Paper ID #34988Teaching Social Justice to Engineering StudentsDr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington Dr. Dianne Hendricks is a Lecturer in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering and the Director of the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Washington. She designs and teaches courses involving universal design, technical communication, ethics, and diversity, equity and inclusion. She co-founded HuskyADAPT (Accessible Design and Play Technology), where she mentors UW students in design for local needs experts with disabilities. She also leads STEM outreach activities for
redesigned a project in an introductory bioengineering course to explore stress managementtechniques through physiology, biosensors, and design. The project allows students to developdesign skills and to explore the impact of wellness practices on human physiology. Assessmentof the curricular redesign will be measured by student evaluations of the offering and theirwillingness to engage in the mindfulness portion of the course. The COVID-19 pandemic hasemphasized the need to focus on student wellbeing in addition to physical health. Integration ofwellness into the core curriculum promotes the use of existing campus resources presented inclass and may normalize the use of these resources within engineering departments and colleges.Ultimately, the
, requires programs to evaluate students’ “ability to applyengineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs…” (ABET EAC 2019-2020SO 2). This major design experience, typically a senior capstone project, should include theculmination of the foundational materials students learn during their course of study. ABET hasalso defined “engineering design” which includes many concepts of Design Thinking (DT). DTis a multistep process that begins with the formalization of the problem statement and movesthrough implementation of possible solutions with the needs of the end-user in mind. There areseveral ‘flavors’ of design thinking available and we have been following the 5-step designthinking process described by Plattner 2010 where the
Paper ID #23347Patient Centered Design in Undergraduate Biomedical EngineeringDr. Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia Dr. Timothy E. Allen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received a B.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bioengineering at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Allen’s teaching activities include coordinating the core undergraduate teaching labs and the Capstone Design sequence in the BME department at the University of Virginia, and his research interests are in the fields of
Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech is currently infusing entrepreneurial minded learning and critical reflection throughout the undergraduate curriculum. One unique aspect of this effort is the creation of studentfaculty partnerships that are focused on developing more entrepreneurially minded and reflective pedagogy within specific core courses. In this pilot effort, eight biomedical engineering students were recruited based on previous course experience, academic performance, and expressed interest in entrepreneurially minded learning and course development. These student partners formed a core team of course implementation assistants (CIA) that were overseen and supported by one faculty member serving as team leader. Six
. Krystina CallahanDr. Kimberly L Bothi, University of Delaware Dr. Kim Bothi has a multidisciplinary background in engineering and social sciences, with research and consulting experience across a range of developing country contexts. She earned a Ph.D. in global community-based resource management from Cornell University (2012), and holds earlier degrees in en- vironmental engineering from Cornell (MS, 2007) and McGill University (BSc.Eng., 2000). As Director of Global Engineering in the University of Delaware’s College of Engineering, Kim is responsible for expanding opportunities for students, staff and faculty to engage in cross-disciplinary, globally-minded research and academic programming. In 2016 and 2017, Kim co
crosslistedas a multidisciplinary course in the School of Arts, Science, and Engineering at the University ofRochester instructs on how to interface sensors and actuators with microcontrollers in order to makemeasurements and control objects in the real world.While learning objectives for this course center around teaching students to properly interfacemicrocontrollers with sensors and actuators, the course was designed with a number of meta-objectivesin mind. One such goal is the desire to enhance the employability of our engineering students byproviding them with more and earlier opportunities to acquire and demonstrate technical knowledge andskills, which have been shown to be very important to engineering employers [1] Second, this initiativesought
and Applied Sciences at Columbia University. This course was targeting the higher levels oflearning as described by Bloom’s taxonomy. At the end of the course, we aimed for the students to be: a. Able to define nanobiotechnology in the context of modern science and engineering, b. Capable of understanding and interpreting concepts such as intermolecular bonds, adsorption and binding/unbinding processes, nanoscale transport mechanisms, and degradation mechanisms at the nanoscale, c. Comfortable in estimating orders of magnitude of objects that relate to engineering, d. Capable of comparing and evaluating research papers related to nanobiotechnology with a critical mind, e. Able to take a position towards an
, “People need people: students feeling impacts of online school isolation,” Ryerson Folio, November 4th 2020[2] J. Bailenson, “Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue,” Technology, Mind, and Behavior, Volume 2, Issue 1, Feb 23, 2021[3] M.J. Callaghan, K. McCusker, J. Lopez Losada, J.G. Harkin & S. Wilson (2009) Engineering Education Island: Teaching Engineering in Virtual Worlds, Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 8:3, 2-18, DOI: 10.11120/ital.2009.08030002
Paper ID #33978Work in Progress: Promoting Equitable Team Dynamics in an IntroductoryBiomedical Engineering CourseDr. Jennifer H. Choi, University of California, Davis Jennifer Choi is currently an Associate Professor of Teaching in the Department of Biomedical Engineer- ing (BME) at UC Davis. In addition to teaching core undergraduate courses, Jennifer is aimed at integrat- ing engineering design principles and hands-on experiences throughout the curriculum, and playing an active role in the senior design course. She has interests in engineering education, curricular innovation, as well as impacting the community through
Paper ID #26410The Teaching Assistant’s Perspective on Flipping an Undergraduate Biome-chanics CourseDr. Christa M. Wille, University of Wisconsin, Madison Christa Wille is a Biomedical Engineering doctoral student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She received an undergraduate degree in Biomedical Engineering and went on to get her clinical doctorate in Physical Therapy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She advanced her clinical skills through a Sports Physical Therapy Residency at UW Health. Although continuing to practice Physical Therapy, Christa has returned to academia to continue to pursue research
Paper ID #30525Work in Progress. Building a Learning Continuum: Forging ConnectionsAcross a Bioengineering Curriculum for Improved Student LearningDr. Sabrina Jedlicka Jedlicka, Lehigh UniversityProf. Eugene Thomas Pashuck, Lehigh UniversityDr. Susan F. Perry, Lehigh University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020WIP: Building a Learning Continuum: Forging Connections Across a Bioengineering Curriculum for Improved Student LearningAbstract:It is becoming increasingly clear that higher education must adapt to address the needs and learningstyles of a new generation of students and to
beformulated. Often with undergraduates, and many writers in general, the most difficult anddebilitating part of a writing assignment can be taking a persuasive stance and building a paperor piece with the power to change the reader’s mind. Scaffolding can be categorized as pre-writing, the first stage of the three stage writing process, which is then followed by writing andrewriting. According to Murray, the prewriting stage can commonly take up to 85% of the totaltime spent on the assignment [4]. In addition to strengthening students’ writing, the emphasis onwriting as process also has positive impacts on content learning [4]. Using this scaffolding skillin engineering classes would provide an effective mechanism to train students to become
educators'essay collection. Arlington, VA: Nation Science Teacher Association PressByrne EP, Desha CJ, Fitzpatrick JJ, and Hargroves K (2010). “Engineering education forsustainable development: a review of international progress”. International Symposiumfor Engineering Education. 14Caine RN ed (2009) 12 Brain/mind learning principles in action: Developing executivefunctions of the human brain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Canziani BF, Sönmez S, Hsieh J and Byrd ET (2012) “A Learning Theory Frameworkfor Sustainability Education in Tourism”. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism,12(1):3-20.Casti J and Karlqvist A Eds (1986). Complexity, Language, and Life
] Wilke, R. R. (2003). The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a humanphysiology course for nonmajors. Advances in physiology education, 27(4), 207-223.[9] Hylton, B. J., Mikesell, D., Yoder, J. D., & LeBlanc, H. (2020). Working to instill theentrepreneurial mindset across the curriculum. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1),86-106.[10] Gorlewicz, J. L., Jayaram, S. (2020). Instilling curiosity, connections, and creating valuein entrepreneurial minded engineering: Concepts for a course sequence in dynamics andcontrols. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 60-85.[11] Rae, D., Melton, D. E. (2017). Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in US engineeringeducation: an international view of the KEEN
System (VOS)," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, pp. 413-431, 2008.[6] D. Silverthorn, "Developing a concepts-based physiology curriculum for bioengineering: A VaNTH project," in Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 2002. 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society EMBS/BMES Conference, 2002. Proceedings of the Second Joint, 2002, pp. 2646-2647.[7] S. S. Klein and R. D. Sherwood, "Biomedical engineering and cognitive science as the basis for secondary science curriculum development: A three year study," School Science and Mathematics, vol. 105, pp. 384-401, 2005.[8] N. R. Council, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded
without the knowledge, skills, and confidence required forengineering design success. With these shortcomings in mind, we integrated design experiencesacross our BME curriculum and evaluated student design performance throughout.Methods: Four engineering design project assignments were developed and integrated intosophomore- and junior-level BME laboratory courses, establishing a continuous design thread inthe curriculum. Through the sequence of projects, student teams worked to design (1) fracturefixation plates, (2) electromyogram-controlled motor systems, (3) compact spectrophotometers,and (4) drug dosing devices. We also developed a common instructional Design Module andused it in each course to build student understanding of the BME design
. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2234–2250.https://doi-org.libproxy.temple.edu/10.1111/bjet.12843[10] Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R. (2000) How people learn: brain, mind,experience, and school. National Research Council. Washington D.C.[11] Van Rossum, G. (2007, June). Python Programming Language. In USENIX annual technicalconference (Vol. 41, p. 36).[12] K. J. Millman and M. Aivazis (March-April 2011) Python for Scientists and Engineers.Computing in Science & Engineering, 13(2), 9-12, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.36.
nano educational labs, as well as mentoring students in their senior capstone projects. His current projects include indus- try integration in the curriculum, undergraduate professional development, and entrepreneurial minded learning in the classroom.Amena Shermadou, Ohio State University Amena Shermadou is an Engineering Education graduate student at The Ohio State University. She received her Bachelors and Masters in Biomedical Engineering from Wright State University, in Day- ton, Ohio. Her experience with teaching first-year engineering students has led to research interests in curriculum development, student empowerment and the development of holistic engineers through the collaboration with engineering
their senior capstone projects. His current projects include indus- try integration in the curriculum, undergraduate professional development, and entrepreneurial minded learning in the classroom.Dr. Nathan Hyungsok Choe, The Ohio State University Dr. Nathan (Hyungsok) Choe is a research assistant professor in department of engineering education at the Ohio State University. He obtained his PhD in STEM education at UT Austin. His research focuses on the development of engineering identity in graduate school and underrepresented group. Dr. Choe holds master’s and bachelor’s degrees in electrical engineering from Illinois Tech. He also worked as an engineer at LG electronics mobile communication company.Amena Shermadou
in the department of biomedical engineering at The Ohio State University. He holds a B.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Puerto Rico Mayag¨uez, and a M.S. and PhD in biomedical engineering from The Ohio State University. His current position entails teaching measurements and instrumentation courses, leading micro and nano educational labs, as well as mentoring students in their senior capstone projects. His current projects include indus- try integration in the curriculum, undergraduate professional development, and entrepreneurial minded learning in the classroom.Amena Shermadou, Ohio State University Amena Shermadou is an Engineering Education graduate student at The Ohio State University. She
Paper ID #27420Board 7: Work in Progress: Approaches to Introduce Biomedical Engineer-ing Design to a Class with Diverse STEM BackgroundsMs. Angela Lai, Carnegie Mellon University Angela is a current 5th year PhD student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Carnegie Mel- lon University. She is actively involved in mentoring undergraduate and graduate students in both the laboratory and in the classroom and promoting the field of BME to the younger generations.Ms. Elaine Soohoo, Carnegie Mellon University Elaine is a 5th year PhD student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity
Paper ID #32483Applying the Framework of Fink’s Taxonomy to the Design of a HolisticCulminating Assessment of Student Learning in Biomedical EngineeringDr. Emily Dosmar, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology B.S. Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Ph.D. Biomedical Engineering, Illi- nois Institute of Technology Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. B. Audrey Nguyen, The University of Akron B.S. Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University M.S. Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University Ph.D. Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Paper ID #33783Development Of Quantitative Methodologies For Analyzing BiomedicalEngineering Resumes And Their Use In Career Pathway AlignmentMr. Tristan McCarty, University of Florida Tristan received his B.S. and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from the J. Crayton Pruitt Family De- partment of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Florida. He will begin studying to complete a doctoral degree in Bioengineering from the University of California, Riverside in Fall 2021.Dr. Sarah Corinne Rowlinson Furtney, University of Florida Sarah Rowlinson received the B.S. degree in biomedical engineering from the University of Miami
, adsorption and binding/unbinding processes, nanoscale transport mechanisms, and degradation mechanisms at the nanoscale, 3. Comfortable in estimating orders of magnitude of objects that relate to engineering, 4. Capable of comparing and evaluating research papers related to nanobiotechnology with a critical mind, 5. Able to take a position towards an engineering-related question and defend their position in front of others, 6. Able to describe examples of applications and outline the state of the art in nanobiotechnology, 7. Able to contribute to and build upon team ideas through discussion. 3.2 Designing the course Once the learning objectives were set, the structure of the class was considered as a
] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3. pp. 223–231, 2004.[22] P. T. Terenzini, A. F. Cabrera, C. L. Colbeck, J. M. Parente, and S. A. Bjorklund, “Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students’ reported learning gains,” J. Eng. Educ. Washingt., vol. 90, no. 1, p. 123, Jan. 2001.[23] How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2000.[24] W. C. Newstetter and M. D. Svinicki, Learning theories for engineering education practice. 2014.[25] E. B. Moje, “Doing and Teaching Disciplinary Literacy with Adolescent Learners: A Social and Cultural
. Rzasa, J.C. Wise, “Developing and Assessing Student’s Entrepreneurial Skills and Mind-Set”. Journal of Engineering Education; vol. 94, no. 2: ProQuest pg. 233, April 2005.11. East Carolina University http://www.ecu.edu/12. J. Ackerman and R. Schaar, "Clinical Observational Design Experience: A large design oriented clinical immersion course based in emergency departments," 2016, [OnLine] Available: http://search.proquest.com.jproxy.lib.ecu.edu/docview/1822614297?accountid=1063913. R.H. Allen, S. Acharya, C. Jancuk, A.A. Shoukas, “Sharing Best Practices in Teaching Biomedical Engineering Design”. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1869-1879, September 2013.14. J. Kadlowec, T. Merrill, R.A. Hirsh, S. Sood
) courses supports thetwo objectives above and improves both student engagement and retention [1], [3], [5], [9], [12]–[17]. With this in mind, the School of Biomedical Engineering at Colorado State Universitysought to improve the 100-level Introduction to Biomedical Engineering course (BIOM-101).This high enrollment (approximately 150 student) course is required for all undergraduatestudents pursuing a biomedical engineering major or minor and is typically taken the first fall ofenrollment in the degree program. The course has been offered every fall for the past seven yearsand, until 2016, was almost exclusively lecture-based with little to no formalized in-class peer-to-peer interaction. In Fall 2015, the course met three times per week
Paper ID #33385Teaching an Immersive Experiential Introductory Biomedical EngineeringCourse in the Land of Covid (AKA: An Old Dog Has to Learn New Tricks)Dr. Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University IEEE Life Fellow, AIMBE Founding Fellow, U.N.E.S.C.O. Academician. Director, Center for Rehabilita- tion Engineering, Science, and Technology (CREST), and Shulman Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY. (Retired) Senior Rehab Research Career Scientist, VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY. Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical