Assessment of the Quality of Bone and Scaffold Materials. Heidelberg,Germany: Springer; 2007.6. Xu H, Simon CG. Fast setting calcium phosphate–chitosan scaffold:mechanicalproperties and biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1337-48.7. Converse G, Yue W, Roeder RK. Processing and tensile properties ofhydroxyapatite-whisker-reinforced polyetheretherketone. Biomaterials. 2007;28:927-35.8. Schnieders J, Gbureck U, Thulb R, Kissel T. Controlled release of gentamicinfrom calcium phosphate—poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) composite bone cement.Biomaterials. 2006;27.9. Xu H, Quinn, JB Calcium phosphate cement containing resorbable fibers forshort-term reinforcement and macroporosity. Biomaterials. 2002;23:193-202.10. LI S, Liu B
CurriculumThe landscape of today’s Biomedical Product Development Industry calls for a diverse set ofskills beyond the typical engineering fundamentals. The current Hospital Value-BasedPurchasing environment driven by the Department of Health and Human Services Centers forMedicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) measure all new products by their ability to improveclinical outcomes, increase patient satisfaction, and lower the cost of care.1 Preparing students tobecome leaders in the Biomedical Engineering (BME) industry therefore must include anunderstanding of health economics and a broad view of the continuum of care and overall impactof care. The proposed changes to Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.’s(ABET) Criterion 3 signals
AC 2007-1793: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE VANTH/ERC BIOMEDICALENGINEERING MODULES: A METHOD TO EXAMINE THE EFFECTS OFSELECTED CORE COMPONENTS OF THE “LEGACY CYCLE” AND HPLMODELDavid Cordray, Vanderbilt University David S. Cordray, PhD is Professor of Psychology and Public Policy at Vanderbilt University. He is currently the Thrust Leader in Assessment and Evaluation for the VaNTH ERC. Professor Cordray has written extensively on research and evaluation methodology in education and human services areas. He has conducted experimental, quasi-experimental and meta-analytic assessments of intervention effectiveness in education, health, welfare, and other human service areas.Alene Harris, Vanderbilt Alene H
, randomized, controlled clinical trial, and clinical experience from 19 centers. Artificial Organs. 2002;26(2):103-110.4. Stange J, Mitzner S, Ramlow W, Gliesche T, Hickstein H, Schmidt R. A new procedure for the removal of protein bound drugs and toxins. ASAIO Journal. 1993;39(3):M621- 625.5. Stange J, Mitzner SR, Risler T, et al. Molecular adsorbent recycling system (MARS): clinical results of a new membrane-based blood purification system for bioartificial liver support. Artificial Organs. 1999;23(4):319-330.6. Stange J, Ramlow W, Mitzner S, Schmidt R, Klinkmann H. Dialysis against a recycled albumin solution enables the removal of albumin-bound toxins. Artificial Organs. 1993;17(9):809-813.7. Steiner
a 1800’s technologyAppreciation of posed an interesting case” Unique 2 “stipulation of using pre 1900 technology made me think how hard Constraints inventors and scientists had to think outside the box to prove theories and invent … technologies” Page 24.1409.7 Hands-On “interesting lesson that I took away from the RDC was becoming 1 Skills more comfortable with biomedical equipment”An additional indirect assessment of students’ assessment of RDC
to the current phase “Expansion Development” (NSF DUE-1022750).References1. Acharya R, Wasserman R, Stevens J, and Hinojosa C: Biomedical imaging modalities: a tutorial. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 19:3-25, 1995.2. Allan GL, and Zylinski J: The teaching of computer programming and digital image processing in radiography. Intl. Journal of Medical Informatics 1998; 50:139-143.3. Alon P: Bringing the Internet and multimedia revolution to the classroom. Campus-Wide Information System 17:16-22, 2000.4. Athanasiou S, Kouvaras I, Poulakis I, Kokorogiannis A, Tsanakas P, and Koziris N: TALOS: An interactive
firm since 1986, she is also the VaNTH project leader for core competency instruction. Hirsch has a B.A. in English from the University of Michigan and a Ph.D. in English from Northwestern University.Stacy Klein, Vanderbilt University Stacy S. Klein is the Associate Dean for Outreach at the Vanderbilt University School of Engineering. She is also a Research Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Radiological Sciences, and Teaching & Learning. An active mentor in the REU program, she also runs an RET program.Julie Greenberg, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Julie E. Greenberg is a Principal Research Scientist and Director of Education and Academic Affairs at the
C. randomize order of treatments D. all of the above8. A company wants to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between their new cholesterol drug and their old cholesterol drug. Which test should the company use to compare the sample means? A. ANOVA B. p-test C. t-test D. both B & C9. Which of the following is/are the correct test(s) to compare sample variances of two populations? A. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) B. t-test C. f-test D. both A & C10. A biomedical researcher has measured the strength of several different brands of coronary artery stents. Which of the following tests should he/she use to compare the data? A
to the following for their contributions to the learning modules: KimWoodrow and members of the Woodrow lab, Suzie Pun, Barry Lutz, Rahil Jain, and IanAndrews.Bibliography1. Yilmaz, M., Garcia, C., Guillen, T. & Ramirez, D. (2011). A K-12 Advanced Research Camp for Engineeringand Science Disciplines. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference 2011, Vancouver, Page 26.283.14Canada, 2011. 2. Yilmaz, M., Ren, J., Ramirez, D., Custer, S. & Coleman, J. (2010). An Improved K-12 Outreach Camp
in that was not part of your regular coursework? How many yearshave you performed research and at what level of your education (high school/college/etc?)?______________________________________________________________________________What was your high school GPA (4.0 scale)? _________What is your current GPA at IIT? _________What is your current GPA in your major(s) at IIT? _________What is your overall GPA in science courses? _________What college science courses have you taken so far? ______________________________________________Career & AspirationsWhat career or occupation(s) are you interested in pursuing after your studies at IIT? ____________________What individuals, if any, do you identify with who are in the field of science or
. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, et al. Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science,Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(23):8410-8415.8. Johnson D, Johnson R, Smith K. Cooperative Leraning Returns to College: What Evidence is there that it Works?Change. 1998;30(4):26-35.9. Bowen CW. A Quantitative Literature Review of Cooperative Learning Effects on High School and CollegeChemistry Achievement. Journal of Chemical Education. 2000;77(1):116.10. Alfieri L, Brooks PJ, Aldrich NJ, Tenenbaum HR. Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?Journal of Educational Psychology. 2011;103(1):1-18.11. Felder RM, Brent R. The ABC's of engineering education: ABET, bloom's taxonomy
biological modeling approach to someone who already has a solid background in mathematics, cell biology, and physiology. You must provide your “student” with the known mechanisms of a particular disease (with which you yourself are already very familiar), and then teach this person to determine the appropriate length scale at which to model the disease process (e.g. cellular, molecular, tissue, etc.) and to identify functional modules in which to compartmentalize the model. Rate your current confidence level at accomplishing this task on a scale of 1-5 (5 being “extremely high confidence”).8. Would you feel comfortable picking up a book(s), researching journals, and integrating information across multiple length scales to set
than 6.0. Thehighest scores were for effectiveness in demonstrating the significance of the subject matter, andthe overall quality of instructor(s). The lowest scores were for adequacy of the physical facilitiesand the instructional resources.For Spring of 2005, the undergraduates rated all nine areas higher than 6.0. The undergraduatesgave the highest scores to the effectiveness in demonstrating significance of the subject matterand the instructor’s interest in whether or not the students understood the course content. Theundergraduates gave the lowest scores for clarity of instructor’s interpretation of abstract ideasand adequacy of physical facilities. The graduate students rated eight out of nine areas higherthan 6.0. The graduate students
, pp. 181-204, Summer 2013.[2] W. Karlen, Ed., Mobile Point-of-Care Monitors and Diagnostic Device Design, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2015.[3] G. J. Kost, N. K. Tran, M. Tuntideelert, S. Kulrattanamaneeporn, and N. Peungposop, “Katrina, the tsunami, and point-of-care testing: Optimizing rapid response diagnosis in disasters,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 513-520, 2006.[4] M. J. Rust, N. A. Carlson, and J. H. Nichols, “A thermo-modulating container for transport and storage of glucose meters in a cold weather environment,” Point of Care, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 157-160, September 2012.[5] S. K. Esche and H. A. Hadim, “Introduction of project-based learning into mechanical engineering courses
instruction, students work in a self-directed manner to interpret outcomes based oninvestigation of their own question. Here, we describe a cost-effective, sustainable biomaterialslaboratory for juniors using inquiry-guided instruction at a large public university.The four laboratory components focused on key biomaterial topics and lasted for two-to-threeweeks. During the first week, students were provided with available materials pertaining to themodule and worked with group members and instructor(s) to devise and test a custom hypothesisinstead of using “cookie cutter” lab manuals. In the second week, students performedexperiments to test their hypotheses. During the last week, students either continued to performdata collection or complete
flow. Gettingcomplete coverage of the material requires that the discussion not be free ranging, but rathergently guided by the instructor; this takes significant planning.Literature cited1. Williams, D. F. & Biomaterials, E. S. for. Definitions in biomaterials: proceedings of a consensus conference of the European Society for Biomaterials, Chester, England, March 3-5, 1986. (Elsevier, 1987).2. Custers, E. J. F. M. Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Adv. Heal. Sci. Educ. 15, 109–128 (2010).3. Arzi, H. J., Ben-Zvi, R. & Ganiel, U. Forgetting versus savings: The many facets of long-term retention. Sci. Educ. 70, 171–188 (1986).4. Kooshkabadi, M. & Chen, J. Staged PCI Case Study. ZOLL LifeVest at
approximately 2.5 mL. To synthesize gold NPs, 1.0 mMhydrogen tetrachloroaurate (III) trihydrate was added dropwise into 30 ml of sodiumborohydride, swirling the tube occasionally, until a pink or purple color appeared. The finalvolume of silver nitrite used was approximately 2.5 mL. Both NP suspensions were Page 15.900.5characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy (Nanodrop ND3300) and DLS. DLS was conducted on aMalvern Nano Series Zetasizer with a 633 nm laser. The duration of each scan was 60 s and 3scans were acquired.NP Application to CellsOn day 1, cells were rinsed once with 700 l of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and 700 l offresh cell culture media was
who are accepting of the electronic format tend to find themodules useful. This suggests that enhancement of the electronic experience itself could allowmore students to recognize the learning benefits of this technology.References1. Howard L. Adaptive Learning Technologies for Biomedical Education. IEEE Engineering in Medicine andBiology Magazine 2003; 22:58-65.2. Howard L, Remenyi Z, Pap G. Adaptive Blended Learning Environments. 9th International Conference onEngineering Education. San Juan, PR; 2006:T3K11-T13K16.3. Bransford J, Brown A, Cocking R (eds). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School Washington,DC: National Academy Press; 1999.4. Roselli RJ, Howard L, Brophy S. A computer-based Free Body Diagram Assistant. Computer
taken outtside the BIO OEN departm ment. Lastlyy, juniors preesented the ddesire to havve anincreased d quantitative basis in their physiologgy course. partmental ProceedingsIntradep P s: New Curriculum DeevelopmentHaving successfully s navigated thhe ABET acccreditation pprocess in 20008, the depaartmentdeterminned it had eno ough experieence and forrmative feedbback to undeergo an exam mination of tthecurriculu um. Consideeration of thee results pressented abovee ultimately led to an iniitiation ofcurriculu um revision by b the BIOE EN faculty annd academicc affairs stafff. The first sstep consisteed ofa “Curricculum Summ mit,” in which
Page 24.1018.9[7] N, Friesen, "Defining Blended Learning". Technical report, 2012.[8] D. R. Garrison & H. Kanuka, “Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education.”The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 7, pp. 95–105, 2004. [9] S. Alexander, “Flexible Learning in Higher Education,” In: Editors-in-Chief: Penelope Peterson, Eva Baker andBarry McGaw, Editor(s)-in-Chief, International Encyclopedia of Education (Third Edition), Elsevier, Oxford, pp.441-447, 2010.[10] M. Driscoll, "Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype." E-learning 1.4, 2002.[11] Hoic-Bozic, Natasa, Vedran Mornar, and Ivica Boticki. "A blended learning approach to course design andimplementation." Education, IEEE Transactions on 52.1 (2009
–624 (2012).3. Tursz, T., et al; Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 177–183 (2011).4. Disease, Committee on A Framework for Developing a New Taxonomy of Disease, Board of Life Sciences, Division of Earth and Life Sciences, N. R. C. of E. N. A. Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease (2011). doi:10.17226/132845. Chivers, T. Genomics: the revolution that’s transforming medicine. The Telegraph6. Jordan, T. C. et al.; mBio 5, (2014).7. Daack-Hirsch, S. et al. Integrating Genetics and Genomics into Nursing Curricula. Nurs. Clin. North Am
challenges that mostengineers encounter in their professional careers.Bibliography[1] K. Topping, “Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 68. pp. 249–276, 1998.[2] K. Cho, C. D. Schunn, and R. W. Wilson, “Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives.,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 98. pp. 891–901, 2006.[3] N. Falchikov, “Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment,” Innovations in Education & Training International, vol. 32. pp. 175–187, 1995.[4] S. Pulford and A. C. Taylor, “Visual Communication Learning through Peer Design Critiques: Engineering Communication Across
-2975 Zenios S, Makower J, Yock P. (2010) Biodesign, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.6 https://www.citiprogram.org/index.cfm?pageID=265 Page 26.1762.5
in key concepts is not affected by differentinstructors and offered class times. Through engineering a board game students’improvement in innovation, prototyping, and design is strongly supported. Thisunique pedagogy is an effective measure for teaching and learning that can at anygrade level truly help students prepare for their senior design.Appendix 1Figure 8: A comparison of a board game and medical device. The left columnuses an example of the process a board game has to address before getting tomarket. The right column shows the process a medical device ,specifically a bloodglucose meter, needs to consider before market.References1. Malkoc A, Krause S, Ankeny CJ. Value of Student Resources in Materials
teamworking. Medical education, 40(2), 150-157. 5. De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & education, 46(3), 249-264. 6. Shaffer, D. W. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & education, 46(3), 223-234.
Coalition. 1998 FIE Conference, Session T1D.2. Sheppard S. et al., Examples of Freshman Design Education. Int. J. Engng Ed. Vol. 13 (4), p. 248-261, 1997.3. Cardella ME. et al., Students with Differing Design Processes as Freshmen: Care Studies on Change. Int. J. EngngEd. Vol. 24 (2), p. 246-259, 2008.4. Borrego M. et al., Team Effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied toengineering student project teams – A review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102 (4), p. 472-512, 2013.5. Adapted from BP Challenge: Encouraging hands-on learning, Fill It Up. Available at:http://www.starters.co.nz/bpchallenge-index.html.
Liquid Chromatography Laboratory (HLCL) which is designed to facilitate ablended learning mode. Page 22.1662.6 Figure 5: Actual LP Biologic Chromatography SystemLearning cyclesThe proposed blended learning cycle recommends a five-step approach to student learning: 1. use simulations and online materials to learn the theory and basic principles underlying protein purification; 2. use simulations to become familiar with a liquid column chromatography system, its components and their function; 3. perform virtual experiment(s); 4. evaluate knowledge and virtual skills, using a built-in assessment tool, before granting access
Agrawal R. Programming games to learn algorithms. Proceedings of theASEE Conference 2007.3. Bowen J. Motivating civil engineering students to learn computer programming with astructural design project. Proceedings of the ASEE Conference 2004.4. Bundy D. Four steps to teaching C programming. Proceedings of the Frontiers in EducationConference 2002.5. Clough D. Teaching introductory computing to ChE students - A modern computing coursewith emphasis on problem solving and programming. Proceedings of the ASEE Conference2002.6. Clough D, Chapra S and Huvard G. A change in approach to engineering computing forfreshmen - Similar directions at three dissimilar institutions. Proceedings of the ASEEConference 2001
to TTL levels for devicecontrol. For engineering programs that lack resources for extensive neural interface research,this game offer a less expensive, but no less educational, laboratory experience forundergraduates. The possibility for adaptation of these toys to control various devices for neuralinterface demonstrations is limited only by the imagination of an engineer.References (note to reviewers - references need formatted to ASEE standards)1 Reyes, Janet F. and Tosunoglu, Sabri, “An Overview of Brain-Computer Interface Technology Applications in Robotics” Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics. May 2011.2 Velliste, Meel; Perel, Sagi; Spalding, M. Chance; Whitford, Andrew S.; Schwartz, Andrew B. “Cortical control of
show good signal acquisition technique, goodacquired signals, an understanding of the underlying digital signal processing, and a reasonableresult. Of the 37 design teams to date, all but one was successful.Summary The ABPM Project is a freshman mini-project which is succeeding in realizing the objectivesidentified in this paper. Preliminary outcome assessment indicates that objectives are beingachieved, and suggests areas for improvement in both the assessment process and the projectitself.References [1 ] Caverly, R., Fulmar, H., Santhanam, S., Singh, P., O’Brien, J, Jones, G., Char, E., Mercede, F., Weinstein, R., and Yost, J., Project-Based Freshman Engineering Experience: The Core Course, ASEE Annual Meeting, 2010. [2 ] L