enroll in a unit operations laboratory. This factor may or may not have influences student’sinterview results from the study, but it was consistent for both the group that received hands-onand the group that received lecture, so it is assumed the two groups are equal with respect toadditional hands-on learning.The interview protocol was updated to better reflect the course content that was covered in 2013.One question from the 2012 protocol was omitted on applying the ME balance to a piping systemand another question on continuity was added. The results from the continuity question will bereported elsewhere. The 2013 interview protocol can be viewed in the appendix of this paperwith questions emphasizing different usages of the ME balance and
integrity.” • “I don't want this to turn into some kind of witch-hunt where I have to defend myself for even writing a similar sentence.”These comments reflect the views espoused in other literature on the use of Turnitin6. However,in the selected sample of ChE students, these views were in the minority as indicated by thesmall fraction (<10%) of negative responses from each class. It is suggested by the authors thatthe focus of this particular ChE department on ethics throughout the curriculum may inform themore tolerant nature of students’ views toward their instructor using plagiarism screeningsoftware. Similar views have also been described in other studies pertaining to non-engineeringstudents8, 9.A considerable fraction of students
ProblemsChallenge-Based (CBI) is (or, at least, can be framed as) a variant of PBL: rather thanapproaching course material as a sequence of topics, CBI presents material through aseries of specific challenges or modules. The development of CBI was inspired byadvances in learning science brought forward in the 2000 book “How People Learn”12,and is centered around a learning cycle (typically the STAR.Legacy learning cycledeveloped at Vanderbilt University). After presenting the challenge, students reflect oninitial thoughts, then receive information in the form of perspectives and resources; theythen apply what they have learned and are assessed in some form, and finally, thechallenge is solved either by the student or an expert or some collaboration between
?AcknowledgementsSeveral of the panelists gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation’sCourse, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement Program, under the grant NSF 1023099,“Collaborative Research: Integration of Conceptual Learning throughout the Core ChemicalEngineering Curriculum.” Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation. Page 22.1317.9References1. Elby, A. (1999). Another reason that physics students learn by rote. American Journal of Physics 67, S52.2. Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R
students to comment onhow the repetitive structure of the ChE lab course has impacted their education and academicdevelopment.Results of the SurveyOf 90 students in ChE 101, 76 responded and 67 of the 78 students in ChE 301 responded. Thepercent of students’ responses from both courses are compared in Table 3. The number ofrespondents per question for ChE 101 and ChE 301 are tabulated in Tables 4 and 5, respectivelyand are presented at the end of the paper.Discussion of ResultsIt is important to note that this survey reflects the student attitudes towards the lab courses and Page 22.1579.5does not provide a direct measurement of the actual
students halfway to being able to do it as well as their professors, justtaking longer (3.5). Lastly, the students were asked to reflect back on their skills at thebeginning of the course and compare them to the end of the course when they completed thesurvey (Q28), the average felt they were somewhat better now (4.2) with graduate studentslanding halfway between ‘no change’ and ‘somewhat better now’ at 3.5 and undergraduatesbeing between ‘much better now’ and ‘somewhat better now’ at 4.5. This ties back into the firstquestion which asked if the students thought the class was a good use of their time, which amajority did. Page
. integrated. feedback loops may exist. Correctness – conforming The map is naive and contains The map has few subject matter The map integrates concepts to or agreeing with fact, misconceptions about the sub- inaccuracies; most links are cor- properly and reflects an accurate logic, or known truth ject area; inappropriate words or rect. There may be a few spelling understanding of subject matter terms are used. The map docu- and grammatical errors. meaning little or no misconcep- ments an inaccurate understand- tions, spelling/grammatical er- ing
teaching methodology, as it helped them transition smoothly from a student to avaluable employee in the U.S. workforce.AcknowledgmentsThis work is partly supported by an internal KEEN (Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network)curricular reimagination grant.Works Cited[1] C. H. T. Ng and S.-M. Cheah, “Chemical product engineering using CDIO enhanced with design thinking,” p. 9, 2012.[2] M. Lynch, U. Kamovich, K. K. Longva, and M. Steinert, “Combining technology and entrepreneurial education through design thinking: Students’ reflections on the learning process,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 164, p. 119689, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.015.[3] T. F. Edgar, B. A. Ogunnaike, J. J. Downs, K. R. Muske, and B
]. Additionally, this strong interest inbiomaterials is reflected economically. In 2019, the global market for biomaterials was estimatedto be worth $106.5 billion, and revenues from biomaterials are projected to increase to $348.4billion by 2027 [5]. To ensure these societal and economic demands for novel biomaterials aremet, we must prioritize educating diverse students about designing, engineering, and testingbiomaterials [6], [7].One way to meet this goal is through K-12 outreach. Outreach is an important activity forincreasing the number of students studying science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) at the university level [8], [9]. This is especially important for increasing therepresentation of individuals who are traditionally
at:http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSpage.html, Accessed 1/15/2008.8. Fleming, N. and Mills, C.: Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection, To Improve the Academy,11:137-149, 1992.9. Fleming, N.: VARK, a guide to learning styles, information and instrument available on-line at:http://www.vark-learn.com/english/index.asp, Accessed 1/12/2008.10. White, A. and Livesay, G.A.: Differential student engagement with hands-on activities, Accepted forpresentation at the ASEE IL/IN section meeting, Terre Haute, IN April 3-5, 2008. Page 13.432.10Appendix – Detailed Description of the Hands-on Activities
activities designed to foster self-reflection and investigation of career pathways can bebuilt directly into required courses. This is particularly useful when it is done consistently and isevaluated formally as part of the student's academic performance. Assignments that have beenused to do this successfully include a one page essay where students describe why they areinterested in their major and what aspects of possible careers interest them after a short lecture onthe possibilities. Another activity involves a lecture on resumes, their content, and how tostructure them to be concise and attractive, followed by an assignment requiring students tosubmit a resume for critique and scoring. This activity has been done at the freshman level tomotivate
state assumptions, investigateand find sources for data. Extensions become more important, and students are asked to reflect ontheir assumptions and solution method. Bringing students into the thought process required totake on these new responsibilities may be easier if the overall structure for problem-solving isconsistent in a curriculum. In third year, emphasis in instruction should be placed on thefollowing elements: • Data and Assumptions — Decide on relevant assumptions and data sources; • Solution procedure — Identify the best solution method (numerical or analytical); and, • Extension — Understand potential problem variations (impact of assumptions on solution procesure)..The Concept Map for Fourth-year Courses A large
that the Aspen Plus instructor slow down or otherwise provide“helping moments” during the lectures to ensure students keep up with the tutorial or examplemodels. Students responded well to this change, both in the mid-semester survey and in courseevaluations, leading the instructor to adopt this teaching method permanently.The in-person feedback session was a lunch-time meeting (with pizza provided by thedepartment) including the coordinators of the course and a panel of students selected from agroup of volunteers. The student panel was chosen to reflect the full range of academicperformers in the class as well as the diversity of experiences from working on different projects(with different advisors). These sessions often provided the most
were completed byeveryone in the group. During both years, the results were kept confidential. However, theinstructors intervened as necessary when significant differences and problems were observed.The discussion on these results is presented in the next section.4. Results and Survey DiscussionFirst, the results of the numerical peer evaluations are presented when the instructor assignedteams. As each team leader led a presentation, several disagreements and conflicts within thegroups were shared with the instructors, and these results were reflected in the numerical peerevaluation. Figure 2 shows the results of the numerical surveys provided to the students duringthe Fall 2016 semester when teams were assigned based on individual academic
also conducted with respect to the “Feedback Controls” comic, which depicted theindividual PID tuning parameters proportional gain (KC), integral time (τI), and derivative time (τD) asboxers, with the strength and speed of their punches relating to the impact that the respective tuningparameters would have. An instructor who had taught a section of Process Controls in both the fall andspring of the 2014-2015 academic year, implemented the comic in a section of both semesters in the2015-2016 academic year. A similar exam question was given to students in all four semesters thatdirectly addressed the effects of the individual PID tuning parameters. Class sizes varied, as reflective of the growth in the enrolled students at Northeastern (10
methodswhereby they achieve the learning objectives. This is deliberate as the instructor gives onlytechnical guidance and course lectures are for the most part generic and not specific to the widerange of projects that the students might choose. Therefore, successful completion of the courserequires students to design and undertake their own physical or computational experiments andthus take charge of their own learning.The following are some reflections on recent cohorts from the instructor’s point of view: • At the end of the semester, there is a high degree of enthusiasm exhibited by the students taking the course. Although some students complained in the surveys of the large workload, there are almost no drop-offs for
point Chemical and Mechanical Engineering are the only two coreengineering discipline divisions that have committed to a diversity effort. It is our hope that thiswill change during the ‘year of action on diversity’.To quantify the prevalence of diversity-related efforts in engineering education, we did akeyword search for articles that appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) and inthe European Journal of Engineering Education (EJEE). The number of relevant articles in thesejournals will reflect the diversity-related efforts happening in the United States (JEE) and Europe(EJEE). The keywords ‘diversity’, ‘women’, ‘minority’, and ‘gender’ were used as search termsfor homologous hits in article titles. Two other keywords commonly
3. Since there are three “choices,” oneonly has three degrees of freedom before the vehicle is totally specified. Another way to helpstudents to see that 3 is the correct answer is to once again reflect on the reaction balancing Page 26.1661.6problem. There are four variables in the example problem (Example 1), but once one of thevariables has been specified, the entire problem is specified completely. Therefore, there is only one “chooice” to be made. m This iss true despitee the fact thaat the one chhoice can be made an inffinitenumber ofo ways. Equating a deg
. For all student-led examples, student teams are tasked to complete the following:1. Develop a 30-45 minute step by step learning module for your classmates on the background physics, setting up and solving of the assigned problem. Start from fundamental concepts (i.e. those foundations already covered in the course) and build up to apply them in the example. a) Make sure that your team coordinates closely on the preparation of your example. The goal is to teach yourself and each other the material. Teams who divide up individual work are easily recognizable – this will be reflected in the grades (see section below). b) It is OK to give the class any supporting reading materials prior to your
National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1712186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. This work was completed within the framework of University of Toledo protocol202214.References1. Crimson. Top 10 Jobs in 2030: Skills You Need Now to Land the Jobs of the Future: Future Skills. 2018 [cited 2019 January]; Available from: https://www.crimsoneducation.org/us/blog/jobs-of-the-future.2. Vest, C.M., Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. 2012.3. Daigger, G.T., et al., Real World Engineering Education Committee. 2012.4
added to experiment Volume of methanol remaining in product Moles of methanol added to experiment Mass of methanol remaining in product Volume of methanol reacted Moles of methanol remaining in product Mass of methanol reactedFor the entire reaction procedure, determine the following, and compare the ratios to those Page 13.489.12specified by the theoretical equations.Moles methanol:moles oilMass methanol:mass oilVolume methanol:volume oilTask #4: Re-write the chemical reaction on a mass, molar, and volume basis, to reflect the actualamount of oil used, the total amount of methanol added as a
system(ABET17). Therefore, we do not perform a formal evaluation of learning outcomes using theABET categories a-k. However, we have prepared a summary in Appendix A giving our viewsof how the PSE program contributes to the key ABET learning goals.3.0 Teaching and Learning MethodsPSE material is presented using a range of teaching and learning methods that reflect the needsof the courses and the preferences of the instructors. Since the material is concentrated in the lasttwo years of the undergraduate program, many courses include projects that integrate the priorknowledge with PSE technology. Some of the instructors use Problem-based learning to involvestudents in problem definition and open-ended problem solving7. In addition, two of
ofthe study director and management immediately.(4) Periodically submit to management and the study director written status reports on each study, noting anyproblems and the corrective actions taken.(5) Determine that no deviations from approved protocols or standard operating procedures were made withoutproper authorization and documentation.(6) Review the final study report to assure that such report accurately describes the methods and standard operatingprocedures, and that the reported results accurately reflect the raw data of the nonclinical laboratory study.(7) Prepare and sign a statement to be included with the final study report which shall specify the dates inspectionswere made and findings reported to management and to the study
bystudents taking this course. The majority of responses indicated the following commonchallenges: Was this an open-ended question or are there stats to indicate what % of peoplementioned each response? Any value in reflecting that, or OK to lump together under generalconcerns? Cheating (downloadable solutions) Student maturity/seriousness Problem-solving skills Mathematical Software Skills Physics, chemistry & math preparation Preference for familiar units Limited contact time Broad range of student ability
could be strengthened. Upon reflection, almost all curricular changessuggested and undertaken in the department, in regard to course enhancements, were recognizedto come from Part 1 of the instructor assessment (See Figure 1) rather than the numerical ratingsobtained from the student assessments or Part 2 of the instructor assessment. Part 1 is filled outby the instructor, where a portion of this form requires the instructor to identify strengths andweaknesses of the students based upon direct assessment. Requiring each instructor to evaluatethe performance of each course each semester generates a tremendous amount of ideas toimprove the curriculum in a manner that the numerical data, from either the instructor or thestudents, never does.The
other hand, they report that innovative instruction can lead toimprovements in student beliefs. A project based design (graphic, industrial, interiorphotographic and fashion) curriculum, and a business curriculum promoting self reflection bothresulted in statistically significant increases in deep approach scores as measured by the SPQ.Although conventional lecture-based educational practices tend to reinforce more naive beliefs,innovative instruction can develop more expert-like beliefs, which in turn can promote learning.Over the last four years, the WISE Learning Tool has become an increasingly integralcomponent of the Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering (CBEE) curriculum atOSU, and has been integrated into the three courses