Conference Session

Pedagogical Developments in BME

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Craig Somerton, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Expansion Coefficient 1  ÷τ(η, T)  -1 δ =-   in K τ(η, T)  ÷T  P Page 14.838.4 Table 1 Transport Properties for Blood at 310 K and 101 kPa η∀ µ π k χ∀ Pr ∀ (Nt s/m2) (m2/s) (W/m K) (m2/s) 0.00 8.3040E-04 8.3603E-07 0.2907 7.2500E-08 11.53 0.06 9.7694E-04 9.8180E-07 0.3420 8.5568E-08 11.47 0.12 1.0742E-03 1.0776E-06 0.3760 9.4391E-08 11.42

Conference Session

Integrating Design into the BME Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amit Nimunkar, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Silas Bernardoni, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Tyler Lark, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Willis Tompkins, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

BME Department forproviding their continuous support, resources and encouragement. We would also like to thankfaculty members affiliated with the DELTA program, the College of Engineering and theCIRTL11 group at our university for their continued support (NSF Grant No. 0227592).References1.Biomedical Engineering Design, http://www.engr.wisc.edu/bme/courses/bme200.html2. K. Sanders, P. V. Farrell, and S. K. A. Pfatteicher, "Curriculum Innovation Using Job Design Theory," HumanFactors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, vol. 50, pp. 779-783, 2006.3. Introduction to Engineering, http://www.engr.wisc.edu/interegr/courses/interegr160.html4. Bernardoni S., Nimunkar A. J., Murphy J. and Courter S., “Student-initiated design and

Conference Session

Pedagogical Developments in BME

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Cawthorne, Purdue University; Osman Cekic, Purdue University; Monica Cox, Purdue University; Melissa Stacer, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

, G., Liu, S. Q., Smith, H. D., & Hirsch, P. (2006). Educational Modules in Tissue Engineering Based on the “How People Learn” Framework. BEE-j , 7.4. Birol, G., McKenna, A. F., Smith, H. D., Giorgio, T. D., & Brophy, S. P. (2002). Integration of the "How People Learn" Framework into Educational Module Development and Implementation in Biotechnology. Second Joint EMBS/BMES Conference (pp. 2640-2641). Houston: IEEE.5. Barr, R, Pandy, M, Petrosino, A, Austin, B and Goldberg, E. (2004). Classroom Testing of VaNTH Biomechanics Learning Modules. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Session 1109: 20 pages (2004).6. Greenberg, J.E., Smith, N.T. and Newman, J.H. Instructional Module

Conference Session

Integrating Design into the BME Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Chris Yoder, University of Pittsburgh; Phil Weilerstein, National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance; Angela Shartrand, National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

development, testing and preproduction, introduction and productionand life cycle management. Elements that were not specific to any one stage were then groupedinto a sixth “on-going” stage.The model is delineated as follows:≠ Stage one involves conceptualization of the product/technology, the identification of a potential target market, and competitor benchmarking. The project scope is then defined, resources are allocated, and technical feasibility and financial evaluations are conducted.≠ Stage two involves the design and physical development of the technology. A critical activity is an assessment of customers’ needs and specifications. Finally, a detailed design is created and a prototype(s) is developed.≠ The third stage ensured

Conference Session

BME Laboratory Courses and Experiences

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Micou, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

theirgraduate student or post-doctoral mentor than with their faculty mentors, although satisfactionwith both was generally high (Table 2). Participants felt like a welcome member of the universityand the department, the program left them with a positive impression of research, and they allwould recommend the program to a friend (Table 2). Participant Survey Results Ave ± SD My grad student and/or post-doc mentor(s)... was available to assist me 4.7 ± 0.7 had a positive impact on my experience 4.7 ± 0.7 My faculty mentor... Was available to assist me 4.0 ± 1.4

Conference Session

BME Laboratory Courses and Experiences

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy Allen, University of Virginia; Jeffrey Saucerman, University of Virginia; Jason Papin, University of Virginia; Shayn Peirce-Cottler, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

biological modeling approach to someone who already has a solid background in mathematics, cell biology, and physiology. You must provide your “student” with the known mechanisms of a particular disease (with which you yourself are already very familiar), and then teach this person to determine the appropriate length scale at which to model the disease process (e.g. cellular, molecular, tissue, etc.) and to identify functional modules in which to compartmentalize the model. Rate your current confidence level at accomplishing this task on a scale of 1-5 (5 being “extremely high confidence”).8. Would you feel comfortable picking up a book(s), researching journals, and integrating information across multiple length scales to set

Conference Session

BME Curriculum Development

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aura Gimm, Duke University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

twosemesters. The course integrated a number of lectures on specific nanoscale and biotechnologyconcepts, included fairly inexpensive “NanoLab” modules that required limited resources withadditional reading and homework material. The students also worked in teams to address someof engineering and/or design challenges facing bionanotechnology in the areas of nanomedicine,diagnostics, and other areas of their interest. The course with its flexible structure can be easilyadopted by other biomedical or bioengineering programs.AcknowledgementsWe are grateful to the National Science Foundation though the Nanotechnology UndergraduateEducation Award (award # EEC-0634230) for the support.References1. Irvine DJ, Stachowiak A, Jain S. “Engineering biomaterials

Conference Session

BME Laboratory Courses and Experiences

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Conrad Zapanta, Carnegie Mellon University; Warren Ruder, Carnegie Mellon University; Justin Newberg, Carnegie Mellon University; Paul Glass, Carnegie Mellon University; Davneet Minhas; Elvira Garcia Osuna, Carnegie Mellon University; Liang Tso Sun, Carnegie Mellon University; Alyssa Siefert, Carnegie Mellon University; Judy Shum, Carnegie Mellon University; Portia Taylor, Carnegie Mellon University; Arielle Drummond, Carnegie Mellon University; Bur Chu, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Conference Session

BME Curriculum Development

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sonya Seif-Naraghi, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

engineering student; must have completed four semesters at ASU or be withinthree semesters of graduation at the time of participation.Textbook(s): ≠ Recommended: Samovar, Larry, Richard Porter, Edwin McDaniel. Communication between cultures. ≠ Recommended: Rick Steve’s Guide to the destination city. ≠ Recommended: Lonely Planet Guide to the destination city.Course Objectives: ≠ Students will become aware of the differences in communication and interaction style of their host society. ≠ Students will develop an appreciation for and an understanding of the people in their host country. ≠ Students will be able to learn the necessary skills to function in a new environment. This will include: o Proper

Conference Session

Integrating Design into the BME Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University; Daniel Cavanagh, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

specific design functions and specifications. For thisassignment, teams must: 1) Identify up to 10 desired functions of their device, based upon the user needs and objective tree. 2) Categorize each function as either basic or secondary. 3) Explain how both convergent and divergent thinking were used to brainstorm and refine device functions. 4) Determine the appropriate design specification(s) for at least five of the identified functions. 5) Categorize each specification as procedural, prescriptive or performance.To support this assignment, accompanying lectures define a function as an operation a devicecan perform and a specification as a measurable attribute of a device. Emphasis is placed ontranslating imprecise user

Conference Session

BME Curriculum Development

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Regina Nelson, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Naomi Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

. & Peterson, P. (2001). A tool to measure adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering students. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Albuquerque, NM: ASEE.11. Harris, T.R., Bransford, J.D. & Brophy, S. (2002). Roles of learning sciences and learning technologies in biomedical engineering education: A review of recent advances. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering,4, 20-48.12. Pandy, M.G., Petrosino, A.J., Austin, B.A. & Barr, R.E. (2004). Assessing adaptive expertise in undergraduate biomechanics. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3): 211-222.13. Martin, T., Rayne, K., Kemp, N.J., Hart, J. & Diller, K.R. (2005). Teaching for adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Directions

Conference Session

Integrating Design into the BME Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristine Csavina, Florida Gulf Coast University; James Sweeney, Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

communicate your project with your industry 3.8 mentor(s)? Page 14.822.8 How prepared were you to document your work as you progressed through the 3.8 design process for your device?The instructors also asked the seniors to comment on what recommendations they would suggestto improve the Bioengineering Product Design course. Below are some of their comments: 1. Additional information about regulatory standards is needed. More information on prototyping and testing would be fun

Conference Session

Integrating Design into the BME Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Blair Rowley, Wright State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Project Based Introduction, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009. Page 14.370.93. Middendorf, W. and R. Engelemann. Design of Devices and Systems, 3rd ed.NewYork: Marcel Dekker, Inc.,1998.4. King, P. and R. Fries. Design of Biomedical Devices and Systems, 2nd ed. Boco Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009.5. Karsnitz, J., S. O’Brien, and J. Hutchinson. Engineering Design An Introduction, 1st ed. New York: Delmar, 2009.6. Eggert, B. “Achieving Team Work in design Projects: Development and Results of a SpreadSheet Tool.” 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburg, PA, June 2008.7. Zoltowski, C., W. Oakes, B. Myers. “Multi

Conference Session

Pedagogical Developments in BME

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mia Markey, University of Texas, Austin; Kathy Schmidt, University of Texas, Austin; Wonsoon Park, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

courses and these results indicate that weneed to look at how lectures are delivered to study the impact of these approaches. Are there Page 14.129.9specific needs that DL students seek when it comes to instructional delivery, for example? Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2009 American Society for Engineering EducationAlso, some local students indicated that some characteristics of their course(s), e.g. courseorganization and class size, negatively impact their learning. Further investigation is required onwhat the better or worse

Conference Session

Integrating Design into the BME Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia Mellodge; Brad Deschenes

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

-health-care-is-digital-panelists- say.aspx4. http://www.intel.com/healthcare/5. http://www-03.ibm.com/industries/healthcare/us/index.html6. http://www.microsoft.com/industry/healthcare/default.mspx7. S. Patel, K. Lorincz, R. Hughes, N. Huggins, J. Growdon, M. Welsh, and P. Bonato, “Analysis of Feature Space for Monitoring Persons with Parkinson's Disease With Application to a Wireless Wearable Sensor System,” 29th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, August, 2007.8. O.A. Blanson Henkemans, K.E. Caine, W.A. Rogers, A.D. Fisk, M.A. Neerincx, and B. de Ruter, “Medical Monitoring for Independent Living: User-centered design of smart home technologies for older adults,” Proceedings of the Med-e-Tel