bulk and surface characterization. Current research includes pH- and temperature-responsive polymers, diagnostic sensor technologies, and the synthesis and surface modification of bioplastics. Page 13.862.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Making the Connections: Facilitating Student Integration of Chemical Engineering Concepts into a Coherent FrameworkAbstractOne of the greatest challenges an instructor faces is helping his/her students to see theconnections between material being covered in a particular class and that covered in previouscourses or courses being taken concurrently
AC 2011-711: INTEGRATION OF THE CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LAB-ORATORY WITH A FOCUS ON BIO-FUEL PRODUCTIONDanilo Pozzo, University of Washington Prof. Pozzo’s research interests are in the area of soft materials and nanotechnology. His group focuses on developing structure-function relationships for a variety of nano-structured materials having applica- tions in materials, alternative energy and separations. Prof. Pozzo obtained his B.S. from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagez and his PhD in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh PA. He also worked in the NIST Center for Neutron Research and is currently an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Washington where
, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He cur- rently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels. Page 22.431.1 c American Society for
. Unfortunately, while efficient, this format hasnot shown to be effective at producing the critical, innovative thinking skills needed to solvedifficult technological problems2, 3.This paper describes a module for promoting students’ creativity in a Material Balances secondsemester required course for Chemical, Food, and Environmental Engineering at Universidad delas Américas Puebla (Mexico). Major goals include stimulating and strengthening studentcognitive flexibility that could allow them to be creative thinkers. The proposed four class-sessions module is an active and cooperative experience that was implemented as course finalproject. Students explored creativity through multiple representations of a problem that should bepresented in written
Phenomena, Professional Development / Ethics and Mathematical / Compu- tational Methods. He is the recipient of various teaching and educational research awards, including the 2015 Raymond W. Fahien Award from the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching and assessment, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as
assessing intent to persist and in the long term by graduation rate.Additionally, we will test whether participation in a two-day voluntary workshop (the “ChemECamp”) held just before the start of fall classes has a lasting impact on the factors of self-efficacyand social support. The same surveys described above are administered to camp attendeesbefore and after the camp, and preliminary results show an increase in self-efficacy, social andacademic integration, and intent to persist for those who attend. These effects appear to largelysustain throughout the sophomore year, in contrast to the results observed for non-attendees. Inthis work-in-progress, we share our findings from the most recent academic year illustrating thepositive effects of the
time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Understanding the gap between communication in the classroom and communication during an industrial internshipAbstractWhile it
the 2016 ASEE ChE Division Raymond W. Fahien Award. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics.Dr. Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University Dr. Lisa Bullard is an Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. She received her BS in Chemical Engineering from NC State and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. She served in engineering and management positions within Eastman Chem- ical Company from 1991-2000. A faculty member
”, or “ I can’t wait to get into fluid mechanics!” (a first semester sophomore course inour curriculum) bring strong affirmation of this approach to the first-year engineering course. Page 24.311.8Observations, Assessment and ConclusionsAs the course has evolved over the nine years I have taught it, I have moved from a more open-ended project format to one where the projects have a “tighter” design window. For example, apast Team Challenge requiring pH control in a mixing tank involved students assembling “fromscratch” a completely automated systems from an assortment of disconnected pipes, pumps, andtanks (along with their LEGO NXT and Vernier
formats for the first year experience than do the grads. The table showsthat the new format results in faster engagement with a PhD research topic, advisorconversations, integration into lab groups, and conversations with the PhD committees.We conclude that the new format fruitfully addresses the prior concerns of both ourfaculty and graduate students.Spring proposition: An original or an echo ? Graduate students are uniformly supported by outside grants. According, foreach advisor topic offered to new students in our late fall student-advisor selectionprocess, a funded proposal already exists. Whether the spring proposition courseproduces a novel proposal is suspect, but the defining purpose of spring is for the studentto take ownership
survey,instructors viewed themselves as a guide or facilitator, bringing students through the textbookmaterial in a “rational way” and providing alternate explanations to the text. Others attempt togive a “big picture” view, tying various elements of the course (and the curriculum) together into Page 22.788.13a cohesive whole. For some, the role shifts as needed, from mentor to partner to coach dependingon the student and the situation. Some express the need for them to make the topic interestingand accessible, and to develop new examples and homework problems. The role as an evaluatorwas
(Taxol) through the use of plant cell cultures from the Taxus Yew Tree. Throughout her time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Performance in an Online Chemical Engineering
Paper ID #8528Examining the Entrepreneurial Mindset of Senior Chemical Engineering Stu-dents as a Result of Exposure to the Epistemic Game ”Nephrotex”Mr. Kerry Michael RogyDr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh Cheryl A. Bodnar, PhD, CTDP is an Assistant Professor (Teaching Track) in the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She obtained her certification as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional
Paper ID #8897Fostering the Development of Critical Thinking in an Introduction to Chem-ical Process Engineering Design CourseMrs. Gladis Ch´avez-Torrej´on, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Gladis Ch´avez-Torrej´on is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches psychology related courses. Her research interests include critical thinking, cognitive processes, and creating effective learning environments.Mrs. Silvia Husted, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Silvia Husted is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at
Paper ID #25464An Interdisciplinary Elective Course to Build Computational Skills for Math-ematical Modeling in Science and EngineeringDr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt, Oklahoma State University Dr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt is an assistant professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Okla- homa State University. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in ChE at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and her B.S. at the University of Oklahoma. She did postdoctoral research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on developing computational models for multiscale tissue physiology and pharmacology
for engineering classes,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 1999.[21] K. D. Dahm, S. Farrell, and R. P. Ramachandran, “Communication in the Engineering Curriculum: Learning to Write and Writing to Learn,” J. Eng. Educ. Transform., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2015.[22] V. Svihla, “Advances in Design-Based Research in the Learning Sciences,” Front. Learn. Res., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 35–45, 2014.[23] The Design-Based Research Collective, “Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry,” Educ. Res., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 5–8, 2003.[24] J. R. Gomez and V. Svihla, “Building individual accountability through consensus,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 53, no. 1, 2019.[25] J. R. Gomez, V. Svihla
requires four stages, as shown inclockwise-order in Figure 1: 1. Tangible, concrete learning experience (Do Something) 4. Experimentation and testing 2. Reflection on the learning (Plan and adapt) experience (Think about it) 3. Generalization of the learning to broader applications (Make conclusions) Figure 1 Four stages of Kolb’s experiential learning cycle5.Experiential learners are actively engaged directly with their environment – the industrialengineering workplace in this case. The learner is an integral and
/chemical-engineering/liberatore/Megan Davidson, The University of ToledoKayla Chapman, Kayla Chapman is currently studying chemical engineering at the University of Toledo and expects to earn a B.S. degree in 2021. She has assisted with multiple areas of research and data analysis regarding zyBooks reading participation and challenge activities. She became interested in performing research after completing a chemical engineering course that used zyBooks. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Quantifying success and attempts on auto-graded homework when using an interactive textbookAbstractOnline homework and interactive textbooks provide big data that can
) developing interlinkedcurriculum components (web-based teaching and learning modules) to organize and reinforcecore ideas in chemical engineering curricular; (3) creating an integrated assessment plan that isbeing used to analyze the learning and development of chemical engineering students withrespect to forward-looking set of learning outcomes, and (4) using service learning in requiredchemical engineering courses.Course StringsThe first key strategy for curriculum reform and development involves organizing undergraduatechemical engineering courses into four course strings: thermodynamics and kinetics; emergingfundamentals and applications; transport phenomena; and systems design. Course string facultycommittees were developed to address the
chemicalengineering curriculum, the project team began by asking what new capabilities were desired forgraduates with a BS in chemical engineering. The project team initially framed these additionalcapabilities in terms of four outcomes that described what graduates would be able to do or howthey would think:a) Apply fundamental ideas in chemical engineering over a greatly expanded range of time and length scales. Lengths range from sub-molecular and nanoscale processes to super-macroscopic plant integration encompassing more traditional continuum and macroscopic scales. Time scales range from sub-nanosecond molecular motions to month-long time constants for plants.b) Apply ChE fundamental ideas to emerging application areas such as biotechnology
single rubric can be used forboth. The instructor grades a student report using the rubric, and aspects of the rubric areused as embedded indicators for assessing program outcomes. Thus, essentially all of theeffort required to collect program assessment data is integrated into the routine task ofgrading.Overall Approach to Assessing Measurable OutcomesBecause program outcomes speak to the capabilities of graduates, the Rowan UniversityChemical Engineering department has settled on an assessment strategy that focuses onthe two courses in the curriculum that best reflect real engineering practice: Chemical Plant Design- This is the program’s capstone design experience. Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic- This is a multidisciplinary
Paper ID #29183Putting Course Design Principles to Practice: Creation of an Elective onVaccines and ImmunoengineeringProf. Joshua A Enszer, University of Delaware Joshua Enszer is an associate professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control, capstone design, and mathematical modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic portfolios as a means for
Paper ID #18197WIP: An On-going Analysis of the Impact of Assigning Online Thermody-namic Homework in place of Traditional HomeworkDr. Louis Reis, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Louis Reis currently serves as a lecturer in the Mechanical Engineering department at Louisiana Tech University. He received his B.S. degrees in Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University along with his M.S. degree in Microsystems Engineering and his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering. He teaches a variety of courses at Louisiana Tech including: Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, and the ”Living with the Lab” freshmen
Undergraduate Professor Award, ASEE Chemical Engineering Division Raymond W. Fahien Award, and the 2013 and 2017 ASEE Joseph J. Martin Awards for Best Conference Paper. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, and integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics.Dr. Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University Dr. Lisa Bullard is an Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. She received her BS in Chemical Engineering from NC State and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. She
OperatingProcedures; and other process-specific topics germane to an organization. The undergraduateChemical Engineering curriculum can provide courses in these topics, or integrate these topicsinto existing courses to help prepare the graduating engineer for industrial practice.In addition to proactive programs that prevent incidents, it is important to learn from pastexperience. In the words of George Santanaya, a famous Spanish philosopher, “Those who donot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Company-sponsored, post-graduationtraining programs are meant to fulfill these needs.A more formal approach to deciding what process safety topics should be covered is to reviewthe regulatory framework. Companies in the United States involved with storing
actual equipment. Once again, students should be encouraged to have theirsimulations correspond to actual equipment.Discussion What can be done to alleviate this problem? Experience provides some suggestions. It isprobably unrealistic to expect students to understand equipment details before the design classunless that is a point of emphasis in lower level classes. In many programs, the introductorytransport classes focus more on theory than on equipment. Even in a separation class, the stagecalculations often dominate the coverage of tray sizing and performance. One approach wouldbe to integrate equipment details throughout the curriculum; however, this might be unrealistic inlarge programs with different instructors for the same course in
MEB course at another well-known university in 2014 when our institutionwas evaluating that course for potential transfer credit. We were initially skeptical of onlinecourses in general – concerned about how the integrity of the exam taking process could becontrolled, how rigorous the assessments could be in an online course, how students could reallylearn material like that online, etc. After speaking with the facilitating professor of the course,we concluded that if a student passed the course, they would be prepared for our curriculum andwe accepted the course for transfer credit. Exams were similar in content and format to ours andwere mailed to the professor at the university for grading after students took them on paper at atesting
lecture course. “Unit Operations Lab” or “Junior / Senior Lab” are common examples of this type of course. This survey is primarily focused on courses of this type. Clinic An integrative experiential hands-on-course that serves as the experimental lab for all other courses taken that semester. This survey is not focused on experiences of this type. Lab / Bench / The definition of what constitutes “pilot” scale varies by industry and type of Pilot Scale product. For the purposes of this survey, we will define “pilot” scale as one with working volumes significantly in excess of those one would typically encounter in a chemistry
, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum.Prof. Samira Azarin Samira Azarin is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Minnesota. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy in 2006 and went
inherently safer design. 4. Understand how to control and mitigate hazards to prevent accidents. 5. Be familiar with the major regulations that impact the safety of chemical plants. 6. Understand the consequences of chemical plant incidents due to acute and chronic chemical releases and exposures. 7. Be reasonably proficient with at least one hazard identification procedure. 8. Have an introduction to the process of hazard evaluation and risk assessment. While these eight outcomes specify what needs to be covered, they do not specify where theseoutcomes should be covered in the curriculum. In 1999, Anton Pintar (Michigan TechnicalUniversity) discussed whether to integrate chemical process safety into the