course, Biochemistry and MolecularEngineering. The objectives of these labs were three-fold: (i) reinforce the content presented inthe online lecture, (ii
,” in Nonconventional and Vernacular Construction Materials, 2nd ed., K. Harries and B. Sharma, Eds. Woodhead, 2020.[13] N. Ospina Uribe, P. C. Silva Díaz, A. I. Santiago Román, and C. Papadopoulos, “Building Effective Community Resilience through Active Participation,” in Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.[14] M. Favretti, Futurephobia: Teaching for Power and Life. To appear: Routledge/Taylor and Francis, 2022.[15] A. Mathie and G. Cunningham, Eds., From Clients to Citizens: Communities Changing the Course of Their Own Development. Practical Action Pub., 2008.[16] P. C. Silva Díaz, N. Ospina Uribe, C. Papadopoulos, M. Castro Sitiriche, and L. Seijo Maldonado
practiced as a structural engineer and building envelope engineer in Washington, D.C. and Pittsburgh. She previously served as a lecturer at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. Sarah teaches courses in Structural Engineering, Materials, Soil Mechanics, and Design. Sarah is passionate about curricular re- design to prepare students to be successful in the changing field and developing new design and laboratory courses intended to improve critical thinking and problem solving skills through experiential learning. As a 2021-2022 Provost’s Inclusive Teaching Fellow, Sarah will be working to improve social-consciousness of engineering students through changes to the CEE capstone design course.Ms. Andrea Francioni Rooney
undergraduate engineering education havepersisted over the decade following the initial inquiry, and to understand whether the results ofthis research are generalizable to smaller programs, this paper intends to gather similar data onengineering student experiences, expectations, and knowledge both in general and in relation tothis paper via a survey that will be distributed to project participants when the project isimplemented in winter semester 2022. A mock-up of this survey is included in Appendix II . Inaddition to providing insight regarding student opinion of engineering education, the results ofthis survey will inform the content generation for this paper by highlighting discrepanciesbetween real and expected attainment of design process
whereasentrepreneurship is most often based on innovation.Recent studies on future workforce needs identify the need for “refreshing curricula to includeskills required in the future workforce – both digital as well as ‘human’ skills such ascommunication, problem-solving, creativity, collaboration and critical thinking.” [13] And,while it might be natural to infer that proficiency in new technologies would be at the top of theskills list, it is “only one part of the 2022 skills equation…as ‘human’ skills such as creativity,originality and initiative, critical thinking, persuasion, and negotiation… attention to detail,resilience, flexibility and complex problem solving [will] see outsized increase in demandrelative to their current prominence.” [14] At the same
. In November 2022, we launched the survey withthe support of Engineers Canada, seven provincial and two territorial professional engineeringassociations, the engineering alumni office at two Canadian universities, Engineering Deans Canada,and two equity-oriented societies on campus (WISE and NSBE). We left the survey open for one month.982 engineering degree holders completed the survey. We had two delimiting factors: participants had tohave completed their undergraduate engineering degrees at least 10 years prior to our survey launch andthey had to either have completed their engineering training in Canada or be working in Canada. Pleasesee Table 1 for information about our sample.Table 1: Survey Sample Variable % of
. To deal with these comments, the Dean instituted an avenue for all students in thecollege to develop these skills. As part of this initiative, new courses were developed. This paperwill discuss the various skills taught in these courses and their importance to the students and theindustry. This paper is a review of the literature on the need for teaching interpersonal skills toConstruction and Engineering (CE) Industry students. It also reviews qualitative data collectedover the period from 2015 to 2022. The qualitative results show that literature reinforceswhat industry has been saying for the past decade. CE students have been well prepared with thetechnical skills necessary to make their mark in the industry but, for the most part, are
Paper ID #43931Investigating Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Understanding and Perceptionsof Affective Domain of LearningMs. Anna Li Coffman, University of OklahomaDr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He has worked with Tata Consultancy Services as an
Paper ID #43927Cognitive Domain of Learning: Exploring Undergraduate Engineering Students’Understanding and PerceptionsMiss Anna Li Coffman, University of OklahomaDr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He has worked with Tata Consultancy Services as an
scoring. Dr. Goldberg also conducts professional development activities on such topics as classroom assessment practice, using assessment results to inform instructional practice, and literacy learning across content areas.Leigh R Abts (Principle Research Scientist) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Engineering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric (EDPPSR) – Initial Validity and Reliability (Fundamental)AbstractResearch prior to 2005 found that no single framework existed that could capture theengineering design process fully or well and benchmark each element of the process to acommonly accepted set
-informed practical approaches that she uses in her research. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Perceptions of Engineering Learning Software in Classrooms with Diverse Student Populations Using an Expanded Technology Acceptance ModelAbstract The perceptions and experiences of first year and sophomore engineering students whenplaying an online serious engineering game are examined in this mixed method study. Theengineering game of interest was designed to improve engineering intuition and knowledge ofengineering mechanics in a statics course. Use of serious educational engineering games
Paper ID #37116An Equity-minded Assessment of Belonging amongComputing StudentsKylan Nicole Stewart Kylan Stewart recently earned her B.S. and M.S. in Computer Science from California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. Her studies centered on understanding how the lived experiences of students affected their computing education and investigating strategies to improve support strategies for undergraduate students.Bruce DebruhlZoe Wood (Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com An Equity-minded