, Northeastern University Dr. Lucas Landherr is an associate teaching professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Northeastern University, conducting research in engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 How we teach: Unit Operations LaboratoryAbstractOne of the truly distinctive elements of a chemical engineering undergraduate experience isworking with larger-scale process equipment in a laboratory setting. Unit Operations coursesseek to expose students to the type and scale of equipment they are likely to see in industry andto equip them with the ability to analyze the behavior of these systems as well as have a true“feel” for how they work (or don’t work
Laboratory Edith Gummer is the Director of the Classroom-Focused Research and Evaluation Program for the Center for Classroom Teaching and Learning at the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. She coordinated the structure of the research design and the data collection and analysis processes of the project. She has been faculty in science and mathematics education quantitative and qualitative research design courses at the doctoral level. She has been involved in the development of innovative mathematics curricular activities and formative assessment in mathematics problem solving.Philip Harding, Oregon State University Philip Harding holds the Linus Pauling Chair in the School of
courses. Students can earn a resource as they successfullycomplete assignments, increasing their grade as the semester progresses. Earning things basedon successfully completing assignments, as opposed to losing things based on poor performance,can alter student perceptions of the class and give them a more positive attitude toward learning9.While it is still difficult to judge if adding game elements actually contributes to student learningor retention, and while gamification is not a “magic bullet” that can be applied to every course toequal effect, it can allow students to associate the course material with positive reinforcement1,10.Additionally, the novelty of the teaching style can be memorable to students11.2. Previous Laboratory
Paper ID #12331A Unit Operations Laboratory Experiment Combined with a Computer Sim-ulation to Teach PID Controller TuningDr. William M. Clark, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Professor Clark holds B.S. and Ph.D degrees in Chemical Engineering from Clemson University and Rice University, respectively. He has been teaching in the Chemical Engineering Department at Worcester Polytechnic Institute since 1986. His teaching interests include thermodynamics, separations processes and unit operations laboratory. He conducts research in separations processes and teaching and learning, particularly in combining laboratory experience
Paper ID #12940The Effectiveness of In-Class, Hands-On Learning vs. Lecture for TeachingAbout Shell and Tube Heat ExchangersDr. Paul B Golter, Washington State University Paul B. Golter obtained an MS and PhD Washington State University and made the switch from Instruc- tional Laboratory Supervisor to Post-Doctoral Research Associate on an engineering education project. His research area has been engineering education, specifically around the development and assessment of technologies to bring fluid mechanics and heat transfer laboratory experiences into the classroom.Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University
Paper ID #8178Solving Material Balance Problems at Unsteady State using a Remote Labo-ratory in the classroomDr. Darinka del Carmen Ramirez, Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey (ITESM), M´exico Dr. Darinka del Carmen Ram´ırez Hern´andez has been a professor in the Chemical Engineering Depart- ment of Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey (ITESM) in Campus Monterrey, M´exico since 1996. She also works on the Virtual Laboratory Project at ITESM. Dr. Ram´ırez earned a Ph.D. in Innovation in Education from ITESM in 2011, an M.S. in Chemical Engineering from ITESM in 1989, and a B.S. in Biochemical Engi- neering from IT La Paz in 1987. She teaches to
simulations.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation under thegrant TUES 1245482. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References 1. Bowen, A. S., Reid, D. R., & Koretsky, M. D. (2015). Development of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Difficult Concepts in Thermodynamics. Chemical Engineering Education 49(4), 229- 238. 2. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R.. (2003). Enhancing teaching-learning environments in undergraduate courses. Occasional Report, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment, The University of Edinburgh
Paper ID #16947Flipped Laboratories in Chemical & Biomolecular EngineeringDr. Lauren Sefcik Anderson, Lafayette College Dr. Anderson is Associate Professor and Acting Head of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at Lafayette College. She received a BS in Chemical Engineering from Lafayette College in 2004 and a PhD in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia in 2009. She is the recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. Dr. Anderson teaches courses in transport phenomena, experimen- tal design, biomolecular engineering, and material science, including biomaterials. Her research area combines
Paper ID #25970How We Teach: ThermodynamicsDr. Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, and in the ways hands-on activities such as making
a three-day Teaching Writing Workshop and monthlyworkshops hosted by the WC.Our rationale for submitting a proposal was to improve integration of writing into the chemicalengineering senior laboratory courses through collaboration with the Writing Center. We wereinterested in integrating more effective technical writing assignments into the senior-levelECHM 442/443: Unit Operations course sequence in order to better meet our ABET assessmentoutcomes, which includes “Develop technical writing and oral communication skills.” Moreimportantly, we wanted our students to be better prepared for the demands of their careers. Asseniors, they will soon enter the workforce. Based on quality of the current required lab reports,we felt there was room for
Paper ID #32851Innovative Use of Technologies to Teach Chemical Engineering CoreClasses and Laboratories During the Covid-19 Pandemic at an HBCUDr. Rupak Dua, Hampton University Dr. Rupak Dua graduated with a Ph.D. in 2014 in Biomedical Engineering with a specialization in Tis- sue Engineering and Biomaterials from Florida International University located in Miami, FL. Dr. Dua worked for two years as a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Institute of Orthopedic Research and Education housed in Texas Medical Center - the world’s largest medical center - located in Houston, TX. Before joining Hampton University in the Department of
process is toencourage life-long learning skills. A crucial component of this endeavor is to follow thegraduates and to observe whether the stated outcomes of an undergraduate curriculum are metfollowing graduation.3. Course StructureThe three consecutive UOL courses offered in chemical engineering curriculum have twopurposes: firstly, introducing fundamental transport concepts to students enabling them toreinforce core courses and secondly, teaching how to design/implement experiments and lastlyemphasizing critical thinking on the processes. In industry, engineers are often responsible forpractical laboratory issues in order to meet the requirements for experimental data in developinga new product and to test a product whether the product or
to give students direct exposure to the basics of the practice.Our approach aligns closely with the AIChE/SAChE guidelines for teaching safety and design,allowing students to gain appreciation for the importance and rigor of the process, providingsimple guidelines to help students identify and characterize potential hazards, and exposingundergraduates to What-If analyses to reinforce the idea that hazards can be controlled ormitigated with appropriate design.MethodologyProcess Hazard Analyses are being integrated in two successive courses, Unit Operations(Laboratory Practice and Statistical Analysis) and Process Design and Optimization. In bothcourses, after an introductory presentation defining Process Hazard Analyses, students are asked
Paper ID #7241How We Teach: Capstone DesignDr. David L. Silverstein, University of Kentucky Dr. David L. Silverstein is the PJC Engineering professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Kentucky and director of the College of Engineering’s Extended Campus Programs in Paducah, Ky., where he has taught for thirteen years. His Ph.D. and M.S. studies in Chemical Engineering were com- pleted at Vanderbilt University, and his B.S. in Chemical Engineering at the University of Alabama. Dr. Silverstein’s research interests include conceptual learning tools and training, and he has particular in- terests in faculty
. Page 22.588.6Conclusions This work describes the results of integrating an ethics case study in Senior UnitOperations Laboratory over a two year period. The data obtained from post course surveysrevealed several findings. First, students feel that learning ethics is important, and that casestudies were a useful tool in doing so. Second, we need to consider if teaching ethics is useful,because it is often a function of how students are raised. Finally, choosing the “right” personnel(i.e. one that is engaging and possesses a relevant industrial background) for this project isimportant for delivering a positive experience for students.References[1] American Institute of Chemical Engineering , AICHE Code of Ethics, Accessed January 18,2011
Paper ID #12614Results & Lessons Learned from a Chemical Engineering Freshman DesignLaboratoryProf. Anthony Edward Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Assistant Professor (Lecturing) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and
AC 2010-1373: FERMENTATION LABORATORY EXERCISE HELPS FIRSTYEAR STUDENTS UNDERSTAND LOG-TRANSFORMED VARIABLESPolly Piergiovanni, Lafayette CollegeJ. Ronald Martin, Lafayette College Page 15.580.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Fermentation Laboratory Exercise Helps First Year Students Understand Log-Transformed Variables in Linear RegressionAbstractLafayette College’s Introduction to Engineering course offers students a chance to learn aboutfive branches of engineering. The students spend approximately three weeks with faculty fromeach branch, and complete three laboratory exercises during that time. In the chemicalengineering branch, the
of Arkansas. His research interests include fluid mixing and process design. Professor Penney is a registered professional engineer in the state of Arkansas. Page 11.857.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Laboratory Demonstrations/Experiments in Free and Forced Convection Heat TransferIntroductionA number of papers have been written recently on methods for improving or supplementing theteaching of heat transfer including the use of spreadsheets to solve two-dimensional heat transferproblems1, a new transport approach to teaching turbulent thermal convection2, the use
tools such as CATME[9], which have also been testedin the past for this laboratory; however, through this study, a shorter and faster assessment tool toperform peer evaluation was tested in a laboratory teaching environment which is primarily basedon group reports. The commitment to sign a form describing the individual contributions to thereport seems to foster the individual accountability and assigned efforts. Future efforts shouldfocus on comparing different peer-assessment tools during the same semester to evaluate theefficacy of each tool. Nonetheless, this could create resistance from the students, which couldhinder teaching and learning aspects of the class, and a careful approach must be taken whenmultiple assessments are given in a
Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009 and 2015, respectively. His primary areas of research are game-based learning in engineering courses and membrane separations for desalination and water purification.Dr. Gregory T. Neumann, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Gregory received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and later received his Ph.D. in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering from the University of Notre Dame. his research interests are in heterogeneous catalysis as well as engineering pedagogy, in particular, the overlap of the technical research with teaching to improve the quality of laboratory learning
(e.g., reverse osmosis, spray drying, injection molding) toobtain practical experience of atypical chemical engineering unit operations. At the end of thesemester, and after completing the required experiments, students are required to propose a finalexperiment with defined experimental objective(s) and parameters or variables to study. For thepast twenty years, at the authors’ institution, the final experiment has been an open-endedexperience; however, students occasionally struggle to identify and perform a detailed study dueto limited exposure to an experimental research environment and lack of directions. Additionallimitations include costs, laboratory time, and equipment availability.During Fall 2018, the instructors teaching the
size.Commonly accepted and literature proven methods of instruction are commonly applied withinthe course. Use of “clickers” is common both as formative assessment and as a teaching tool.Resources supporting an emphasis on conceptual learning, such as publication of conceptualquestions online, are increasing. Problem based learning approaches are common, as arelaboratories. Many programs are utilizing improved simulations of laboratories to obtain learningoutcomes similar to laboratory exercises. Active learning approaches are widespread and varied,and those who use them are satisfied that they are effective.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all of the instructors who completed this survey; the departmentchairs who passed on the request
survey characterized the current offerings of processcontrol as marked by transition. Both Laplace and time domain approaches are being utilized,computing tools and modern pedagogies are changing teaching approaches, and increasingenrollments are challenging the incorporation of physical laboratory exercises. Even with thecommonalities the course shares across implementations, like many chemical engineeringcourses there remains a wide range of approaches to teaching the course and a diverse selectionof topics taught.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all of the instructors who completed this survey; the departmentchairs who forwarded the request; Frances Petrozelli who collected online information aboutcourse instructors of record
combination, percent Percent of labs 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Sapon/ester-ification Petrochemical Decolorization H2O2 decomposition Bioreactions Polymerization Other inorganic Simulated generic No reactionFigure 19. Percentage of laboratory activities which involve the listed reactionsEffective Teaching MethodsOne open-ended question allowed faculty to describe the unique features of the course as theyteach it. One theme that emerged from responses is an emphasis on teaching. Faculty mentionedsix different areas that they emphasize in teaching: • Problem-solving approaches
: <25% Between 25 and 50% Between 50 and 75% >75% 25 [CompLabs]Do your students have computing laboratories available? Page 25.703.22 Please choose all that apply: Yes, maintained by the Department Yes, maintained by the College8 of 22 5/4/2011 5:37 PMUK College of Engineering Surveys - AIChE Best Practices in Teaching 2011 http://www.engr.uky.edu/survey/admin
Paper ID #13167How We Teach: Transport Phenomena and Related CoursesDr. Daniel Lepek, The Cooper Union Dr. Daniel Lepek is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at The Cooper Union for the Ad- vancement of Science and Art. He received his Ph.D. from New Jersey Institute of Technology and B.E. from The Cooper Union, both in chemical engineering. In 2011, he received the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division ”Engineering Education” Mentoring Grant. His research interests include particle technology, transport phenomena, and engineering education. His current educational research is focused on peer instruction
AC 2009-2331: STUDENTS CREATE PROBLEMS FOR TEACHING ANDLEARNINGClaire Komives, San Jose State UniversityErik Fernandez, University of Virginia Page 14.1086.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009AbstractThe BioEngineering Educational Materials Bank (BioEMB) is a web repository of biologicalapplications that has been designed to enable chemical engineering students to learn to applytheir chemical engineering principles to biological processes and problems. In spite of gettingmany offers of contributions to the website from Biochemical Engineering faculty, only very fewproblems were submitted except by a handful of faculty. In order to expand the contributions tothe website
AC 2010-489: HOW WE TEACH: FRESHMAN INTRODUCTION TO CHEMICALENGINEERINGDavid Silverstein, University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein is the PJC Engineering Professor and an Associate Professor of Chemical & Materials Engineering at the University of Kentucky. He is assigned to the College of Engineering’s Extended Campus Programs at Paducah, Kentucky. Silverstein received his B.S.Ch.E. from the University of Alabama in 1992, his M.S. in Chemical Engineering from Vanderbilt University in 1994, and his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Vanderbilt in 1998. He is the 2007 recipient of the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effectiveness and Educational
AC 2007-80: TEACHING OPERABILITY IN UNDERGRADUATE CHEMICALENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATIONThomas Marlin, McMaster University Department of Chemical Engineering McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Tom Marlin joined the Department of Chemical Engineering at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, as NSERC Research Professor in Industrial Process Control in 1988. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts in 1972; then, he practiced engineering for 15 years in the chemical and petroleum industries. In 1987, he served as the Visiting Fellow, for the Warren Centre Study located at the University of Sydney, Australia. During the one-year project, a
that are suitable for instruction ofthese new and evolving concepts. It is often believed that large investments of funds and effort are required to bringcontemporary topics into older laboratories that teach the traditional unit operations such asdistillation, heat exchange and reactor processes. In this article, we present our recentexperiences in the design and implementation of a new experimental module that has beenintroduced in the second part of the Chemical Engineering laboratory sequence at the Universityof Washington using existing facilities and only a minor financial investment. Our primary aimis to modernize some of the laboratories by introducing concepts involving some of the latestdevelopments in areas of biotechnology