stoppeddropping after a while. Water at different temperatures were then assigned to different groupsand they were asked to take temperature readings at regular intervals for 10 minutes with a waterflow rate of 74 mL/s (70 gph) and an air speed of 1 m/s (as measured by an anemometer). Figure2 is a schematic of the process. Following the data taking, the students worked on several con-ceptual questions that prepared them for the analysis of experimental data and evaporator per- Page 15.243.7formance predictions that they would be doing as homework. The evaporator analysis involvedfinding the slope of the temperature versus time graph near time zero along
bookexam. (Author’s note: we are working on further statistical analysis to discern the effect). Page 23.999.11References[1]Smith, J. M.; Van Ness, H. C.; Abbott, M.M.; Introductions to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, McGrawHill, 7th Edition, February 1 2005.[2]Bruneau J.; Techniques to increase student reading, Wakonse, May 24-29, Muskegon, 2012.[3]Fry, S. W., and Villagomez, A. Writing to Learn: Benefits and Limitations. College Teaching, Vol 60, No 4, p170-175 (2012).[4]Mosteller, F., The “Muddiest Point in the Lecture” as a Feedback Device. On Teaching and Learning, Volume 3,ege Teaching, Vol 3, p 10-21 (1989).[5] Pryor, J.H., Eagan, K
. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.5 Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW press.6 Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.7 Lord, S. M., Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Layton, R. A., Ohland, M. W., & Wasburn, M. H., (2009). Work in
application of what isbeing taught.1 Educational researchers also widely acknowledge that learning by doing is moreeffective for most people than passively listening to a lecture.2 Finally, there is consistent andstrong data from employers of chemical engineers that the primary attributes they are looking forin new hires include problem-solving skills, teamwork skills, and communication skills.3 Thesedata have been a strong motivation to change how the first chemical engineering course is taught. Page 14.1144.2Between the late 1990’s and the early 2000’s, the Principles of Chemical Engineering atBucknell University was transformed from a more
contribute ideas for activities based upon their more recentexperiences learning the material.How can I start flipping a large class with no graduate or undergraduate TA support?Julie – Since I don’t really know the institutional constraints involved, I’m just going to throwout some ideas. Maybe one will work; hopefully, one will get you thinking about what couldwork for you specifically. Could you conscript your graduate student(s) to TA for you pro bono(as part of their broader impact fulfillment on a research stipend)? Could you have anindependent study class for undergraduates that would focus on teaching, mentoring and
report FY 2015,” 2016.[5] United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB), “Impact Report FY 2016,” 2017.[6] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/.[7] S. J. Dee, B. L. Cox, and R. A. Ogle, “Connect with Wiley,” Process Saf. Prog., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 316–319, 2015.[8] B. K. Vaughen and T. A. Kletz, “Continuing our process safety management journey,” Process Saf. Prog., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 337–342, 2012, doi: 10.1002/prs.11515.[9] E. Mkpat, G. Reniers, and V. Cozzani, “Process safety education: A literature review,” J. Loss
simplified into approachablemathematical terminology while still capturing essential system behavior.The methods outlined in the second case study extend the original aim presented to thestudents into discussions and considerations of multiple drug doses, complications ofmodeling of the human body, the issue of complex system modeling, and the concernsand factors involved in determining “how” to modeling severely complex systems.Through use of the first case study the students have been facing both mathematical andexperimental complications in the project and with the addition of the second case studythe overall project goal(s) are reinforced. The simulations students construct provideadditional paths for examination of behaviors in a very complex
limited budget.Acknowledgements We would like to thank the students Sarah H. Widder, Margaret S. Donegan-Ryan andKyle M. Flotlin who kindly provided Karr Column diagrams from their experimental planningreport. We also want to thank David Gery and Arne Biermans who have helped in themodification liquid-liquid extraction equipment. Page 14.78.21References[1] Wintermantel, K. Process and Product Engineering Achievements, Present and Future Challenges. TransIChemE , 77 (A), 175-187, 1999.[2] Molzahn, M. and Wittstock, K. Chemical Engineers for the 21st Century - Challenges for University Education.Chemical Engineering & Technology , 25 (3), 231-235, 2002.[3] Saraiva, P. M. and Costa, R
discussed with any of the groups but isa possibility for further consideration. In order to determine if the outcomes of this project are reproducible, a version of thisproject will be introduced into Northeastern ’s fluid mechanics course in an upcoming semester.In order to better analyze the student’s self-reported enjoyment and improvement, a 4-point Likertscale will be used on the end-of-semester surveys to more accurately assess and quantify studentresponses. An ANNOVA analysis will also be utilized for better comparison between semesters.References(1) Vreman-de Olde, G.C., de Jong, T., Gijlers, H. Educational Technology & Society, 2013, 16(4),47-58.(2) Leeder, D. Education Media International, 2000, 37(4), 219–224.(3) Cherrett, T
, Longman2 E. L. Boyer and L. D. Mitgang, Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education and Practice, Princeton, NJ, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1996.3 J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1991.4 C.D. Hundhausen, N.H. Narayanan, and M.E. Crosby, “Exploring Studio-Based Instructional Models for Computing Education,” Proc. 2008 ACM Symposium on Computer Science Education, 392, New York, ACM Press.5 M. Oliver-Hoyo and R Beichner, "The SCALE-UP Project," Teaching and Learning through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors,” edited by V. S. Lee, Stylus
Structure: Lessons for Engineering Instructors from a Capstone DesignCourse Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington.10.18260/p.2434810. Anderson, C. R. (2014, June), Development of a Drug Delivery Elective for ChemicalEngineers Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis,Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/2030511. Savelski, M., & Farrell, S., & Hesketh, R., & Slater, C. S. (2003, June), Fundamentals,Design, And Applications Of Drug Delivery Systems Paper presented at 2003 AnnualConference, Nashville, Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/1182712. Mansilla, V. B., Lamont Michele, and Sato, K. (2012) Successful InterdisciplinaryConnections: The contributions of shared
. Boice, Advice for new faculty members: nihil nimus, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.[2] P. C. Wankat, The effective, efficient professor: teaching, scholarship, and service, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2002.[3] J. Price and S. R. Cotten, "Teaching, research, and service: expectations of assistant professors," The American Sociologist, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 5-21, 2006.[4] B. G. Davis, Tools for teaching, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.[5] T. Huston, Teaching what you don't know, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.[6] W. J. McKeachie and M. Svinicki, "Countdown for course preparation," in McKeachie's teaching tips: strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 2006
National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1712186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. This work was completed within the framework of University of Toledo protocol202214.References1. Crimson. Top 10 Jobs in 2030: Skills You Need Now to Land the Jobs of the Future: Future Skills. 2018 [cited 2019 January]; Available from: https://www.crimsoneducation.org/us/blog/jobs-of-the-future.2. Vest, C.M., Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. 2012.3. Daigger, G.T., et al., Real World Engineering Education Committee. 2012.4
? - Focusing on precision in thinking. Am I providing enough details? - Focusing on accuracy in thinking. Am I certain that the information I am using is accurate? - Focusing on relevance in thinking. How does my point bear on the issue at hand? - Focusing on logicalness in thinking. Given the information I have gathered, what is the most logical conclusion? - Focusing on breadth in thinking. I wonder whether I need to consider another viewpoint(s)? - Focusing on depth in thinking. What complexities are inherent in this issue? - Focusing on justification in thinking. Is the purpose justified or is it unfair, self- contradictory, or self-defeating given the facts
correction factor, F(G) for a 1 pass shell side and 2 pass tube side exchanger applied tothe log mean temperature difference as described with the correction factor a function of the twoparameters R and S as shown below.12 Eq 5 Eq 6 Eq 7Using the modified shell and tube exchanger with thermocouples attached at the middle andeither end of the tube bundle on both first and second tube passes, experimental individual heattransfer coefficients hi and ho can be derived using the
Engineering Education 8(4).3. Saterbak, A., Huang-Saad, A. & P. Helmke, B. Biomedical Engineering Education and the Special COVID-19 Issue. Biomed Eng Education 1, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-020-00029-64. Holme, T. A. (2020). Introduction to the Journal of Chemical Education Special Issue on Insights Gained While Teaching Chemistry in the Time of COVID-19.5. Atman, C. J. (2020). Hope, Stress, Sketch & Kvetch: Emphasizing Caring Through Reflection in Online Teaching in the Pandemic. Advances in Engineering Education 8(4).6. Blizak, D., Blizak, S., Bouchenak, O., & Yahiaoui, K. (2020). Students’ Perceptions Regarding the Abrupt Transition to Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case of Faculty of
education.References1 ABET. Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs. (2014).2 Phase, I. Educating the Engineer of 2020:: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. (National Academies Press, 2005).3 Ainsworth, S. in Visualization: Theory and practice in science education 191-208 (Springer, 2008).4 Miskioğlu, E. E. in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE. 1-7 (IEEE).5 Kolb, D. A. Learning styles and disciplinary differences. The modern American college, 232-255 (1981).6 Miskioğlu, E. E. Learning in Style: Investigation of Factors Impacting Student Success in Chemical Engineering at Individual and Team-Levels with a Focus on Student Learning Styles, The Ohio State University
Interviews (BEI) technique was chosen as atechnique to assess students’ level of leadership competence. The basic principle ofcompetency approach is that what people think or say about their motives or skills is notcredible. Only what they actually do, in the most critical incidents they have faced, is tobe believed22. Therefore, the objective of BEI is to get very detailed behavioraldescriptions of how a person goes about doing his/her work22. The questions are basedon real situations and the interviewee is asked to describe the specific behaviors,thoughts, and actions s/he has shown in real critical situations. An example BEIquestion is; “Describe a time when, against all odd, you were able to get a project ortask completed within the defined
description into visual form.1 R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman, "Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education," Engr.Education, 78(7), 674-681 (1988).2 D. Norman and S. Draper, User-centered system design, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah, NJ, (1986). Page 13.382.9
: The graphics are clear. In contrast, visual aids are not easily seen by many seats in a typical classroom. • Duration: The “twenty-minute” rule for length of lesson was not observed. However, students have the option to take a break(s) during the e-Lesson; break points are suggested. • Participation: Exercises are included during the workshop class to encourage students to begin their problem solving. Complete solutions are provided. • Quiz: A digitally-mediated quiz containing numerous short-answer (true-false, multiple choice) questions is provided after the new material has been presented in each e-Lesson. This quiz is not graded, and solutions are given for all responses. This approach is
, Fall 2017.[9] C. E. Osgood, G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum, The measurement of meaning (no. 47). University of Illinois press, 1957.[10] B. K. Sato et al., "What’s in a Prerequisite? A Mixed-Methods Approach to Identifying the Impact of a Prerequisite Course," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 16, no. 1, p. ar16, 2017.[11] R. Lieu, A. Gutierrez, and J. F. Shaffer, "Student Perceived Difficulties in Learning Organ Systems in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course," HAPS Educator, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 84-92, 2018.[12] J. S. Eccles, "Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors," 1983.
Annual Meeting. 2015.6. Branch, K.J. and A.E. Butterfield. Analysis of student interactions with browser-based interactive simulations. in ASEE Annual Meeting. 2015. Seattle, WA.7. Falconer, J. and G. Nicodemus, Interactive Mathematica simulations in chemical engineering courses. Chemical Engineering Education, 2014. 48(3): p. 165-174.8. Chi, M.T., Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Top Cogn Sci, 2009. 1(1): p. 73-105.9. Chickering, A.W. and Z.F. Gamson, Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. AAHE Bulletin, 1987: p. 1-7.10. Freeman, S., et al., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and
responsecurves for the circulating bath, jacket, and reactor and the integral absolute error (IAE) providinga measure of the deviation of the process temperature from the set point. ∞ 𝐼𝐴𝐸 = ∫0 |𝐸(𝑡)|𝑑𝑡 (2)A typical response curve is shown in Figure 3. T (K) Time (s)Figure 3. Temperature (K) in the reactor (blue), bath (green) and hose (magenta) as a function oftime in seconds. Set point temperature is in red. Page 26.130.4Student ExperienceSome students may have encountered
, June 2010.3. Grenville, R. K. & A.W. Nienow, “Mixing of Miscible Fluids”, In NAMF Handbook of Industrial Mixing, (E. L. Paul, V. A. Atiemo-Obeng and S. A. Kresta eds.), Wiley, NY, 2004. Page 26.1158.7Figure 1: Vessel, baffles, motor and speed controllerFigure 2a: Narrow blade hydrofoil Figure 2b: Wide blade hydrofoilFigure 2c: Pitched blade turbine Figure 2d: Rushton turbine Page 26.1158.8Figure 3: Conductivity versus time for blend time measurement
eight respondents, the majority of whom were professors from researchinstitutions, completed the survey. Although there were not any statistically significantconclusions, the results suggest that (1) having a formal application procedure, (2) choosingundergraduates based on conceptual understanding and (3) assessing undergraduates basedlargely on critical thinking lead to more undergraduates attending graduate school. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Professors William Krantz (University of Cincinnati),Christine Grant (North Carolina State University) and Willie Harper Jr. (Auburn University) forfeedback on the survey. References 1. Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P. and McCullough, J., “Benefits of Undergraduate Research
engineering.References1. am Ende, D. (ed) Chemical Engineering in the Pharmaceutical Industry: R&D to Manufacturing. Wiley, 2010.2. http://pharmeng.rutgers.edu/ [accessed 1/7/2013]3. http://chemicaleng.njit.edu/academics/graduate/masters/pharm.php [accessed 1/7/2013]4. Farrell, S., Slater, CS., Gephardt, ZO., Savelski, MJ. Workshop Modules on Pharmaceutical Engineering forUndergraduate Education. Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.5. Cavanagh, DP, Wagner JJ. A Three-Week Hands-On Introduction to Biotransport & Drug Delivery for First-YearEngineering Students. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.6. Allen, LV. Popovich, N., Ansel, HC. Ansel’s Pharmaceutical Dosage
Engineering, 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2005, pages 836 – 841.3. Seader, J.D., Henley, E.J., Separation Process Principles, 2nd Edition, Wiley, 2006, pages 548 – 613. Page 25.853.84. Felder, R. M., and Rousseau, R. W., Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, 3rd Edition, Wiley, 2005, pages 275-76.5. Chairat, M., Rattanaphani, S., Bremer, J.B., Rattanaphani, V., An adsorption and kinetic study of lac dyeing on silk. Dyes and Pigments 2005 (64): 231 – 41.6. Smith, A.I. and Wallitsch, E., Comparison of Wool and Silk Dyeing Kinetics using Allura (Red No. 20). Subitted to Dyes and Pigments, Summer 2012
Engineering”. Chemical Engineering Progress, March 2013. 2. Saltzman W. Drug Delivery. Oxford University Press, 2001. 3. Truskey G. et al. Transport Phenomena in Biological Systems. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. 4. Farrell S. et al. “Drug Delivery Education Using Microsphere Technology,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2011. 5. Gu F. et al. “Sustained Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor with Alginate Beads,” Journal of Controlled Release, 2004, 96(3): 463-472. 6. Gombotz W. et al. “Protein Release from Alginate Matrices,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1998, 31 (3): 267-285