quadcopter family,” IoT S P 2017 - Proc. 2017 Work. Internet Things Secur. Privacy, co-located with CCS 2017, no. Ii, pp. 31–36, 2017, doi: 10.1145/3139937.3139943.[17] C. G. Leela Krishna and R. Murphy, “A review on cybersecurity vulnerabilities for unmanned aerial vehicles,” Auvsi Xponential 2018, pp. 0–5, 2018.[18] D. Rainer, “Code corner,” Chem. Heal. Saf., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 39–40, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.chs.2005.05.008.[19] Interagency Security Committee, “Protecting Against The Threat of Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” 2020.
undergraduate research in orthopaedics. Proceedings of the Spring 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Illinois- Indiana Section Conference, 2007.2. Prince, M.J.; Felder, R.M.; Brent, R. Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies. Journal of Engineering Education 2007, 96, 283-294.3. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University 9Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching), Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for america\'s research universities, 1998 (http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED424840.pdf, accessed 20 March 2016).4. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs
. Page 13.995.5 Program Outcome Performance Courses to be Assessment Time of Data Assessment Evaluation of Criteria Courses Involved Assessed Method(s) Collection Coordinator Results Table 3. Program Outcome Worksheet.Faculty have been instrumental in assisting with completing these worksheets. Before theprocess could begin though, it was crucial that each of the columns be defined, so there was noambiguity. Performance criteria are specific, measurable statements identifying the performancerequired to meet the outcome. Three to four statements under performance criteria should besufficient. It is important that the
om/blog/nasa s-lunar-rover- everything- you-need-to- 14 Compressor (oxygen and Devices compresses gas 2 each $ 50,000.00 $ 100,000.00 http://www.di hydrogen) from electrolysis
the targeted SO. 1 ~ the assignment is not related to the targeted SO.If the score assigned is lower than 4, the reviewer(s) should provide suggestions as to how toimprove the assignment to better foster student attainment of the targeted Student Outcome.Examples of the Results of the Work Review Assessment The initial implementation of the Work Review process was in the spring 2013 semester.The table and discussion below show how the results of that SO attainment were reported in theself-study. The courses involved in the table are: ASE 324L – Aerospace Materials Laboratory ASE 333T – Engineering Communication ASE 366K – Spacecraft Dynamics ASE 367K – Flight Dynamics ASE 370L – Flight Control
, theauthors summarized six insights from the students: Gain valuable experience in teamwork Expand knowledge, skills, and learn industry standards Have opportunities to interact with industry professionals and experts Exposure to real-world problems Improve problem-solving skills Improve technical writing and communication skillsA similar question for the faculty advisors is “Describe the value of the educational experiencefor your student(s) participating in this competition submission” (ACRP, 2017). The five insightsextracted from the answers of advisors are: Receive educational experience beyond normal classroom curricula Improve communication skills Learn importance of persistence and follow-up
dedication—without them, none of this would havebeen possible.References[1] National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2004 (NSB 04-1, NSB 04-1A), Arlington, VA:National Science Foundation, 2004.[2] National Science Board, The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America’s Potential (NSB 03-69), Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2003.[3] O’Keefe, S., speech to the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University, 12April 2002.[4] Hart-Rudman U.S. Commission on National Security in the 21st Century, Road Map for National Security:Imperative for Change, 2001.[5] Bilén, S.G., Bernal, L.P., Gilchrist, B.E., and Gallimore, A.D., “The Student Space-Systems FabricationLaboratory
, 2000. 3. Cimbala, J. M.; Pauley, L. L.; Zappe, S. E.; Hsieh, M. Experiential learning in a fluid flow class via take-home experiments. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2006. 4. Hertzberg, J.; Leppek, B. R.; Gray, K. E. Art for the Sake of Improving Attitudes Toward Engineering. ASEE Annual Conference, 2012. 5. Jouaneh, M.; Palm, W. System Dynamics and Control Take Home Experiments. ASEE Annual Conference, 2010. 6. Cengel, Y. A.; Cimbala, J. M. Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications; McGraw Hill: Boston, 2010. 7. Stephan, E. A.; Bowman, D. R.; Park, W. J.; Sill, B. L.; Ohland, M. W. Thinking like an engineer: An active learning approach; Pearson: New Jersey, 2011. 8. Tennekes, H. The Simple Science of Flight; MIT Press
each studentwhile s/he practices. The course is three credit hours.There has been concern voiced regarding large lectures with respect to attendance rates,effectiveness of large lecture instruction, and connectivity between the instructor and students.To provide a more flexible learning environment and improve student learning outcome [2, 3, 6],starting in the fall of 2010 under the assistance of Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence(CTLE) at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University a hybrid version of the course wasimplemented. The hybrid sections are delivered on the regular basis each semester after oursuccessful initiation. The general format of the hybrid and traditional remains the same: 2 hoursof lectures per week and 2 hours of lab
. Deseret Morning News, August 15, 2006. Cited from online version: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,645193239,00.html?pg=24. M.A. Swartwout, C.A. Kitts, R.J. Twiggs, T.J. Kenny, B.R. Smith, R.A. Lu, K. Stattenfield, F.K. Pranajaya. Mission results for Sapphire, a student-built satellite. Acta Astronautica, 2008; 62:521–538.5. M.A. Swartwout, R. Reed, S. Jayaram. Argus: A Flight Campaign for Modeling the Effects of Space Radiation on Electronics. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Page 25.1170.10
. 1, 2003, pp. 85-90.4. M.I. Hoit, and M.W. Ohland, "The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 87, No. 1, 1998, pp. 79-86.5. D. Woods, R Felder, A. Rugarcia, and J. Stice, “The Future of Engineering Education. III. Developing Critical Skills,” Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2000, pp. 108–117.6. S. Sheppard, and R. Jenison, “Examples of Freshman Design Education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1997, pp. 248-261.7. M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, 2004, pp. 223-231
of Engineering Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 1050, Baltimore, MD: Accreditaion Board of Engineering and Technology; 2009.2. Krystofolski A, Batterson B, Budarz S, Clark R, McNamara K, Miller M, Fagan J, Thomas Bianchi, Peters C, Brusseau K and others. NASA Moonbuggy Lunar Vehicle Design - 2008. Project report. New Britain: Central Connecticut State University; 2008.3. Six F. Moonbuggy Rules and Penalties. NASA; 2008.4. Hrenko J, Danenberg A, Summers K, Shaw H, Varghese P, Geagea E, Cook C, Elhwali A, Cegelka N. 2009 Great Moonbugg Race. Project report. New Britain: Central Connecticut State University; 09.5. Naoumov V, Al-Masoud N. NASA Project in ME Senior Capstone Design Class: Experience and
Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Page 15.535.10Education at the Pennsylvania State University for its support of this project.Bibliography1 Long, L., (2008), “The Critical Need for Software Engineering Education”, The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, January 20082 Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., Sullivan, W. M. (2009), Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field, pp. 7-8, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Preparation for the Professions.3 Sindre, G., Stalhane, G., Brataas, G., Conradi, R., “The cross-course software engineering project at the
back of the chapter homework problems. Students use the equations they learned in classto a hypothetical problem to get an answer by inserting numbers into the equation. One such question fromFundamentals of Aerodynamics book by John Anderson [5] (which is adopted by most instructors as arequired textbook for aerodynamics course) is given below:Consider a NACA 2412 airfoil. The airfoil is flying at a velocity of 60 m/s at a standard altitude of 3 km.The chord length of the airfoil is 2m. Calculate the lift per unit span when the angle of attack is 4°.In this problem, students have to employ the equation of lift per unit span 𝐿′ 1 𝐿′ = 𝜌𝑉 2
functionality, students also learn to incorporate VisualBasic Macros toautomate tedious processes and enable finer detail in trade studies. Finally, the Excel add-in 8@Risk, developed by Palisade Corporation, is used to teach students to use Monte Carloanalyses in spacecraft design and performance assessment. Students learn how to perform MonteCarlo analyses and interpret the results through outputs such as probability density functions(PDFs), cumulative distribution functions (CDFs or “s-curves”), and tornado plots.Grades are determined by frequent lab assignments, quizzes, and a final project. There are fivelaboratory assignments and quizzes are given weekly at the beginning of each lab period. Thequizzes
Safety – pointing angle, wind speed, base deflector All rockets are launched from launch rails or towers pointed in the opposite direction of all spectators. The launch angle shall not exceed 30 degrees from vertical. No launch is permitted in the presence of wind speeds no greater than 20 miles per hour. Base deflectors shall be used in any scenario in which the firing of a rocket motor poses a threat to the structural integrity of the launch stand.Size of rocket The maximum liftoff weight of a high power rocket shall not exceed one third of the certified average thrust of the high power rocket motor(s) intended to be ignited at
. 213-224, Feb. 2008.[2] P. Kunz, U. Frischknecht – Tobler, B. Bollmann – Zuberbuehler, and S. Groesser, “Factors influencing the adoption of systems thinking in primary and secondary schools in Switzerland,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 34, pp. 78-93. Jan. 2017.[3] H. Shaked, C. Schechter, “Definitions and development of systems thinking,” in Systems Thinking for School Leaders, Cham: Springer, 2017, pp 9-22.[4] R.D. Arnold and J.P. Wade, “A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 44, pp. 669-678, 2015.[5] J.W. Forrester, Industrial Dynamics. Portland: Productivity Press, 1961.[6] B. Richmond, “Systems thinking/system dynamics: let’s just get on with it,” System
former systems engineer at Hughes Aircraft, Space and Communications Group inthe 1990s working on satellite attitude dynamics and control systems, it seems that this projectdoes a pretty good job of replicating the issues involved in such an industrial setting, and as aresult, is preparing these students for success in both subsystem and systems engineering roles.BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Halsmer, D. M., Voth, J. A., McCain, C. A., Reutter, J. D., Frailey, N. S., Samuelson, M., &Ahrens, D. (2018, June), Development of a Virtual Reality Flight Simulator to Assist in theDesign of Original Aircraft Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition ,Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30326.2. J. Abbitt, B. Carroll, R. Fearn, & R
Aviation Administration, [Online]. Available: https://www.faa.gov/pilots/training/atp/media/institutional_authority_list.pdf [Accessed: Jan. 12, 2020][9] B. Dalgarno, M.J.W. Lee, L. Carlson, S. Gregory and B. Tynan, “Institutional support for and barriers to the use of 3D immersive virtual worlds in higher education,” in Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011, G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown, B. Cleland, Eds. Tasmania: 2011. pp. 316-330. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs/dalgarnofull.pdf
catch-as-catch-can.AppendicesReferences[1] “Conceptual Design of a Test Bed for Miner Rescue,” R.A.M. Munny, A Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science In Electrical and Computer Engineering, UNIVERSITY, May 2019[2] “Latching Mechanism Between and UGV Team for Mine Rescue,” S. Hoffman, A Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering, UNIVERSITY, August 2017[3] “Raspberry Pi 3 Model B,” Raspberry Pi. [Online]. Available: https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-3-model-b-plus/. [Accessed: 19-Apr- 2019].[4] “Pi NoIR Camera V2,” Raspberry Pi. [Online]. Available: https
, TR-83-3048, Oct. 1960 (Revised 1978).13. Husman, J., Lynch, C., Hilpert, J., and Duggan, M. A., "Validating measures of future time perspective for engineering students: Steps toward improving engineering education", presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.14. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. , “Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1993, 53(3), 80115. Yasar, S., “Discourse in freshman engineering teams: The relationship between verbal persuasions, self-efficacy, and achievement”, 200816. Bandura, A., “Guide for
classroom,’ Retrieved: September 20, 2011. 15. Hou, Huei-Tse, ‘Exploring the Behavioural Patterns in Project-Based Learning with Online Discussion: Quantitative Content Analysis and Progressive Sequential Analysis,’ Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, v9 n3 p52-60 Jul 2010 16. Goldberg, Nisse A.; Ingram, Kathleen W., ‘Improving Student Engagement in a Lower-Division Botany Course,’ Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, v11 n2 p76-90 Apr 2011 17. Khalid, A., Nuhfer-Halten, B., Vandenbussche, J., Colebeck, D., Atiqullah, M., Toson, S., Chin, C., ‘Effective multidisciplinary active learning techniques for freshmen polytechnic students,’ Intellectbase International
Laboratory Adv Advanced Lin Linear AN Aeronautical or Aeronautical Engineering LTU Lawrence Technological University App Application(s) Manuf Manufacturing Arch Architecture ME Mechanical Engineering AS Aerospace Engineering Mech Mechanics Assoc. Associate’s (degree) Meth Methods Assy Assembly NASA National Air and Space Agency Auto Autonomous NL