6 Spring 2021 200 1 300 5 Fall 2021 200 1 300 5 Spring 2022 200 0 300 8 Fall 2022 200 0 300 6 Spring 2023 200 0 300 7Data AnalysisThe strategy for data analysis was adapted from a larger
department at a Midwestern R1 University.Table 1 outlines the number of course syllabi and number of instructors associated with thecollection of courses each semester, from Spring 2019 to Spring 2023. A total of 93 syllabi wereanalyzed, from 39 unique instructors. Table 1. Number of syllabi analyzed per semester Semester Syllabus Count # of Instructors Spring 2019 16 14 Spring 2020 (Regular) 15 14 Spring 2020 (COVID) 14 13 Spring 2021 17 17 Spring 2022 15 14
fluid mechanics course duringspring semesters from 2019-2022 were asked about their perceptions on the impact in theirprofessional preparation of a semester-long multidisciplinary service-learning assignment. Thispaper evaluates their current perceived impact of the assignment (long-term impact) and whetherit might have changed from when they took the course (short-term impact). A survey was sent toall former students who went through the course and participated in the assignment, with a61.64% return rate. The survey included questions about how well they remembered theassignment (some of the students were involved in it 4 years prior to completing this survey), therelevance of the project in terms of their professional preparation, how it
,inspired student retention at the college.Getting Back on the RoadThe SotR event organizers have had difficulty collecting true outcomes data in support of theproject. During the first few years when the events were run, surveys were created to gather datafrom high school participants. However, these surveys were difficult to collect and the ability tocorrelate and track students that attended a SotR event was not possible. For 2021 and 2022 theSotR organizers chose to track the attendance of participants via lists generated as studentssigned up for SotR SWAG raffle items. These lists were then provided to the universityadmissions office so that tracking will be possible in the future as high school students enter Proceedings of the
Paper ID #41426Board 66: Impact of ChatGPT on Student Writing in Construction Management:A Study of Applied RisksDr. Tianjiao Zhao, East Carolina University Tianjiao Zhao joined the Department of Construction Management at East Carolina University as an assistant professor in Fall 2022. With a robust background in BIM, green building, Lean Six Sigma, semantic web technologies, intelligent transportation, Internet of Things, and water engineering, she brings extensive expertise to her role. Maintaining an active research agenda, her work primarily revolves around enhancing the efficiency, safety, and eco-friendliness of the
15.17 (2022): 6276.2. Mallette, Jennifer. "Centering Equity and Inclusion in Engineering Collaboration and Writing." 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2022.3. https://www.aace.org/awards/4. https://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/es/esawards.html5. https://www.sefi.be/activities/events/annual-conference/6. https://2023.fie-conference.org7. https://www.icl-conference.org/current/8. https://www.asee.org/events/Conferences-and-Meetings/2023-Annual-Conference9. https://www.asee.org/publications/journals/jee10. Severson, Scott, Robin Dunkin, and Samantha Walker. "Applying principles of the PDP towards mentoring." (2022).11. Karstina, Svetlana G. "Engineering Training in The Context of Digital Transformation." 2022 IEEE Global Engineering
students compared to other students,and to determine if coursework is well suited for entrepreneurial attitudes. Interviews of PAtENTstudents and faculty were conducted [12]. Additionally, a focus group was conducted with theproject leadership team to reflect upon project success and challenges to be addressed. Theselessons learned are shared following description of the methodology.Participation in the PAtENT pathway option to date has included six faculty and eight students(half of whom are female). While this is a small number compared to the total number ofdoctoral students in Engineering (Fall 2022, the most recent available term had 206 doctoralEngineering students enrolled), the interest expressed during student orientations has
Signal Processing course. We surveyed students in the course offerings in Fall2022 and checked to see which features correlated with final course grades. We also aimedto discover study resources and resources that might be associated with performance.2.1 ParticipantsDuring Fall 2022, we surveyed 265 students from ECE 210, the Analog Signal Process-ing course in the introductory electrical engineering sequence, at the University of IllinoisUrbana-Champaign. The total number of students in the course was 335. Only students 1who answered an IRB approved questionnaire were included in the study. The consent andprofile questionnaire was sent out via Qualtrics, while the post-exam surveys were sent
themselves. While empirical data suggests that students perform better when activelylearning content in a problem-based setting, students themselves perceive lecture-basedapproaches to teaching as more effective, (El-adaway, Pierrakos, Truax, 2014; Yadav et al.,2011). Nonetheless, investigators for the ABLE project are encouraged to use this approach tolearning having found that students are more motivated, show more interest and achieve at ahigher level when learning within this setting (Munawaroh & Setyani, 2022).Service-Learning Service learning or service-based learning is seen as a pedagogical tool that supportsproblem-based learning by actively addressing identified needs of a community (El-adaway,Pierrakos, Truax, 2014). In the
therequired calculation steps, showed some standards of mathematical calculations, and thenshowed several examples. Students were also provided with a written document which outlinedthe same requirements in detail and included a written example.In fall 2022, the same material was delivered in a new way. Rather than directly explaining therequired calculation steps, the instructor provided three examples of written solutions to the sameproblem with varying levels of detail and clarity. The three solutions were created by theinstructor and specifically designed to incorporate common student errors in calculations. Allthree solutions reached the same correct answer, but documented it with varying degrees ofclarity and consistency. The first example
the predominance of this joining process inshipbuilding. Shipyard layout is then discussed with a focus on product flow and logicaladjacencies motivated by the manufacture process. Ship structure and assembly is then covered.Outfitting discussions then occur, and this topic is followed by lectures on accuracy control andmanagement methods. A brief review of project management techniques is then undertaken, andscheduling processes are discussed. Exams and homework are arranged to keep pace with thelecture schedule. The schedule for the Spring 2022 course is given as Table 1 to further illustratethe lecture sequence and exam schedule. Table 1 – Course Schedule from Spring 2022 Week Date Subject
implementation, and campus logistical hurdlesare one challenge the course must overcome. Ad hoc partnerships and case-by-caseimplementations have been the approach so far. Sustainment, multi-disciplinary growth, andscaling are major unknowns moving forward.AcknowledgementsThis work was funded by VentureWell, grant #2374021, February 2022 to August 2025.References[1] Johnson, Kathryn, “The Development of Sociotechnical Thinking in EngineeringUndergraduates, 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Minneapolis, MN,June 2022, ID #38347.[2] M. Swartz, J. Leydens, J. Walter, and K. Johnson, “Is Sociotechnical Thinking Importantin Engineering Education?: Survey Perceptions of Male and Female Undergraduates,” in 2019ASEE Annual Conference &
sections. In the Fall 2022 semester, we piloted aself-paced, mastery-learning model for the online section, while the in-person sections continuedto follow a traditional format.Mastery LearningThe mastery learning approach was articulated in the 1960s by Bloom [1], who saw it asenabling nearly all students to achieve mastery of a subject, despite variations in aptitude andlearning styles. The essential idea, which derives from Carroll [2], is that variations in aptitudedo not imply differences in the capacity to master the material, only to differences in the timerequired to achieve mastery. Mastery learning is therefore closely linked to self-pacedinstruction.A review of prior work on mastery learning in computer science education is given in [3
future workforce, researchers andpractitioners are seeking to understand how children’s psychological characteristics influenceengagement and persistence in STEM related activities (Lockhart, et al. 2022; Wang, 2013). Thepast several decades has yielded a plethora of survey measures to assess children’s self-perceptions of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics capabilities, with some alsofocusing on children’s appraisal of their own problem-solving skills and entrepreneurialcapacities (e.g., Garner, et al., 2021; Friday Institute, 2012b; Jones, et al., 2021; see alsoNewman, et al., 2019). Less attention has been paid to measuring children’s self-perceptions oftheir inventiveness, which includes problem-solving, but also problem
. Morgan, R.W. Robey, Y.-C. Liu, and L. Chen, “Incorporating performance probability and data-oriented design in phase-field modeling”, IDETC2022- 89513, ASME 2022 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE 2022), August 14-17, 2022, St. Louis, MO, USA.6. C.O. Yenusah, Y.-Z. Ji, Y.-C. Liu, T.W. Stone, M.F. Horstemeyer, and L. Chen, “Investigation of precipitation kinetics and hardening effects of γ” in Inconel 625 using a combination of meso-scale phase-field simulations and macro-scale precipitates strengthening calculations”, IMECE2020-23328, ASME 2020 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, virtual conference, November
: An Overview of Recent Trends,” in U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy, R.B. Freeman and H. Salzman, Eds. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2018. 10. D.B. Oerther, L. Gautham, and N. Folbre, “Environmental engineering as care for human welfare and planetary health,” J. Environ. Eng., vol. 148, no. 04022029, 2022. 11. T. Friedman, “From hands to heads to hearts,” The New York Times, 2017. [Online] Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/04/opinion/from-hands-to-heads-to-hearts.html. [Accessed February 3, 2023]. 12. D.B. Oerther, “From disaster to development: Finance provides a platform to empower technology for resilience to climate change,” Procedia Engineering, vol
Cornerstone Projects will becompared. Project 1 took place during the spring of 2022 and was comprised of a windmillpower generation system. Students constructed this windmill and used Arduino programming tointerpret sensor data and calculate system performance. Project 2 took place during the 2022summer semester and was comprised of a water filtration system. In this project, students utilizedthe Arduino to both observe system information and control its behavior.At the end of each of these semesters, students took a survey in which they provided theirperceptions of the programming instruction they received, in addition to expressing theirconfidence in programming. Results of these questions from Spring 2022 (Project 1) andSummer 2022 (Project 2
seminars and lectures.We collected qualitative and quantitative information for each program identified. For thequalitative analysis, we recorded the corresponding host university and college, degree type, major(if applicable), program information and focus, and curriculum for further analysis. Additionally,we standardized the number of courses and credits. This approach enabled us to analyze allprograms using the same criteria.2.3 Follow up InterviewsTo better understand education practices, we identified the top 20 universities on the mostinnovative ranking, Canada's Best Universities by Reputation 2022, issued by Maclean's [10],2021). These 20 universities offer a total of 104 programs. We conducted structured interviewswith the managers of
]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00222-7[4] “Undergraduate Retention and Graduation Rates,” https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/ctr/undergrad-retention-graduation, May 2022, [Online; accessed 26-February-2023].[5] M. Haungs, C. Clark, J. Clements, and D. Janzen, “Improving first-year success and retention through interest-based cs0 courses,” in Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ser. SIGCSE ’12. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2012, p. 589–594. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157307[6] T. Phillips, “Is There a Shortage of Developers? Developer Shortage Statistics in 2022,” https://codesubmit.io/blog/shortage-of
a strong desire to maintain academic excellence and strive for highergrades, with some exceptions (such as Chemical Engineering students). As the pandemic progressed,students were more likely to opt for a letter grade in their APMA course(s) in spite of lower GPAs. Thismay be due to a number of factors, such as increased competition for scholarships and internships, or adesire to demonstrate mastery of a particular subject to future employers. While the challenges presentedby the pandemic have been significant, students have continued to persevere and strive for academicexcellence, demonstrating their unwavering commitment to their education and future goals.References[1] Guadagni, G., Maiti, D. and Dizaji, F.S., 2022, August. Impact of
professionals.Our findings are based on two cohorts of students participating in an NSF-funded ResearchExperience and Mentoring (REM) combined summer program in Summer 2021 (a virtual programbecause of COVID restrictions) and in Summer 2022 (an in-person program). Both cohorts spenttheir first six weeks doing research with the Center for Innovative and Strategic Transformation ofAlkane Resources (CISTAR), a National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center, beforespending their last four weeks of summer mentoring kids at the National Society for Black EngineersSummer Engineering Experience for Kids (NSBE SEEK) camps.Our focus in this paper is on the CISTAR Industry Energy Program that we added to their six-weekresearch experience, and how it
into manufacturing engineeringcurriculum. The goal of this project is to establish a structured framework comprising of lectures,labs, and industrial experience, to enhance experiential learning about robotics and additivemanufacturing standards among engineering students.Program and Course DesignThis two-year project started from spring 2022 and will complete in spring 2024. To achieve thegoal of this project, there are three objectives: 1) Innovate course modules (lectures, labs, andprojects) to advance students' experiential learning of standards, 2) Produce virtual learningmaterials to improve students' career readiness, and 3) Establish a sustainable online coursestructure to enhance the impact of education.The courses involved in this
Publishing, 2022).Ms. Shruti Misra, University of Washington I am a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. My research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. I am interesting in various ways that universitiesAlicia MullenProf. Eve A. Riskin P.E., University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate degrees in EE from Stanford. She was a professor in the ECE Department at the University of Washington for 32 years and is now Dean of Undergraduate Education at Stevens Institute of Technology.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a
; Renteria Marquez, I., & Tseng, T., & Rahman, M. F., & Luna, S. (2022, August), Smart Manufacturing for Underserved Workforce Development Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41835[4] Nithyanandam, G., Munguia, J., & Marimuthu, M. (2022). “Digital Literacy”: Shaping industry 4.0 engineering curriculums via factory pilot-demonstrators. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 5, 100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aime.2022.100092[5] Xie, L., & Natarajarathinam, M., & Johnson, M. (2020, June), Warehouse Workforce Preparedness in the Wake of Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
as Program Chair for the Engineering Management Division (EMD) of ASEE. Dr. Asgarpoor is the 2022-2023 Secretary for the American Society for Engineering Management. Her interests lie in scholarship of teaching and learning specifically in asynchronous online space, assessment of learning, engineering management, and quality management.Ipek Bozkurt ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 CIP 2030: A Strategy for Engineering Management to be Reclassified as an Engineering DisciplineAbstractThe National Center for Education Statistics started the Classification of Instructional Programs(CIP) in 1980 to facilitate the organization, collection, and
to attending OSU, she received a B.S. and M.S. in Environmental Engineering from Michigan Technological University. Her current research interests include understanding engineering identity and motivation in first-generation college students, online learning pedagogy, and service learning projects. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 First Year Engineering Student Definitions of Systems Engineering: A Comparison Between Two InstitutionsAbstractThis full research paper builds on previous work investigating first-year engineering (FYE)students’ understanding of Systems Engineering and suggests methods to increase
award. In 2016 he received ASEE’s biannual National Engineering Economy Excellence Award. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Annuities as a Good Course ExampleAbstractAnnuities are widely recommended and purchased as a low-risk retirement investment,guaranteeing income for life. As an example, an immediate or a deferred annuity would bepurchased for $100,000 at age 62, and then monthly benefits would start at any time until age 85.In these annuities, once monthly income starts it continues until death, but nothing is received ifdeath occurs before income starts.We discuss why and how to include immediate and
interests include experimental aerodynamics, aircraft design and engineering education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Virtual Reality Lessons in Undergraduate Introductory STEM Courses Chadia A. Aji Mathematics Department Tuskegee University M. Javed Khan Aerospace Science Engineering Department Tuskegee UniversityAbstractThe availability of low-cost virtual reality (VR) hardware and software provides
University School of Physics, where the students had the opportunity to perform real experiments and present a report on them.Figure 3 documents some of these activities of the students.Course outcomes.The course was taught as a pilot during the Fall 2022 semester at Penn State University. 25 studentswere enrolled: 15 in residence (4 undergraduate students, 9 graduate students) and 9 remotestudents (all graduate). The hybrid nature represented a significant barrier for engagement,especially for remote students that were not able to utilize the interactive features of TopHat duringlectures. The fact that many of the remote students were taking the course asynchronously due totheir work activities did not allow them to participate live in