In some respects the course title is a misnomer. Rather than teaching engineering history per se,the course teaches engineering through history.The course also included a final group project. Students were assigned to groups of 4 or 5 by theinstructor. Each group selected a historical case study topic, wrote a technical paper, andpresented it on the final day of the class.A similar course is taught by Dr. Billington course at Princeton University. The course isentitled “Engineering in the Modern World,” numbered CEE 102A (also EGR 102A, MAE102A). The course description is “Among the works of concern to engineering are bridges,railroads, power plants, highways, airports, harbors, automobiles, aircraft, computers, and themicrochip. Historical
AC 2012-3327: THE RAISE THE BAR EFFORT: CHARTING THE FU-TURE BY UNDERSTANDING THE PATH TO THE PRESENT - THE BOKAND LESSONS LEARNEDDr. Stuart G. Walesh P.E., S. G. Walesh Consulting Stuart G. Walesh, Ph.D., P.E., Dist.M.ASCE, D.WRE, and F.NSPE, is an independent consultant provid- ing management, engineering, education/training, and marketing services. Prior to beginning his consul- tancy, he worked in the public, private, and academic sectors serving as a Project Engineer and Manager, Department Head, Discipline Manager, marketer, legal expert, professor, and Dean of an engineering college. Walesh authored or co-authored six books and many engineering and education publications and presentations. His most recent
from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initia- tives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall objective of properly preparing individuals for their futures as civil engineers. An example is his staff leadership of ASCE’s initiative to ”Raise the Bar” for entry into professional engineering practice. Dr. Lenox’s awards include ASCE’s ExCEEd Leadership Award
to develop criterion-referenced tests. Thesemeasure the learners’ accomplishment of the objectives using absolute (not relative) standards ofachievement. These might include homework, quizzes, design problems, final exam, oralpresentations, group exercises, laboratory exercises, or project deliverables. This step makessense when considering how one will measure whether the course objectives have been attained.The measures chosen should best relate to the cognitive level the objectives are attempting toachieve. Lower cognitive level tasks requiring recitation, comprehension, or application caneasily be measured with a quiz or test. Higher cognitive level tasks requiring analysis, design orevaluation may necessitate a lab report, design
andrelationship of individual course components in the inverted model (recorded lecture videos,concept quizzes, problem sets, laboratory exercises, and design projects) are presented. Impactson faculty planning and preparation are discussed. A review of the changes made between eachsuccessive course offering based on lessons learned is also provided.In addition to the authors’ (faculty) perspective, the students’ perspective is also addressed basedon the results of extensive end-of-the-semester surveys asking students for feedback on theinverted model. Student responses to numerous multiple choice “rating” questions about courseformat and course components are provided. Student performance is also addressed through abroad comparison of examination grades
professionalpractice.Ressler17 and others18,19,20,21 discuss the importance of service learning, communicating withcustomers, and collaborating with colleagues and professional associates. Still others discusspartnering with industry as sources of problems for capstone and research projects forinternships. These opportunities are intended to facilitate the transition from the classroom to theworkplace and expose students to practitioners who, in addition to modeling technical expertise,also demonstrate the centrality of effective communication in the workplace. Page 22.167.3In an analysis of communication skills in the engineering workplace, Nicometo et al. report
tactics, the first being restructuring the Civil Engineeringcurriculum to create unique opportunities for nontraditional faculty-student interactions andrelationships [1].One of the central components of the restructured curriculum is the creation of a sequence ofcourses (Springer 1, Springer 2, Junior Studio, and Keystone Design) that incorporate skills andconcepts presented in the traditional Civil Engineering courses offered at Clemson. However,these courses differ from the norm in that they employ a project-based learning approach,thereby exposing students to a collaborative environment consisting of their peers, teams offaculty members, and stakeholders from the greater community. This sequence of coursesculminates in a Keystone Design
graduation.LEEDLEED, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is a sustainability rating schemecreated and managed by the United States Green Building Council (USGBC). Using a system ofcredits for sustainability features, buildings certified under the LEED system are eligible for aplaque advertising the sustainable nature of the building. LEED certification is based on thebuildings performance in seven key areas: Location and Transportation, Sustainable Sites, WaterEfficiency, Energy and Atmosphere, Materials and Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality,and Innovation. LEED APs (Accredited Professional) are credentialed to guide a project throughthe LEED certification process. Before becoming a LEED AP, members must first achieve aLEED GA (Green
Paper ID #24639Interactive Physical Experiments in an Advanced Undergraduate StructuralDynamics CourseCharles D. Facciolo, Daedalus Structural Engineering Charles Facciolo is a project engineer with Daedalus Structural Engineering where he is currently focused on high-end residential design. He received his bachelor’s degree in architectural engineering with a minor in construction management from California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo. Charles is working to continually broaden his engineering knowledge in order to become a well rounded structural engineer who can provide unique solutions to challenging
specified loads. Create construction pattern or matrix from diverse elements specifications for a project. Key Words: Categorize, compile, create, design, devise, plan, revise, summarize (6) Evaluate: Making judgements about the Example: Critique a proposed design. value of ideas, work products or processes. Justify a novel design or construction technique. Key Words: Assess, conclude critique, judge, justify, validate.The classification scheme developed by Krathwohl and his colleagues
included:3. an ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs8. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of solutions in a global and societalcontext10. a knowledge of contemporary issues13. an understanding of the elements of project management, construction and assetmanagement14. an understanding of business and public policy and administration fundamentals15. an understanding of the leader and leadership principles and attitudesAn analysis of these outcomes reveals that, while some understanding of various aspects of thehumanities and social sciences are needed to meet the outcome, there are no direct outcomes inthe humanities and social sciences.Humanities and Social Sciences in BOK2Building on BOK1, those
professional activities have included projects in East Africa, Central America, the Middle East, Alaska’s North Slope, and throughout the ”lower 48 states.” His current activities at Texas A&M cover a wide spectrum from K-12 outreach and recruiting to undergraduate curriculum design to retention, monitoring, and post-graduation engagement.Dr. Debra A Fowler, Texas A&M University Dr. Debra Fowler serves the Associate Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence at Texas A&M Uni- versity. Following 16 years working in industry she completed a Ph.D. is in Interdisciplinary Engineering with a specific focus on engineering education from Texas A&M University. Her research areas of focus are faculty perspectives
sustainability.Jason D. Millar, Oregon Institute of Technology Jason Millar is a graduate student in the civil engineering program at Oregon Tech. With a background and emphasis in structural engineering, Jason is conducting a research study regarding the use of technology to enhance the education and application of non-destructive structural health monitoring. In his fourth year at Oregon Tech, Jason has enjoyed the opportunity to attend multiple national engineering conventions, hold leadership positions in several extracurricular clubs, and excel in a broad range of civil engineering and related projects. The ultimate career goal for Jason is to own a private consulting firm specializing in sustainable structural
Paper ID #30624Leaving Civil Engineering: Examining the Intersections of Gender,Disability, and Professional IdentityDr. Cassandra J. McCall, Virginia Tech Dr. Cassandra McCall is a post-doctoral researcher in the Department of Engineering Education Vir- ginia Tech. Her primary research interests include professional identity formation in undergraduate civil engineering students, grounded theory methods, and theory development. Currently, she is principal in- vestigator on an NSF sponsored project exploring the professional identity formation of civil engineering students who experience disabilities. In particular, she is
this policy is thebelief that, in the future, the BOK necessary to enter the practice of civil engineering atthe professional level will be beyond the scope of a traditional 4-year bachelor’s degreeand required pre-licensure practical experience. The BOK formulated in support of PolicyStatement 465 is defined as the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to be a licensedprofessional civil engineer.Parallel to, and independent of, the Policy Statement 465 activities, the NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE) was also studying the future education of engineers.The NAE’s Committee on Engineering Education originated and chartered a two-phaseproject. The first portion of the project culminated in a report entitled “The Engineer of2020 – Visions
the University of Canterbury. Prior to joining Canterbury in 2004, he worked for ten years as a transportation engineer and traffic researcher for Opus International Consultants. Dr. Koorey’s wide- ranging experience includes considerable research and consulting work on road safety modelling, speed management, sustainable transport planning, crash analysis, and the design and operation of rural two- lane highways. At Canterbury, he has taught professional design project courses since 2006. He has also delivered oral and written presentation skills to students for many years.Prof. Aisling Dominique O’Sullivan Ph. D., University of CanterburyDr. Keith Comer, Chalmers University of Technology
: (i) technicalcompetence; (ii) managerial & leadership abilities; (iii) business communication skills; (iv)ethical & professional matters; and (v) social awareness.Training is a crucial component and process in the development of these qualities of aprofessional engineer. It is a period for a candidate to acquire practical knowledge, skills, andattitudes which can be learnt only in an industrial or commercial environment, and arecomplementary to those he has already acquired in college through formal education. Thetraining is aimed at developing the technical and managerial abilities of the candidate so as tobetter prepare him to undertake engineering projects as a professional engineer in his later careerwith due consideration of
has been involved in research projects to develop, refine, and apply innovative assessment tools for characterizing student knowledge of sustainability. Her ultimate goal is to use this assessment data to guide the design and evaluation of educational interventions to improve undergraduate sustainability education. In the area of bioprocessing, Dr. Watson has experience using bacteria and algae to convert waste materials into high-value products, such as biofuels.Mr. Joshua Pelkey, AirWatch Joshua Pelkey is currently a product manager at AirWatch in Atlanta, GA. He completed his MS in Elec- trical and Computer Engineering at GT and his BS in Computer Engineering from Clemson University. He has conducted
project management. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech in 1984 and her M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley in 1988. Page 12.1498.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Training for Adjunct FacultyAbstractProfessor, teacher, instructor, faculty member –all are cherished and incredibly important titles atany university. At the same time, every full-time faculty member knows that it took time tobecome a good teacher and that training and mentoring shortens the required train-up period.Members of the Civil Engineering
to the traditional lecturemethod.IntroductionAccording to the learning cone [1] shown in Fig. 1, students retain knowledge better byseeing than by only reading or hearing. Having that as a motivation, Van Wie andcoworkers [2] have developed portable desktop learning modules (DLMs) for chemicalengineering and have implemented nontraditional learning pedagogies: namely,cooperative, hands-on, active and problem-based learning. Cooperative learning has beenimplemented by forming small groups of students to work on worksheets, quizzes,homework and projects. Hands-on learning involves groups of students observingtheoretical principles in action with the DLM hardware. Active learning is promoted bygroup exercises in the form of worksheets which
future. Important among these is theNational Academy of Engineering, which has recently completed its Engineer of 2020 project.The report on Phase I of the project was discussed by Russell et al. last year and will not befurther reviewed here.3 While Phase I focused on visions of the problems that engineers wouldbe asked to solve in 2020, Phase II of the study considered the implications of these futureconditions for engineering education. The Phase II report, published in 2005, contained 14recommendations on the education of engineers.4 The first two are very closely related toASCE’s PS 465 initiative and are quoted below: 1. The baccalaureate degree should be recognized as the “pre-engineering” degree or bachelor of arts in
Paper ID #28967Countering Threats to Licensure with ASCE’s Engineer Tomorrow InitiativeMr. Bradley Aldrich PE, American Society of Civil Engineers Bradley F. Aldrich, P.E., F.NSPE, F.ASCE is a Senior Associate and former President of Aldrich + Elliott, PC an environmental engineering firm and also serves as vice-chair of the Board of Professional Regula- tion for Engineers in Vermont. He earned his bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from the University of Vermont. Over his thirty-five year career, Mr. Aldrich has held project management and leadership positions with a national general contractor and several
a principal investigator or co-principal investigator on over 25 research projects. She has authored or co-authored over 50 papers and served as committee chair for over 25 Masters and Doctoral students. Since 2008, she has served as one of the faculty advisors for the University of Nebraska’s Chapter of En- gineers Without Borders-USA. Dr. Jones has received numerous awards for her leadership, mentoring and teaching including most recently the 2015 Holling Family Distinguished Teaching / Advising / Mentoring Award from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln College of Engineering and the 2014 Engineers Without Borders-USA Peter J. Bosscher Faculty Advisor Award for Outstanding Leadership.Dr. Richard L. Wood, University
Long Island University, and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University. Dr. Lenox served for over 28 years as a commis- sioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Di- vision. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd
Page 24.764.7Figure 3: Student Assessment of Course Form and Analysis Tool Page 24.764.8 Table 1 Sample of the faculty comments and recommendations for improvement, spring 20124 Course Faculty Comments Recommendation for Continuous Improvement ENGR The students are at many different levels of Have less homework problems and smaller projects. 120 independence. Some students are ready for This will keep the amount of work the same but college engineering; some still want their high place more importance more spread out. school teacher to walk them through
Clemson University. She has over ten years of construction and civil engineering experience working for energy companies and as a project management consultant. Dr. Simmons has extensive experience leading and conducting multi-institutional, workforce-related re- search and outreach. She is a leader in research investigating the competencies professionals need to compete in and sustain the construction workforce. Dr. Simmons oversees the Simmons Research Lab (www.denisersimmons.com), which is home to a dynamic, interdisciplinary mix of graduate researchers and postdoctoral researchers who work together to explore human, technology and society interactions to transform civil engineering education and practice with an
initiate discussion bysuggesting a relevant topic or project.Besides the regular class-material based homework assignments, on average given every otherweek, completion of a term project on Istanbul, “Istanbul: the past, the present, and the future”,was a requirement to receive a passing grade in the course. The term project, with its separateparts on cultural history, seismic history, seismic hazard setting to be completed before theoverseas trip, and the state of the built environment of the city, estimation of the state of the builtenvironment immediately after a major earthquake in the near future, and mitigation andemergency-response recommendations, allowed the students with different levels of education topresent their understanding at
Academy of Engineering. 2005. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. National Academies of Sciences, Washington, DC. (http://www.nae.edu) 4. Augustine, N. R. “Re-engineering Engineering: 21st-Century Needs Can’t Be Met With Just a Four-Year Degree.” ASEE Prism. Feb. 2009. 5. Duderstadt, J.J. Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. The Millennium Project, The University of Michigan. 2008. (http://milproj.dc.umich.edu/) 6. National Science Foundation. 2007. The “5XME” Workshop: Transforming Mechanical Engineering Education and
Associate Professor and Mechanics Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the
and structural engineering courses at VMI and enjoys working with the students on undergraduate research projects and with the ASCE student chapter. He currently serves as a Member of ASCE’s Committee on Licensure and Com- mittee on Student Membership.Dr. Brian J. Swenty P.E., University of Evansville Brian J. Swenty, Ph.D., P.E. is Interim Dean of the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Evansville. He earned his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Missouri-Rolla and his M.S. degree in civil engineering from the University of Florida. He is a licensed professional engineer in California, Florida, Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana. He has held positions as an active duty Army