Paper ID #25161Work in Progress: Career Ready... or Not? A Career-Readiness Activity forSenior Chemical Engineering StudentsDr. Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Daniel Anastasio is an assistant professor at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009 and 2015, respectively. His primary areas of research are game-based learning in engineering courses and membrane separations for desalination and water purification.Elizabeth R. Morehouse, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Liz Morehouse is an assistant director in
Paper ID #27004The Relationship Between Spatial Skills and Solving Problems in ChemicalEngineeringDr. Norman W. Loney, University of Cincinnati Norman Loney received his undergraduate and graduate chemical engineering and mathematics degrees from New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT). He has authored or coauthored more than 64 publications and presentations relating to the use of applied mathematics in chemical engineering since joining the Chemical Engineering department at NJIT in 1991. His most noteworthy publication is the textbook: ”Applied Mathematical Methods for Chemical Engineers” 2nd Ed. published by
Paper ID #27526Board 13: The Effects of Frequent, Multimodal Questioning to DriveLecture: A Positive Case for IRE Student-Instructor InteractionsRobert Gammon-Pitman, Ohio State University PhD student studying STEM education with a focus in engineering education. I am an engineering edu- cator determined to improve the student learning via professional development, outreach, and community development. LinkedIn URL Below https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-gammon-pitman-5888152bDr. Paul E. Post, Ohio State University Ph.D. in Industrial Technology, Purdue University M.S. in Industrial Education, Purdue University B.S. in
[cited 2019 January]; Available from: https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.2. Kennedy, G.E., et al., First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian journal of educational technology, 2008. 24(1).3. Roos, D., How Net Generation Students Work. 2007.4. Lang, J.M., Small Teaching: Everyday Lessons from the Science of Learning. 2016: John Wiley & Sons.5. Liberatore, M.W., Improved student achievement using personalized online homework for a couse in material and energy balances. Chemical Engineering Education, 2011. 45(3): p. 184-190.6. World Economic Forum, Figure 10: Change in demand for core work-related skills, 2015- 2020, all
Paper ID #27555Board 12: Inclusive Learning and Teaching Strategies or Effective CourseDesign? Constructing Significant Learning Experiences in Low and HighAchieving LearnersRobert Gammon-Pitman, Ohio State University PhD student in STEM education with a focus in engineering education. I am an engineering educator determined to improve student learning via effective teaching & learning strategies, professional develop- ment, outreach, and community development. LinkDr. Paul E. Post, Ohio State University Ph.D. in Industrial Technology, Purdue University M.S. in Industrial Education, Purdue University B.S. in
students’ experienceswhich serve as invaluable pointers for the next phase of our curriculum review. Firstly, weneed to think more carefully about the technological platforms we expose our students to asthey impact the ways in which students engage with learning and subsequently with us aseducators. Secondly, valued and connected support mechanisms are key to ensuring studentsdevelop appropriate ways of coping with their workload which in and of itself, needs to bebalanced. Finally, students need to be more exposed to employers and industrial settings sothat they can further develop their professional skills.References:[1]. Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., Stice J.E. and Rugarcia, A., “The future of engineering education”, Chemical Engineering
sciences, and instructional design and technology. His recent research focuses on the cognitive and pedagogical underpinnings of learning with computer-based multimedia re- sources; knowledge representation through interactive concept maps; meta-analysis of empirical research, and investigation of instructional principles and assessments in STEM. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D., and did his postdoctoral work at the Uni- versity of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State University (WSU) faculty for 36 years and for the
; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Techno-economic modeling as an inquiry-based design activity in a core chemical engineering courseAbstractPurpose. Authentic engineering practice is often introduced to students through engineeringproblem-solving in the classroom. These problems usually have a single, correct answer and failto guide students’ problem framing
).16. B. Rubin, R. Fernandes, M. Avgerinou & J. Moore. “The effect of learning management systems on student and faculty outcomes.” The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 82-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.008 (2010).17. T. McGill & J. Klobas. “A task–technology fit view of learning management system impact.” Computers & Education, 52(2), 496-508 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.00218. M. Besterfield-Sacre. “Triangulating assessments,” Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Annual Meeting. American Society for Engineering Education (2000).
analysis of several additional comics.Background Chemical engineering can be a difficult major for any student, given the complexity of the coreconcepts and frequency with which the subject matter can be highly theoretical. This challenge isparticularly difficult to address as an instructor, given the breadth of fields within chemical engineering,and the resulting range in depth of mastery that each student will need upon graduating. These challengesare similar to those facing current education in STEM (science, technology, engineering, math), inparticular the theoretical nature of some core concepts. Traditional approaches to support instruction,and establish connection between concepts and applications, include providing examples of real
Paper ID #25565Identifying Challenging Spreadsheet Skills Using Reading and HomeworkAnalytics from an Interactive TextbookProf. Matthew W. Liberatore, University of Toledo Matthew W. Liberatore is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. His current research involves the rheology of complex fluids as well as active learning, reverse engineering online videos, and interactive textbooks. His website is: http://www.utoledo.edu
Engineering Department hosts 48 junior and senior students, of which 6have taken ENGR 248. Our team believes that the population of students that have taken thecourse will give good baseline data on the tendencies of students writing technical reports whohave previously been enrolled in a dedicated technical communications course.Data collection is split into an evaluation of a student’s process of writing and a student’s finalwritten product. Evaluation of a students ‘Process’ is based on a novel method for time-dependent data analysis that will use screen capture technology [6]. Real-time data capture offersthe ability to capture all behaviors and activities and also allows for investigators to transcribeand code behaviors done by the subjects
, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer Cole is the Assistant Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering in the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University and the Associate Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research. Dr. Cole’s primary teaching is in capstone and freshman design, and her research interest are in engineering design education.Dr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub
Paper ID #25464An Interdisciplinary Elective Course to Build Computational Skills for Math-ematical Modeling in Science and EngineeringDr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt, Oklahoma State University Dr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt is an assistant professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Okla- homa State University. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in ChE at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and her B.S. at the University of Oklahoma. She did postdoctoral research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on developing computational models for multiscale tissue physiology and pharmacology
co-teaching, classroom technologies, active learning in the classroom, and various classroom-based affective inter- ventions targeted at fostering self-efficacy, belongingness, metacognitive learning strategies, and growth mindset affect outcomes such as student retention and success, particularly during the freshman and sophomore year. Her field of research is undergraduate engineering education. Dr. Kiehlbaugh com- pleted her BS and MS at the University of Arizona and her PhD at UC Berkeley. She is now a Research Assistant Professor in the College of Engineering at her undergraduate alma mater. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 1 Scalable and Practical
, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, and in the ways hands-on activities such as making, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Amy Frances Golightly, Bucknell University I am currently working with a team of engineering
engineering education, 95(2), 123-138. 8. Cooney, E., & Alfrey, K., & Owens, S. (2008, June), Critical Thinking In Engineering And Technology Education: A Review Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. https://peer.asee.org/3684 9. Adair, D., & Jaeger, M. (2016). Incorporating critical thinking into an engineering undergraduate learning environment. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 23.
Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Safety and Chemical Engineering Education (SAChE) Certificate Program, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.aiche.org/ccps/community/technological- communities/safety-and-chemical-engineering-education-sache/certificate-program. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2019].[6] Safety and Chemical Engineering Education (SAChE), SAChE - Course List, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://sache.org/view_course_list.asp?id=8. [Accessed: 18-Dec-2018].[7] Safety and Chemical Engineering Education (SAChE), “Process Safety Beacon”, Safety and Chemical Engineering Education Program, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://sache.org/beacon/products.asp. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2019].[8] American Institute of Chemical
Paper ID #26162Work in Progress: Implementing an Open-Ended Laboratory Experience inthe Unit Operations Laboratory with an Alternative CSTR ReactionDr. Erick S. Vasquez, University of Dayton Erick S. Vasquez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Dayton. Dr. Vasquez earned his B.Sc. degree in chemical engineering at Universidad Centroamericana Jose Simeon Ca˜nas (UCA) in El Salvador. He received his M.Sc. degree in chemical engineering from Clemson University and his Ph.D. degree in chemical engineering from Mississippi State University. His research focuses on
taught within the engineeringcurriculum, fewer have looked at communication requirements in industry, as reviewed by Donnellet al. [3]. Through this review, authors determined the key disconnects between what is taught andwhat is required in industry to be 1) goals of communication in the classroom vs. in industry and2) audience of communication assignments. To better address the communication needs ofgraduating engineering students, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) has modified the outcomes for engineering programs to include communication to a widerange of audiences [2]. As a result, engineering programs will need to diversify communicationassignments.Some universities have aimed to reconcile the disconnect between
Paper ID #26269Developing Reliable Lab Rubrics Using Only Two ColumnsProf. Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware Dr. Joshua Enszer is an associate professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control, capstone design, and mathematical modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic portfolios as a means for assessment and professional development
.2-16, Jan. 2003. [4] M. Frank, I. Lavy, and D. Elata, “Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an Academic Engineering Course,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education vol. 13, pp. 273-288, 2003. [5] A. B. Frymier and G. M. Shulman, “What’s in it for me?: Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation,” Communication Education vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 40-50, 1995. [6] J. R. White and A. Palazoglu, “Using Student Generated Senior Design Project Ideas to Achieve ABET Student Outcomes in a Chemical Engineering Process Design and Economics Course.” in Proceedings of the 2017 American Society for Engineering Education’s Annual Conference and Exposition
Paper ID #27548A Time-Saving Algorithm for Team Assignment and Scheduling in a Large-Scale Unit Operations Laboratory CourseDr. Andrew Maxson, Ohio State University Andrew Maxson is an assistant professor of practice in chemical engineering at The Ohio State University where he teaches Chemical Engineering Unit Operations. He earned his B.S. in chemical engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and his M.S. and Ph.D. in chemical engineering at Ohio State. Having worked as a manufacturing process engineer for ten years, his focus is on optimizing the process of teaching, as well as hands-on, practical engineering
, H.S., LeBlanc, S.E., and Rizzo, B. (2014). Strategies for Creative Problem Solving. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 7. Lucietto, A.M., Scott, A.S., Connor, K.A., Berry, F.C. (2017). “Initial Survey of Engineering Technology Capstone Courses and Teamwork Building Using CATME” ”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH. 8. Alexander, M.L. (2017). “Improving Student-Instructor Coaching in the Chemical Engineering Capstone Design Course”, ASEE Chemical Engineering Faculty Summer School, poster presentation, NC State University, Raleigh-Durham, NC. 9. Kendall, M., Williams, M., Strong, A., Basalo, I., Ural, D., Henderson, G. (2019). “Co- Designing an Engineering Education Research Agenda
., vol. 80, no. 2, p. 33, 2016.[5] J. L. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, “The flipped classroom: A survey of the research,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013, vol. 30, no. 9.6 One student said “we can always speed it up ourselves in the video player software settings”, tothe agreement of several others.[6] B. Kerr, “The flipped classroom in engineering education: a survey of the research,” in 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 2015.[7] P. J. Muñoz-Merino et al., “Flipping the classroom to improve learning with MOOCs technology,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 2016.[8] R. D. Weinstein, “Improved performance via the inverted classroom,” Chem. Eng
oxide membranes and teaching reactor engineering, and she has been teaching back at CSM since 2004. She is now a Teaching Professor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at CSM. Her primary research focus is in pedagogy, specifically in utilizing tablets and other technology and different teaching methods to increase student engagement and reduce/eliminate lecturing in the classroom. She likes to play with her kids, play racquetball, run, bike, swim, and play pool in her free time.Dr. Jason C. Ganley, Colorado School of Mines c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Best Practices in Teaching unit operations: the “Field Session” Lab Experience at