Engineering she serves as the coordinator of ABET and other accreditation processes, acts as a resource/consultant to faculty in the different programs, develops and implements assessment plans, and serves as the primary educational assessment/data analyst adviser on the Dean’s staff. A particular interest is in helping faculty to develop and implement classroom-based assessment and action research plans to establish the effectiveness of instruction and to use the data to improve teaching and student learning. She is currently working with several engineering faculty assessing the impact of in-class use of technology on teaching and student learning. Dianne has also worked as an education consultant for a number of
requirements and pros and cons of different sources of capital. 5. Abilities to apply knowledge about intellectual property to strategically create barriers to entry for competitors. 6. Abilities to plan and manage a design project to complete specified deliverables within allotted time and budget. 7. Abilities to organize, improve, and contribute effectively to a multidisciplinary project team. 8. Abilities to access, learn, process, and demonstrate knowledge competence to advance a team-based entrepreneurial engineering project. 9. Abilities to explain and demonstrate ethical and professional responsibility in the context of team interactions, class assignments, client interactions, and professional
. For example, in the sophomore Fundamentals ofBiomedical Engineering course, students spend the semester identifying, planning, constructingand carrying out experiments modeling a physiologically relevant fluid flow phenomenon.While the students learn how to construct basic flow systems in class, they are completelyresponsible for the identification, design and implementation of their individual physiologicalmodel. This project provides an environment in which the students are very invested in theexperimental design process yet prevents them from being overwhelmed by having to manage anentire project.As the students enter into the final two years of the curriculum, they are presented with moreopen-ended projects in which they are required to
deliverables: needsspecifications, project plans and posters, for three needs. These needs were chosen based onareas of clinical need, cost effectiveness, interest and feasibility for milestone completion incapstone design during the academic year. Scholars met with faculty to gauge potential solutionsfrom the basic science and clinical perspectives. The summer program ended with a finalScholar symposium of projects, reflections of the Scholar experiences and plans for academicyear projects. Table 1 summarizes the 2014 Rowan Bioengineering Scholars Program. Table 1: Summer 2014 Rowan Bioengineering Scholars Program Week Topic Deliverable 1 Overview of program and Basic physiology
a genetic perspective, including the use of bioinformatics,genomics, and recombinant DNA technology.Survey design and data collection processDuring the summer of 2005, the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment(IRPA) at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, in conjunction with the course instructorcreated a confidential course survey for the “Mendelian and Molecular Genetics” course. Allsurveys were administered online during the last week of the fall quarter and the first week of thewinter quarter. The course survey contained questions regarding the relevance of the course tothe student’s major, course placement, problem solving skills, and future plans. Specifically
activity, and replaced the other reflections with short assignments inspired by examples from Studying Engineering by Raymond Landis,4 focusing on topics including goal-setting and reflecting on different engineering job functions. Career preparation exercises. In Fall 2015 and Fall 2016, weekly student assignments included preparing a résumé, attending and reporting on a university-hosted career exploration event, and reflecting on their visit to the engineering career services center. In Fall 2015, students also took an online assessment (Indigo) designed to measure workplace competencies (similar to a personality test and DISC assessment combined). Academic success planning. In Fall 2015 and 2016, students were asked to make a
includingbiomechanics, rehabilitation engineering, bionanomaterials and biomedical imaging, the firstyear of the Bioengineering Experience for Science Teachers (BEST) Program provided in-depthparticipant-tailored curricular mentoring via weekly workshops that focused on principles ofeffective planning, instruction, and assessment which will be directly connected to teachers’classroom curriculum. In addition to exposure to research in bioengineering labs, City PublicHigh School teachers from diverse schools across the district also translated their experience intocurriculum unit lesson plans being implemented the following academic year. 1. IntroductionIt has been well established that there is a shortage of STEM professionals [1]. While there are anumber of
Spring 2005 yielded no prior Quiz Bowls with afocus on Bioengineering. The idea of such a Quiz Bowl was quickly endorsed by UCSD Facultyand also the UCSD Undergraduate Student Chapter of the Biomedical Engineering Society(UCSD BMES). Jina was designated as the chair of the organizing committee. Other members ofthe BQB Committee, Kevin Huang, Alex Varond, Reetu Singh, and John Yamauchi, planned thepublicity, venue, technical equipment needed for the contests, refreshments, and sponsorship.One of the first challenges was to establish an overall goal for the Quiz Bowl event. Theorganizing committee establisheded the following mission statement, “to establish a tradition inthe UCSD Department of Bioengineering that will foster recognition of
. The students spend four days learning physicalexamination procedure through lectures and clinical sessions. During the second eight-weekperiod of the internship, students attend morning rotations in internal medicine, pediatrics,obstetrics and gynecology, surgery, intensive care, and the emergency room. Students areassigned to a clinical mentor, and observe their mentor interacting with patients, performingclinical procedures, analyzing test results, and developing treatment plans. Students keep aweekly journal in which they describe their experiences in the clinical rotations. Afternoons inthe latter eight weeks of the internship are spent working on independent research supervised bya faculty mentor. Students write a short proposal at the
two-course, team-based, experimental research capstone sequence. The goal of thedevice design capstone is to advance intellectual property while providing a multidisciplinarydesign experience. In the first course of the sequence, the teams are presented with a clinicalproblem and are expected to conceive, design, prototype and evaluate devices with innovativesolutions. The course emphasizes information gathering, establishing requirements, conceptdevelopment, and evaluation. In the second course in the sequence, a verification plan isgenerated and implemented. The goal of the experimental research capstone sequence is tointroduce students to the design and conduct of a pilot study involving human subjects. To thisend, students develop a
communication skills, all of which encompass the goals ofour capstone design course3.There are a number of criteria that must be met in order to ensure that cooperative learning istaking place. These are: positive interdependence, individual accountability, face-to-faceinteraction, interpersonal skills, and group self-assessment2.This paper will discuss specific activities adopted for the course to ensure that cooperativelearning is taking place. We will then present a case study for a single student project and discussthe direct benefits of the new course structure. Finally, we will present conclusions related to thecourse revisions, and a plan for future assessment of the changes.MethodsTo ensure that we are truly implementing cooperative learning
are expected to be professional andwell-rehearsed.ApproachIt is believed that alumni of the nanotechnology course will have increased involvement inresearch and intentions of attending graduate/professional school. To measure future researchinvolvement, alumni who have completed the first-year engineering honors program within thepast four years were surveyed to quantify their involvement in various research roles andactivities, including undergraduate research, presentations at technical forums and conferences,research and development internships, as well as planned participation in graduate orprofessional school. The survey consists of a variety of multiple choice, check boxes, andoptional short answers. The survey was combined with another
between technological progress on the one hand, and existinglimitations in educational and socioeconomic resources on the other, a varied number ofvisionary frameworks and strategic plans have been put forth by commissions of theAccreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET)1, the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE)2, and the National Science Foundation (NSF)3. A strong, consistentrecommendation in these reports is the need for engineering graduates to have professionaldevelopment, or “soft” skills. The visions of these reports have particular relevance tobioengineering, a discipline whose explosive international growth is generating abundant careerdevelopment, professional development, and humanitarian development opportunities
indicated that they were overall well-satisfied withthe bioengineering program (3.8 ± 0.4, on a 5 point scale), 71% of the group session reports citedthe desire for track-based elective options based on a thrust area, in order to increase thespecificity of their knowledge. The desire for specialized track-based elective options wasrecapitulated in student alumni surveys as well. Based on this feedback, we plan to implement arequirement for focus area specialization in the new curriculum.Based on both the quality of students admitted and graduated and on the placement of ourgraduates in top graduate schools, medical schools, and local industry, we were alreadyproviding a strong and successful program. Nonetheless, the ongoing assessment
patent and mock SBIR serve asrealistic exercises that inform and instruct students in the components of a successful technologyventure and the competitive nature of securing funding for a start-up company.The drafting of patent claims is instructive in defining an invention with respect to the prior art,and gauging its strengths and weaknesses regarding infringement: the value of a project isultimately in the strength of any ensuing patent claims. The SBIR proposal has a standardizedformat that will compel students to review the competing technologies; make a rationale for theapproach; define technical objectives; organize the research effort by formulating a detailed workplan with specific tasks, milestones and schedules, and contingency plans
. Design Challenge Schedule Month Date Day Topic/Event Assignment Due August 22 W Problem Statements, User Needs 27 M Functions, Specifications 1. Problem State / User Needs / Prelim. Ideas 28 T Solution Generation, Solution 2. Functions & Analysis, Solution Planning Specifications 29 W Sign Off Meeting by Friday with Prof. 3. Possible Solutions
Issues (18) Technological Issues (4)Create Product Description Produce 2 and 3-Drawings Develop a Product Manufacturing Plan Consideration of Product Service OpportunitiesPreliminary Research Design For Manufacturability Product Test Method Definition Pilot Scale Operational Testing and EvaluationGenerate Multiple Product Alternatives Design For Assembly Prototype Testing Production Line Design and SetupChoose Product Design From Multiple Alternatives Design For Automation
thirteen undergraduate students who participated in the program in2012. Five of the 13 students worked directly with a faculty member and eight students wereassigned a graduate student mentor in addition to working with faculty mentor. This studyfocused only on the eight undergraduate students who were assigned a graduate student mentor.Of the eight students, six students attended four-year universities and two attended localcommunity colleges. Four of the student attending four-year universities had declared/planned tomajor in biomedical engineering, one in bioelectronics, and one in industrial engineering andeconomics. One of the community college students was planning on pursuing a degree in biologyand the other was considering engineering
initiates with team formation andthe rapid design challenge, then assignment of teams (of two to four students) into their full two-semester design projects (typically with clients in local industry and/or health care), and throughthe remainder of each fall semester progresses teams through the design process (includingproblem definitions, team mission statements and contracts, development of project Houses ofQuality including competitive benchmarking, pertinent FDA regulations and engineeringstandards, patents and intellectual property, and structured brainstorming leading into projectdesign solution concepts and selection). The course also includes aspects of professionaldevelopment, and post-graduation planning. A roundtable design review late
workplace competencies (similar to a personality test and DISC assessment combined), and a written reflection on the students’ visit to the engineering career services center. Academic success planning, including making a personalized major map and annotating an ABET student outcomes rubric with information on what parts of his/her college experience would help the student master that outcome. Listening and writing summaries of talks, for each of four faculty presentations and two alumni talks. The faculty presented on their career trajectories and research; the alumni focused on next steps for getting into medical school, and intellectual property law as a career path. In-class written surveys administered during the first and
there was any need for change, students modified the design andmanufactured a new prototype, and then performed the surgery again to validate if the newdesign worked better with the existing surgical procedure/tools.In final presentations, all groups presented problem definition, market analysis and potentialcustomer, project timeline, design input and output. Verification and validation plan, engineeringspecifications, and results were also included in the presentations. Especially the groups whowere introduced surgical procedure presented how the knowledge and experience of surgicalprocedure changed the final design outcomes compared to the original design.ResultsThis new approach was implemented to the capstone design course for the first
identified needs and suggesting relevant improvements or necessary revisions.To meet the course objectives and prepare the students for the capstone senior project, manytopics were discussed in lecture and reinforced through laboratory experiences. The lecture andlab topics included: • Client interactions and developing problem statements • Identifying and evaluating constraints • Generating multiple design solutions • Using feasibility and merit criteria to make decisions • Developing a prototype • Developing, implementing, and evaluating test plans • Multidisciplinary design and regulatory issues • Reverse Engineering • Project Documentation • Technical communicationDuring this 10-week crash course, or
future BME 201 students, the contents of which areprovided in Appendix III. We have received feedback from the BSAC and other students forcourse improvements. We plan to address these in the upcoming semester as described below. Page 24.1331.7Course improvement We plan to further develop and improve upon this course as follows:1. Increase the diversity of the blended learning experience using video lectures, in-class problem solving and advising2. Improve and develop new hands-on laboratory modules geared toward teaching multidisciplinary BME technical and professional skills3. Develop new guided-design multidisciplinary group projects4
Scholaroutcomes are also presented and discussed as well as future plans for the program.INTRODUCTIONHealth care spending represented 17.8 percent of the United States economy in 2015.1Innovations are needed in the healthcare system to enhance patient care and health, whilereducing costs. Educating quality bioengineers trained to identify and solve healthcare problemswill prepare them to develop cost-effective solutions.Our strategy involves team-based design experiences driven by new projects drawn from unmetclinical needs is the strategy used here to train engineers while simultaneously addressinghealthcare problems. Design experiences are core to engineering education and result in studentshaving a deeper understanding and ability to identify and
, fundamental understanding of the characteristics of a successfulprogram is lacking. In addition, longitudinal tracking of participants that evaluate the influenceof the experience on their long-term plans is lacking. In this paper we describe and evaluate our9-year experience with a 10-week summer undergraduate program.MethodsOverall Program Description Page 26.695.5 From 2006 - 2014, a research university in the U.S. Midwest (Illnois Institute ofTechnology) has delivered a 10-week, summer engineering Research Experience forUndergraduate (REU) program. The program focuses on engineering research in theunderstanding and treatment of diabetes and
will operate. The external mentor is expected to give feedback which shouldbe incorporated into future prototypes and the final functional deliverable.Device BenchmarkingThe students must develop a benchmarking plan to assess whether or not their finaldevice meets each specification. Similar to the feasibility testing, the external mentorsmay provide the appropriate medical environment in which to perform the finalbenchmarking.Functional DeliverableAll groups are expected to create a functional deliverable that solves the problem asstated in the problem description by meeting all specifications. Results from thebenchmarking tests are used to assess whether the device passes or fails eachspecification. At the conclusion of the semester
clinical trials, economics, ethics, and regulatorystrategies. Throughout the second year, students will continue working on their research project,with the culmination of the second year being a summer clinical or industrial immersion relevantto the project. In addition to immersion experiences, we are planning tracks: research,entrepreneurship, professional school, and industry; while these are at early stages indevelopment, they are being developed to integrate with other campus activities.Beginning junior year, students will continue undergraduate research while being extensivelytrained in engineering design, in contrast to traditional education which focuses primarily ondesign in the senior capstone course. The coursework for this year is not
biomedical engineering (BME) curriculum is a daunting challenge.BME is unlike most engineering programs with the need for more life science courses as a corecomponent of the curriculum. Described here is the rationale for using a differential equationbased physiological modeling course as a substitute for a math taught differential equationscourse, and the subsequent flexibility it allows in the curriculum.In addition, many BME programs prepare their students for more options than the usualengineering program. Approximately one-third of BME students in our program plan to attendmedical or dental school and expect that the medical and dental school requirements be a part ofthe basic program. We have accomplished this challenge with basic medical
ideas, best practices, reports, and strategies throughout theyear via teleconferencing and email. Although simple in some ways, it also included a lot ofchallenges. Further discussion refined the early ideas to focus on a pre-capstone experience forJunior students, where NJU and OSU students could work on teams and gain extra design andteam skills, with an international perspective, before the senior capstone course. From this, thecurrent plan is detailed here of an annual Summer Design Experiences (SDE) at both institutions,and an internationally co-mentored senior design project in alternate years at NJU.Program StructureThe overall program structure is presented in Table 1, showing the timeline for events in a two-year cycle. The Summer
-class work.Implementation of online content for flipping the “Medical Electronics” course:The implementation plan called for first, designing and developing the online video lessons andposting them on the learning management system “Blackboard”. The online lessons are watchedby the students prior coming to class and include a few sample practice problems for the studentsto practice application of the lesson material to solve circuit analysis exercises. The studentsprepare one or more questions to bring to class. Second, in the classroom the instructor and thestudents address some of the students’ questions. The students then engage in group activitiescentered on circuit analysis and design problems and virtual laboratory exercises using