research group members, the amount of time spent with researchmentors, and the advice given about graduate school. Improvement was suggested for theelement of amount of time spent doing meaningful research. REU program participants indicatedanticipated completion of a presentation, talk, or poster at a professional conference (25%) andinvolvement in co-writing a paper for either an academic journal or an undergraduate researchjournal (33%). Approximately 58% of participants indicated plans for some level of graduateschool at program completion.Interviews of program participants corroborated the indication of research-based gains andprovided a more in-depth understanding of impact of the program. Specifically, interviewsprovided information about
plans and outcomes, were also obtained. Results indicatedinvolvement in presentations and publications as well as moderate to high ratings of core REUexperiences.A key finding from the study is the clarifying role the REU program played in facilitatingstudents’ graduate school plans; results support REU programs as a refining experience ratherthan a prompting experience for graduate school outcomes. Qualitative analysis of studentinterview data revealed a perceived significant benefit of working collaboratively with otherstudents while engaged in the research experience and an increased and improved understandingof the nature of research. Qualitative analysis of faculty mentor interview data corroborated theperceived benefits of student pairing
that the engineering and scientific workforce is still made up of 51%white males2despite continued efforts on the part of academic institutions, professionalorganizations and other stakeholders to address this issue.As part of the ASEE’s “Year of Action on Diversity”, the Chemical Engineering divisionassembled a committee to perform a review of the state of diversity within its division and toidentify opportunities where improvements could be made and a plan for accomplishing thesegoals. The diversity committee performed preliminary analysis of the Chemical Engineeringdivision’s membership information and compared it against diversity data for engineering facultyand the overall engineering workforce. Chemical engineering divisions’ membership
provide a short answer response about their attitude towards theimplementation, how they feel the implementation could be improved, and whether they felt theimplementation was valuable for their learning.The results from the pre- and post- activity motivational surveys will be grouped by gender andanalyzed to determine if the BME LCDLMs were largely beneficial for the five areas of studentmotivation listed above, and specifically, whether female students had a disproportionate changein motivation compared to male students.CONCLUSIONS & FUTURE WORKIt was originally planned to have the BME LCDLM prototypes along with motivational surveysimplemented in the first-year Introduction to Chemical Engineering (CHE 110) class for the spring2020
receiver. When the column shuts down, the receiver should be drained to 5% full. Write the discrete logic to start and stop and pump, and turn the level controller from AUTO to MANUAL, such that the receiver’s level will be controlled effectively without dead- heading the pump through startup, normal operation, and shutdown.The important lesson for chemical engineers to learn is to plan through a scenario like that bymapping out all of the possible states (thermodynamic + equipment), deciding what the systemshould do in each state, and then writing a series of logical rules to carry out that logic. Astudent who can solve that problem will also have a new appreciation for the operation ofreceivers, pumps, and level control
(technical, formal presentations in front of an audience) Oral communication (communicating ideas to other engineers) Oral communication (communicating ideas to stakeholders or the public)Project Management Skills Planning a schedule to meet deadlines Prioritizing tasks Delegating tasks across team members Organizing resources and information Making decisions collectively and effectivelyInterpersonal and Teamwork Skills Dealing with difficulties effectively Listening and being open-minded and respectful when disagreeing Encouraging everyone to contribute ideas Showing concern for the feelings of other team members Making sure team members understand each other Adapting to new ideas Giving
A&M University conducted processsafety related surveys of ABET accredited Chemical Engineering Programs in 2006 and 2012.7,8The survey focus was to determine the number of programs offering either a core or electiveprocess safety courses or those planning to develop such courses. Surprisingly, in 2012 onlyabout 50% of the respondents (32% of all programs) offered a core or elective course in processsafety. An additional 16 % of responding institutions indicated that they planned to developeither a core or elective course in process safety. Results from a more recent survey werepresented at the AIChE 2014 Annual Meeting.9 About one third of responding ChemicalEngineering programs indicated that they have a process safety course while
wherestudents share answers and aimed to create assignments and exams less susceptible to plagiarism.When faculty took a learner-centered approach to conscientiousness, they put in time and/oreffort to learn about their students’ interests, experiences, and lives; they used this information inplanning course activities and examples. For example, several faculty hired peer learningfacilitators—students who had just completed the course. Rather than simply asking thesestudents to grade, they sought their ideas in planning the course, situating the students as part ofthe instructional team. Such faculty also updated their course materials, but they put effort intoresearching authentic applications of course content and checking with peer learning
novel teaching approach in engineering education because of the many factorsthat go into incorporating writing into a technical classroom. To address these concerns andbarriers, development and research plans for a scaffolded writing pedagogy are described below.Implementation in the Fluid Mechanics ClassroomTo follow the studies that have already been performed by the IUSE group at WSU, the writingpedagogy will be tested in the junior-level, the fluid mechanics and heat transfer course (CHE332) in parallel with the current hands-on learning implementation.i. Targeting Higher Levels in the Cognitive DomainTo target higher levels in the cognitive domain, it is crucial to start with the students’ conceptualfoundation. Identifying common
% offered similar laboratory experiences through chemical engineeringspecific courses1. Several engineering educators have developed hands-on laboratory or designmodules targeted for introducing freshmen to chemical and/or biomedical engineering topics andconcepts using applications including sensors1, evaporative cooling2, water treatment3, fuel cellcars4, food and beverage science5-9, drug delivery10-12, and human physiology13, 14. Experiments,simulators, and lesson plans have also been developed for introducing pharmaceuticalengineering to students in K-12 and in college beyond the freshman year15-22. The commonthread through all of this previous work is that there is ample evidence that students considerhands-on experiences through experiments
art. Yet, Dan’s academic plan to support his well-being and be happy are highly criticized. Dan’s vision long-term goal to be employable hasn’t happened and locates himself as “sitting in a void” reconciling with how to modify his plan or where things went wrong. Dan’s internalized yearly failures - the first 2 years of co-op/intern rejections as his lack of soft skills (being personable) and the third year as bad luck because of COVID—are from poor planning that should have been more career-oriented. Dan found the arts helpful to his personal growth and related more to these participating members than engineers. Reflecting Dan grapples with what he should’ve done,“ I shouldn't have made that um, I guess that happiness my
we planned to prepare the students for the jigsaw session, but dueto scheduling conflicts, we held the jigsaw in the recitation period directly following an exam.To avoid burdening students already anxious about an exam with the need to additionally preparefor this activity, we decided not to announce the session prior to class. Students were tasked withexplaining their subteam’s work to students from other production phases. We asked them toshare the following in their jigsaw groups: • Update of important findings • What was important to know for your particular phase? • Why was it important for your design?At the end of the jigsaw session, we elicited anonymous feedback, asking the students to writewhat they’d like to see
) from an academic program must prepare their graduates with “an ability to communicateeffectively” (SO k), and the “ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze andinterpret data” (SO b), and others [6]. In fact, the new ABET student outcomes, effective in2019-2020, have a stronger emphasis on team efforts: “An ability to function effectively as amember or leader of a team that establishes goals, plans tasks, meets deadlines, and creates acollaborative and inclusive environment” (SO “3”)[6]. All these outcomes can be assessedthrough the Unit Operations Laboratory; however, the main challenge is to implement practicaltools for a team, either assigned or self-selected, to function properly throughout the semester.For instance
resulted (last column of Table 1). Some groups that included reactantrecycle reported only minimal improvement in conversion associated with the recycle. In thecase of a vinyl chloride process (performed by two different groups), hydrochloric acid generatedas a by-product of a third reactor was recycled back to the beginning of the process where it wasutilized as a reactant in one of the first two parallel reactions. Besides reactant recycle, threedesign groups included recycling of non-reactant chemicals added for the express purpose ofproduct recovery (triethylene glycol for water recovery, paraffin oil for isobutylene recovery, anddibutyl phthalate for maleic anhydride recovery). In the future, the instructor plans to requestthat the students
agenda. Our future work includes a means to have students systematicallyreflect on their engineering assets and connect these to their developing engineering identities.As we integrate new engineering design challenges into early coursework, we plan to explore theimpact of both of these efforts on student persistence.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC #1544233. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. Atman, C.J., et al., Moving from pipeline thinking to understanding pathways: Findings from the academic
of the 17 students, ofwhom 8 are women and 9 men. A feature of this area is that it teaches students from differentdisciplines of engineering. The sample has students from the following careers: 2 fromengineering in sustainable development, 2 from engineering in mechanics, 2 from bio-technology and 10 from chemical engineering. This subject is taught in 4th semester as acommon core for engineering at the Tecnológico de Monterrey.Learning Objectives for the PBL activityThe learning objectives planned by the teacher for the application of this PBL were: 1) theapplication of energy balances at an industrial plant, 2) the identification of the thermodynamiccycle that is used in the processes, 3) the development of the competence of ethics and
work benches on castors, which allow rearrangement of the room.Power is provided to each workbench via retractable outlets installed on ceiling beams.Whiteboards are installed at the south and west walls of this space. The Design Studio isprimarily used for instruction, team planning, assembly of designs, and design validation. Teamswork at the benches, and may bring appropriate items from the other spaces into this area to beused. As can be seen comparing Figure 2a to 2b, though less floor space is used, this changeincreased the area of available and versatile work bench space, and consolidated student teamsinto one primary location, whereas in UOL they were spread across several walled-off spaces.This organization is meant to allow students
problems. Professional competence has been previouslydefined as a high level of motivation, use of intelligence to solve problems and make decisions,teamwork, management and leadership of others, communication, planning and management of aproject and resources, innovation, and a strategic view of the larger picture of the project2,3. Thesecompetences, along with strong technical knowledge skill set, have been linked to futureprofessional engineering success3,4. Additionally, ABET requires that graduating engineers meetthe following select criteria: (d) ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; (f) understandingof professional and ethical responsibility; (g) ability to communicate effectively; and (h) the broadeducation necessary to
surveys,documentation, and reflections papers to address: a) What cultural resources were used bystudents to obtain community-centric and project-centric information? b) What culturalinformation was obtained and how useful was this information for the project design andunderstanding the community? and c) How were students impacted by the Learning Outcomes?A brief discussion of future plans for strengthening the GEO course will also be presented.Surveys, Documentation, and Reflection Papers.Surveys were developed in collaboration with faculty and students in the Department ofSociology at Brigham Young University. The surveys were administered using the Qualtricssoftware and included free-response questions, multiple-choice questions, rank order
]. Three distinctlearning strategy groups were identified: Navigators, Problem Solvers, and Engagers [10].Navigators plan their learning and focus on completing the necessary activities to achieve theirgoals. Order and structure are important to these learners, who tend to be logical, objective, andperfectionists. They want clear objectives and expectations at the beginning of a course and inadvance of activities, such as in an explicit and detailed syllabus. Problem Solvers are criticalthinkers who like to explore multiple alternatives. For them, the process is important, so theyneed flexibility in completing learning activities. They may have difficulty making decisionsbecause they must choose among multiple alternatives and because the
? What would be the factors involved in making this selection (e.g. think of size, cost, safety, packaging, and reliability)? What is the efficiency of a typical battery?Planned Problem AssessmentThis problem provides an ideal opportunity for assessing student comprehension of critical topicslate in the Mass and Energy Balances course. The problem will be given to students in thecurrent spring semester course, with an assessment implemented to evaluate the learning impactof this problem. The format of the assessment will be as follows. First, a general, open-endedproblem statement will be provided to the students as a seed, and the students will be asked toidentify key variables required to perform the calculations and assumptions
graduated in 2019 with a BA in Education and a minor in Psychology and plans to go to graduate school to obtain a Masters in Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Computer Simulations versus Physical Experiments: A Gender Comparison of Implementation Methods for Inquiry-Based Heat Transfer ActivitiesAbstract Fundamental concepts in chemical engineering such as rate versus the amount of heattransferred and thermal radiation, can be difficult for students to understand. While priorresearch has found that one way to facilitate conceptual understanding and alter misconceptionsis with inquiry-based activities, there may be differing outcomes based on their method ofimplementation. This
; (b) requiring groups tocomplete a project planning phase that serves as a roadmap for their experience; (c) encouragingassignment of tasks to individuals rather than condoning ‘group work’; (d) conducting regularcheckups of team progress; and (e) coaching teams or team leaders in dealing with non-performing team members or other team dysfunction. All of these aspects of team guidance bythe instructor are deemed critically important to project success [2, 6].Approach to Capstone Design ExperienceThe project groups or teams for the capstone design in chemical engineering at TAMUK areformed in the fall, at the beginning of the two-semester senior design course sequence (fall-spring sequence, also known as Design II and Design III). The students
. The breadth and depth of engineeringmeant any individual branch within engineering, such as chemical engineering, could easily have46 episodes devoted to within that branch, or even within a single engineering course likethermodynamics. The direction to cover all of engineering meant that achieving a balance betweenall branches of engineering, with appropriate breadth and depth to cover key topics within eachfield, would take significant planning and effort before the series could even be filmed. Mappingout the series took ten months of research, which occurred while the series was being initiallywritten, filmed, animated, produced, and released. The series effectively broke down into several components. The first six episodes
. Full descriptionsof the modules including procedures and presentations slides are available at AuburnUniversity’s MSP Website under teacher resources;10 lesson plans have also been submitted forpublication in the Alabama Learning Exchange (ALEX). Both activities have been disseminatedin multiple formats including the SECME Summer Institute for teachers, K-12 classrooms,university open houses, and student organizations’ outreach activities. The use of everyday andnatural materials as well as the incorporation of art in the modules has made them accessible to adiverse audience.Why are Abalone Seashells so Strong and Shiny: This module was largely developed by achemical engineering undergraduate researcher with no prior background in
learning compared with less academically successful students [37], [38].119 One important component of metacognition is the ability to plan, monitor, and evaluate learning. This is120 called self-regulated learning[39], [40]. As Zimmerman stated, self-regulated learning is about121 transforming “mental abilities into academic skills”[41]. Considering concepts such as Bloom’s122 taxonomy [42], students’ success can be fostered through direct instruction that challenges them to move123 from using lower-order to higher-order thinking on Bloom’s scale.124125 Promoting student metacognition includes instruction that explicitly helps students learn how to retain126 information, apply information to new situations, and skillfully and
understanding with one another. When thisshared understanding is lacking, change is much harder to come by (Lyon et al., 2014).Troublingly, however, it has become evident that universities are not always aware of theirstudents’ expectations and are therefore unable to factor their voices into institutional change.Allen and Nichols (2017) highlight that while student input is frequently involved in the processof evaluating and revising teaching efforts, it is seldom included when planning and operatingother forms of student support. While Kuh et al. (1995) lay out expectations universities mighthave of their students, it remains unclear how adept the institutions’ administrators and facultyare at gauging students’ wants and needs. The work of Shank
- prices-for-formic-acid-in-europe-and-in-the-americas/. [11] Office of the Federal Register, "The List of Extremely Hazardous Substances and Their Threshold Planning Quantities," 2008. [12] ScienceLab.com, "Acrylic Acid MSDS," 2013. http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9922794. [13] C. A. Quispea, C. J. Coronado and J. A. Carvalho Jr., "Glycerol: Production, consumption, prices, characterization and new trends in combustion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 27: 475-93, 2013. [14] S. N. Bizzari and M. Blagoev, "CEH Marketing Research Report: FORMIC ACID," Chemical Economics Handbook, 2010.[15] L. Terry, "Dow acrylic acid cuts seen as good first step," ICIS, 05 February 2016. http
research (DBR) study[22], [23]. DBR is a method that allows researchers to test their hypotheses about how learningcan be supported by conducting iterative cycles of classroom-based study. In this method, thecourse instructor typically collaborates with a learning scientist to document and analyze theimpact of carefully planned instruction. Each cycle provides an opportunity to evaluate how theinstruction did or did not support learning as intended. This study, therefore, builds on findingsfrom the previous two iterations.Participants & settingThe participants included 56 students in 10 teams enrolled in a sophomore-level materials andenergy balances course, a core course in the chemical engineering program at a Hispanic-servingresearch
andMcFarlane also found that playing games can support valuable skill development such asstrategic thinking, planning, communication, negotiating skills, group decision making, and datahandling.16 Other studies completed by Macy, Squires, and Barton and Dede have concluded thatgame-based learning has enabled a merging of play and learning which can lead to stagedlearning opportunities that replicate real life and the transfer of knowledge learned from onesituation to another.16 These studies support game-based learning having the capability to notonly allow students to develop communication skills but also learn the ability to transfer theseskills to other contexts.After determining how games influence students’ perceptions of important communication