. 2IntroductionThe demand for energy consumption in the world is growing at an annual rate of close to 2% peryear ( Welker, A., et al., 2022) ) and that translates to about 3,598 Twh in 2022. In the UnitedStates (US), the energy consumption growth rate is 2.6% which translates to about 106 Gwh in2022 (EIA, US Electricity Overview, 2023). The US energy generation sources in 2022 (USPrimary Energy Source, 2022) are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 US Energy Source Distribution (Source EIA)Fossil fuels (Petroleum, Natural Gas, and coal) make up 78.8% of the total energy source in theUS. Petroleum is the largest source and solar is the lowest. Renewable sources add up to 13.1%(Solar at 1.9%). It has been a fact that these non-renewable sources
, thenmonitored the progress during the Application Phase.Results and DiscussionThis section summarizes the data and results obtained from the summer enrichment programs inthe last three years.The number of students in each cohort is included in Table 2. The student participants andminority students rates were relatively low in 2021 due to covid-19 disruption and remotelearning/working in schools and universities, but were increased quickly in 2022-2023 with theteam’s recruiting effort and when the communities were back to normal operations, as shown inFigure 3. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Table 1. Student
us to explore the effectiveness of utilizing well-structured, expert-createdcontent as a standalone fine-tuning source.In addition to sentence annotation for fine-tuning, 169 and 109 sentences from the ProblemDefinition sections of the 2022 and 2019 reports were manually annotated for validationpurposes. The purpose of these datasets is to evaluate the model’s classification accuracyperformance across different fine-tuning exercises. Details regarding the number of sentencesand the sources for each fine-tuning dataset used in this study are summarized in Table 1. The2022 dataset was in the context of an assistive robotic arm design, and 2019 was a scale modelhyperloop vehicle design. In each dataset, the name “2019” or “2022” corresponds to
present study. Table 2: Data Science Competency (Milonas, Li, & Zhang, 2022) Category Competency Categories Data Science Competencies (Milonas, Li & Zhang, 2022) (Corresponding ACM Task Force) 1 Computing Fundamentals 4. Computing and Computer Fundamentals 9. Programming, data structures, and algorithms 10. Software development and maintenance 2 Data Management, Governance, 5. Data Acquisition, Management & Governance Privacy 7. Data Privacy, Security, Integrity, Analysis for Security
student feedback.Specifically, it assesses student preferences for Teaching Assistant (TA) support in engineeringcourses at a large public research university. This work complements existing research with anin-depth comparative analysis of NLP approaches to examining qualitative data within the realmof engineering education, utilizing survey data (training set = 1359, test set = 341) collected from2017 to 2022. The challenges and intricacies of multiple types of classification errors emergingfrom five NLP methods are highlighted: Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), Non-NegativeMatrix Factorization (NMF), BERTopic, Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), and PrincipalComponent Analysis (PCA). These results are compared with results from traditional
learn if given the time, and that both theteacher and the learner share responsibility for the desired learning (Anderson, 1975). In areview of mastery learning, Winget and Persky (2022) explain that mastery learning mayresult in better performance because it establishes an environment that supports motivation,offers regular opportunities for testing, and provides repeated feedback. The challenge is tofind practical ways of implementing mastery learning, or incorporating aspects to supportindividual needs within a course, while covering required content within a set time span(e.g. semester), and devising a grading system that matches students’ level of competencewith flexibility to acknowledge those that go beyond expectations (Guskey, 2007).In
.[19] S. Fan, R. Y. Lau, and J. L. Zhao, “Demystifying big data analytics for business intelligence through the lens of marketing mix,” Big Data Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–32, 2015.[20] Sep 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/math/data-scientists.htm[21] M. A. Halwani, S. Y. Amirkiaee, N. Evangelopoulos, and V. Prybutok, “Job qualifications study for data science and big data professions,” Information Technology & People, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 510–525, 2022.[22] J. C. Adams, “Creating a balanced data science program,” in Proceedings of the 51st ACM technical symposium on computer science education, 2020, pp. 185–191.[23] K. D. Schubert and M. D. Rossetti, “Creating a multi-college interdisciplinary bs data
identified themes in this study. Future research couldexplore alternative approaches (e.g., GPT-4) to streamline the clustering and code generationprocesses, potentially leveraging advanced natural language processing techniques to automatethe identification and consolidation of overlapping themes.References[1] A. Alsharif, A. Katz, D. Knight, and S. Alatwah, “Using Sentiment Analysis to Evaluate First-year Engineering Students Teamwork Textual Feedback,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. Accessed: Nov. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41460.pdf[2] R. S. Baker and P. S. Inventado, “Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics,” in Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice, J. A. Larusson
perspective challenges in big data,” in Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications: Proceedings of the Sixth Euro-China Conference on Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications, 15-18 October 2019 Arad, Romania. Springer Singapore, 2022, pp. 309–325.[4] Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Data Scientists,” Occupational Outlook Handbook. 2023. Accessed: Aug. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/math/data- scientists.htm[5] J. A. Rosendale, “Gauging the value of MOOCs,” Higher Education, Skills and Work- Based Learning, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 141–154, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-09-2016- 0065.[6] National Academies of Sciences, “Data science for undergraduates: Opportunities and
instructors and researchers in theirpursuit to evaluate student understanding.AcknowledgmentsWe acknowledge the support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) through grant EEC2226553. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] H. Auby, N. Shivagunde, A. Rumshisky, and M. Koretsky, “WIP: Using machine learning to automate coding of student explanations to challenging mechanics concept questions,” in Proceedings of the 2022 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/40507[2] H. Auby and M. Koretsky, “Work in progress: Using
process to enhance the value of NLP in educationalresearch?Methodology Research Question (RQ2):How does data analysis involving both unsupervised learning methods compared with analysisusing only unsupervised methods?ParticipantsThe study involved a total of 1,857 participants, consisting of sophomores and juniors from fourdifferent engineering majors enrolled as undergraduates. The participants were surveyed betweenthe winter of 2017 and the spring of 2022. The study population was divided into two settings:traditional (in-person) prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and emergency remote teaching (ERT),which was conducted remotely during the pandemic. The gender distribution showed that 74.1%of the participants were male, 24.4% were female, and a
aid variables), which are among theprevalent notions of extra credit accumulation, using the derived co-occurrence variables.4.1 DatasetWe experimented on real transcript data of Bachelor’s-degree graduated students from a largepublic (R1) university. The campus-wide dataset includes 11038 students that graduated betweenFall 2015 and Summer 2022. The campus-wide (all) student cohort included students from 114distinct degree programs. The number of campus-wide Transfer students (students thattransferred into the university) was 3015. Some noteworthy raw statistics for the undergraduatestudent group are: 9661 graduated with greater than 0 extra credits, 8841 graduated with greaterthan 0 excess (Ex) credits, 4100 graduated with greater than 0
: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x.[7] G. H. Golub, J. M. Ortega, and J. M. Ortega, Scientific computing and differential equations: an introduction to numerical methods. Boston: Academic Press, 1992.[8] K. Hadley and W. Oyetunji, “Extending the Theoretical Framework of Numeracy to Engineers,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 376–399, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20453.[9] D. Salsburg, The lady tasting tea: how statistics revolutionized science in the twentieth century, First Holt paperbacks edition. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2002.[10] D. Lane, M. Hebl, R. Guerra, D. Osherson, and H. Zimmer, Online Statistics Education: An Interactive Multimedia Course of Study. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2023. [Online]. Available: https
BackgroundLarge language models (LLMs) are artificial intelligence (AI) tools trained to create human-likecontent such as text and images through simple prompts by processing extremely large sets ofdata [1], [2]. LLMs include generated pre-trained transformers (GPT) like ChatGPT, an Open AItool. A very popular LLM since its release in 2022, ChatGPT has garnered attention from bothindustry and academia. These tools have been applied across various fields for purposesincluding generating codes in programming [3], helping with language translation [4], writingassistance[5], replying to mental health questions [6], and scheduling construction projects [7].In the academic context, ChatGPT has been used in research, teaching and learning [8] includingwithin
and slowly changing problem. 1.00 50 1.09 1.29 40 1.65 Percent Women 2.19 Male : Female Ratio 30 3.03 4.18 20 10 0 2012 2022 2032 2042 2052 2062 2072
thepool of optimal solutions could be another direction for future research.References1 ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2022–2023 Accreditation Cycle. 2022. www.abet.org.2 Edmund C. Short. A historical look at curriculum design. Theory Into Practice, 25(1):3–9, 1986.3 Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe. Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Develop- ment, Alexandria, VA, 2nd edition, 2005.4 Gregory L. Heileman, Chaouki T. Abdallah, Ahmad Slim, and Michael Hickman. Curricular analytics: A framework for quantifying the impact of curricular reforms and pedagogical innovations. www.arXiv.org, arXiv:1811.09676 [cs.CY], 2018. arxiv.org/abs
public (R1) universitywas used for experimentation. The campus-wide dataset includes 11038 students that graduatedbetween Fall 2015 and Summer 2022 from this university, 999 of which were engineeringstudents. The campus-wide (all) student cohort encompassed 114 different degree programs. Thenumber of campus-wide Transfer students (students that transferred into the university understudy) in the dataset was 3015, out of which 263 were engineering. Following are a few notableraw statistics among the engineering graduates: 971 graduated with greater than 0 extra credits,778 graduated with greater than 0 excess (Ex) credits, 852 of them graduated with greater than 0unusable-earned (UE) credits, 211 of them graduated with greater than 0 unusable
Data Visualization Activity Worksheets in the Context of aCritical Data Visualization Workshop: Findings from a Usability Survey. ASEE 2020, July 22-26,Virtual Conference.[7] Vetria L. Byrd. Innovative Pedagogy for Teaching and Learning Data Visualization. ASEE2021, July 26-29, Virtual Conference.[8] Bertin and Berg, Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. ESRI Press, 2011.[9] Gestalt psychology, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_psychology[10] Hans Rosling, https://www.ted.com/speakers/hans_rosling[11] McFarland, Joe. “When Art and Engineering Collide.” UToday News, 11 Jan. 2022,ucalgary.ca/news/when-art-and-engineering-collide[12] Lobos, A. Babbott, C. Integrating Emotional Attachment and Sustainability in ElectronicProduct
, “The Impact of Occupational Healthand Safety Measures on Employee Performance at the South Tongu District Hospital,” 2017.[5] E. Anne. Lloyd, The structure and confirmation of evolutionary theory. PrincetonUniversity Press, 2021.[6] A. Kok, “Cognitive control, motivation and fatigue: A cognitive neuroscienceperspective,” Brain Cogn, vol. 160, p. 105880, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.BANDC.2022.105880.[7] G. Borragán, H. Slama, M. Bartolomei, and P. Peigneux, “Cognitive fatigue: A Time-based Resource-sharing account,” Cortex, vol. 89, pp. 71–84, Apr. 2017, doi:10.1016/J.CORTEX.2017.01.023.[8] D. R. Davis, “The disorganization of behavior in fatigue,” J Neurol NeurosurgPsychiatry, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 23, Jan. 1946, doi: 10.1136/JNNP