AC 2008-1024: KIDS BIRTHDAY PARTIES: “HAVING FUN AND LEARNINGENGINEERING”Gerardine Botte, Ohio University Gerardine G. Botte: Dr. Botte is an Associate Professor at the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department at Ohio University and the Director of the Electrochemical Engineering Research Laboratory (EERL) at Ohio. She received her B.S. from Universidad de Carabobo (Venezuela), and her M.E. and Ph.D. from University of South Carolina. She worked for three years as a Process Engineering in a Petrochemical Complex (PEQUIVEN, filial of PDVSA. Venezuela) before going to graduate school. Dr. Botte applies chemical engineering principles for the analysis of electrochemical systems. She has
student teams work out theirinterpersonal problems only to then be faced with hours of grading lengthy reports. And,although the students only have to complete the work once, for faculty, the cycle repeatsannually.Two years ago, we attended a presentation on gamification in a laboratory course 1. Although theplan used in that paper did not suit us, the idea of adding an element of fun and competition tothe Unit Ops Lab had a certain appeal. We brainstormed ways to incorporate the game conceptand fix some of the small annoyances of teaching the lab courses. The small gamificationaddition was dubbed “Bragging Points”. The idea would be to recognize the students for doingsomething right (that they probably should have been doing anyway) and let them
Paper ID #7252A Computer-Controlled Biodiesel ExperimentDr. William M. Clark, Worcester Polytechnic Institute William Clark is an associate professor in the Chemical Engineering Department at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. He holds a B.S. from Clemson University and a Ph.D. from Rice University, both in Chemical Engineering. He has taught thermodynamics, separation processes, and unit operations laboratory for over 25 years. In addition to research efforts in teaching and learning, he has conducted disciplinary research in separation processes.Mr. Nicholas Janeiro Medeiros, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteDonal James
the Uni- versity of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State University (WSU) faculty for 37 years and for the past 23 years has focused on innovative pedagogy research and technical research in biotechnology. His 2007-2008 Fulbright exchange to Nigeria set the stage for him to receive the Marian Smith Award given annually to the most innovative teacher at WSU. He was also the recent recipient of the inaugural 2016 Innovation in Teaching Award given to one WSU faculty member per year.Kitana Kaiphanliam, Washington State University Kitana Kaiphanliam is a second-year doctoral student in the Chemical Engineering program at Washing- ton State University (WSU). Her
from zyBooks have shown excellent results. Course median reading rates up to 99%were observed. The interactive textbook format has also been demonstrated to help students in thelower third of the class engage in the course [7, 8, 19, 20, 25-27]. Reading participation using azyBook is also discussed in another 2019 ASEE contribution.In this contribution, an interactive textbook for teaching spreadsheets will be reviewed, readingparticipation and repetition analyzed, and successes and challenges of auto-graded problemssummarized.Materials: An interactive textbook with spreadsheetszyBooks creates interactive textbook replacements using the philosophy: Less text, more actionTM.These interactive textbooks are viewed, read, and interacted with in
Paper ID #13244Preparation of Biology Review and Virtual Experiment/Training Videos toEnhance Learning in Biochemical Engineering CoursesDr. Jacob James Elmer, Villanova University Dr. Elmer earned dual B.S. degrees in Biology and Chemical Engineering from the University of Mis- souri Rolla in 2003 and obtained a PhD in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University in 2007. After a short posdoc at Arizona State University and some adjunct teaching at Grand Canyon University, he secured an Assistant Professorship at Villanova University in the Chemical Engineering department. He currently teaches heat transfer and several
chosen a different approach to this section,from teaching a broad overview using a seminar approach, to focusing on teachingspecific software necessary for future courses.Introduction to Chemical Engineering The department faculty has adapted a project-based learning approach due to thelarge success shown in many other similar introductory level courses(3-7). The goal was tointroduce different unit operations through a fun process example that was simple enoughfor the students to follow. The process needed to involve simple chemistry and provideopportunities for introducing different unit operations, teamwork, ethics andsustainability. The other challenge, due to lack of laboratory space, the process ideallywould not require the use of a
Dean of Undergraduate Programs and Professor-in-Residence in the De- partment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his B.S. in chemical engineering from Lehigh University in 1998, and his M.S.C.E.P and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively. His primary areas of interest are chemical vapor deposition and engineering pedagogy.Dr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University Dr. Matthew Cooper is an Associate Professor (Teaching Track) in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. He teaches Material and Energy Balances, Unit Operations, Transport
State University, where he directs the Human-centered Environments for Learning and Programming (HELP) Lab (http://helplab.org). Recipient of over $2.5 million in funding from the National Science Foundation, Dr. Hundhausen applies the methods of human-computer interaction to the design and empirical evaluation of software and pedagogies to improve learning and retention in computing and engineering education.Dr. Derrick Wayne Smith, University of Alabama in Huntsville Dr. Derrick Smith is an Associate Professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville College of Ed- ucation, Department of Curriculum and Instruction. He has over 14 years of professional teaching and research experience within education. His
2011, Dr. Barankin was a lecturer at the Hanze University of Applied Sciences in Groningen, where he taught both in Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado
experts in teaching and research directly related to the light hydrocarbon industry and shalefuel conversion. Second, we will send the survey to our list of 26 industrial partners. Thesepartners range from multinational oil and gas companies to boutique consulting and advisoryfirms focusing on oil and gas, energy, and chemicals. This list also includes national laboratories(i.e., Argonne, Oak Ridge, Pacific Northwest, and Sandia), international universities, andfoundations. The list will also be distributed through networks of the CISTAR faculty to expertsin the field. Together, this list encompasses a wide range of experts across a number of divisions.If the first survey reveals a lack of input from a particular sector, purposeful sampling will
his Ph.D., he moved to the Raleigh area to serve as a Research Chemical Engineer for RTI International, focusing on ”cutting-edge” energy research. In his free time, Cooper enjoys hiking, sports, and cooking.Dr. Lisa G. Bullard P.E., North Carolina State University Lisa G. Bullard is a Teaching Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. She received her B.S. in chemical engineering from NC State and her Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Carnegie Mellon Univer- sity. She served in engineering and management positions within Eastman Chemical Co. from 1991-2000. A faculty member at NCSU since 2000, Bullard has won
strategies being developed are broadly applicablewe will just present one instance, with the civil engineering cartridge, of the identification ofmisconceptions and experimental design for assessing the impact of the DLM on learning. Theassessment includes a pre- and post-test assessment to determine improvement in understandingbasic concepts and persistence and/or repair of misconceptions. Concrete Experience IntroductionHands on teaching methods have a long historyof use in science and engineering. Usually this is Active Experimentation Reflective Observationseen in the form of laboratory classes that eitheraccompany a lecture course to reinforce con-cepts and teach research skills
programs. She also has projects with local companies on the topic of process simulations and analysis for environmental remediation. Dr. Rivera was born and raised in San Juan, Puerto Rico. She is a first generation engineer and doctor- ate. She completed her bachelor’s and Ph.D. in chemical engineering at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez with five publications and two patent applications on the topic of nanotechnology for environ- mental remediation. Dr. Rivera has close to 10 years of teaching experience in Higher Education and professional training. Before joining IE3, Dr. Rivera was the Assistant Director of the Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) program at the University of Florida. Dr
andinvestigate faculty awareness and adoption of a wide variety of research-based instructionalstrategies in engineering education.13 They found three major types of factors that contribute tothe decision to adopt innovations:13 The most prevalent type of factor was resources (e.g., funding, computers, classroom and laboratory space, etc.). Faculty member related issues occurred as the second most common type of factor, and included: time for preparation, management of labor-intensive innovations, culture of the faculty members’ environment, “resistance to change, marginalization of teaching in promotion and tenure, and skepticism regarding evidence of improved student learning. (p. 199)”13 The third
elective(s) in unit operations could be Table 1: Suggested Traditional Chemical Engineering Curriculum Required Subjects Basic Sciences basic skills/freshman class math material and energy balances chemistry thermodynamics physics fluid mechanics biology heat transfer mass transfer/separations Possible Electives transport phenomena§ safety reaction engineering biochemical engineering control materials/polymers unit operations laboratory class(es
, where he has served since 1987. He is currently the Pope Professor of chemical engineering at BYU and an Adjunct Research Professor in the Bioengineering Department of the University of Utah. During his 24 years at BYU, his teaching has been in the areas of materials, polymers, and transport phenomena. His research has spanned many disciplines ranging from biomedical material surfaces and composite materials to his current work in controlled drug and gene delivery. With colleagues and students at BYU and other institutions, he has more than 110 peer-reviewed journal publications.Prof. Morris D. Argyle, Brigham Young University
Engineering award, and the 1999 College of Engineering Outstanding Engineering Educator Award.Dr. Bill B Elmore, Mississippi State University Bill B. Elmore, Ph.D., P.E. is the Interim Director and Hunter Henry Chair for the Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical Engineering, Mississippi State University. His teaching areas include integrated freshman engineering and chemical engineering courses through the curriculum including ChE Problem Analysis and Unit Operations laboratories. His current research intersts include engineering education reform, enzyme-based catalytic reactions and bioengineering applied to renewable fuels and chemicals
Paper ID #6273Using Energy Modules to Introduce Sustainable Engineering and ImproveRetention of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate StudentsDr. Jason M. Keith, Mississippi State University Dr. Jason M. Keith is a professor in and director of the Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical Engineering at Mississippi State University. He is also holder of the Earnest W. Deavenport, Jr. Chair. Prior to joining Mississippi State University, Dr. Keith was employed at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Keith has received numerous teaching and research awards, most notably the Raymond W. Fahien Award from the Chemical Engineering
energy. This energy will then be transferred to the greenhouse enclosure atnight. A moveable thermal blanket will be drawn over the top and down the sides of thegreenhouse on cold nights to further preserve heat.A geothermal closed loop ground coil heating system will be furnished for supplementaryheating with radiant hot water as required. This system will basically transfer heat from theground and discharges it into the greenhouse in the cold weather. It is 50% more efficient than astandard gas fired heater. The yearly electricity requirement for geothermal system will be offsetwith the electricity provided by a 7.5 KW solar voltaic system installed on the south facing roofof the adjacent laboratory building.Monthly heat loss charts have been
dynamics and effectiveness.Teams are easily observed during classroom or laboratory workshops, either whencomputational, deliberation, or laboratory activities are being done. If agreeable, teams can befilmed or photographed. Candid still photos taken by a teaching assistant have also been found tobe helpful at identifying ineffective team behaviors. Some common problems observed include: Page 22.1341.11distracted students, e.g. using computer to surf or view Facebook or texting on cell phone duringteam meeting; unengaged students, e.g. a student that never contributes and works off to the sidewhile others appear engaged; disconnected team, e.g
Uni- versity of Technology (Austria) studying and teaching engineering education, particle technology, and pharmaceutical engineering. His research interests include particle technology, transport phenomena, and engineering education. His current educational research is focused on peer instruction, technology- enhanced active learning, and electronic textbooks.Prof. Marc-Olivier Coppens, University College London (UCL) Marc-Olivier COPPENS, FIChemE, is Ramsay Memorial Chair and Head of Department of Chemical En- gineering at UCL, since 2012, after academic posts at Rensselaer (USA) and TU Delft (Netherlands). He is Director of UCL’s Centre for Nature Inspired Engineering, which was awarded a £5M EPSRC ”Frontier
large research centers funded by DOE, USDA and other agenciesCenter/Laboratory name Institution / DepartmentEngines & Energy Conversion Laboratory Colorado State Univ. Depart. of Mech. Eng.(EECL)Center for BioEnergy Research and Dev. South Dakota School of Mines and Tech. (lead) Multi-Univ. /(CBERD) multidiscip.Biomass Energy Center Pennsylvania State Univ. / Multidiscip. (incl. Chem. Eng.)Office of Biobased Technologies (OBT) Michigan State Univ. / Multidiscip., (incl. Chem. Eng.)The Institute for Massachusetts Biofuel Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst / Multidiscip. (incl. Chem. Eng.)ResearchBiofuel Research Laboratory (BRL
Engineering for last seventeen years. His research interests include Environmental and Surface Chemistry, Catalysis, Advanced Materials, Biomedical Research, Capillary Electrophoresis, Advanced Electrochemistry and Sensors.Jewel Gomes, Lamar University Dr. Gomes currently serves as Postdoctoral Researcher at the Department of Chemical Engineering of Lamar University under Dr. Cocke. His research interests are Atmospheric Chemistry, Matrix Isolation Spectroscopy, Gaussian Simulation, Wastewater Management, Materials Characterization, and Electrochemistry. He is also actively involved with Problem Based Learning (PBL) laboratory of Lamar.Hector Casillas, Lamar University Mr. Moreno is currently
received his Ph.D. from MIT in 1998 and his B.S. from WPI in 1992. Among his areas of interest are use of computing and process simulation in the curriculum. He has received the 2005 Raymond W. Fahien Award, the 2003 Joseph J. Martin Award and the 2002 PIC-III Award from ASEE.Richard Zollars, Washington State University DICK ZOLLARS is a professor in, and director of, the School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering at Washington State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado. He has been teaching engineering for 27 years. His interests are colloidal/interfacial phenomena and reactor design
a specific laboratory environment.These later interventions do not help their understanding when they are initially taught theseconcepts. To address this, miniaturized hands-on modules have been developed to compelstudent engagement in sophomore and junior level engineering classes, specifically within theheat transfer and fluid mechanics classroom context. These highly visual low-cost desktoplearning modules (LC-DLMs) have been shown to improve student understanding compared topassive lectures, especially at higher Bloom’s levels such as evaluation and creation [4-5].Even with significant data to support the fact that active learning leads to more cognitive gainscompared to traditional lecture-based teaching, there are still perceived
participants indicated their initial impres-at 75.1 gallons. Over 70% of student water conservation sions of chemical engineering involved excessive work inefforts involved reducing the amount of time showering, which experimental laboratories, and were not aware of the subjectsaccounted for an average of 50.4% of their daily water use environmental applications. A number of responses indicatedwithout conservation. Water use from showering also showed that reservoir design was a task students did not associate withFig. 3. Common student activities that required use of water, and theiraverage daily use both with and without water consumption. All units are inUS Gallons
has caused it to manifest itself in different ways across programs. While someprograms have built it into required courses, others dedicated resources to provide a coursefocused on teaching TC to engineering students. Technical communications exists in the schoolof engineering at our institution in multiple forms, but most notably are integrated methodswithin capstone or laboratory courses and a stand-alone engineering elective. The electiveENGR 245 (later renamed to ENGR 248) is not required in any of the engineering disciplines’curricula, however, it is taken by many students in the college. This dedicated TC course isdesigned to be a kinesthetic environment that leverages past experiences of the students. Studentsare engaged into role
Paper ID #19349Films, Foams and Powders: Using Food to Introduce First Year Students toChemical EngineeringDr. Polly R. Piergiovanni, Lafayette College Polly R. Piergiovanni is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Lafayette College. Besides chemical engineering courses, she teaches an engineering course to nonengineering students. Her current research interests include critical thinking evident in student writing and assessing learning in experiential learning activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Films, Foams and Powders: Using Food to Introduce
dynamics (how processes change in time inresponse to perturbations), and to develop the skills for controlling dynamic chemical processes.The concepts in question are difficult to grasp from a textbook alone, neither are the requiredskills easy to acquire merely by solving math problems.At Rowan University, we have developed an active learning strategy for teaching PD&C thatintegrates seamlessly with class material and is conducive to a variety of learning styles. In thiscourse, the students are required to complete an in-class active learning module each week. Eachassignment begins with conceptual questions that help the students recall the theory underlyingthe topic and provide additional problem-solving practice. Next, the assignment