struggles. This allows precise plans to bemade to improve student learning the next time the course is taught.This paper will explain this new assessment process in detail. To illustrate the value of the newprocedures, the results of the new method will be compared with those of the traditional method(numerical 1-5 scale). Emphasis will be placed on showing how the new method not onlyprovides better data, but does so in a time-efficient manner and makes “closing-the-loop” easier.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. First, the traditional method of assessmentof the competencies will be explained in more detail and the historical results will be presented.This will be followed by an explanation of the changes that were made for the
2and exercises contained in the TC, TMC & TWA are designed to evoke responses surroundingthe 12 team performance indicators.Table 2. Performance factors assessed in the TIDEE instruments used in this study.Perform Area Performance Factors Inclusive Climate: Building an inclusive supportive climate for all members.Team Rela- Member Commitment: Gaining buy-in and interdependence of all members.tionships Conflict Resolution: Resolving conflicts to enhance teamwork.Joint Goal Establishment: Establishing shared team goals.Achieve- Planning and Management: Managing tasks to achieve team goals.ments Joint Work Products: Producing competent consensus outputs. Work
, consisting mostly of developing teacher expertise.Understanding and planning for the transportability of educational interventions is beingemphasized by funding agencies at the national level. The aspects of transportability specificallystudied in this paper include usage history and current adoption information, the VirtualLaboratory Project’s perceived sources of effectiveness, barriers to implementation andadaptations made during the implementation process. This paper is a subset of a largerinvestigation on student learning in virtual laboratories. Artifacts of implementation and teacherand student perceptions were the primary data sources for this investigation.Thus far, the Virtual Laboratory Project has been adapted to high school, community
learning and plans to pursue a teaching career upon earning his Ph.D.Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Campbell University Jacqueline Gartner is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University in the School of Engineering, which offers a broad BS in engineering with concentrations in chemical and mechanical.Dr. Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University Prof. Prashanta Dutta has received his PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Texas A&M University in 2001. Since then he has been working as an Assistant Professor at the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State University. He was promoted to the rank of Associate and Full Professor in 2007 and 2013, respectively. Prof. Dutta is an elected
Bent, Bucknell University Edward Bent is currently an undergraduate student at Bucknell University majoring in chemical engineer- ing.Rachel Cincotta, Bucknell University Rachel Cincotta is a student at Bucknell University pursuing a BS in Chemical Engineering.Kyle Andrew MacDougall, Bucknell University Chemical Engineering Department Currently a Chemical Engineering student with a process concentration in Bucknell University’s class of 2017. Throughout my studies at Bucknell I have gained many areas of interest, especially in the fields of food science, pharmaceutical engineering, and material science. After graduation I plan on pursuing a career as a process engineer, either in the food or pharmaceutical
novel teaching approach in engineering education because of the many factorsthat go into incorporating writing into a technical classroom. To address these concerns andbarriers, development and research plans for a scaffolded writing pedagogy are described below.Implementation in the Fluid Mechanics ClassroomTo follow the studies that have already been performed by the IUSE group at WSU, the writingpedagogy will be tested in the junior-level, the fluid mechanics and heat transfer course (CHE332) in parallel with the current hands-on learning implementation.i. Targeting Higher Levels in the Cognitive DomainTo target higher levels in the cognitive domain, it is crucial to start with the students’ conceptualfoundation. Identifying common
system for thegreenhouse will be in the form of closed loop geothermal heat pump system powered by a 7.5kW photovoltaic system.project designThe proposed greenhouse will be a south facing structure with a 25 ft. by 40 ft. footprint, asshown in Figure 1. The north wall of the greenhouse was moved away from the existing labbuilding wall to make room for an exiting stairway at the east end of the building. The floor ofthe greenhouse will be sunk approximately 5 ft. below the grade of the western side of thegreenhouse. See Figure 1 for western and southern elevations and a plan view of the greenhouse.The frame of the greenhouse will be made of metal and the walls will be finished with 3 inchwide brick and 3.25 inch thick fiberglass insulation on the
Effective People (1)ENT3972 Electronic Circuit Design and Fabrication (1)ENT3973 Geohydrologic Techniques (1)ENT3975 Intro to Vehicle Design and System Modeling (1)ENT3976 Personal Brand Management (1)ENT4951 Business Plans & Budgeting / Enterprise (1)ENT4954 Global Competition (1)Table 2. Partial Listing of Business, Communication and Elective Modules for MTU Enterprise Program Page 14.678.3A vertical (sophomores, juniors, and seniors) and horizontal (various engineering andbusiness disciplines) integration makes the program a unique experience for students.Over 10% of students enrolled in the College of Engineering are
lesson plans can be found in the Appendix of this paper.Each prediction activity began with the instructor explaining the demonstration and asking aquestion about what would happen in the system. Students wrote down their predicted answerwith some justification. A brief demonstration followed, allowing students to observe whatactually happened. The instructor concluded the activity with a 5 minute explanation of thetheory governing the system. Within a week of the in-class activity, students in Class Ccompleted a brief set of structured questions, aimed to engage students in reflection. Thesefollow-up activities are in the Appendix.Table 1: Experimental Design. The same HECI test was administered pre- and post-instruction as a quantitativeform
you hear and understand yourself well? Do you find anything about the way you presented distracting? List one, or two, items that you felt you did well during the presentation? What is one improvement that you plan to make for the next presentation?Following the second presentation, group members are asked to individually watch the video oftheir group’s performance and provide comments pertaining to how effectively they thought theother individuals in their group communicated. They are asked to not focus on themselves so thatemphasis is placed on other group members. The Google Forms survey for intra-group critiquesrequests group number along with critique questions to reduce organizational time required
data (MSDS) sheets, and proper handling, storage, and disposal of chemicals. Become familiar with basic principles of emergency vents.Safety is stressed throughout the course and university on-line modules from the university wideEnvironmental Health and Safety (EHS) are required before students enter the laboratory. Sevenmodules are required: Laboratory Standard Training, Chemical Spill Cleanup, Compressed GasCylinders, Toxicology, Building Emergency Action Plan (BEAP), and Hazard Communicationfor Laboratory Personnel. Emergency vents for pressure relief are covered in detail in a lectureintroducing the “layers or protection” model of plant safety. Students are given examples ofaccidents and proper design of control systems
% offered similar laboratory experiences through chemical engineeringspecific courses1. Several engineering educators have developed hands-on laboratory or designmodules targeted for introducing freshmen to chemical and/or biomedical engineering topics andconcepts using applications including sensors1, evaporative cooling2, water treatment3, fuel cellcars4, food and beverage science5-9, drug delivery10-12, and human physiology13, 14. Experiments,simulators, and lesson plans have also been developed for introducing pharmaceuticalengineering to students in K-12 and in college beyond the freshman year15-22. The commonthread through all of this previous work is that there is ample evidence that students considerhands-on experiences through experiments
added during the review process to provide sufficient choices for review by content experts.It is planned to include one nonsense consideration in its final state. Rest et. al. described thatmeaningless items, or M-items, are used to detect unreliable data.9 M-items are items on theDIT2 that are written with similar complexity and vocabulary to the other considerations but arenot relevant to the dilemma in question.9 The nonsense items on the EPSRI will serve as M-items, and will be used to detect unreliable data from the data pool in the further validation studythat will be conducted.Instrument Content ValidationThe validation of the EPSRI followed the content validation process outlined by Devellis.10 Theprocess involves having people
that the author originally planned to askthem in their individual test. The author planned for the next slightly higher level conceptexercise, which is elaborated below.Concept group test 2 (moderate)If the following grid (Figure 3b) is available to solve unsteady state one-dimensional laminarflow equation, can you write discretized algebraic equivalent? If intervals of ‘y’ and ‘t’ andkinematic viscosity are known, can you find out velocities at points (2,2) and (3,3)? How manyequations that you will need to calculate velocity at point (2,2) if only V0= 3 ft/s is known at theentrance, y=0?Summary of student groups response:As this was open book test, it was relatively easy for all the groups to provide the followingequation
accomplish the formation of an entrepreneurial culture at Mississippi State Uni- versity. Nelson is also the director of the Entrepreneurship Program in the College of Engineering at Mississippi State University. He implemented the Entrepreneurship program at MSU in March 2001 to establish relations and invite entrepreneurial leaders and experts to Seminar Series. He mentors students involved in the program, plans and executes Project Teams, and markets the program to students. He advises the Entrepreneurship Club and the Engineering Toastmasters Club. From July 1999 to March 2001, Nelson was the chief operating officer at Deka Medical Inc. in Columbus, Miss. In this role, he was responsible for manufacturing operations
are applying algorithmic thinking and notjust learning how to operate in a single computing environment, (2) that students are able todevelop their abilities to formulate problems in a computational context, and (3) that students areapplying numerical algorithms in meaningful ways and not just following a template. To thatend, we discuss here overviews of our computational methods courses and implementation thatencourages behavior independent of choice of computer software.We also share here our plans to evaluate student abilities and perceptions in courses followingcomputer methods to assess the effectiveness of the courses. We share results here frompreliminary self-assessment surveys plus plans for implementation for the Spring 2012
mentor, connect these to learning (or other) student-derived benefits fromparticipating in the program, discover enjoyable aspects of the program, and identify areas of theprogram that might be improved. Within this paper, informal relational structures relate toactivities that were planned outside of those mandated by the program, and formal relationalstructures are activities that were experienced by all students in the program and were designedby program administrators.MethodsParticipantsParticipants in this study were eleven undergraduate engineering students selected for thesummer 2008 Design, Application, Analysis, and Control of Interfaces (DAACI) ResearchExperiences for Undergraduates program. These students represented seven
increased surface area. In this work, we have created an artificialmicrocapillary network by encapsulating cotton candy in an elastomer. We are currentlyadapting this as a laboratory exercise where students will investigate conductive andconvective heat transfer in this networked path. The objective of this laboratory activitywill be to reinforce the importance of heat transfer surface area. In this paper, we presentthe laboratory activity and our plans for adapting the activity in engineering courses atRowan University.1. IntroductionHuman physiology is complex, yet when distilled down to its component parts, the bodycan be studied as an interconnected set of unit operations with a common overallobjective: the maintenance of steady state, known as
withcurrent teaching approaches in these classes, none of which use SBL or ChemProV.The plan for the assessment of the OBSLE/ChemProV combination involved recruiting sevenother universities to participate in the study. At each of the schools the participating facultyagreed to teach their material/energy balance class in their normal fashion during the 2011-2012academic year. Also during this time ChemProV was being upgraded to include the capability ofaccommodating both material balances and energy balances. In addition, ChemProV is beingintegrated into the OSBLE structure to allow for an asynchronous SBL implementation. In the2012-2013 academic year each of the participating universities then will teach thematerial/energy balance class but now using
the MaterialsStore. After writing up a design proposal, a budget, and rationale for why the design is expected to be successful,each team is ready to gather materials. One student from each group is assigned to pick up the materials thegroup needs. In the typical classroom with thirty students and one sink, a water distribution and disposal systemneeds to be planned. For this lab use Petri dishes (or other small wide pans) to reduce the amount of water neededfor each test; each group has a small container of water at their station and another empty container for disposingof waste water to reduce trips to the sink. Also have a large tub for the class for collecting waste water to bedisposed outside later. It works well to have the teacher be
from the first cohort show satisfactory results for all student learning outcomes exceptStudent Performance Assessment Item 2. The assessment of this item was based on eachindividual’s contribution to the team’s report. Unfortunately, each team member did not performthe steps necessary to obtain credit for the performance of these tasks. In future implementationto improve the performance on this critical item we plan to offer an outline for the report so thatstudents must address each area that is required for this performance evaluation. The students’ability to use DCS system tools to retrieve event and historical data and interpret it is critical totheir ability to perform troubleshooting in the field.Future WorkWe plan to implement
implementation of an assessment plan toevaluate the effectiveness of this tool in promoting higher order thinking skills. The NorthwestRegional Educational Laboratory is providing support for the project evaluation and assessment.A five-member advisory committee consists of engineers and statisticians from academia(Oregon State University, University of Oregon) and industry (LSI Logic, Intel, WaferTech).The VirtualCVD Learning Platform is available now for use in approved courses. Instructorswho are interested in adopting this software into their curriculum can go to the following webpage for information: http://che.oregonstate.edu/research/VirtualCVDMotivationProficiency with statistical methodologies such as Design of Experiments (DOE) is
connections between their introduction to new concepts,the application of those concepts in larger and more complex systems, and the opportunities toapply their gained knowledge and experience within an open-ended project. Discovery usescuriosity and imagination to build connections between fundamental phenomena and personalexperience. Discovery can be simply encapsulated within the statement of “What happens when .. .”, and allows for introduction to classroom concepts, experimental and analytical design.Development uses knowledge of these relationships discovered in the Discovery stage to developan experimental plan. This plan allows students to test hypotheses of system behavior and quantifyrelationships among variables, usually within an
therefore modified the original DLM and tailored it to the con-cepts above. We are currently implementing 15 of these DLM’s replacing a lecture based teach-ing method with a hands on, active learning atmosphere that will hopefully correct any robustmisconceptions and reinforce any correct beliefs. We also, based on preliminary results, havemade three worksheets to accompany the DLM for students to work through and develop a cor-rect working knowledge of the commonly developed misconceptions. We plan to replace threelecture days with interaction with the DLM. Each day will focus on a common misconceptionrelated to: 1) hydraulic jumps and the hydraulic and energy grade lines; 2) flow profiles; and 3)flow transitions, e.g., from subcritical to
informfuture design processes. In addition, we report on initial deployment, community buildingactivities, and future plans for the AIChE Concept Warehouse.Concept-based PedagogyConcept-based pedagogies have been studied in the physics education research community fordecades and provide a model that engineering education researchers have been adopting. Twoconcept-based pedagogical tools have dramatically reshaped how conceptual teaching andlearning are viewed in college physics classrooms: ConcepTests8 and concept inventories.3 Bothof these tools require high quality concept questions in order to be effective. High qualityconcept questions are typically multiple choice, conceptually challenging, and require little to nocalculation so students cannot
Page 14.1144.4 Department about your strong technical background, you have been promoted to the status of provisional sophomore engineer. As a new sophomore chemical engineer in this program, your team of four members will apply problem-based learning to develop a chemical process and determine its process requirements for material and energy using the process simulator Aspen HYSYS. In addition, your team will manually set up and solve chemical processing problems using fundamental principles of material balances, phase equilibria, and energy balances, in order to learn how HYSYS does its calculations on process units. Also, your team will plan, conduct, and analyze experiments in the company's laboratory. Furthermore, as a
plan the course for the second semester of the junior year.Fogler’s Elements [4] and Essentials of Chemical Reaction Engineering [5] textbooks are stillthe most popular, used by 60% of the 85 reporting courses, as shown in Figure 2. Fogler’stextbooks were also the most commonly used in the 1991 and 2010 surveys [6]. A sixth editionof the Folger Elements textbook was released in Fall 2020 but was not captured in this survey.The “Other” category includes books by Hill, Froment, Hayes, and Davis as well as others notfurther described. The websites used most often in 63 responding courses are the textbookwebsite and the course’s learning management system (Figure 3). Other resources notspecifically listed in the figure include Chemical Safety
art. Yet, Dan’s academic plan to support his well-being and be happy are highly criticized. Dan’s vision long-term goal to be employable hasn’t happened and locates himself as “sitting in a void” reconciling with how to modify his plan or where things went wrong. Dan’s internalized yearly failures - the first 2 years of co-op/intern rejections as his lack of soft skills (being personable) and the third year as bad luck because of COVID—are from poor planning that should have been more career-oriented. Dan found the arts helpful to his personal growth and related more to these participating members than engineers. Reflecting Dan grapples with what he should’ve done,“ I shouldn't have made that um, I guess that happiness my
we planned to prepare the students for the jigsaw session, but dueto scheduling conflicts, we held the jigsaw in the recitation period directly following an exam.To avoid burdening students already anxious about an exam with the need to additionally preparefor this activity, we decided not to announce the session prior to class. Students were tasked withexplaining their subteam’s work to students from other production phases. We asked them toshare the following in their jigsaw groups: • Update of important findings • What was important to know for your particular phase? • Why was it important for your design?At the end of the jigsaw session, we elicited anonymous feedback, asking the students to writewhat they’d like to see