Conference Session

ChE: Innovations in the Classroom

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas Marlin, McMaster University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Conference Session

Perspectives and Approaches to Teaching Simulation and Design-Based Courses

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David L. Silverstein, University of Kentucky; Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University; Warren D. Seider, University of Pennsylvania; Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

course in 19651. Thestructure for this report draws heavily on previous reports published on behalf of the EducationDivision.2,3,4The survey was conducted via internet server hosted by the University of Kentucky runningLimeSurvey (limesurvey.org). E-mail invitations to participate were initially sent to all 158department chairs in the United States and later those in Canada requesting participation from thefaculty members teaching the relevant course(s). A number of instructors outside of NorthAmerica were also invited to participate. A separate request was sent to the instructors of recordfor senior design course during the 2011-2012 academic year based on information posted online

Conference Session

"How Do We Compare?" - Students, Case Studies, and Learning Approaches

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christi P Patton Luks, University of Tulsa

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

international students. I will continue to utilize elements of theproblem-based learning methodology, but I will not be adding it to all courses.References 1. Mayer, R.E. & Greeno, J.G. (1972). Structural differences between learning outcomes produced by different instructional methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 165-173. 2. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G. & Chinn, C.A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. Page 23.309.9 3. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S

Conference Session

Using Communication and Writing Techniques to Improve Student Learning

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

.                                                                  i   Felder, R.M., “Stoichiometry without Tears”, Chemical Engineering Education, 24(4), 188‐196, 1990.  ii   Maharaj, S. and L. Banta, “Using Log Assignments to Foster Learning: Revisiting Writing across the Curriculum”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2000, 73‐78.  iii  Sharp, J., J. Harb, and R. Terry, “Combining Kolb Learning Styles and Writing to Learn in Engineering Classes”, Journal of Engineering Education, April 1997, 93‐101.  iv  Felder, R. and R. Brent, “Writing Assignments – Pathways to Connections, Clarity, Creativity, College Teaching,” College Teaching 40(1), 1992, 43‐47.  v  Burrows, V., B. McNeill, N. Hubele, and L. Bellamy, “Statistical Evidence for Enhanced Learning of

Conference Session

Bringing Industrial Applications into the Classroom

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emilia Golebiowska; Giovanni Kelly II; Yassir M. Samra; James P Abulencia, Manhattan College

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. (1996) Alternative FuelTransit Bus Evaluation Program Results. International Spring Fuels and Lubricant Meeting. Dearborn, MI. SAEPaper No. 961082. Retrieved December 28, 2012, fromhttp://web.missouri.edu/~schumacherl/Collection_and_Collation_of_Performance_Data.pdf.16 Schumacher, L G. (1995). Biodiesel Emissions Data From Series 60 DDC Engines. American Public TransitAssociation Bus Operations and Technology Conference. Reno, NV. Retrieved December 28, 2012, fromhttp://web.missouri.edu/~schumacherl/Collection_and_Collation_of_Performance_Data.pdf.17 Marshall, W., Schumacher, L.G, Howell, S. A (1995) Engine Exhaust Emissions Evaluation of a Cummins L10EWhen Fueled with a Biodiesel Blend. SAE Paper No. 952363. SAE, Warrendale, PA. Retrieved

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Poster Session & Unit Operations Lab Bazaar

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William M. Clark, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Nicholas Janeiro Medeiros, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Donal James Boyd; Jared Snell, WPI; Lucas J Brutvan, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

of soybean oil, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 74, 1457-1463(1997).5. Gunvachai, K., Hassan, M. G., Shama, G., and Hellgardt, K., A new solubility model to describe biodieselformation kinetics, Trans. IChemE, Part B, 85(B5), 383-389, (2007).6. Slinn, M. and Kendall, K., Developing the reaction kinetics for a biodiesel reactor, Bioresource Technology, 100,2324-2327, (2009).7. Vicente, G., Martinez, M., Aracil, J., and Esteban, A., Kinetics of sunflower oil methanolysis, Ind. Eng. Chem.Res., 44, 5447-5454, (2005).8. Stamenkovic, O. S., Todorovic, Z. B., Lazic, M. L., Veljkovic, V. B., and Skala, D. U., Kinetics of sunflower oilmethanolysis at low temperatures, Bioresource Technology, 99 (2008) 1131-1140, (2008).9. He, B. B., Singh, A. P., and Thompson

Conference Session

Impact of the Gulf Coast Oil Spill on Chemical Engineering Education & Misc.

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tamara Floyd Smith, Tuskegee University; Nadar Vahdat, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

semester. The case study includes the description of the accident and thesequence of events that caused the explosion, a brief history of safety violations at BP Page 22.764.4and other companies involved, and the role of government. This case is presented inAppendix B.For the assignment, students were required to study the case and determine the mainreason(s) for the Deep Water Horizon disaster. Students were provided with thefollowing potential list: • Company’s greed (BP) • Lack of oversight from government • Company’s work environment • Not paying attention to heath and safety regulations • Lobbying efforts by the company

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Educational Methods and Tools to Encourage Conceptual Learning I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan Cernusca, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Daniel Forciniti, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering, Educational Research and Methods

- shots instead of desktop video captures of this navigation because they allowed the instructor to better focus students¶ attention to each of the major tools in these toolbars. In addition, this strategy significantly reduced the demand on the instructor¶s time to produce these materials. Once the

Conference Session

Best. Class. Ever.

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victor M. Ugaz, Texas A&M University; Aashish Priye, Texas A&M University ; Yassin A. Hassan, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

., Goddard, N. L. & Libchaber, A. Exponential DNA replication by laminar convection. Physical Review Letters 91, 158103 (2003).4 Chen, Z., Qian, S., Abrams, W. R., Malamud, D. & Bau, H. Thermosiphon-based PCR reactor: experiment and modeling. Analytical Chemistry 76, 3707-3715 (2004).5 Wheeler, E. K. et al. Convectively driven polymerase chain reaction thermal cycler. Analytical Chemistry 76, 4011-4016 (2004).6 Krishnan, M., Agrawal, N., Burns, M. A. & Ugaz, V. M. Reactions and fluidics in miniaturized natural convection systems. Analytical Chemistry 76, 6254-6265 (2004).7 Ugaz, V. M. & Krishnan, M. Novel convective flow based approaches for high-throughput PCR thermocycling. Journal of the

Conference Session

Adaptive and Supportive Learning Environments

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shiran Zhavian; James P. Abulencia, Manhattan College

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering, Minorities in Engineering

isalways an additional help. When the professor poses a problem and then works with theclass to generate feedback to solve it, understanding for a Deaf student is enhanced. Page 25.1037.7 BLACKBOARD P 1 2 SFigure 1 – Basic classroom setup. As the professor (P) lectures, one interpreter (1)translates to the deaf student (S). Meanwhile, a second interpreter (2) is preparing for thenext topic, as well as assist the deaf student.Although I

Conference Session

Learning By Doing in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peyton Richmond, Lamar University; John Gossage, Lamar University; Qiang Xu, Lamar University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

be achieved simply by lecturing at them.DCS Demonstration Lab OverviewWe use an industrial quality DCS system with all of the alarming capabilities of typical systemsused by the chemical process industries. A Honeywell Experion DCS system was purchased forthis purpose. This DCS system is much less bulky than its predecessor, the TDC3000, whichuses predominantly 10base5 cable with BNC connectors, and is commonly found in manyrefineries and chemical plants. A major factor contributing to this reduction in bulkiness is theHoneywell Experion’s use of CAT5 Ethernet cable in place of the TDC3000’s bulky and stiff10base5 coaxial cable connectors, which allows this system to be implemented using equipmentfound in a typical campus computer lab. The

Conference Session

Improving Introductory Experiences in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Fall of 2012. Based upon both published results on “writing to learn” from the literatureand the authors’ observations from Fall 2012, it was reasonable to hypothesize that the activity ofwriting homework abstracts would lead to improved attainment of the course instructionalobjectives. However, the control experiment that was conducted in the Fall of 2013 did notproduce any evidence to support of this hypothesis.Literature Cited i Felder, R.M., “Stoichiometry without Tears”, Chemical Engineering Education, 24(4), 188-196, 1990. ii XXXX and YYYYY, “Effects of Requiring Students to Write Abstracts for Homework Problem Solutions,”Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA (2013). iii Maharaj, S

Conference Session

Real and Virtual - "New" Approaches to Teaching "Old" Courses

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James P Abulencia, Manhattan College; Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University; David L. Silverstein, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

, and Research Bases." Journal of Engineering Education 25.123(2006)Prince, Michael J., Vigeant, M., and Nottis, K., “A Preliminary Study on the Effectiveness ofInquiry-Based Activities for Addressing Misconceptions of Undergraduate Engineering Students”,Education for Chemical Engineers, 4:29 (2009)Schuck, S., Kearney, M., and Aubusson, P., “Education Opportunities and Challenges forGeneration OurSpace: Taming the beast?”, Proceedings of World Conference on EducationalMultimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications, 5804, 2008Vigeant, M., Prince, M., and Nottis, K., “Creating of Reliable Instruments for Assessment ofConceptual Understanding in Heat Transfer and Thermodynamics”, AIChE Annual Meeting, 2009Vigeant, M., Prince, M., and Nottis, K

Conference Session

"Modular" Learning

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason M. Keith, Mississippi State University; Bill B Elmore, Mississippi State University; William Todd French, Mississippi State University; Hossein Toghiani, Mississippi State University; Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

andReactions, Industrial Heating, BNP Media, Pittsburgh, PA: August 1982.10. Fogler, H. S. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering. 4th Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper SaddleRiver, NJ, 2009. Page 23.1314.11

Conference Session

Virtual and Online Learning Tools in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alec Steven Bowen, Oregon State University; Daniel Robert Reid, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

the National Science Foundation under thegrant TUES 1245482. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. Ma, J., and J. Nickerson. 2006. Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 1-24.2. Wieman C. and K. Perkins. 2005. Transforming physics education. Physics Today,58(11), 36-41.3. Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid, S., Wieman, C., & LeMaster, R. 2006. PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 44, 18.4. Finkelstein, N.D., W.K. Adams, C.J

Conference Session

Learning Outcomes and Assessment Within Chemical Engineering

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tamara Floyd Smith, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

-during-covid-19. [Accessed May 13, 2020].[2] R. Felder, "Designing Tests to Maximize Learning." J. Prof. Issues in Engr. Education & Practice, Vol. 128, pp 1-3, 2002.[3] D. Berrett, “A Professor Asked His Students to Write Their Own Exam Questions. Here’s What He Found,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 28, 2019. [Online]. Available: www.chronicle.com. [Accessed March 17, 2020].[4] M. Teplitski, T. Irani, et al., "Student-Generated Pre-Exam Questions is an Effective Tool for Participatory Learning: A Case Study from Ecology of Waterborne Pathogens Course" Journal of Food Science Education, 17, 76-84, 2018.[5] S. Bottomly and P. Denny, “A Participatory Learning Approach to Biochemistry Using Student Authored and Evaluated

Conference Session

Work in Progress: Assessment, Evaluation and Hands-on Activities

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University; Nicole Joy Sweeney, Complexly

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. Research in Learning Technology, 2004, 12, 113–124.12) Downes, S. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2010, 2, 27–33.13) Kirsch, C. “John Green to Crash Course Fans: “Read Your Boring Textbooks”. PublishersWeekly 2015. Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/2xN7dhy on Mar. 17, 2020.14) Chen, B.; Wei, L.; Li, H. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 2016, 6, 148-165.15) Fernandez, V.; Simo, P.; Algaba, I.; Albareda-Sambola, M.; Salan, N.; Amanate, B.; Enache,M.; Bravo, E.R.; Sune, A.; Garcia-Almin Ana, D.; Rajadell, M.; Garriga, F. International Journalof Engineering Education 2011, 27, 1–10.16) Crash Course. “What Is Engineering?: Crash Course Engineering #1.” YouTube, 17 May 2018,https://youtu.be/btGYcizV0iI.17) Crash Course

Conference Session

Novel Courses and Content for ChEs II

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nichole Au, University of Maryland-Baltimore County; Taryn Bayles, University of Maryland-Baltimore County; Julia Ross, University of Maryland-Baltimore County

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

fourchoices of membrane, varied in pore size and the tubing diameter (which are the sameparameters that the students will select from for their hemodialysis system design), and a rangeof flow rates for the blood and dialysate. The simulation provides practice for the actual designproject. From the simulation, the students should have a good idea of how these parametersaffect the efficiency of the dialysis, and they need to balance this with the major design factor,which is cost.A traditional membrane separation process has a fluid with component(s) that need to beremoved, and a membrane that can selectively remove those components, which pass through toa carrier fluid. In the design challenge, the students are given 0.5-L of simulated unfiltered

Conference Session

Developing Communication/Teamwork Skills in ChEs

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Lefebvre, Rowan University; Loren Connell, Rowan University; Kevin Dahm, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

A464/A280 > 0.05Achieve “purity goal #2” $350 DsRed2 with A561/A280 > 0.6 EGFP with A488/A280 > 1.0 Page 13.316.10 Flavodoxin with A464/A280 > 0.10Appendix CFinal exam question on enzyme kinetics – negative control:The following data were recorded during a test of kinetics of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction at49.6 ºC. The enzyme concentration was 1.6 g/L. S [mmol/mL] 0.1 0.033 0.01 0.0067 0.005 V [mmol/(mL*min)] 5.13 3.70 1.89 1.43

Conference Session

New Trends in CHE Education II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Ted Lee, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

transferability.Clearly, the nano-lab module(s) that we utilize in the Chemical Engineering Thermodynamicscourse may need anywhere from a minor adjustment to a total redesign in order to be applied. Itis not the specific lab modules that are the “selling point” here. Instead, it is the mechanism bywhich degree projects can be incorporated into an existing curriculum that is the key and novelconcept. Once the framework allowing for this incorporation has been established, it becomesrelatively easy for other STEM departments to apply the same methodology by selection (orcreation) of lab modules that mesh with the traditional courses of each individual major, andbetter match the scientific instruments available to a given department. The model of acontinuous four

Conference Session

New Trends in CHE Education II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Golter, Washington State University; Bernard Van Wie, Washington State University; Gary Brown, Washington State University; David Thiessen; Nurdan Yurt; Baba Abdul, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

appreciation goes to Mr. G. Held of the WSU College of Engineeringand Architecture Machine Shop for fabrication and insights on the development of theDLMs. Assistance in the design of control circuitry for the DLM was provided by Prof.H. Davis, Clinical Professor of the WSU Voiland School of Chemical Engineering andBioengineering. Finally we acknowledge the help of undergraduate researchers Mr. J.Babauta and Mr. S. Isacson of the WSU Voiland School for assistance with DLM andCHAPL data collection tasks, the staff of WSU's Center for Teaching, Learning andTechnology for assistance with CHAPL assessment strategies, and the many students atWSU and Ahmadu Bello University for willingness to participate in this pedagogicalstudy.ReferencesAronson, E

Conference Session

New Trends in CHE Education I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Dahm, Rowan University; William Riddell, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

three parameters they could vary: the amount of clay in the nose, theamount of water used as propellant, and the size and shape of the fins. The project wascompleted in teams of 3-5 but each student wrote an individual, final report on the project. Themodel of design as an alternating series of divergent and convergent steps was covered explicitlyin class, including circulating portions of Dym, et al.’s article. Students were required to identifyactions taken by the team, categorizing them as “divergent” or “convergent” thinking, andproviding a quantitative rationale for final decisions regarding the three parameters. Typically,student characterized brainstorming possible fin configurations as their main divergent task andfinding the optimal

Conference Session

ChE: Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith Lodge, University of Minnesota-Duluth

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Aluminum channelBoard of Education End of metal rod Rubber bandBattery pack (servo power) Sump Pressure Transducer Page 11.1320.10 2.0 Volumetric flow rate, Q / mL s-1 Figure 2. Flow data Data obtained with a fully opened valve 1.5 l linear fit

Conference Session

ChE: Outreach Programs

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sundararajan Madihally, Oklahoma State University; Eric Maase, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. Each group wasallowed five minutes to present their report which included question and answer sessions. In the first group, the two male members monopolized the presentation with the threefemale members only participating during the question and answer portion. The initial groupalso provided no introductions of group members nor motivation(s) for the experimental work.Prior to the beginning of second presentation, the instructors gave immediate feedback onpresentation strategy and reminded the students about the required equal participation from allgroup members. This method of immediate comments to influence the presentation behavior ofeach group was followed for all presentations and the expected improvements in

Conference Session

Perceptions, Reflections, Collaborations, and Student Support in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bradley Cicciarelli, Louisiana Tech University; Eric A. Sherer, Louisiana Tech University; Baker A. Martin, Clemson University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

, R.W., Sheu, H.B., Singley, D., Schmidt, J.A., Schmidt, L.C. and Gloster, C.S. "Longitudinal Relations of Self-Efficacy to Outcome Expectations, Interests, and Major Choice Goals in Engineering Students," Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 328-335 (2008)[22] Van Soom, C. and Donche, V. "Profiling First-Year Students in STEM Programs Based on Autonomous Motivation and Academic Self-Concept and Relationship with Academic Achievement," PloS One, 9(11), e112489 (2014)[23] Hutchison, M.A., Follman, D.K., Sumpter, M. and Bodner, G.M. "Factors Influencing the Self‐Efficacy Beliefs of First‐Year Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 39-47 (2006)[24] Brown, S.D., Tramayne, S., Hoxha, D., Telander, K

Conference Session

The Latest in Improving Learning in ChE Students

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Kelly, Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

of active learning activities – a similar balance was employedfor each section. Exam performances of the two sections were compared against eachother to assess the degree to which an increase in active learning promotes understandingand retention. Entrepreneurial tendencies were noted for individual students as theyworked on group projects near the end of the semester. Before the projects were handedout, both sections were exposed to lectures on state-of-the-art heat transfer technologicalsolutions to some current problem(s). During these lectures, entrepreneurialcharacteristics (i.e. creativity and “big-picture thinking” etc..) and skills (i.e. problemidentification, market analysis and patent searching etc..) that were exhibited during

Conference Session

ChE: Departmental Issues and Integrating Freshmen into the ChE Program

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Coronella, University of Nevada-Reno

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

., Johnson, R.T. "Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-basedpractices" J. Engr. Ed. 94 (1) 87-101 (2005).2 Minerick, A.R. and Schultz, K.H. "Freshman Chemical Engineering Experiment: Charged Up on Electrophoresisand Brewing with Bioreactors" ASEE annual conference, Portland, OR June 12 - 15, 2005.3 Farrell, S., R.P. Hesketh, J.A. Newell, and C.S. Slater, "Introducing Freshman to Reverse Process Engineering &Design Through Investigation of the Brewing Process," Int. J. Engr. Educ. 17(3), 588-592, 2001.4 Wang, E. "Teaching Freshmen Design, Creativity and Programming with Legos and Labview", IEEE Frontiers inEducation, pp. F3G-11-15, 2001.5 Solen, K. A., and J. N. Harb, Introduction to Chemical Process Fundamentals & Design, 4th Edition, McGraw

Conference Session

ChE: Innovations in the Classroom

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy Raymond, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Effectiveness of Active-Engagement Microcomputer-Based Laboratories,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 65, No. 1, 1997, p.45.8. Laws, P., D. Sokoloff, and R. Thornton, “Promoting Active Learning Using the Results of Physics Education Research,” UniServe Science News, Vol. 13, July 1999.9. Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry by Daniel J. Jacob, Princeton University Press, 1999.10. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change by John H. Seinfeld and Spyros N. Pandis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.11. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain by B. S. Bloom, New York: Longmans, Green, 1956.12. Clouds in a Glass of Beer: Simple Experiments in Atmospheric Physics by

Conference Session

Grasping the "Concept"

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sayara Saliyeva, Nazarbayev University; Dinara McLaughlin; Moulay Rachid Babaa, Nazarbayev University; Hella Tokos, Nazarbayev University; Stefaan Jan Rogier Simons, University College London; Sarim Naji Al Zubaidy, Nazarbayev University; Joseph A. Menicucci Jr., Nazarbayev University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Brent. ASQ Higher Education Brief. Volume 2, No. 4, August 2009.15. http://jimi.cbee.oregonstate.edu/concept_warehouse/16. Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles. Richard M. Felder and Joni Spurlin. International Journal of Engineering Education. Volume 21, No. 1, pp. 103-112, 2005.17. A Psychometric Study of the Index of Learning Styles. Thomas A. Litzinger, Sang Ha Lee, John C. Wise and Richard M. Felder. Journal of Engineering Education. Volume 96, No. 4, pp. 309-319, 2007.18. A Contribution to Validation of Score Meaning for Felder-Soloman’s Index of Learning Styles. Malgorzata S. Zywno. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &

Conference Session

Curriculum Development and Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University; Christina Smith, Oregon State University; Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

-158. 5. A. Elby, American Journal of Physics, 1999, S52. 6. R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, 57-72. 7. C. Crouch, J. Watkins, A. Fagen and E. Mazur, Research-Based Reform of University Physics, 2007. 8. A. Fagen, C. Crouch and E. Mazur, The Physics Teacher, 2002, 206-209. 9. M. D. Koretsky and B. J. Brooks, Chemical Engineering Education, 2012, 46, 289-297. 10. E. M. Rogers, Addictive behaviors, 2002, 27, 989-993. 11. M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd and T. Simin Hall, Journal of Engineering Education, 2010, 99, 185. 12. M. Borrego, S. Cutler, J. Froyd, M. Prince and C. Henderson, in Australasian Association for Engineering