Paper ID #23350Work in Progress: Teaching Effective Teamwork Skills in Biomedical Engi-neering Laboratory CoursesMs. Monica D. Okon, The Ohio State University Monica Okon, a current graduate student in biomedical engineering at Ohio State University, became in- terested in engineering education when starting as a graduate teaching associate (GTA) for the Engineering Education Department at Ohio State University. She has had the opportunity to teach the Fundamentals in Engineering laboratory component for the standard courses as well as served as a lead GTA for that department for two years. She is currently a lead GTA in
Paper ID #30210Work In Progress: Interfacing with microcontrollers: an onlinelaboratory learning experienceDr. Scott Howard Seidman PhD, University of Rochester American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WORK IN PROGRESS: INTERFACING WITH MICROCONTROLLERS: AN ONLINE LEARNING EXPERIENCEAn online learning experience for resident students entitled “Interfacing with Microcontrollers” has beendesigned and implemented. This is a 2-credit laboratory course offered in online format using theBlackboard LMS. This course, offered within the Department of Biomedical Engineering and
Paper ID #27395An Improved Cellphone-based Wearable Electrocardiograph Project for aBiomedical Instrumentation Course SequenceDr. Charles Carlson, Kansas State University Charles Carlson received a B.S. degree in Physics from Fort Hays State University in 2013 as well as B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University in 2013, 2015, and 2019, respectively. Charles is currently a Graduate Teaching and Research Assistant in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Kansas State University (KSU). He works in the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory and is interested in engineering
Paper ID #27966A Gold Nanoparticle-based Lab Experiment Sequence to Enhance Learningin Biomedical Nanotechnology at the Undergraduate LevelDr. Rachel C. Childers, University of Oklahoma Dr. Childers is an Assistant Professor and Chair of Undergraduate Studies in the Stephenson School of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She developed and teaches all of the Junior-level biomedical engineering lab courses (6 different core areas) within the department.Dr. Stefan Wilhelm, University of Oklahoma Stephenson School of Biomedical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education
student interest. Dr. Warren is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Dr. Charles Carlson, Kansas State University Charles Carlson received a B.S. degree in Physics from Fort Hays State University in 2013 as well as B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University in 2013, 2015, and 2019, respectively. Charles is currently a Graduate Teaching and Research Assistant in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Kansas State University (KSU). He works in the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory and is interested in engineering education, bioinstrumentation, and bioinformatics. He is a member of the American
, Avatars, StoryLines, Visualizations, Progress Bars, Punishments, Levels, Challenges, Feedback, and Phrases;all with the intended outcome of facilitating the end-user, or student, experience in the classroom[4].In this study, we pilot the use of the First-Person Shooter (FPS) perspective to deliver technicalcontent. First-person shooter (FPS) is a video game genre that relies on a first-personperspective; that is, the player experiences the action through the eyes of the protagonist. Theplayer is able to select tools and perform actions to help them on their quest – all through theeyes of the protagonist. In a biomedical engineering wet-laboratory environment, the mostcommon way to teach technical navigation and aseptic technique in a Biological
three or four coding objectives which aresubmitted and checked using MATLAB’s Grader software.Table 1: Laboratory activities focus on teaching and improving programming skill along with problem-solvingapplications relevant to Biomedical Engineering Title Concepts Application 1 Signal Properties Arrays, Indexing, Loops ECG Analysis, Descriptive Statistics 2 Systems of Equations Arrays, Curve Fitting Air Transport in Lungs (Windkessel Model) 3 Time and Frequency Domain Loops, FFT ECG Analysis, Pulse and Respiratory Rate Detection 4 Signal Processing Filtering ECG Analysis, Filtering 5
Engineering (BME) from The Ohio State University (OSU), before joining the OSU BME Department as an Assistant Professor of Practice in 2014. Her roles include designing and teaching undergraduate BME laboratory courses, and mentoring multidisciplinary senior capstone teams on rehabilitation engineering and medical device design projects. She also leads K-12 engineering outreach events, and is pursuing scholarship in student technical communication skills and preparing BME students for careers in industry. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress:Biomedical Engineering Students’ Perspectives on a Laboratory Technical Writing
scientific equipment, technology, and instrumentation,following technical protocols and demonstrating proficiency in physical laboratory techniques [2]are widely regarded as challenging to teach outside a traditional laboratory setting [3]. At-homelab kits are emerging instructional tools currently being used to address this challenge in a varietyof scientific courses, such as general biology [4], physics [5], chemistry [6], and engineeringcontrols [7]. To provide students enrolled in an online section of a cell and tissue engineering labcourse with hands-on activities for learning laboratory techniques, we prepared a kit containingthe equipment and supplies needed to perform various activities remotely. The overarching goalof the class is to
laboratories," Computers & Education, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 2054-2067, 2011/11/01/ 2011.[10] B. D. Jones, "Motivating students to engage in learning: The MUSIC model of academic motivation," International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 272-285, 2009.[11] B. Jones, "User guide for assessing the components of the MUSIC® Model of Motivation," ed, 2017.
Paper ID #33665WIP: Biomedical Sensors Laboratory Activities Using Labview andAdaptation for Virtual InstructionProf. Benjamin Hawkins, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo My professional interests focus on the development and use of microsystems (biosensors, microcon- trollers, etc) to matters of human health. Primarily this is focused on microfluidics, but also ranges from wearable devices to laboratory equipment. Applications range from cell measurements to ecological ques- tions. Educationally, I am focused on developing courses and content that connects theory to technology in practice, with an
Paper ID #30497Work In Progress: Utilizing Guided Worksheets to Address Gender Gap inTroubleshooting Laboratory CourseSabia Zehra Abidi, Rice University Abidi has a doctorate in biomedical engineering from the University of Texas, Austin. Her investigations in Professor Krishnendu Roy’s lab utilized in vitro 3-D polymer scaffolds and notch ligand functionalized microbeads to scale up the production of cells of hematopoietic lineage. Optimization of scaffold and microbead properties resulted in enhanced commitment to hematopoiesis and T cell lineage, respectively, demonstrating promise for cell substitutes in diseases of
Paper ID #33666WIP: Effectiveness of Different Reflection Approaches for ImprovingMastery in an Engineering Laboratory CourseMs. Amy N. Adkins, Northwestern University Amy N. Adkins is a PhD candidate in Biomedical Engineering at Northwestern University. She received her M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Northwestern and her B.S. in Engineering Science from St. Mary’s University in San Antonio. Her technical graduate research is focused on utilizing novel imaging techniques to quantifying adaptation of muscle architecture in humans. She also desires to implement innovative teaching, mentoring, and hands-on problem
innovative teaching methods proposed in the flipped classroommodel as described herein.This paper focuses on the implementation of a flipped classroom for an undergraduate biomedical engineeringintroductory biomechanics course consisting of 77 junior and senior engineering students. Key aspects of thiscourse included pre-recorded video lectures, interactive problem-based learning during in-class time, onlinehomework, and applied examples of course content experienced during laboratory sessions. Unique assistancein the development of this course was provided by graduate students who provided significant contributions tothe prep work needed to prepare a course for the flipped classroom model. The purpose of this paper was todetermine the effectiveness
percent of students agreeing with the givenstatement), a Chi-squared test was employed to analyze statistically significant differencesbetween each years’ results. A 95% confidence interval was used (p < 0.05) to indicatesignificant statistical difference in the year-to-year data.Results and DiscussionTo analyze how the structure of lecture/course delivery in a Biotransport Laboratory correlatedwith student perceptions of the course, we analyzed data from three years of student end-of-course evaluations. Assessments of overall satisfaction with the course, course content, coursestructure, and teaching methods are analyzed to quantify the difference between the 3 yearsbeing studied.Overall course satisfactionStudents were asked to rank their
teams. The deliverablefor each module was a laboratory report graded for mastery of the aforementioned problemsolving skills.Here, we will describe our assessment of SBG implementation in terms of student attitude andstudent achievement. We measured student attitude through the use of reliable and validatedsurveys that 1) assess the value of SBG based on motivation theory and 2) confidence inscientific literacy.5,6 Student attitude was assessed at the end of the term. The student valuesurvey measured interest, utility, and cost of SBG. The scientific literacy survey measuredstudent confidence levels on a scale of “1-not at all confident” to “5-very confident”. The surveywas administered at the beginning and end of the quarter. To understand
Paper ID #22649Work in Progress: Developing Assignments to Reinforce Process Knowledgefor a Medical Equipment Troubleshooting Laboratory CourseDr. Renata Fortuna Ramos, Rice University Renata Ramos is an Associate Teaching Professor and the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the De- partment of Bioengineering at Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005: rfr1@rice.eduMiss Kathryn Kundrod, Rice University Kathryn Kundrod is pursuing her PhD with Dr. Rebecca Richards-Kortum at Rice University. She works toward the development of low-cost HPV tests for cervical cancer screening. c American Society
Paper ID #27353Retrospective Multi-year Analysis of Team Composition Dynamics and Per-formance within a Yearlong Integrative BME Laboratory SequenceDr. Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia Dr. Timothy E. Allen is an Associate Professor and Interim Undergraduate Program Director in the De- partment of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received a B.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bioengineering at the University of Cal- ifornia, San Diego. Dr. Allen’s teaching activities include coordinating the core undergraduate teaching labs and the Capstone Design
Paper ID #33650Work in Progress: Creative Biomechanics Project Using an InteractiveDigital Experience as an Alternative Laboratory (IDEAL) – Phase 2Dr. Elizabeth Mays, Michigan State University Elizabeth earned her BSE and MSE in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. She then earned her PhD in Biomedical Engineering from Wayne State University, Detroit, MI. Elizabeth is currently a Post-doctoral Research Associate at Michigan State University, with a focus on Engineering Education research, specifically with using creative teaching methods to encourage student engagement, learning, and
Paper ID #23488Work in Progress: An Economical and Open-source Mechanical Testing De-vice for Biomaterials in an Undergraduate Biomechanics Laboratory CourseDr. Julien Henri Arrizabalaga, University of OklahomaDr. Matthias U. Nollert, University of OklahomaDr. Rachel C Childers, University of Oklahoma Dr. Childers is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Stephenson School of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She developed and teaches all of the Junior-level biomedical engineering lab courses (6 different core areas) within the department. c American Society for Engineering
directly from BME instructors about their laboratory and project-based courses (including senior design). Survey participants were asked to provide informationon each laboratory course that they currently teach. Participants were asked course structure,credit hours, techniques taught, and methods of assessment. Participants were given the option toupload a course syllabus.Survey Data Collection. Survey data were collected under institution IRB approval. Surveyquestions reported are listed in Appendix 1. The survey was advertised through informationcards passed out to attendees at the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) annual meeting inthe fall of 2019 and through emails to the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Biomedical
Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring an inquiry-based learning with peer-teaching pedagogy in a physiological signals lab courseIntroduction and BackgroundActive learning can support meaningful engagement with science concepts and practices, whichhas been known to improve students’ affect toward science [1]. Professors recognize theopportunity for students to engage in such active learning during laboratory courses and haveemployed successful methods of doing so that foster meaningful engagement [2,3,4]. Onemethod of active learning and enhancing student engagement is using inquiry-based learning in alaboratory environment. This method also helps to develop creativity and critical thinking skills[8,9] which are
Paper ID #22451Teaching Genomics and Genomic Technologies to Biomedical Engineers: Build-ing Skills for the Genomics WorldDr. Karen R. Thickman, University of Washington Karen R. Thickman is a lecturer in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Washington. She received an A.B. in biophysical chemistry from Dartmouth College, and a Ph.D. in molecular bio- physics from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. She was an assistant teaching professor at Carnegie Mellon University in the Computational Biology Department for five years before transitioning to the University of Washington. Thickman’s teaching
Analysis (FEA) and 2) biomechanics of body motion that requires themotion tracking system. However, setting up these two types of experiments can lead to asignificant financial investment in the laboratory. Worst of all, it is often very challenging tosynchronize data collected from different types of experiments. Without the properlysynchronized data collected from tissue mechanical test and body motion analysis, the studentswill have difficulty understanding the causality between the biomechanics of body motion andtissue mechanics A successful example of the implementing FEA simulation in tissuebiomechanics lecture1 or the introduction of a digital image motion analysis in the lecture tocover biomechanics of body motion2 were reported in the
computationalanalysis were compared to students who only participated in the computational research project.The initial results indicate that there was no significant difference between the survey responsesof the two groups and that a computational CURE may have similar impact without including atraditional lab component. Further study of the project design and impact on students is plannedfor future semesters.IntroductionMost CUREs have been designed for laboratory courses or for joint lecture and laboratorycourses. This model works well for investigations in molecular biology or chemistry, but manycomputational research tools are taught in a lecture course only. There is evidence that lecturecourses can also be improved with the CURE model. The Genome Solver
Paper ID #28879Work in Progress: Embedded Ethical Inquiry and Reflection in aBiomedical Engineering CurriculumDr. Sharon Miller, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Dr. Miller is the Undergraduate Program Director and Clinical Associate Professor of Biomedical Engi- neering at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). After earning her BS in Materials Science and Engineering from Purdue University (West Lafayette), she earned her MS and PhD degrees at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor). Her current roles include teaching, assisting in program assess- ment, student advising, and helping
. Engineering education research includes curriculum and laboratory development of biomechanics and bio-signal processing concepts.Dr. David V.P. Sanchez, University of Pittsburgh David Sanchez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and the Assistant Director for the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation. His research is focused on fus- ing sustainability principles and design thinking to address the Water and Energy grand challenges in the natural and built environment. Current projects include: Renewable electrode materials for Bioelectro- chemical systems, Recirculating Aquaponic Systems, Environmental Quality wireless sensor networks, and incorporating Sustainable Design
Paper ID #22013Creating New Labs for an Existing Required Biomedical Engineering Imag-ing CourseDr. Elizabeth Kathleen Bucholz, Duke University Dr. Bucholz is an Assistant Professor of the Practice for the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and has served as the Associate Director of Undergraduate Studies for the Department of Biomedical Engineering in the Pratt School of Engineering for the past four years. She has been teaching for the department for 7 years, and graduated from Duke University with a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engi- neering in 2008 from the Center for In Vivo Microscopy under the guidance of
, teaching and assessing upper-level Biomedical Engineering laboratory courses, with particular interest in improving student technical communication skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Improving Biomedical Engineering Students’ Technical Writing through Rubrics and Lab Report Re- SubmissionsIntroductionGraduates from ABET accredited engineering programs are expected to demonstrate an ability tocommunicate effectively [1-2]. Technical writing skills are particularly difficult to teach andeven more time consuming to assess [3], often limiting the number of opportunities students aregiven to practice and improve throughout their
Paper ID #23512Guided Modules Emphasizing Process-Based Troubleshooting Techniques HelpBelow-Average Performing Students Improve Instrumentation SkillsDr. Renata Fortuna Ramos, Rice University Renata Ramos is an Associate Teaching Professor and the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the De- partment of Bioengineering at Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005: rfr1@rice.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Guided Modules Emphasizing Process-Based Troubleshooting Techniques Help Below-Average Performing Students Improve Instrumentation SkillsAbstractInstrumentation laboratory